IPv6 Address Space Management LIR Working Group RIPE-45 Barcelona, May 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal-062: Use of Final /8 Jonny Martin, Philip Smith & Randy Bush Policy APNIC 26 28th August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand.
Advertisements

APNIC IPv6 Pool Management Sanjaya, Services and Operations Director.
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.
March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
IPv6: The Future of the Internet? July 27th, 1999 Auug.
IPv6 Addressing – Status and Policy Report Paul Wilson Director General, APNIC.
1. 2 Information Document 22-E ITU-T Study Group 2 May 2003 Question:1/2 Source:TSB Title:IPv6 Address Management – Past, Present and Future (by Anne.
IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address Allocation Bob Hinden at RIPE Sept Brian Carpenter at ARIN Oct Alain Durand at APNIC Oct
2009-3: Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries.
A proposal to improve reachability of new IANA blocks Tomoya YOSHIDA NTT Communications
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
APNIC Update RIPE 59 October Overview APNIC Services Update APNIC 28 policy outcomes APNIC Members and Stakeholder Survey Next APNIC Meetings.
1 IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.
Desired IRR Operational Model ~IRR/Whois Interaction~ Kuniaki Kondo (JPNIC IRR Workshop/IIJ) Ikuo Nakagawa (Intec) Takashi Arano (Asia Global Crossing)
APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC IP Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 29, Kuala Lumpur Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v002.
1 APNIC allocation and policy update JPNIC OPM July 17, Tokyo, Japan Guangliang Pan.
Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Global Policy for the Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address Space  Japan Network Information Center.
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
Life After IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile. Overview ARIN’s current IPv4 inventory Trends and observations Ways to obtain IP addresses post IPv4 depletion.
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
1 Shared Transition Space Victor Kuarsingh & Stan Barber July 27, 2011.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Anne Lord & Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Workshop, 10 May IP Address Management AfNOG Workshop, 11 May 2001 Accra, Ghana presented by:
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 31, Hong Kong Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v003.
Overview of Policy Proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 31 August 2011.
1 Life After IPv4 Depletion Jon Worley –Analyst Leslie Nobile Senior Director Global Registry Knowledge.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
APNIC 32 AMM Policy SIG Report Andy Linton Thursday 1 September 2011.
News from APNIC German Valdez Communications Area Manager RIPE October 2008.
Draft Policy ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.
17 th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC IPv6 Address Guidelines Akira Nakagawa )/ POWEREDCOM Billy MH Cheon / KRNIC Toshiyuki.
Prop-073 Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6 Terry Manderson Andy Linton.
1 IANA global IPv6 allocation policy [prop-005-v002] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
Global IPv6 Address Interim Policy Draft Open Issues and Discussion Summary Address Policy SIG / 13 th APNIC Meeting Kosuke Ito Global IPv6 Interim Policy.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
Policy SIG Report APNIC AGM Friday 29 August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand 1.
1 APNIC IPv6 Activities: Past, Present and Future Paul Wilson APNIC.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
Policy SIG report AMM, APNIC 27 Manila, Philippines.
2002網際網路趨勢研討會IPv6 Tutorial
Regional Internet Registries
A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries
IPv6 Documentation Address Policy
APNIC IPv6 pools and delegation practice
IPv6 Address Allocation APNIC
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure
APNIC 29 Policy SIG report
Downstream Allocations by LIRs A Proposal
Joint IPv6 Forum/IPv6 SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003
Requiring aggregation for IPv6 subsequent allocations
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
IPv6 Address Management Past, Present and Future
Policy SIG Wednesday 3 March 2010
IPv6 Policy and Allocation Update
News from APNIC ARIN XXII 16 October 2008.
Jane Zhang & Wendy Zhao Wei
Policy SIG Thursday 26 February Manila, Philippines
Randy Bush & Philip Smith
Overview of policy proposals
IPv6 Allocation Status Update
Overview of policy proposals
IPv6 Address Space Management A follow up to RIPE-261
IPv6 Address Space Management
Removing aggregation criteria for IPv6 initial allocations
Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Address Space Management LIR Working Group RIPE-45 Barcelona, May 2003

