Structural Accessibility Layer SAL Structural Accessibility Layer WU_PT1 Cecília Silva Vitor Oliveira, Ana Amante, Sílvia Sousa WG2 meeting. Edinburgh.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.

Advertisements

1 Providing robust data to support evidence based policies for child friendly justice.

Slide 1 COST Action TU 1002 – Edinburgh, October 2011 THE EFFECTS OF DECISION-MAKING ON URBAN FORM, A TOOL FOR SUPPORTING PLANNING PROCESSES Matteo.

NCHRP Renaissance Planning Group Rich Kuzmyak Chris Sinclair Alex Bell TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6, 2013 Columbus,

Use of GIS Systems in Official Statistics. Overview of Presentation  Overview of GIS systems  Current use within the ABS  Potential future applications.

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.

MATSim Destination Choice for Shopping and Leisure Activities

Sprawling Cities and TransporT From Evaluation to Recommendations.

Introduction Considering that the growth of cities does not always follow the principles of sustainability, it is essential to study this phenomenon in.

Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.

Internship Management: Internship Management: Professor Hemalata Iyer University at Albany VRA Conference, 2006.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Decision Support Systems for Supply Chain Management Chap 10 王仁宏助理教授國立中正大學企業管理學系 ©Copyright 2001 製商整合科技中心.

Tools for Representing and Appraising the Distributional Impacts of Policies Example: Streetspace Allocation Peter Jones & James Paskins Centre for Transport.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Islamic University of Gaza Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Nursing Faculty of Nursing Community Health Nursing Assessment Tool.

Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.

Accreditation Employee Survey. Positive Responses Top Five in Order from Greatest.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Geographical Data Products Carol Blackwood UKBORDERS 3 rd July 2012.

Bryan Matthews Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds The Equity Implications of Smartphones for Disabled People’s Travel Experiences theoretical.

ACT Canada 2012 Sustainable Mobility Summit – Hamilton, Ontario Personal Travel Planning in the UK.

11 Comparison of Perturbation Approaches for Spatial Outliers in Microdata Natalie Shlomo* and Jordi Marés** * Social Statistics, University of Manchester,

Isochrone maps (GIS) to shopping centers in Metrosur (Madrid) influence area Rosa M Arce Ruiz Working Group 2 Meeting, COST Action TU 1002 Accessibility.

Estimating Personal Transfers Planning a Household survey in the UK Stuart Brown Office for National Statistics, UK June 2009.

WEEK 1 INTRODUCTION. Course Objective  Students will be introduced to the concepts and the process of urban transportation planning in metropolitan areas,

Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.

1 26 October 2013 Observation and Reflection on Official Statistics against Big Data Challenge Yuan Pengfei Research Institute of Statistical Sciences.

Urban and Regional Development Khin Chaw Myint Associate Professor Department of Applied Economics.

USE OF GIS TECHNOLOGY IN STATISTICAL OFFICE OF ESTONIA NORDIC FORUM FOR GEO-STATISTICS , COPENHAGEN Inge Nael HEAD OF GIS SECTION MARKETING.

National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS): A Framework for Building Statistical Capacity Presented by Pali Lehohla, Statistician General,

Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.

Recognizing personalized flexible activity patterns Sergio A. Ordonez M. July 2015.

FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.

Next Steps and Objectives for the 13 th Meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Washington Group on Disability Statistics Bangkok, Thailand.

Beyond Transit Justice: Lessons From Welfare Reform for Transportation Policies and the Poor Paul Ong, Director The Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional.

Utrecht Attractive and Accessible A new approach for sustainable urban mobility in Utrecht Paul Kouijzer, Manager Environment and Mobility.

Activity based indicators of connections and access needs Petter Næss, Aalborg University, Thomas Sick Nielsen, DTU.

Lesson 4 1 Looking closer at the input elements Learn how the initial demand was created for Switzerland Create a single agent using MATSim tools (the.

Joint Accessibility Design Luca Bertolini (on behalf of : Thomas Straatemeier, Luca Bertolini, Marco te Brömmelstroet, Karst Geurs) Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Nadejda Cojocari National Bureau of Statistics Republic of Moldova Development of Gender Statistics In Republic of Moldova.

