The University of Texas at El Paso Task Force on Research October 8, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
Work in Progress: The Bridge to the Doctorate Experience A Reflection on Best Practices and Project Outcomes T. Aktosun (UT Arlington) A.Arciero, B. Flores,
June Strategic Questions Where can we lead the world? Can we define the Engineering College of the 21 st Century? Positioning the College to leverage.
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
NOAA Science Advisory Board The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Strategic Plan James R. Mahoney, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and.
Regional Economic Development 101 Module Two. Session Overview Defining economic development Exploring major trends Examining your economic development.
University of Idaho Biotechnology & Biomedical Research Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force September 7, 2005 By Charles R. Hatch Vice.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science National Science Foundation Arlington, VA Todd Clark October 25, 2003 Workforce Development Issues from a.
Just Think State of the University Address Presented by Chancellor Thomas F. George September 17, 2003.
External Reports Overview Presentation for the ENG Advisory Committee By Michael Reischman Deputy Assistant Director for Engineering.
Section I: Introduction –Measures and metrics Section II: FY06 Research Statistics – Section III: Ten Year Analyses:
Overview of the “120-day Study” on the WSU Research Enterprise
Higher Education Incentive Funding University of Texas at San Antonio.
Office of Workforce Development For Teachers & Scientists (WDTS) Bill Valdez Director, WDTS Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Presentation for.
NC Future of Nursing Action Coalition BSN & Higher Degree Taskforce Champions Foundation for Nursing Excellence NC Area Health Education Centers.
“Advancing Knowledge. Improving Life.” Strategic Planning Workshop Dean Stanley Lemeshow Strategic Planning Process Dean Stanley Lemeshow October 2007.
Fellowship Application Universe WPI Office of Sponsored Programs Elena Glatman Associate Director, Pre-award Services.
Prepared by the Office of the Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations (internal report)
TOP 25 A summary of the plan. An update on the progress that’s been made. A challenge for faculty. FEBRUARY 2011.
National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce TheTechnology Innovation Program (TIP) Standard Presentation of TIP Marc G.
Oregon State University Research New Faculty Orientation October 23, 2014 Ron Adams Interim Vice President For Research.
Ohio Research and Technology Support Programs Garrison Walters and Harry Andrist Ohio Board of Regents August 14, 2003.
World-class engineering through learning, discovery, and engagement College of Engineering FACULTY TOWN HALL 1.Update 2.Discussions Nov 2014.
ND EPSCoR Dr. Philip Boudjouk Advancing Science Excellence in North Dakota Vice President for Research, Creative Activities & Technology Transfer North.
FY14 Sponsored Programs Expenditure Report Prepared by the Office of the Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations (Internal Report)
1 The Lockheed Martin India Innovation Growth Program
Research in Context The Federal and Political Landscape, What it Means for Universities Travis Reed Lewis-Burke Associates LLC October 1, 2012.
Research management and research productivity in Russia: public vs. private university Yulia Shumilova – Sofia Cusnir University of Tampere, HEG 32nd ANNUAL.
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND FY 2009 BUDGET William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor February 1, 2008.
SBIR/STTR Programs Introduction John Ujvari, MBA SBIR Program Specialist North Carolina SBTDC Phone: Web:
ACADEMIC PLAN III Looking ahead: themes, motifs, process Myron Allen VP for Academic Affairs January 2007.
Prepared by the Office of the Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations (internal report submitted Fall 2011)
Vice President for Research The University of Utah An Overview of University Research Academic Senate University of Utah January 12, 2009 Thomas N. Parks,
THECB 8/03 Leveraging Research Dollars Deborah L. Greene, PhD Assistant Commissioner for Finance, Research, and Campus Planning Texas Higher Education.
Sponsored Research Activities in Fiscal Year 2002 Research Administrators Forum February 13, 2003 Cynthia White Director, Research Office (From a 12/6/02.
Malta Council for Science and Technology Research Opportunities for SMEs Dr Brian Warrington CEO, MCST.
Summary of the Report to THECB April Vision  To become a premier public research university providing access to educational excellence  Interdisciplinary.
FY13 Sponsored Programs Expenditure Report Prepared by the Office of the Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations (Internal Report)
1 Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor Wednesday September 24, 2008.
Plenary 6 Making the Best of Business Opportunities PhD. Reyes Juarez President of Fepac.
Summary of NAST Major Accomplishments Dollars in Millions National Coalition White Paper NAST Congressional Testimony $54.5M RAND $2M Wind Tunnel Study.
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education Improving Our Future by Degrees The Funding Picture: 2011 Dr. Linda Mason.
1. The Research Process Research New Research New Ideas Solve Problems Commercialization Enhanced Scientific Literacy Updated Learning Materials Increased.
Economics, Finance, & Strategy Michael Townsley, Ph.D.
Research at UMR Serving the needs of Missouri and our Nation Wayne Huebner Interim Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO
Georgia Perimeter College FY2011 Budget Transforming Lives, Strengthening Communities, Fostering Teamwork.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
Office of Science Office of Science Advisory Committee Chairs Perspectives on the Department of Energy Office of Science - Issues and Opportunities in.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION – 5/26/2010 Advancing the University of Tennessee, Knoxville Towards the Top 25.
CAMPUS FORUM March 2, Vision for 2035: World Class Research University.
1 American Competitiveness Initiative John H. Marburger, III President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology March 28, 2006.
NSF Update October 2009 Jo Ann Smith, Ph.D. Research Development Office of Research & Commercialization.
Financing Graduate School and Beyond
FY15 Research Expenditure Report
UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
Donald D. Snyder President UNLV
US STI Policy: Continuity and Change October 24, 2003 STEPI Forum
Updates COM Faculty Council
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Christa Hooijer – director institute organisation NWO-I
Advancing the University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Office of Research & Commercialization
2019 Academic Administrator Workshop
Standard 10 Research(**) البحث العلمي )**(.
Presentation transcript:

