Traditional approaches to the formulation of an accounting theory Chapter 3 Traditional approaches to the formulation of an accounting theory
Traditional approaches to accounting theory Non-theoretical approaches Deductive approach Inductive approach Ethical approach Sociological approach Economic approach
The nature of accounting: various images Accounting as: language historical record current economic reality information system commodity ideology
Accounting as an ideology Accounting has been perceived as: a means of sustaining and legitimising the current social, economic and political arrangements: Karl Marx maintained that accounting perpetuates a form of false consciousness and mystifies rather than reveals the true nature of social relationships accounting has been perceived as a myth, symbol and ritual that permits the creation of a symbolic order within which social agents can interact an instrument of economic rationality and a tool of the capitalistic system
Accounting as a language Accounting is perceived as the language of business According to Hawes, a language has two components, being symbols and grammatical rules: numerals and words and debits and credits are examples of the symbols unique to accounting in accounting, grammatical rules refer to the general set of procedures used
Accounting as a historical record Accounting records provide a history of the manager’s stewardship of the owner’s resources Measurement of the stewardship concept has evolved over time, in the following periods: pure custodial period traditional custodial period asset-utilisation period open-ended period
Accounting as a current economic reality Balance sheets and income statements should both be based on economic reality rather than on historical costs The main objective of this image of accounting is the determination of true income
Accounting as an information system Accounting links an information source or transmitter (usually the accountant), a channel of communication and a set of receivers (external users) This view of accounting: assumes that the accounting system is the only formal measurement system in the organisation raises the possibility of designing an optimal accounting system capable of providing useful information
Accounting as a commodity Accounting exists because specialised information is in demand and accountants are willing and capable of producing it There is a market for accounting information with its derived demand and supply
The nature of accounting theory The primary objective of accounting theory is to provide a basis for the prediction and explanation of accounting behaviour and events No single comprehensive theory of accounting exists at present
Definitions of accounting theory Hendriksen defines accounting theory as ‘a set of broad principles that: provides a general frame of reference by which accounting practice can be evaluated guides the development of new practices and procedures’
Definitions of accounting theory (cont’d) McDonald argues that a theory must have three elements: encoding of phenomena to symbolic representation manipulation or combination according to rules translation back to real-world phenomena
How accounting meets these criteria Accounting employs: symbols (debit and credit) translation rules rules of manipulation
The two methodologies Descriptive methodology: attempts to describe accounting practices that exist and are deemed useful Normative methodology: attempts to justify what ought to be rather than what is
Non-theoretical approaches The pragmatic approach: consists of the construction of a theory that conforms to real-world practices and suggests practical solutions The authoritarian approach: consists of issuing pronouncements for the regulation of accounting practices
The deductive approach Steps used to derive the deductive approach Specifying the objectives of financial statements Selecting the ‘postulates’ of accounting Deriving the ‘principles’ of accounting Developing the ‘techniques’ of accounting
The inductive approach Four stages Recording all observations Analysing and classifying these observations to detect recurring relationships Inductive derivation of generalisations and principles of accounting from observations that depict recurring relationships Testing the generalisations
Comparing deductive and inductive approaches In the inductive approach, the truth or falsity of the propositions does not depend on other propositions, but must be empirically verified In the inductive approach the truth of the propositions depends on the observation of sufficient instances of recurring relationships Accounting propositions that result from inductive inference imply special accounting techniques only with high probability Accounting propositions that result from deductive inference lead, on the other hand, to specific accounting techniques with certainty
The ethical approach The basic core consists of the concepts of fairness, justice, equity and truth In general, the concept of fairness implies that accounting statements have not been subject to undue influence or bias The committee on auditing procedures refers to ‘fairness of presentation’ as: conformity with GAAP disclosure consistency comparability
The sociological approach Emphasises the social effects of accounting techniques According to this approach, a given accounting principle or technique is evaluated for acceptance on the basis of its reporting effects on all groups in society Implies that accounting data will be useful in making social welfare judgements
The economic approach Emphasises controlling the behaviour of macroeconomic indicators that result from the adoption of various accounting techniques The choice of different accounting techniques depends on their impact on the national economic good Accounting policies and techniques should reflect ‘economic reality’, and the choice of accounting techniques should depend on ‘economic consequences’
Eclectic approach In general, the formulation of accounting theory and the development of accounting principles have followed an eclectic approach (a combination of approaches), rather than just one school of thought