InCommon Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Community Update February 22, 2013 www.incommon.org 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appropriate Access InCommon Identity Assurance Profiles David L. Wasley Campus Architecture and Middleware Planning workshop February 2008.
Advertisements

The Internet2 NET+ Services Program Jerry Grochow Interim Vice President CSG January, 2012.
Trends in Identity Management Nate Klingenstein Internet2 EDUCAUSE Security Professional 2007.
Cross Platform Single Sign On using client certificates Emmanuel Ormancey, Alberto Pace Internet Services group CERN, Information Technology department.
Interfederation subgroup of InCommon Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) spaces.internet2.edu/display/incinterfed.
TAC Interfederation Subgroup
1 Issues in federated identity management Sandy Shaw EDINA IASSIST May 2005, Edinburgh.
Federated Identity Management for the context of storage Bart Kerver - TERENA Storage-meeting, Amsterdam,
1 eAuthentication in Higher Education Tim Bornholtz Session #47.
Federated Identity, Levels of Assurance, and the InCommon Silver Certification Jim Green Identity Management Academic Technology Services © Michigan State.
Information Resources and Communications University of California, Office of the President UCTrust Implementation Experiences David Walker, UCOP Albert.
Copyright JNT Association 20051OptionalCopyright JNT Association 2007 Overview of the UK Access Management Federation Josh Howlett.
InCommon and Federated Identity Management 1
National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign InCommon and TeraGrid Campus Champions Jim Basney
1 USHER Update Fed/ED December 2007 Jim Jokl University of Virginia.
Credential Provider Operational Practices Statement CAMP Shibboleth June 29, 2004 David Wasley.
SWITCHaai Team Federated Identity Management.
ESA EO Federated Identity Management Initiatives A. Baldi ESA: M. Leonardi RHEA:
Use case: Federated Identity for Education (Feide) Identity collaboration and federation in Norwegian education Internet2 International Workshop, Chicago,
InCommon Michigan State Common Solutions Group, January 2011 Matt Kolb
The InCommon Federation The U.S. Access and Identity Management Federation
National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Secure Access to Research Infrastructure via the InCommon Federation.
Exploring InCommon Getting Started with InCommon: Creating Your Roadmap.
Internet2 – InCommon and Box Marla Meehl Colorado CIO 11/1/11.
IDENTITY ASSURANCE PROFILES AND FRAMEWORK DOCUMENTS: PEEK INTO PROPOSED FICAM CHANGES 12/12/12 1.
SALSA-NetAuth Joint Techs Vancouver, BC July 2005.
Federated Identity Management for HEP David Kelsey WLCG GDB 9 May 2012.
Elements of Trust Framework for Cyber Identity & Access Services CYBER TRUST FRAMEWORK Service Agreement Trust Framework Provider Identity Providers Credential.
Identity Federation Policy Marina Vermezović, AMRES Federated Identity Technology Workshop Sofia, Bulgaria, 20. Jun 2014.
Belnet Federation Belnet – Loriau Nicolas Brussels – 12 th of June 2014.
Stuff, including interfederation stuff Dr Ken Klingenstein, Director, Middleware and Security, Internet2.
The I-Trust Federation: Federating the University of Illinois Keith Wessel Identity Management Service Manager University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Neil Witheridge APAN29 Sydney February 2010 ARCS Authorisation Services Neil Witheridge Manager, ARCS Authorisation Services APAN29, Sydney, February 2010.
Social Identity Working Group Steve Carmody. Agenda Intro to Using Social Accounts Status and Recent News –Current UT Pilot –Current InCommon Pilot with.
Federated Access to US CyberInfrastructure Jim Basney CILogon This material is based upon work supported by the National Science.
Empowering people-centric IT Unified device management Access and information protection Desktop Virtualization Hybrid Identity.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks David Kelsey RAL/STFC,
The InCommon Federation The U.S. Access and Identity Management Federation
Shibboleth Update Eleventh Federal & Higher Education PKI Coordination Meeting (Fed/Ed Thursday, June 16, 2005.
INTRODUCTION: THE FIRST TRY InCommon eduGAIN Policy and Community Working Group.
Leveraging the InCommon Federation to access the NSF TeraGrid Jim Basney Senior Research Scientist National Center for Supercomputing Applications University.
The UK Access Management Federation John Chapman Project Adviser – Becta.
Federated Identity in Texas Paul Caskey The University of Texas System HEAnet National Conference Kilkenny, Ireland 13 November 2008.
Géant-TrustBroker Project Overview Daniela Pöhn 7 th FIM4R meeting Frascati, Italy April 24 th, 2014.
Federated Identity Management for HEP David Kelsey HEPiX, IHEP Beijing 18 Oct 2012.
University of Washington Collaboration: Identity and Access Management Lori Stevens University of Washington October 2007.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Roles & Responsibilities Ian Bird SA1 Manager Cork Meeting, April 2004.
Brown University Leveraging Social Identities Steve Carmody CSG, May 15, 2013.
Programme ›TERENA ›Overview of the middleware initiatives in the European Higher Education ›What is eduroam: the technology and how to set up eduroam ›eduroam-in-a-box:
Introduction & use-cases FedAuth IETF78 Maastricht, July 27, 2010
Connect communicate collaborate Trust & Identity EC meets GÉANT 19 June 2014 Brussels Valter Nordh, NORDUnet Federation as a Service Task Leader Trust.
SEPARATE ACCOUNTS FOR PROSPECTS? WHAT A HEADACHE! Ann West Assistant Director, InCommon Assurance and Community Internet2 at Michigan Tech.
1 Identities and Federation: The Next IT Wave (The Canadian Access Federation) Rick Bunt President The Canadian University Council of CIOs (CUCCIO)
INTRODUCTION TO IDENTITY FEDERATIONS Heather Flanagan, NSRC.
1 US Higher Education Root CA (USHER) Update Fed/Ed Meeting December 14, 2005 Jim Jokl University of Virginia.
Designing Identity Federation Policy, the right way Marina Vermezović, Academic Network of Serbia TNC2013 conference 4 May 2013.
1 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master Authentication & Authorization Technologies for LSST Data Access Jim Basney
The Federal E-Authentication Initiative David Temoshok Director, Identity Policy GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy February 12, 2004 The E-Authentication.
WLCG Update Hannah Short, CERN Computer Security.
LIGO Identity and Access Management
Shibboleth Roadmap
Use case: Federated Identity for Education (Feide)
Data and Applications Security Developments and Directions
John O’Keefe Director of Academic Technology & Network Services
InCommon Steward Program: Community Review
European AFS & Kerberos Conference 2010
U.T. System Federated Identity Management Update
HIMSS National Conference New Orleans Convention Center
Fed/ED December 2007 Jim Jokl University of Virginia
Appropriate Access InCommon Identity Assurance Profiles
Presentation transcript:

