Www.isocat.org Data Category specifications 20 March 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC
ISOcat Data Model: Workflow & Guidelines Marc Kemps-Snijders a, Sue Ellen Wright b, Menzo Windhouwer a a Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, b.
ISOcat Data Category Registry Defining widely accepted linguistic concepts Menzo Windhouwer 1CLARIN-NL MD tutorial, September 2009.
Bulk loading ISOcat data categories with the Data Category Interchange Format 10/24/20111CLARIN-NL ISOcat Call 2 followup.
RDF Schemata (with apologies to the W3C, the plural is not ‘schemas’) CSCI 7818 – Web Technologies 14 November 2001 Van Lepthien.
ISO DSDL ISO – Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) Martin Bryan Convenor, JTC1/SC18 WG1.
Principles of ISOcat, a Data Category Registry Marc Kemps-Snijders a, Menzo Windhouwer a, Sue Ellen Wright b a Max Planck Institute for.
ISOcat introduction 19 June 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
Data Category specifications 19 June 20121CLARIN-NL 2012 ISOcat tutorial.
CLARIN-NL/VL procedure 20 June 20131CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands Metadata Component Framework Possible Standardization Work.
MLIF: A Metamodel to Represent and Exchange Multilingual Textual Information ISO TC37 SC4 WG Samuel Cruz-Lara, Gil Francopoulo, Laurent Romary,
The current state of Metadata - as far as we understand it - Peter Wittenburg The Language Archive - Max Planck Institute CLARIN Research Infrastructure.
TC3 Meeting in Montreal (Montreal/Secretariat)6 page 1 of 10 Structure and purpose of IEC ISO - IEC Specifications for Document Management.
Introduction to XLink Transparency No. 1 XML Information Set W3C Recommendation 24 October 2001 (1stEdition) 4 February 2004 (2ndEdition) Cheng-Chia Chen.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 8 The Enhanced Entity- Relationship (EER) Model.
The NSDL Registry Diane Hillmann  Jon Phipps. What We’re Doing Received an NSF grant in Oct. 2006, to: Register metadata schemas, vocabularies, application.
ISOcat: known issues 10 May /20111CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
Procedures to Develop and Register Data Elements in Support of Data Standardization September 2000.
ISO as the metadata standard for Statistics South Africa
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 4 1 XML Schema Tutorial – Carey ISBN Working with Namespaces and Schemas.
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 3 1 DTD Tutorial – Carey ISBN
Lecture 2 The Relational Model. Objectives Terminology of relational model. How tables are used to represent data. Connection between mathematical relations.
Chapter 4 The Relational Model.
Chapter 3 The Relational Model Transparencies Last Updated: Pebruari 2011 By M. Arief
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Commonalities and Differences.
Principles of the GOLD Ontology & Conversion of GOLD to DCIF Presenters: Anthony Aristar, Evelyn Richter.
CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop 2011 part 2 Ineke Schuurman Menzo Windhouwer.
The ISO-DCR 17 January /20111CMDI tutorial Marc Kemps-Snijders a, Menzo Windhouwer b, Sue Ellen Wright c a Meertens Institute, b MPI for.
Standards for language resources the ISO/TC 37(/SC 4) perspective
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
CLARIN-NL Call 3 ISOcat follow-up 10/10/20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat Call 3 follow-up.
DC specifications or “Do’s and don’ts” when creating a DC.
Content of the Data Category Registry 10 May /20111CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
Processing of structured documents Spring 2002, Part 2 Helena Ahonen-Myka.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
Chapter 3 The Relational Model. 2 Chapter 3 - Objectives u Terminology of relational model. u How tables are used to represent data. u Connection between.
1 Tutorial 13 Validating Documents with DTDs Working with Document Type Definitions.
ISOcat: known issues 20 June 20131CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
Report on the ISOcat project Marc Kemps-Snijders Menzo Windhouwer Peter Wittenburg Sue Ellen Wright January 8,
Of 33 lecture 10: ontology – evolution. of 33 ece 720, winter ‘122 ontology evolution introduction - ontologies enable knowledge to be made explicit and.
Tommie Curtis SAIC January 17, 2000 Open Forum on Metadata Registries Santa Fe, NM SDC JE-2023.
CLARIN-NL Call 4 ISOcat follow-up 2/10/20131CLARIN-NL Call 4 ISOcat follow-up.
9/7/2012ISC329 Isabelle Bichindaritz1 The Relational Database Model.
ISOcat introduction 20 June 20131CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
ISOcat introduction 20 March 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
ISOcat: known issues 19 June 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
11 CMDI/ISOcat And Semantic Operability Ineke Schuurman ISOcat content coördinator CLARIN-NL Menzo Windhouwer ISOcat system administrator Utrecht
CaDSR Software Users Meeting 3.1 Requirements Review 9/19/2005 caDSR Software Team Host: Denise Warzel NCICB, Assistant Director, caDSR.
Tutorial 13 Validating Documents with Schemas
ISOcat: How to create a DC (including “do’s and don’ts”) 19 June 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat tutorial.
Beyond ISOcat 20 June 2013CLARIN-NL ISOcat tutorial1.
LexEVS Value Domains. LexGrid Definitions Value Domain Definition – the description of the contents Value Domain Resolution – the actual contents –The.
ISO TC 37/CLARIN SEMANTIC DATA REGISTRY WORKSHOP UTRECHT, DECEMBER ISOcat: Metadata Registry SUE ELLEN WRIGHT DECEMBER 2013.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
CLARIN Concept Registry: the new semantic registry Ineke Schuurman, Menzo Windhouwer, Oddrun Ohren, Daniel Zeman
ISOcat status
Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 An Introduction to the DCMI Abstract Model JISC.
ISO TC 37/CLARIN DISCUSSION UTRECHT, DECEMBER 9/ Thinning Down a Bloated Cat SUE ELLEN WRIGHT DECEMBER 2013.
ISOcat tutorial DCR data model and guidelines. Simple and complex DCs Simple Data CategoryComplex Data CategoryConceptual Domain Data CategoryDescription.
ISOcat: How to create a DC (including “do’s and don’ts”) 20 June 20131CLARIN-NL ISOcat tutorial.
Group work and standardization features in ISOcat Menzo Windhouwer 8/14/20101Standardizing Data Categories in ISOcat - Implementing Group.
Configuration & Build Management. Why Software Configuration Management ? The problem: Multiple people have to work on software that is changing More.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
Linking to Linguistic Data Categories in ISOcat Menzo Windhouwer a, Sue Ellen Wright b a The Language Archive - MPI for Psycholinguistics,
ISOcat introduction 10 May /20111CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop.
Marc Kemps-Snijders Menzo Windhouwer Sue Ellen Wright
XML QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
New Perspectives on XML
Presentation transcript:

