Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Non-photonic electron production in STAR A. G. Knospe Yale University 9 April 2008.
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Cluster Finding Comparisons Ron Cassell SLAC. Clustering Studies This report studies clustering in the EM calorimeter, using SLIC simulated ttbar events.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Calo preparation for 2015 Goals: -Trigger stability -Good calibration for HLT2 processing -Improved calibration ( timing, e/gamma response) for all calo.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
ECAL software development Yuri Kharlov IHEP Protvino.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
Calo Calibration Meeting 29/04/2009 Plamen Hopchev, LAPP Calibration from π 0 with a converted photon.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.
April12 DST calibration status
Full Simulation Session SuperB General Meeting
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Individual Particle Reconstruction
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Argonne National Laboratory
A. Menegolli, University of Pavia and INFN Pavia
G. Battistoni, R. Brunetti, K. Cieślik, A. Dąbrowska, R. Dolfini,
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin

Outline ► Calorimeter software development  photon reconstruction ► cluster finder ► simple reconstruction  UrQMD events  matching  Calorimeter drawing tools ► Cluster fitting  requirements ► Conclusions ► Next steps

Photon reco. Requirements ► Robust reconstruction of single photons ► Two close photons case:  robust reconstruction of parameters in case two separate maximums  separation one/two photons in case of one maximum ► Fast!

Cluster finder Cluster formation ► Remove maximums near charged tracks  real tracking ► Precluster:  formed near local maximum ► cut on maximum energy  find maximum 2x2 matrix near maximum  add a neighbor to local maximum cell with minimal energy deposition ► to add inromation  check precluster energy ► >0.5GeV ► Cluster: group of preclusters with common cells 4870 Central UrQMD Au+Au 25GeV CbmEcalClusterFinderV1. At SVN Requirements ► Clusters should be large  information for unfolding ► Clusters should be small  hadrons background

Cluster finder performance Benchmark ► 2x1 GeV photons ► 3x3 cm cells  inner calorimeter region ► 2-10° angle  geometry of inner calorimeter region

Simple reconstruction ► Energy:  calibration ► only energy in scintillator is visible ► Position:  S-curves ► χ 2 calculation for reconstructed photon CbmEcalRecoSlow. At SVN

UrQMD events with simple reco Subtraction of mixed events is necessarily! Invariant mass spectra True Mixed Gamma spectra

Simple reconstruction ► Robust reconstruction of single photons ► Two close photons case: ► occupancy  robust reconstruction of parameters in case two separate maximums  separation one/two photons in case of one maximum ► Fast! ► Need more complex reconstruction!

Matching ► Why?  check origin of cluster ► neutron clusters  physics processes ► π 0 and η decays ► prompt photons ► … ► Most simple method at moment ► Energy deposition in the cluster > 70% of cluster energy  γ /e is secondary also look for mother ► showers started before the calorimeter treated correctly  loss clusters with more than one maximums CbmEcalMatching. At SVN

Matching. Usage example π0π0 η π 0 born after IP (conversion)

Calorimeter drawing tool ► Draw  calorimeter structure  energy deposition in calorimeter  reconstructed tracks ► and energies  reconstructed photons ► energies ► and matched MC particles  clusters ► found approximation quality ► and χ 2 of cluster  MC tracks ► type (photon, neutron …) ► energy ► …and all at one picture!

Calorimeter drawing tools ► Photons  MC  Reconstructed ► * ► (Anti) neutrons ► Charged tracks  Reconstructed ► *  MC ► Secondary  Photons  Electrons CbmEcalQualityCheck. At SVN

Fitter requirements ► Robust reconstruction of single photons ► Two close photons case:  robust reconstruction of parameters in case two separate maximums  separation one/two photons in case of one maximum ► χ 2 criteria ► all analyzed approaches have failed to reconstruct photons energy/position correctly ► χ 2 shape should not depend on photon’s energy  same value for efficiency cut ► separation power of one/two photons in case of one maximum as a criteria  example: with 95% efficiency for clusters formed by single photon

Realization of fitter ► CbmEcalRecoSlow ► current version at SVN  no so slow actually! ► 40 sec per UrQMD event  first approximation ► CbmEcalRecoSimple  χ 2 minimization ► minimizer  TFitterMinuit ► shower shape (E pred )  shower lib ► σ 2 formula