InCommon Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Community Update February 22,

TAC Community Update Agenda 1.Update on PrioritiesRenee Shuey5 minutes 2.Certificate/Network ToolsJim Jokl5 minutes 3.AssuranceTom Barton/Ann West12 minutes 4.InterfederationJim Basney12 minutes 5.Identity LandscapeSteve Carmody10 minutes 6.Other Q&A 2

Priorities – Community Feedback 3 Which of the priorities will you find most helpful for you/your institution (choose 3-4)

Other Community Feedback 4 Do you intend to implement the R&S category? 77% have either done so or plan to do so in 2013 Do you intend to pursue Bronze and/or Silver? 27% said “both in 2013” 8% said Bronze only and 8% said Silver only

TAC Subgroups What’s a subgroup? A community group that forms to work on a technical priority. A subgroup has a charter and goals Who can participate? Anyone in the community with an interest in the topic and time to contribute 5

TAC Subgroups Current TAC Subgroups Social Identity Working Group Interfederation Identity Landscape PKI Subcommittee Proposed Subgroups Project Moonshot Demo Assurance Technology Federation Operations 6

InCommon Network Provisioning Tools TAC Community Update February 22,

InCommon Network Provisioning Tools Goals –Automate on-boarding for workstations and mobile devices Automatically configure network and wireless settings Device registration, security configuration and testing, etc. –Enable widespread use of InCommon Client Certificates Secure authentication to Campus SSO environment, WLAN (campus and eduRoam), VPN, etc., etc. Signed . Anti-phishing, strong authentication. –Customizable without coding Easy for campus to leverage just the pieces that meet local needs 8

Provisioning Tool Structure Goals 9 InCommon Comodo CA Campus Server Macintosh Client Windows Client iOS Interface Android Client Campus AuthNZ Campus Logging, etc.

Current Status (Version 1.0 deliverables are a subset of the longer-term goals) Version 1.0 Clients –Windows Client – full initial scope Wireless, Security, Certificate, Life Cycle, Device Registration, AuthN Screen Saver –iOS Web Service – full initial scope Wireless, Device PIN, Certificate, VPN –Macintosh (OS-X) Web Service – reduced scope Wireless, AuthN Screen Saver, Certificate, VPN –Indiana University developing clients Much of the core functionality is already operational 10

Getting Involved Testing and Deployment –30 to 60 days –New Comodo CA update needed to support tools Contributing to the Windows/Apple tools –60 to 90 days Android Developer –Now Contact: 11

Background Information Summary Document – 4/InCommonCertToolv2.pdfhttps://spaces.internet2.edu/download/attachments/ /InCommonCertToolv2.pdf – OS Requirements Table – Client Certificate Roadmap – 12

