Definition for Levels of Automation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (165th session)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November.
1 Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.Ching-Yao Chan, Ph.D.
Legal issues addressed in the EU funded AdaptIVe project
Maarten Oonk MSc.Joakim Svensson Sr. Market Manager TNO [ Automation in Road Transport Past, Present & Future Date: 7th of March 2013.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Brief Report to GRPE on the progress made by EFV Informal Group in its 5 th meeting held in New Delhi on 25 th November 2009 Informal document No. GRPE
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Advanced Workshop School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096.
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.
Document No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 03 November 2015, agenda item 3-2) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Automated Driving Submitted.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Task Force on Electro-magnetic Compatibility (TF EMC) Status report of TF to GRE-75 Friday, 8 April 2016 Informal document GRE (75 th GRE, 5-8 April.
Autonomous Vehicle Submitted by ISO TC 22Document No. ITS/AD (8th ITS/AD, 9 March 2016, agenda item 4)
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
CEN TC226 Road Equipment and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems)
VIAQ (Vehicle Interior Air Quality) Informal Working Group
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Report Task Force UNR46 5th Meeting OICA Paris, 26-27th September 2016
Automated vehicles Horizontal regulation Preliminary considerations
Real World Test Drive – OICA views
Real World Test Drive – OICA views
Task Force Outline Submitted by an expert from the Republic of Korea
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Overview/Review of AV/Pedestrian Interactions
World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (165th session)
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
High level objectives Overview Proposal for approach
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Transmitted by the expert from ISO
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
New Assessment & Test Methods
ACSF – Automated Driving Systems Taxonomy and Definitions - SAE J3016 Jean-Michel Roy Transport Canada.
Participants/Address list
Report on Automated Vehicle activities
Safety concept for automated driving systems
International Telecommunication Union CITS meeting 8 March 2019 Geneva Status report of the GRVA activities Context, current activities and impact François.
White Label Truck Platooning specifications
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Task-force on reverse warning signal CURRENT STATUS in United nations C-WGN 16th – Wuhan – December 11, 2018.
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Definition for Levels of Automation Informal document No. WP.29-162-20 162th WP.29 session, 11-14 March 2014 agenda item 20. Automated Driving Definition for Levels of Automation OICA, 2014-03-14

Motivation New automated driving and parking systems will be available in the foreseeable future To reach further progress and to avoid misunderstandings a classification of those new automated systems with a sufficient level of detail is needed. The classification should address legal and technical aspects A refined classification of existing driver assistance systems is not in the scope of this classification If harmonized worldwide, the definitions of the levels of automation create a common understanding for governmental institutions, regulatory bodies, OEMs, suppliers, etc. In future discussions, this classification can be used for Legal assessment, e.g. for an evaluation which national and international laws or vehicle regulations need an amendment or clarification Technical assessment, e.g. for a classification of automated driving functions with respect to functional safety Communication, e.g. to outline a roadmap including introduction scenario for automated driving functions March 2003

Levels of Automated Driving Level of automation* Driver continuously performs the longitudinal and lateral dynamic driving task Driver continuously performs the longitudinal or lateral dynamic driving task Driver must monitor the dynamic driving task and the driving environment at all times Driver does not need to monitor the dynamic driving task nor the driving environment at all times; must always be in a position to resume control No intervening vehicle system active The other driving task is performed by the system System performs longitudinal and lateral driving task in a defined use case System performs longitudinal and lateral driving task in a defined use case. Recognizes its performance limits and requests driver to resume the dynamic driving task with sufficient time margin. Automation  Driver Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Driver Only Assisted Partial Automation Conditional High Full Driver is not required during defined use case System performs the lateral and longitudinal dynamic driving task in all situations in a defined use case. System performs the lateral and longitudinal dynamic driving task in all situations encountered during the entire journey. No driver required. *terms acc. to SAE J3016 March 2003

Glossary of Terms Dynamic Driving Task: Performing the lateral and the longitudinal driving task by considering the driving environment. Driving Environment: The outside surrounding of the vehicle in on-road traffic e. g.: Road markings, road signs, road infrastructure Other vehicles, objects on the road/roadside, other traffic members (pedestrians, cyclists, etc…) Monitoring (according to SAE J3016): The activities and/or automated routines that accomplish comprehensive object and event detection, recognition, classification, and response preparation, as needed to competently perform the dynamic driving task. Defined Use Case: A driving scenario (including e. g. the driving environment, expected velocities) for which the dynamic driving task (longitudinal and lateral control) is automated. Example: Highway Chauffeur – a function that performs only on a highway, up to a max. velocity and limited or not to certain manoeuvers (according to the system limitations and thus the level of automation). March 2003

Next Steps Create a more detailed table which shows the different responsibilities at each Level of Automation: “Role of System” (ex. Lateral and/or Longitudinal control) “Role of Driver” (ex. Monitor, Dynamic driving …) March 2003