Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Protection Units
Advertisements

Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
 Clarence H. Carter, Director, Department of Economic Security Edward B. Truman, Special Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office 1.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
An Introduction to Project NO REST February 11, 2015
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Reducing Disproportionality in Suspensions and Positive Behavior Supports Suzann Wilson Lori Rogerson.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Immigration Issues & Consideration for Child Welfare Administrators Presentation by Ken Borelli, Deputy Director Dept of Family & Children’s Services,
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
OUR KIDS OF MIAMI-DADE/MONROE, INC. EDUCATION COLLABORATION PROJECT Presented by: Additional Key Project Team: Claudia Kitchens Robin Molan Director of.
CROSSOVER YOUTH: THE EDUCATION IN BETWEEN Amy Bishop, MSW, Senate Bill 94 Education Advocate Darcy Brown, LCSW, CAC II, Coordinator of Intensive Supervision,
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM Minneapolis, MN January 30, 2012.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Beltrami County Board Room Beltrami County Administration Building
Addressing the Needs of Multi- System Youth: Strengthening the connections between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. DOUGLAS COUNTY CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Children’s Mental Health: An Urgent Priority for Illinois.
The Role of Collaboration in Improving Children’s Mental Health Services Mary I. Armstrong, Ph.D. Presented at the 2007 National Association of Mental.
Building Tribal programs that invest in children, youth, and families, while preserving tribal cultural values and traditions. Hankie P. Ortiz,Deputy Bureau.
NW Minnesota Council of Collaborative’s: “Our Children Succeed Initiative” Overview 2/7/07.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
The Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan Presentation to School Committee December 20, 2010.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Mark Miller, Director of Training Maryam Fatemi; Regional Administrator Tedji Dessalegn Regional Administrator A Los Angeles “Regional Update” Fairness.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
There Is No IEP for Parenting: Engaging the Community in Supportive Practices for Parents with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Ashley L. Annestedt,
Working with Crossover Youth in the San Luis Valley September 2013.
We will have success when a coordinated multidisciplinary response to victims of child abuse, sexual assault and family violence is the standard throughout.
CBCAP Pre-Bid Conference Ken Bopp Bill Holcomb Jamie Myers January 22, 2010.
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
One-Stop Centre Best Practices July 2014 Ilala Crest Lodge.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
CROW WING COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES TASK FORCE Presented by Central Minnesota Community Corrections.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Housing First For Families Overview Prepared By: J.X. Gilmore Grant Compliance Officer.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Division of Student Support Services
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Multidisciplinary Intervention Team
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
CHILD FIRST INITIATIVE Community Implementation Report
Presentation transcript:

Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice

Identify Key Early Activities for Success Identify Key Early Activities for Success Provide an in-depth overview of Phase One of the Crossover Youth Practice Model Provide an in-depth overview of Phase One of the Crossover Youth Practice Model Provide an Interactive Discussion Opportunity for Participating MN Counties Provide an Interactive Discussion Opportunity for Participating MN Counties Identify Immediate Next Steps and a Plan for Action Identify Immediate Next Steps and a Plan for Action Meeting Goals & Objectives

Organizational Change / System Collaboration Infrastructure Leadership Data Considerations When Implementing The Crossover Youth Practice Model

The initiative must have a clear management structure to support the reform/change process through all of its phases. The management structure should: establish the governance and decision-making processes identify goals, objectives & desired outcomes determine staffing and funding designate working teams or committees, and establish timelines Initiating the Process

Who & what agencies/entities do we need as stakeholders? Youth/Parents Judiciary (e.g. judges, masters, court administrator) Juvenile justice (e.g. intake, probation, corrections) Child welfare (e.g. investigation, intake, case managers, permanency) Education Representatives from the local school district (depending on the size of the area) and/or school district w/highly concentrated number of the target youth Mental health and substance abuse treatment providers Law enforcement (local police and school resource officers) Attorneys Prosecutors and attorneys representing the state in dependency proceedings Defense attorneys and counsel representing children in dependency proceedings Youth attorneys CASA and Guardian ad litem Key Practical Initiation Issues