Point-Base Household and Job Geographic Datasets Jill Locantore, Land Use Planner Jeremy Papuga, Demographic Analyst Erik Sabina, Regional Modeling Manager.

Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.

Analysis of the results of the UNECE Questionnaire on valuing unpaid household service work Dominic Webber, Office for National Statistics, UK.

Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.

Sustainability Principles for Land Use and Mobility Approved by City Council – January 2007.

◊MATSim Destination Choice ◊Upscaling Small- to Large-Scale Models ◊Research Avenues How to Improve MATSim Destination Choice For Discretionary Activities?

Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.

Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.

Economics 111Lecture 7.2 Quantitative Analysis of Data.

Land cover change in the Travis county GIS in Water Resources Fall 2015 University of Texas at austin Julie C Faure.

Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.

Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.

In economics we use the concepts of profit maximization and utility maximization to understand why individuals and firms make the decisions that they make.

1 Impact Evaluation in the European Commission Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Unit, DG Regional Policy Budapest, 6 th May 2010.

Travel in the Twenty-First Century: Peak Car and beyond David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.

City Centres: Understanding the Travel Behaviour of Residents and the Implications for Sustainable Travel Firas H.A. Asad Ph.D. Student – CSE School -

Two way tables CoachRailCarAirTotals Jan Feb Mar Total

Plenary: rules of indices

ОПШТИНА КУРШУМЛИЈА.

Potential Accessibility Indicators to Schools

Euro area export and import of goods: direct versus indirect seasonal adjustment Carmen Picón Luxembourg, 6 March 2012.

Spatial Network Analysis of Public Transport Accessibility

Index Notation Sunday, 24 February 2019.

Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014

Community Health Nursing Assessment Tool

Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives

Planning for automated travel

Geo-enabling the SDG indicators – experiences from the UN Global Geospatial Management and the GEOSTAT 3 project Agenda item 12 Ekkehard PETRI – Eurostat,

Presentation transcript:

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL Structural Accessibility Layer WU_PT1 Cecília Silva Vitor Oliveira, Ana Amante, Sílvia Sousa WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK 13 October 2011

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Concepts SAL: – Geographical representation of comparative accessibility levels by types of transport to different types of opportunities Structural Accessibility: – Assess how urban structure constrains travel choices 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK People Access by: different Transport Modes Access to: different Activities

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Method Diversity of activities accessible – Ex: schools, hospitals, shops, services, parks By transport mode: – Non-motorized, public transport and car Comparison between accessibility levels by different transport modes 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Indicators Diversity of Activity Index: – Contour measure type 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK 0 1 Accessibility to all the considered activities None of the activities is accessible fy – ponderation factor regarding frequency of use

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Indicators Accessibility Clusters (comparative measure): – High accessibility levels by particular transport modes – Favourable conditions for the use of those transport modes 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK NM PT CAR I II III IV V VI VII

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Input Data: – Statistical data (at census track) Population Employment Activities by type – Geographical data Transport infrastructure Mobility system service level 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Input Case specific – Study area boundaries – Level of spatial disaggregation – Relevant travel generating activities Use frequency of activities (relative importance in travel) – Cut-off criteria and values (accessibility limits), such as: Time Cost Convenience, etc – Meaning of high accessibility Decision vs Survey 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Output Accessibility levels (from 0-1) of each census track by transport mode Comparative accessibility: – land use and transport conditions enabling or disabling the use of particular modes – How urban structure constraints mode choice 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Output Examples 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Output examples 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL – Structural Accessibility Layer Usefulness in practice Interviews with experts – Robustness NMDivAct Clusters – Usefulness as design support tool – Practical applicability – Legend: positive opinion uncertain negative opinion no answer Experts interviewed: 17 (transport, land use, practitioners, researchers) 13 October 2011 WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK

Structural Accessibility Layer SAL Structural Accessibility Layer WU_PT1 Cecília Silva Vitor Oliveira, Ana Amante, Sílvia Sousa WG2 meeting. Edinburgh UK 13 October 2011 Thank you