A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
3/31/2005 KEK, Japan 1 G4Beamline for KEK test K. Yonehara Illinois Institute of Tech.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Helical Cooling Channel Simulation with ICOOL and G4BL K. Yonehara Muon collider meeting, Miami Dec. 13, 2004 Slide 1.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
J. Pasternak Recent Studies on the PRISM FFAG Ring J. Pasternak, Imperial College London/RAL STFC on behalf of the PRISM Task Force , Geneva,
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
MANX at MTA Andreas Jansson Fermilab. 2/14/2007LEMC Workshop, February 12-16, 2007A. Jansson 2 Foreseen MCTF Experimental R&D Low energy proton beam to.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
COMET μ-e conversion search at J-PARC. μ-e conversion physics SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) – BR = = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) – τ→lγ SUSY-seesaw.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Narrow plasma & electron injection simulations for the AWAKE experiment A. Petrenko, K. Lotov, October 11,
MICE S TEP IV P HYSICS ‘D ELIVERABLES ’ V. Blackmore MAP 2014 Spring Meeting 30 th May, /15 AKA “What will we learn from Step IV?”
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
J. Pasternak PRISM Synergies between muon projects J. Pasternak, Imperial College London/RAL STFC on behalf of the PRISM Task Force , PASI Workshop,
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Muon stopping target optimization
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK R. D’Arcy, A. Edmonds, M. Lancaster, M. Wing, UCL, UK LARGE EMITTANCE BEAM MEASUREMENTS FOR COMET PHASE-I ABSTRACT The COMET experiment will search for very rare muon processes that will give us an insight into particle physics beyond the Standard Model. COMET requires an intense beam of muons with a momentum less than 70 MeV/c. This is achieved using an 8 GeV proton beam; a heavy metal target to primarily produce pions; a solenoid capture system; and a curved solenoid to perform charge and momentum selection. Understanding the pion production yield and transport properties of the beam line is an important part of the experiment. The beam line is a continuous solenoid channel, so it is only possible to place a beam diagnostic device at the end of the beam line. Building COMET in two phases provides the opportunity to investigate the pion production yield and to measure the transport properties of the beam line in Phase-I. This paper will demonstrate how this will be done using the experimental set up for COMET Phase-I. FIELD VARIATIONS INTRODUCTION The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) experiment aims to measure the conversion of muons to electrons, in the presence of a nucleus, with an unprecedented sensitivity of < The details of the COMET Phase-I beam line can be found in WEPEA074. The figure on the left is a schematic of the beam line. COMET Phase-I will provide an invaluable opportunity to make measurements of the beam line that are not possible to do after the full COMET beam line has been constructed. Since the COMET beam line is a large aperture, continuous solenoid channel, accurate simulation of transport properties is dependent on knowing the field precisely. It will be difficult to measure this as the solenoids will be closely coupled and there will be no option for placing complex beam diagnostic equipment between cryostats. In addition to this, the beam will occupy the whole aperture and will consist of multiple species. This means it will be very difficult to measure the transport properties along the length of the beam line after it has been installed. In order to get an understanding of the performance of the beam line, it will be possible to vary certain parameters of the magnets, such as magnetic field strength, and to the measure a corresponding effect at the end of the transport channel. By making several measurements with different types of changes it may be possible to characterise the performance of the beam line in order to understand the background processes that can create electrons that could be mistaken to have come from muon to electron conversion. In addition to this, there is some uncertainty as to the precise composition of the beam due to different models giving different predictions for the production of hadrons in this momentum range. It will therefore be important to be able to measure the production rates and spectra in order to understand potential sources of background particles. ABSORBER Pion production target Thin absorber Stopping target Pion production and capture solenoid Matching solenoid Stopping target solenoid Muon torus Pions Muons HADRON PRODUCTION MuonsPions Transverse momentum of Pions Longitudinal momentum of Pions Transverse momentum of MuonsLongitudinal momentum of Muons 1.5mm 0.1mm 0.5mm 1.0mm 2.0mm Flux of particles through the target. Momentum distribution of muons and pions at the entrance of the muon torus produced by different MARS and Geant4 models. The vertical scale is normalised to the number of primary protons used in the simulation. Momentum distribution of muons and pions at the entrance of the muon torus produced by the FLUKA default (fluka_nd) and precision (fluka_prec) models. The vertical scale is normalised to the number of primary protons used in the simulation. The negatively charged pion to muon ratio for high-momentum and low-momentum particles at the end of the muon torus for different dipole fields. Effect of scaling the capture solenoid field on the momentum distribution of negatively charged pions and muons at the entrance of the muon torus. Effect of scaling the capture solenoid field on the number of negatively charged particles at the entrance of the muon torus. Effect of scaling the capture solenoid field on the number of positively charged particles at the entrance of the muon torus. 1.5mm 0.1mm 0.5mm 1.0mm 2.0mm Momentum of muons after the tungsten absorber for different thicknesses. Momentum of muons after the aluminium absorber for different thicknesses. Percentage of pions, muons and electrons stopped by the tungsten absorber for different thicknesses. Percentage of pions, muons and electrons stopped by the aluminium absorber for different thicknesses.