New Teacher Contracts in North Carolina Understanding the Implications of Section 9.6 from Senate Bill 402.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High School Accreditation Framework North Carolina State Board of Education June 2012 GCS 2 Angela Quick Deputy Chief Academic Officer Elissa Brown, PhD.
Advertisements

Tenure Law: Teacher Contracts Office of Human Resource Services Durham Public Schools 1.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 5, 2013.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
What You Must Know About Teacher Extension and Renewal Presented by: Maureen Sloane Dianna Hanlon.
NOT SO FAST! Why We Must “KILL THE BILL” Boulder Valley Education Association.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
LICENSURE TRAINING 2014 – 2015 Jamie Watts Education Services Coordinator Updated 9/11/2014.
Teacher & Principal Evaluation: As Easy as Doing the Hula.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Administrative Services Credentials 2012 CCAC Conference Teri.
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
STRATEGIC STEPS TO A MERIT SYSTEM Reynoldsburg City School District.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Current Legal Issues in Risk Management February 16, 2011 Presented by: Phillip L. Hartley Harben, Hartley & Hawkins, LLP.
Reduction in Force Overview. Revised June 15, January 28, 2009 Overview  Why is a RIF being considered  Points to Consider  Agency Requirements.
Review of Recent Changes, Forms and Reminders. Agenda Enhancements made to Graduate Guidelines since March: Registration requirement for Grad Assistants.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Montgomery County Schools August 5, 2013.
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
1 NCAE LEGAL How we got where we are How we get where we need to be.
Teacher Quality Initiative Evaluating Current Practice, SB 6, and the 2011 initiative 1.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Understanding Teacher Contracts in North Carolina New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Rachel Beaulieu Director, Legislative.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
Performance Pay Volusia County Schools August 2015.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
THE 25% PLAN. Superintendents must review the performance and evaluations of all “teachers” who have been employed by the board of education for at least.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Educator Effectiveness Update January Agenda 1.Overview of CDE’s Educator Effectiveness Work 2.Focusing Funding Streams to Support Educator Effectiveness.
New Superintendents Meeting Employee Contracts & Labor Relations Jason Hancock SDE Deputy Chief of Staff July 30, 2012.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
1 The Washington State Board of Education Applying to Authorize: Authorizer Application and Evaluation Jack Archer, Senior Policy Analyst State Board of.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Nash-Rocky Mount Schools Payroll Schedule End of Month Pay Days covered Period in paycheck 1 July 1 - July 31 2 Aug. 1 - Aug Sept. 1 -
WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE BILL DRAFTING AND BILL REPORT WRITING October 29, 2004.
Superannuation Arrangements for the University of London (SAUL) Changes to the Scheme Cindy Pike January 2016.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
Haywood County Schools Contract/Tenure Presentation.
Orange County Public Schools Orange County School Board Special Millage Referendum Presentation to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners August.
ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Evaluation Updates and Requirements August/ September 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Budget and Legislative Update Alexis Schauss Director of School Business.
ELIS Entering Professional Development Patty Bouillon Licensure Updated 02/18/2016.
Legislative Updates for Community School Sponsors August 23, 2013 Sponsor Workshop, Panel Presentation.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Richard A. Schwartz Schwartz & Shaw PLLC 19 W. Hargett Street, Suite 1000 Raleigh, NC (919) © 2015 Schwartz & Shaw, P.L.L.C PANC FALL CONFERENCE.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Conflict of Interest Policy Once the arrows appear, you can move forward or backward through the presentation.
House Bill 97: Recent Legislation Impact on Educator Preparation Dr. Rebecca Garland Deputy State Superintendent Joyce Gardner Dr. Andrew Sioberg NCDPI.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Zero-Textbook-Cost Degree Grant Program (Z Degrees)
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Human Resources Updates
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
WHAT ABOUT CONTRACT TEACHERS?
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Contracts in North Carolina Understanding the Implications of Section 9.6 from Senate Bill 402

Current Teacher Contracts A fully licensed teacher that works for four consecutive years with one school system and has a clear license and proficient evaluations throughout this time is awarded career status. During the four year tenure-track term, the teacher has probationary status. A teacher that is hired late and doesn’t work an entire year and/or is not fully licensed has temporary status.

Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Eliminates career status of all “teachers” by July 1, Any teacher who did not attain career status in their current LEA prior to the school year cannot attain career status. This includes probationary teachers and teachers new to an LEA who previously earned career status in another system. BOTTOM LINE: If you didn’t get career status in the LEA in which you were employed in , then you won’t be getting it. These teachers, and all newly hired teachers, are considered probationary teachers during the school year.

Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 The Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 provides that beginning September 1, 2013, the superintendent must review the performance and evaluations of all teachers who have been employed by the board of education for at least three consecutive years. Based on this review, the superintendent must identify and recommend to the board twenty-five percent (25%) of those teachers who have been employed by the board for at least three consecutive years to be offered four-year contracts to be effective beginning with the 2014–2015 school year. The local board of education shall review the superintendent’s recommendation and may approve that recommendation or may select other teachers as part of the 25% to offer four-year contracts, but the local board shall not offer any teacher a four-year contract unless that teacher has shown effectiveness as demonstrated by proficiency on the teacher evaluation instrument.

The 25% Rule… Specifically, beginning September 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, career status teachers and probationary teachers may be offered a four-year contract effective at the start of the school year if all of the following apply: The teacher has three (3) consecutive years of service with the school system; The teacher has shown effectiveness as demonstrated by proficiency on the teacher evaluation instrument; The teacher is selected by the Board of Education following the recommendation from the Superintendent, based on performance and evaluations (Note: only 25% of teachers with at least 3 consecutive years of service may be selected); and The contract offer is accepted no later than June 30, 2014.

25% Rule If a teacher is offered and accepts a 4-year contract ( ), they also get: $500 annual pay raise for each year of the contract. $500 annual (cumulative) pay raise = $5,000 total over the next 4 years.

Understanding Teacher Contracts in North Carolina Four Year Contract The $500 is added to the teacher’s base salary every year. So a teacher whose base salary would be $40,000 would earn the following over the four years: Step increases or raises which might occur in state budgeting would change the above but our understanding is that the additional $500 to base will be included yearly 25% of which teachers? From 9.6(g) of SB 402: “…the superintendent shall identify and recommend to the local board twenty-five percent (25%) of those teachers employed by the local board for at least three consecutive years to be awarded four-year contracts beginning with the school year.”

New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Time Line August 2013 Career Status can no longer be awarded School Year September 1, 2013 – May 1, 2014 Local decisions, planning and review of teacher performance and evaluation in preparation for issuance of contracts January 2014 SBE to provide a model contract to LEAs June Deadline for all 4-year contracts to be made and accepted June 30, 2018 Permanent elimination of career status for all teachers

Proficient? Not Proficient? 3 or more years? consecutive in district Less Than 3 years? consecutive in district Career Status (rare but possible; in cases of recent transfers into districts) No Career Status One Year Contract Continued Career Status Ending June 30, 2018 Career Status No Career Status Four Year Contract 25% of teachers with 3 or more consecutive years in district If Career Status, must agree to relinquish Additional $500 every year (of 4) on base salary New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Decisions that must be made prior to June Draft - Represents our current understanding of the law. This is not a Recommended decision-making path, rather an economical way to represent the decision on a single slide. Non-Renewal Subject to all existing protections One Year Contract Key Law requires District decision point

New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Time Line to By June % of teachers with 3 or more consecutive years in district & Proficient or Above Teachers with Career Status who do not receive 4-year Contract Teachers without Career Status who do not receive 4-year Contractrs Four Year Contract Continued Career Status One Year Contract

New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Time Line to By June % of teachers with 3 or more years in district Teachers with Career Status who do not receive 4-year Contract Teachers without Career Status who do not receive 4-year Contractrs Four Year Contract Continued Career Status One Year Contract Issued Prior to the beginning of each school year based on Superintendent recommendation Things Change in ! 1.No Career Status for anyone 2.Starting in there will be three types of contracts 1-year 2-year 4-year 3.As of now, the salary implications of these contracts are not spelled out but the stated intent of the GA is to move to a pay for performance model built on robust measures of teacher effectiveness

Proficient? Not Proficient? 3-years? continuous in district Less Than 3? continuous in district Career Status (rare but possible; in cases of recent transfers into districts) No Career Status One Year Contract Continued Career Status Ending June 30, 2018 Career Status No Career Status (rare) Four Year Contract 25% of teachers with 3 or more consecutive years in district If Career Status, must agree to relinquish Additional $500 every year (of 4) on base salary New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Decisions that must be made prior to June Non-Renewal Subject to all existing protections One Year Contract Key Law requires District Decision point Essential Question How do LEAs make fair decisions about who gets a four-year contract?

Proficient? Not Proficient? 3-years? continuous in district Less Than 3? continuous in district Career Status (rare but possible; in cases of recent transfers into districts) No Career Status One Year Contract Continued Career Status Ending June 30, 2018 Career Status No Career Status (rare) Four Year Contract New State Statutes Governing Teacher Effectiveness and Contract Awards Decisions that must be made prior to June Non-Renewal Subject to all existing protections One Year Contract Key Law requires District Decision point Making Decisions DPI Guidance for District Process  Think about it now Consult with school board and attorneys being aware of avoiding potential legal claims  Determine a process with stakeholder input Teacher groups explicitly as well as others  Be transparent Publicize the methodology your district will use as far in advance of June as possible 25% of teachers with 3 or more consecutive years in district If Career Status, must agree to relinquish Additional $500 every year (of 4) on base salary