Data Category specifications 20 March 20121CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop

What is a Data Category? The result of the specification of a given data field – A data category is an elementary descriptor in a linguistic structure or an annotation scheme. Specification consists of 3 main parts: – Administrative part Administration and identification – Descriptive part Documentation in various working languages – Linguistic part Conceptual domain(s for various object languages) 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop2 

Data Category example Data category: /Grammatical gender/ – Administrative part: Identifier: grammaticalGender PID: – Descriptive part: English definition: Category based on (depending on languages) the natural distinction between sex and formal criteria. French definition: Catégorie fondée (selon la langue) sur la distinction naturelle entre les sexes ou d'autres critères formels. – Linguistic part: Morposyntax conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/, /neuter/ French conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/ 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop3 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop4 Mandatory parts of the specification to be provided by the user For each data category: – a mnemonic identifier – an English definition – an English name For complex data categories: – a conceptual domain For standardization candidates: – a profile (other then Private) – a justification

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop5 Administrative Information Section The mandatory identifier – is a mnemonic string used to refer to the data category – should be based on a meaningful English word or series of words presented as an alphanumeric character string; for multiword strings, begin with lowercase and express the identifier as one continuous string in camel case with no white space (for instance, /term/, /normativeAuthorization/, /preferredTerm/) – maybe used in XML vocabularies and thus must be a valid local part of a qualified name: Cannot start with a number, shouldn’t contain any whitespace, …  ISOcat warns you when the identifier is invalid and will refuse to save the data category

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop66 Administrative Information Section Each Data Category should be uniquely identifiable – Ambiguity: different domains use the same term but mean different ‘things’ – Semantic rot: even in the same domain the meaning of a term changes over time – Persistence: for archived resources Data Category references should still be resolvable and point to the specification as it was at/close to time of creation Persistent IDentifier – ISO 24619:2011 Language resource management -- Persistent identification and access in language technology applications  ISOcat uses ‘cool URIs’ (/grammaticalGender/) – managed by the system

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop7 The mandatory version – used to refine identifier to indicate the version of the data category – managed by the system – based on branching not on major and minor revisions  ISOcat version scheme will be revised 1:13:0 1:2 1:0 2:0 2:1 2:1:12:1:2 3:1 Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop8 The mandatory data category type – container – complex/open conceptual domain is not restricted to an enumerated set of values – complex/constrained conceptual domain is non-enumerated, but is restricted to a constraint specified in a schema-specific language or languages – complex/closed conceptual domain is restricted to a set of enumerated simple data categories making up its value domain – simple describes a possible value in the value domain of a closed complex data category Administrative Information Section