Routine meeting schedule Identify a specific manager /coordinator Establish team goals and objectives that are mutually agreed upon by all parties on the team (e.g., MOU, MOA, Charter) Understand that struggle is part of the refining process Formalizing the Function

Critical Role of Data Collection Establishes Method for Routine Capacity to ID Youth Establishes Prevalence Supports ID of Target Population Characteristics Builds Capacity for Ongoing Prevalence & Performance Measurement

Crossover Youth Youths who have experienced maltreatment and engaged in delinquency. Dually-Involved Youth A subgroup of crossover youth who are simultaneously receiving services, at any level, from both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Dually-Adjudicated Youth A subgroup of dually-involved youth, encompassing only those youth who are concurrently adjudicated by both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Crossover Youth – Definitions

1.Youth has an Open Child Welfare Case Youth is Arrested Enter the Juvenile Justice System 2.Youth has an open child welfare case Child welfare case is closed Youth is arrested Youth enters the juvenile justice system 3.Youth is victim of maltreatment but it is undetected by CW system Youth is Arrested Youth Referred to the Child Welfare System 4.Youth is arrested and put in a correctional facility Youth is released from the facility but family abandons him/her Youth referred to the child welfare system Pathways to Becoming a Crossover Youth

Early Considerations / Opportunities: Where does crossover occur most likely? (i.e. particular child welfare placement or case type) What supports that can be put in place when at-risk for delinquency behaviors are identified? Are there particular providers that have a higher incidents of police calls and/or arrest? Prevention / Early Intervention

1.In order to help families understand what is happening to them, the CW social worker-JJ case worker team is expected to meet with the family together and describe in detail how the two systems will seek to work as partners. 2.In addition, the team is encouraged to have some form of written documentation (i.e. brochure, family guide) that describes the way that the two systems will work together to serve their youth and their family.  Definitions of terms used in each system  Description of the system’s process and accompanying timeframes  Descriptions of the roles and responsibilities of the social worker and the probation officer  Supports that the family and youth can expect from each system  Expectations of the family and youth CYPM Practices

3.Throughout the Practice Model there are times when family meetings or multi-disciplinary teams are used to support the various decision- making processes outlined below: During the diversion process (Phase I, Practice Area 1); Prior to the court hearing (Phase II, Practice Area 1-4); During assessment and case planning (Phase II, Practice Area 2-3); During the ongoing assessment of progress (case plan review) process (Phase III, Practice Area 4); and During all permanency and transition planning (Phase III, Practice Area 5). CYPM Practices

4. Disproportionality- focus on this issue by:  Developing cultural awareness and to scrutinize our own feelings and beliefs about ethnic and racial groups other than our own;  Understanding that what is important is recognizing and acknowledging these stereotypes and biases. Lack of understanding of how these biases are impacting your practice can create barriers to service deliver and each barrier could represent a lost opportunity to help;  Respecting the client’s perspective;  Avoiding judgment from bias, stereotypes, or cultural myths and;  Asking the family to explain the significance culture has for them, especially regarding family traditions, youth rearing and discipline practices, spiritual beliefs and traditions. CYPM Practices

5.Create protocols that specify how client information databases can be searched to identify crossover youth. 6.Create a memorandum of agreement that describes the ability of child welfare and juvenile justice staff to share information about youth and families involved in both systems. These agreements may also include sharing of educational and behavioral health information. 7.Utilize validated screening and cross system assessment tools that can be used while the youth is in detention. Phase I, Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification and Detention

16

8.Conduct diversion meetings and pursue strategies to reduce youth crossing over into the juvenile justice system. 9.Partner on identifying and funding prevention services to ensure that crossover youth have access to services funded by both systems. Phase 1, Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges * Gap Analysis * Phase I Implementation Plan