Background and Motivation IANA-RIR allocation system –Unchanged in 10+ years –Major IPv4 address space fragmentation Many ISPs have many separate prefixes –IPv6 should not go the same way Proposal for new system for IPv6 –Designed to minimise fragmentation Most ISPs will have 1 prefix for many years Document development –Document jointly authored by RIRs –Published as ripe-261

Current Allocation System IANA allocates to RIR –RIR maintains a pool of addresses –Attempts to maximise aggregation within pool Short-term reservations Sparse allocation RIRs allocate to LIRs/ISPs –When pool runs low, RIR receives more from IANA –Subsequent allocations to existing ISPs cannot be aggregated

Current Allocation System (v4) LIR/ISP  212/8  213/8  /16  /16  /16 IANA RIR /15 ISP has 2 prefixes after 3 requests!

Current Allocation System IPv4 –IANA to RIR allocation unit: /8 –RIR to LIR/ISP: /20… /10… –Many ISPs have multiple prefixes IPv6 –IANA to RIR allocation unit: /23 (64 x /29) –RIR to LIR/ISP: /32 minimum –IPv6 swamp is being created already Maximum reservation per ISP is /29

Proposal “Sparse Allocation” system –Maximise “distance” between allocations to distinct ISPs –Maximise chance of aggregation of subsequent allocations –Sometimes knows as “Binary Chop” For example… ISP A  ISP B  ISP C  ISP D  ISP E  ISP GISP F  ISP H Available address pool

Proposal “Sparse allocation” system will maximise aggregation –Simple system, easily understood –Used in practice by RIRs already (IPv4) within allocated /8 blocks –Used in other allocation systems e.g. dynamic memory allocation

Proposal Benefits increase as size of address pool increases –System breaks down in “overflow condition” i.e. where pool becomes too crowded or full and another pool must be allocated –Therefore RIRs propose to share a single global pool Known as Common Address Pool (CAP) Managed by RIRs jointly, under “Common Registry Service” (CRS)

Proposal CAP needs to be as large as possible –To ensure long life of single pool –To avoid unaggregatable allocations Therefore… –IANA to allocate 2000::/3 (FP001) for CAP For management by CRS Address space already designated by IETF as Global Unicast, for allocation by RIRs

Allocation Request Process 1.First IPv6 allocation to ISP –RIR sends request to CRS for new block of specified size –CRS allocates next entry from list of start addresses 2.Subsequent allocation to ISP –RIR sends request to CRS for expansion of existing allocation for that ISP (to certain specified size) –CRS provides extension of existing allocation If extension is not available, new prefix must be allocated

Avoiding Fragmentation Distance between neighboring allocations is very large initially –Simple method can be used initially However, some ISP allocations will grow faster –Threatening to “collide” with neighbour “Smarter” method may be developed for new allocations –e.g If existing preceding allocation has grown to occupy more than a certain % of address space available to it, select next start address from the list

Avoiding Fragmentation Possible “Smarter” algorithm… ISP A  ISP B  ISP C  ISP E  ISP F  ISP B  ISP D  ISP G However note that this is a far future scenario.

Other Details Review of allocation process –Initial set of allocations limited to 2048 –Providing each ISP with up to /14 (!) Commence review after 1024 th entry (2-3 years?) Common Registration Service Implementation –Function to rotate between RIRs –‘Master’ server at one RIR Mirror servers elsewhere Reverse DNS requirements (ip6.arpa) –CRS administers master DNS server –Other RIRs will be mirrors of master

Disadvantages? Requires single large allocation –Maybe “Putting all our eggs in one basket” –RIR proposal is to utilise very large block, only one-eighth of IPv6 address space Not possible to identify specific blocks allocated to specific RIRs/regions –e.g. for filtering purposes –RIRs note that this is not possible in IPv4 due to historical allocations

Further information Document available from APNIC IPv6 SIG