Historic Water Quality Concerns High nutrients Impacts on downstream Cutler Reservoir Causes included poor management of riparian corridors and uplands,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

Sensors, Cyberinfrastructure, and Water Quality in the Little Bear River: Adventures in Continuous Monitoring Jeffery S. Horsburgh Amber Spackman Jones,
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Assessment of Utah’s Nonpoint Source control program Nancy Mesner, Doug Jackson-Smith, Phaedra Budy, David Stevens Lorien Belton, Nira Salant, William.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Project Venue Little Bear River –Cache County, UT –5-20 km from Utah State University –Existing cyberinfra-structure from ongoing projects with EPA/USDA/USU/
NSF EPSCoR Water Dynamics Workshop November 9-12, 2008 Burlington, VT Midwest.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques David K. Stevens 1, Jeffery.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Regional Climate Change Water Supply Planning Tools for Central Puget Sound Austin Polebitski and Richard Palmer Department of Civil and Environmental.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Who does the monitoring?. State agency staff University/Extension Consultant Volunteer/citizens’ groups Soil & Water Conservation District, Irrigation.
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Tools for Publishing Environmental Observations on the Internet Justin Berger, Undergraduate Researcher Jeff Horsburgh, Faculty Mentor David Tarboton,
Using HydroServer Organize, Manage, and Publish Your Data Support EAR CUAHSI HIS Sharing hydrologic data Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
North Carolina Forest Service North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services NC Forestry BMP Effectiveness Monitoring Watershed Study Virginia.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Workshop on Effective Implementation of IWMP
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality: The role.
The effectiveness of conservation efforts in the Little Bear River Watershed Douglas Jackson-Smith: SSWA Dept, USU Nancy Mesner: WATS Dept, USU David Stevens,
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
ORSANCO Technical Committee Erich Emery USACE Great Lakes & Ohio River Division 11-Oct US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ®
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) USDA Agricultural Research Service E. John Sadler, Coordinator M. A. Weltz, National Program Leader.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Amber Spackman Jones Jeffery S. Horsburgh Stephanie Reeder James Patton iUTAH Cyberinfrastructure to Support Data Collection and Management for the GAMUT.
Presented by Gary Lippner & Glenn Moeller 3 - Year Storm Water Monitoring Action Plan.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
THE ARS WATERSHED RESEARCH PROGRAM Watershed Processes National Program Component AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESEARCH History Facilities.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Water Quality in Lower Yakima River Tributary Streams and Irrigation Return Drains Partners/Contributors: Dept of Ecology; BIA-Wapato Irrigation Project,
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Peru Creek Water Quality Improvements 319 Grant Update February 12, 2014.
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
Protecting and saving water. Partnership Overview Who we are Our accomplishments Our challenges Our priorities.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
David Stevens, Nancy Mesner, Terry Glover, Arthur Caplan
Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
The Effect of Improved Manure Management on Water Quality
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Presentation transcript:

Historic Water Quality Concerns High nutrients Impacts on downstream Cutler Reservoir Causes included poor management of riparian corridors and uplands, poor manure management, flood irrigation, Best Management Practices implemented from Animal waste structures and nutrient management Riparian area and stream channel protection, off-stream watering Sprinkler irrigation systems and management Improved Grazing management Rates of BMP Implementation & Maintenance Utah’s C onservation E ffectiveness A ssessment Project : Taking Lessons Learned to the Next Level Little Bear CEAP Project Background RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Analysis of Historic Water Quality Records and Implementation of Continuous Flow Monitoring System Historic WQ data lessons: Trends suggest WQ benefits from project YET  DATA RECORD WAS INSUFFICIENT because of spatial and temporal variability Results of 3 Years of Continuous Measurement of Proxy WQ Indicators: High variability in nutrient runoff due to seasonal and weather events make traditional grab-sampling methods very unreliable. Development of integrated system of continuous flow and surrogate monitors can be accomplished at reasonable costs. Measures of turbidity can be a reliable surrogate for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Phosphorus (TP) IMPACT AND USE OF CEAP RESEARCH IN UTAH, WESTERN REGION, AND NATION Nancy Mesner (USU Dept Watershed Science), Doug Jackson-Smith (USU Dept of Sociology, Social Work and Anthropology), David Stevens and Jeff Horsburgh (Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering) Lessons Learned  Not all Conservation BMPs are Successfully Implemented or Maintained  Important lessons can be gained by conducting follow-up assessments  Traditional WQ monitoring systems are not well equipped to assess BMP impacts  Need to design monitoring systems around specific BMP objectives  Need to identify & quantify major sources of variability in dynamic systems  Need to understand pollutant pathways and transformation Utilization of our Research  Scholarly Contributions  Presentation at 20+ professional meetings, 4 theses and dissertations, 10 manuscript targeted to peer reviewed journals  Creation of watershed monitoring “TestBed”  Led to new NSF and US-EPA support to extend continuous flow network; availability of real-time data on public website  Development of Watershed Monitoring Guidebook  Distributed regionally and nationally  Impacts on State Non-Point Source Programs  Presentations to numerous local audiences, Utah Water Quality Conference, leaders in state Depts. of Agric. & Env Quality  CEAP team contracted to do Utah NPS program evaluation  Partnerships with new watershed teams for extending this work Key Publications:  Jackson-Smith, D., E. de la Hoz, M. Halling, J. McEvoy and J. Horsburgh. (2010). “Measuring conservation program BMP implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale,” The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(6):  Horsburgh, J. S., A. Spackman Jones, D. G. Tarboton, D. K. Stevens, N. O. Mesner (2009), A sensor network for high frequency estimation of water quality constituent fluxes using surrogates, Environmental Modeling & Software 25(9): doi: /j.envsoft Project Goals Determine whether publicly-funded programs to reduce phosphorus loadings from nonpoint sources into surface waters in the Little Bear River watershed are effective; Examine the strengths and weaknesses of different water quality monitoring programs; and Make recommendations to stakeholders to ensure that future agricultural management efforts are targeted towards the most effective and socioeconomically viable BMPs. Original Implementation: 83% of individual BMPs successfully implemented 32% of farms implemented all BMPS 60% of farms implemented more than 50% of BMPs Ongoing Maintenance: 21% of implemented BMPS had been abandoned. (1/3 were on farms that were no longer active. 2/3 were on active farms but were no longer used) Conclusion: 2/3 of all originally contracted BMPs were STILL in use. Remote Sensing to Detect Impact of Riparian BMPs This research is supported by CSREES CEAP Competitive Watershed Grant UTAW