Data Category types 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop9 writtenForm string open grammaticalGender string neuter masculine feminine closed simple: string constrained complex:  lexicon container

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop10 The justification – a short description justifying why the data category should be included in the registry – mandatory for data categories to be standardized; desirable in general – even data categories that are common in a given thematic domain may be unfamiliar or ambiguous to users unfamiliar with that domain Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop11 The origin – (document, project, discipline or model) for the data category specification Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop12 The mandatory administration status – a designation of the status in the administration process for handling registration requests under the stewardship of the DCR Board – managed by the system – values: private submission pre-evaluation, evaluation, rejected-TDG, accepted-TDG pre-validation, validation, rejected-DCR Board accepted Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop13 Standardization Submission group Data Category Registry Board Validation Thematic Domain Group Evaluation Stewardship group Decision Group rejected Publication 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop14 The mandatory registration status – a designation of the status in the registration life-cycle of an administered item – managed by the system – values: private candidate standard superseded deprecated  ISOcat doesn’t yet provide means to supersede or deprecate a data category 1:13:0 1:2 1:0 2:0 2:1 2:1:12:1:2 3:1 Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop15 The effective date – the date a data category specification has/will become available to DCR users The until date – the date a data category specification is no longer effective in the registry; this information is set when the registration status of the data category specification changes to deprecated or superseded  ISOcat isn’t acting on these dates (yet) Administrative Information Section

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop16 Description Section The mandatory profile – attribute used to relate the current data category specification to one or several thematic domains treated by ISO/TC 37 (for example, morphosyntax, syntax, metadata, language description, etc.) – the value of profile defaults to Private – submission for standardization requires the selection of at least one thematic domain profile because it is the relevant TDG that is responsible for maintenance of standardized data category specifications – if multiple profiles from multiple TDGs are selected one TDG will still be responsible, but the other TDGs will be involved in the harmonization process  When you need a new profile, contact the DCR Board or the ISOcat system administrator

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop1710 May /2011CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop17 Thematic Domain Groups TDG 1: Metadata TDG 2: Morphosyntax TDG 3: Semantic Content Representation TDG 4: Syntax TDG 5: Machine Readable Dictionary TDG 6: Language Resource Ontology TDG 7: Lexicography TDG 8: Language Codes TDG 9: Terminology TDG 11: Multilingual Information Management TDG 12: Lexical Resources TDG 13: Lexical Semantics TDG 14: Source Identification TDGs are the owner and guardians of a coherent subset of the DCR TDGs own one or more profiles Each TDG has a chair A number of judges (assigned by SC P members) A number of expert members (up to 50%) TDGs are constituted at the TC37/SC plenary New TDGs need to be proposed by a SC 1.Translation 2.Sign language 3.Audio 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop18 Data Element Name Sections used to record names for the data category as used in a given database, format or application language independent attributes: – the mandatory data element name one identifier (word, multi-word unit or (alpha)numeric representation – the mandatory source the database, format or application in which the data element name is used  ISOcat needs to better support keeping sources in sync

Data Category example Data category: /Grammatical gender/ – Administrative part: Identifier: grammaticalGender PID: – Descriptive part: Data Element Name: GramGender in Text Meaning Representation English definition: Category based on (depending on languages) the natural distinction between sex and formal criteria. French definition: Catégorie fondée (selon la langue) sur la distinction naturelle entre les sexes ou d'autres critères formels. – Linguistic part: Morposyntax conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/, /neuter/ French conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/ 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop19 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop20 Working and object languages Working language: – language used to describe objects Object language: – language being described You can describe properties of the object language French in the working language Dutch: In de Franse taal worden vrouwelijke en mannelijk zelfstandige naamwoorden onderscheiden.

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop21 Language Section The English language section is mandatory and has to contain at least one name and one definition Additional language sections can be added as needed, and should translate at least the definition of the English language section  When you need an additional language, contact the DCR system administration working language

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop22 Language Section The Name Section – records a possible name for the data category in a specific language – status: standardized name preferred name admitted name superseded name deprecated name

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop23 Language Section The Definition Section – definition of the data category concept associated with the data category, written in the language of the language section – attributes: definition: – definitive formulation that should be general enough to apply to all thematic domains and implementations of the data category source: – from which the definition has been borrowed or adapted note: – any additional information about the definition

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop24 ISO 704 Terminology work — principles and methods Intensional definitions: – They should consist of a single sentence fragment; – They should begin with a meaningful broader concept, either immediately above or at a higher level of the data category concept being defined; – They should list critical and delimiting characteristic(s) that distinguish the concept from other related concepts. Actual concept systems, such as are implied here by the reference to broader and related concepts, should be modeled in Relation Registries outside the DCR. Furthermore, different domains and communities of practice may differ in their choice of the immediate broader concept, depending upon any given ontological perspective. Harmonized definitions for shared DCs should attempt to choose generic references insofar as possible.