13

Why Assure Log-ins? If your credentials protect access to any sensitive data, you must care whether they are good enough for that What standard do you use? –NIST Levels of Assurance 1 – 4 –Bronze & Silver Imply Levels 1 & 2 Specifications written for US Higher Ed –Approved by US government for access to federal agency services –Approved by International Grid Trust Federation for access to national & international HPC 14

Getting Past Passwords Passwords are bad and will get worse. We know! –New York Times –100 million spilled passwords, rainbow tables –Phishing Strategy and choices –Use stronger credentials where you can –Improve passwords until you no longer need them Assurance and passwords –Bronze – satisfactory password management –Silver – good password management or stronger creds 15

Program Basics Spec: Technical Advisory Committee –Identity Assurance Assessment Framework –Identity Assurance Profiles Bronze comparable to NIST Level 1 Silver comparable to NIST Level 2 Legal: InCommon Business Operations –Assurance Addendum to the Participation Agreement Compliance: Assurance Advisory Committee –Bronze – signed Addendum –Silver – audit summary and signed Addendum 16

Community Call to Action Work Underway –AD Cookbook as Alternative Means –Business Case Development –Assurance-over-the-wire –Password entropy tool –CIC Documentation working group Resources –Monthly Implementers Call: First Wed of the month Noon ET – list: –Website: assurance.incommon.orgassurance.incommon.org –Implementers wiki: urance+Program urance+Program 17

TAC Interfederation Subgroup

Mission Promote and pursue interfederation between the InCommon Federation and other SAML federations via a community-based process Both policy and technical aspects are in scope

We need your input! I’ll be asking for your input today via chat Info on group mailing list, phone calls, etc., at

What is interfederation? A.An IdP and SP in separate federations sharing metadata directly with each other B.An IdP or SP joining multiple federations and loading metadata from multiple federations C.An IdP or SP joining one (local/home) federation and transparently working with IdPs/SPs in other federations –Local/Home federation provides the metadata D.Hierarchical / Tiered federation models (state/national/international) –example: eduGAIN How do you define interfederation?

Interfederation Challenges Policies and procedures for –Federation membership –SAML metadata exchange –Attribute release What do you see as major hurdles for interfederation?

Example Use Case LIGO (an InCommon Federation member) seeks to enable federated access to LIGO operated service providers including wikis, document catalogs, event databases, and data investigation tools for LIGO collaborators from across five continents, including collaborators from interferometric gravitational wave experiments and organizations including the European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), responsible for the computing and networking for the Virgo (French and Italian) interferometer experiment, and KAGRA (Japan).

Interfederation Use Cases A.International research collaborations B.Online university course enrollment by foreign students C.Campus federations D.University system federations E.K-12 F.Community colleges What interfederation use cases are important to you?

International Interfederation Federations with LIGO collaborators include: –Australian Access Federation (AAF) –Canadian Access Federation (CAF) –DFN-AAI (Germany) –Fédération Éducation-Recherche (France) –eduID.hu (Hungary) –IDEM (Italy) –GakuNin (Japan) –SURFnet (Netherlands) –UK Access Management Federation for Education and Research –INFED (India) Which national federations do you need to interfederate with?

Interfederation Relationships refeds.org – forum for interfederation discussions edugain.org – interfederation service other federations, including: –UK Access Management Federation (Ian Young) –University of Texas System Federation (Paul Caskey) –K-12 federations enabled by regional networks (Mark Scheible) –INFED ( LIGO collaboration (Scott Koranda) Who else should we be talking with about interfederation?

To participate, visit: Weekly calls Tuesday noon Central Time Join the list All are welcome!

Surveying the Identity Landscape

29 Goals Develop a document summarizing the –Current –Complete –International Landscape of identity-related projects of particular relevance to the Research and Education (R&E) community Provide information as input to strategic decision making by those projects, and to promote increased coordination among them.

30 Goals Provide information that could be used by strategic planning efforts related to Identity in Higher Education/Research Going forward, this Identity Landscape document should be a living document We expect it to be shared widely with the R&E public.

31 Why ? IDM requirements are once again changing rapidly –NetPlus Service Catalog ( –New Communities (applicants, parents, alums) –New Partners (InterFed) –New Requirements (Assurance) –“Identity Convergence”

32 Process Interview People and Groups Collect and organize information Present information, perhaps from multiple perspectives Publish DRAFT documents and solicit comments and feedback Update document Establish ongoing process for keeping the document current

33 Timeline Initial DRAFT presented at Internet2 Member Meeting Apr Feedback collected through mid-May First version published June 1

34 Participate! How to stay informed – Join the conversation: –

Questions? Feedback? 35