The University of Texas at El Paso Task Force on Research October 8, 2004

Long Term Goal Obtain $100 million in externally funded research expenditures within a reasonable period.

Overview of Research and Sponsored Projects Total Active Awards (8/04): All Sources: $175.1 Million – Federal: ~87% (NSF, DoEd, EPA, NASA, DOC, DOE, DOD, etc) – State:~2% – Private Sector:~10%

Research Efforts—Where We Are: FY $32.7 million Fifth Largest Federal Research Activity in Texas among Public, Academic Institutions of Higher Education Highest ratio of State return – 4.65— among top 20 Public Research Institutions

Research & Sponsored Projects Expenditure History

Strategic Research Areas As Defined in 2001 Plan Biomedical and Health Sciences Environment, Energy and Geosciences Materials and Advanced Manufacturing Communications and Information Technology Transportation Policy and Infrastructure Education Business, Policy and Social and Economic Development Defense/Security

~9%

Washington Advisory Group, WAG Report WAG hired by UT System to evaluate UTEP, UTD, UT Arlington and UT San Antonio  $100 million research goal. UTEP Strengths: – Ability to attract federal funding (2 nd in UT System; 5 th in State) – Strong research base with quality faculty. UTEP Challenges: – Additional doctoral programs needed (for instance, Physics and Chemistry) – Competitive vs. set-aside research funding – New sources of funding—foundations, private sector, etc Recommendations: – Develop new strategic research plan – More faculty (~300!) – Additional PhD programs – Higher investment by State to Research Infrastructure

Research Task Force Goals Respond to the recommendations in the Washington Advisory Group (WAG) report, divided into two major Subcommittees: – Strategic Research Directions (Roadmap to Research-Extensive and Top-Tier Status); – Research Enhancement Mechanisms and Strategies (Organizations/Policies/Procedures).

Research Theme Assets Weaknesses Opportunities Barriers People Equipment Facilities Strategies

Milestones—Research Taskforce October 8*1 st Research Forum—development & assignment of tasks October 9-22Subgroup meetings on tasks October 25Initial Completion of Tasks October 27*2 nd Research Forum—discussion of Tasks; begin 1 st draft November 11 st Draft to Taskforce for comment (due Nov 4 th ) November 5 th* Taskforce meeting—assign additional tasks/discussion November 12 th Completion of additional tasks November 15 th 2 nd Draft to Taskforce for comment (due Nov 18 th ) November 19 th* Taskforce meeting—discussion and comment November 30 th* Public Presentation of 3 rd Draft/public feedback December 3 rd* Taskforce meeting to review/comment final draft December 10 th Completion of final draft December 15 th Final Report to the President *Face to Face meetings