Shower width ► Energy deposition in cluster cells are not independent  storing of RMS in shower library useless ► Analytical formula  with correlation ► ALICE  σ 2 =c 0  (E meas +c 1 ) ► no correlations! ► PHENIX  σ 2 =c 0  (E meas  (1- E meas /E cluster )  (1+k  sin 4 θE cluster )+c 1 ) ► correlations are in  Angle dependence ► shower library h4 h5 h4 h5

σ 2 formula ► σ 2 formula declared in configuration file ► … and parameters too  for easy change ► without recompilation  different formulas for different cell types ► … to maintain commonness ► Sum of photon’s energies fixed to energy of cluster  a switch in configuration file ► Parameters space is huge  σ 2 formula ► best c n could be computed if σ 2 formula is fixed  also parameters of cluster finder # Number of cells types for reconstruction types=4 # Number of constants for each type consts=2 # Use Ecluster, Emeas and Epred for measured cluster energy, measured cell energy and predicted cell energy respectively c0_1=0.008 c1_1= c0_2=0.008 c1_2= c0_3=-1111 c1_3=-1111 c0_4=0.008 c1_4= sigma_1=c1*(Emeas*(1-Emeas/Ecluster)+c0) sigma_2=c1*(Emeas*(1-Emeas/Ecluster)+c0) sigma_3=-1111 sigma_4=c1*(Emeas*(1-Emeas/Ecluster)+c0) # if chi2 for cluster is less than no fitting chi2th=-1111 # Max iterations in fitting process maxiterations=1000 # Steps for calculation of gradients estep= cstep= # Fix sum of energies of cluster particles to energy of cluster fixclusterenergy=1 # # Cluster finder stuff # # Maximums belong to charged tracks should excluded? removecharged=1 # Minimum precluster energy minclustere=0.3 # Minimum energy of precluster maximum minmaxe=0.2 # An algorithm for preclustering: default, PHENIX like, # ALICE like, default, but remove low energy cells preclusteralgo=0 # Minimum cell energy mincelle=0.020 # Minimum size of precluster minsize=4 # Attach to cluster nearby cells with Edep>fMinCellE attachcells=0.1 Example of configuration file

Photon reconstruction. Merged photons Simple reconstruction Cluster fitting Fitting of clusters with two maximums allows us disentangle photons! σ 2 formula and parameters does not require much tuning!

Fitter requirements ► Robust reconstruction of single photons ► Two close photons case:  robust reconstruction of parameters in case two separate maximums  separation one/two photons in case of one maximum ► χ 2 criteria ► all analyzed approaches have failed to reconstruct photons energy/position correctly ► χ 2 shape should not depend on photon’s energy  same value for efficiency cut ► separation power of one/two photons in case of one maximum as a criteria  example: with 95% efficiency for clusters formed by single photon

χ 2 distributions. Single photons 95% 1 GeV95% 4 GeV σ 2 =c 0  (E meas  (1-E meas /E cluster )+c 1 ) c1= % 1 GeV95% 4 GeV σ 2 =c 0  (E meas +c 1 ) Shape of χ 2 for each energy looks Ok, but cut with 95% efficiency has different value! Need a different σ 2 formula!

Rejection power. Inner region σ 2 =c 0  (E meas  (1-E meas /E cluster )+c 1 )σ 2 =c 0  (E meas +c 1 )

Rejection power. Outer region σ 2 =c 0  (E meas  (1-E meas /E cluster )+c 1 )σ 2 =c 0  (E meas +c 1 ) Reconstruction in outer region is most sensible to σ 2 formula!

Conclusions ► Calorimeter software development in progress  Cluster finder: CbmEcalClusterFinderV1  Reconstruction: CbmEcalRecoSimple ► and CbmEcalRecoSlow  Matching: CbmEcalMatching  Quality check: CbmEcalQualityCheck

Conclusions ► Photons reconstruction  simple procedures are ready to use  more complicated procedures ► not too slow ► fit clusters with more than one maximum ► still have limited usability  σ 2 formula ► bad cluster rejection ► not trivial ► All presented calculations done using 2 computers  UrQMD transport, reconstruction, etc. ► 3.0 GHz Core 2 Duo ► 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo (My laptop)

Next steps ► Reconstruction tuning ► Detector optimization  geometry  segmentation ► Detailed sensitivity studies for process with photons  π 0, η, χ c … ► e/ π separation with real tracking ► Detailed detector geometry  construction details  light collection efficiency