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop25 Data Category relationships Value domain membership Subsumption relationships between simple data categories (legacy) Relationships between complex data categories are not stored in the DCR partOfSpeech string pronoun personal pronoun 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop26 No ontological relationships?  Rationale: – Relation types and modeling strategies for a given data category may differ from application to application; – Motivation to agree on relation and modeling strategies will be stronger at individual application level; – Integration of multiple relation structures in DCR itself could lead to endless ontological clutter. Solution under development: RELcat a Relation Registry

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop27 Usage of is-a relationships between simple DCs Data categoryMorposyntaxTerminology /partOfSpeech/XX /adjective/XX /ordinalAdjective/X /participleAdjective/X /qualifierAdjective/X /adposition/XX /circumposition/X /preposition/X /postposition/X

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop28 Language Section The examples – a sample instance reflecting the data category – should be limited to those that illustrate the data category in general, excluding language specific usage, which should be documented in a language specific Linguistic Section – may be accompanied by the source of the example The explanations – any additional information about the data category that would not be relevant for a definition (for example, more precise linguistic background concerning the use of the data category) – may be accompanied by the source from which the explanation has been borrowed or adapted The notes – any additional information associated with the data category, excluding technical information that would normally be described in an explanation

Data Category types 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop29 writtenForm string open grammaticalGender string neuter masculine feminine closed simple: string constrained complex:  lexicon container

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop30 Conceptual domains The mandatory data type – the data type, as defined for W3C XML Schema, of this complex data category – the default data type is string Just the data type is enough for an open data category

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop31 W3X XML Schema data types

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop32 Constrained Conceptual Domain The mandatory constraint: – allows users to express constraints on the possible values of a conceptual domain associated with a given data type in a rule language suitable for the schema in question – rule languages currently ‘supported’: Schematron rules Object Constraint Language Semantic Web Rule Language Relax NG datatype parameter XML Schema regular expression XML Schema facet the DCR doesn’t do any interpretation of the rules, this has to be done by the user/TDG/DCR Board  ISOcat does check if its valid XML (when applicable) and includes the constraints in exports (when applicable)

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop33 Profile Value Domain set of permissible values for a specific profile each value is represented by a simple data category the simple data category needs to be a member of the profile  ISOcat makes an exception for the Private profile value domain which can contain any simple data category Standardized data categories can’t have a Private profile value domain

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop34 Usage of is-a relationships between simple DCs Data categoryMorposyntaxTerminology /partOfSpeech/XX /adjective/XX /ordinalAdjective/X /participleAdjective/X /qualifierAdjective/X /adposition/XX /circumposition/X /preposition/X /postposition/X 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop35 Linguistic Sections used to specify the behaviour of a complex data category in a specific object language Language specific examples, explanations and notes Refinement of the conceptual domain: – (additional) constraints for open and constrained complex data categories – subset value domains for closed complex data categories object language

Data Category example Data category: /Grammatical gender/ – Administrative part: Identifier: grammaticalGender PID: – Descriptive part: English definition: Category based on (depending on languages) the natural distinction between sex and formal criteria. French definition: Catégorie fondée (selon la langue) sur la distinction naturelle entre les sexes ou d'autres critères formels. – Linguistic part: Morposyntax conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/, /neuter/ French conceptual domain: /male/, /feminine/ 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop36 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop37 Hierarchical Simple Data Categories Simple data categories can be put in a subsumption (is-a) hierarchy – allows different levels of granularity in a value domain – make large value domains manageable – a simple data category can be only a member of one hierarchy, i.e., it can have only one parent

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop38 Usage of is-a relationships between simple DCs Data categoryMorposyntaxTerminology /partOfSpeech/XX /adjective/XX /ordinalAdjective/X /participleAdjective/X /qualifierAdjective/X /adposition/XX /circumposition/X /preposition/X /postposition/X 

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop39 Changes Each time you save a data category you’re asked to enter a description of what you’ve changed These descriptions are available in the history log of each data category The DCIF contains the first (upon time of creation) and the last change description

20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop40 Checker Not all mandatory parts of the specification has to be filled at once The check will tell you what is still missing Some errors or warnings can only be fixed by issues change requests to a standardized data category – Membership of another profile

Bulk import The ISOcat system administrator can import bulks of new Data Categories or updates – advantage: full coverage of the DCR data model legacy names and definitions Or use the template MS Excel spreadsheet (contact Ineke or Menzo) – advantage: easy – disadvantage: partial coverage of the DCR data model tendency to keep candidate DCs too long private 20 March 2012CLARIN-NL ISOcat workshop41