AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters:- Steve Nunnington xoserve & Sallyann Blackett E.on Sallyann Blackett E.on Rolling AQ – A Straw Man.
Advertisements

Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation Updates June 2013.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Project Nexus Workgroup Unique Sites 4 th November 2014.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
Xoserve sense checks & validation Reasonable Endeavours Claims.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
PN UNC Workgroup Supply Point Register 25 th October 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
Shipperless & Unregistered site working group Recommendations to address the Unregistered Sites Collectively establish & execute activities to correct.
© British Gas Further Analysis on Meter Reading Validation Tolerances proposed by Project Nexus March 2014.
Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
CSEPs Reconciliation “Read Window” proposal. 2 Background  I&C CSEPs (supply point AQ >73,200) are subject to reconciliation  IGTs are obliged to provide.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
1 Industry Shipperless &Unregistered Working Group Wednesday 7th July 10.00am at xoserve.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –25 th February 2010 Distribution Workstream.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
1 New proposal extending the services created by Modification 279 historic asset and read data Modification 279 created an annual report (on request at.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –26 th November 2009 Distribution Workstream.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
Rolling AQ – Initial Calculation
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Background - Tolerance Rules
Nexus Meter Read Performance April 2018
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
Background - Tolerance Rules
Distribution Workstream UNC Modification 0224 Draft UKLink Implementation Summary Responses 26th February 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Release 2 Scope Business Benefit Review
CSS Consequential Change CoS Shell Record Submission for Discussion at 630R 27th April 2018.
AQ Review and Revision Processes & Development of the Current Regime
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
Market Differentiation Workgroup Market Sector Flag Analysis
SPA Processes for DM Sites
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Lessons Learnt UKLC - November 2015
Joint Theft Reporting Review (from meeting 1st March 2019)
AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009
DN Interruption Phase II
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Meter Read Rejections ..
Meter Reads.
Project Nexus Workgroup
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Further Considerations
Presentation transcript:

AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010

AQ Amendments: Summary Part 1  UNC provisions (TPD G1.6.3, G1.6.4 and G1.6.5) Part 2  xoserve system validations

Part 1: AQ Amendment Window

Part 1: Revised Value Restrictions Larger Supply Points  No restriction Smaller Supply Points  Must be lesser or greater than the Provisional AQ by not less than 20%  Except where the amendment would increase the AQ above 73,200kWh

Part 1: Conditions An AQ Amendment can be raised where:  the User reasonably considers that the Provisional AQ is derived from  incorrect Meter Readings  Meter Readings taken prior to User’s registration  incorrect Supply Meter Installation details  the AQ has been carried forward due the Supply Point being Isolated within year or insufficient Meter Readings

Part 1: User Warranties  When submitting an AQ Amendment, the User warranties:  it has applied a consistent methodology  it has applied a methodology that does not materially differentiate where requested AQs are greater than or less than the Provisional AQ  it has sought amendment of all AQs that it is able to under the UNC when applying the methodology

Part 1: Information Requirements User must specify  MPR  Two Meter Readings (in accordance with TPD H3 – Relevant Metered Period etc)  Relevant Meter Exchange information  Requested AQ User shall record evidence and make available if requested

Part 2: xoserve System Validation  AAI – AQ Amendment requests.  If the Meter Point is not part of any confirmation OR if the Shipper is not responsible for the provided MPRN, it would be rejected with SHI  If the provided confirmation reference is not the current live confirmation of the MPRN, it would be rejected with MPO  If smaller supply meter point is not eligible for AQ/WC amendment, then reject with STD  If an outstanding amendment referral exists for an MPRN, it would be rejected with AQA  If the requested AQ is less than 1, it would reject with STD  If the start reading date is less than , then it would be rejected with STD  If the end reading date is less than , then it would be rejected with STD  If the exchange start reading date is less than , then it would be rejected with STD  If the exchange end reading date is less than , then it would be rejected with STD  Invalid Imperial Indicator (other than Y/N), rejects with STD  Invalid Reading Units (other than 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000), rejects with STD  Invalid Exchange Reading Units (other than 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000), rejects with STD  Invalid Reading factor (other than 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100), rejects with STD  Invalid Exchange Reading factor (other than 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100), rejects with STD  Start reading is greater than processing date, reject with STD  End reading is greater than processing date, reject with STD 00160

Part 2: xoserve System Validation  Exchange Start reading is greater than processing date, reject with STD  Exchange End reading is greater than processing date, reject with STD  Invalid Manual check flag (other than Y/N), reject with STD  Number of dials out of permitted range (ideal range is 4 to 12), reject with STD  If reading unit, reading factor and imperial indicator are inconsistent, then reject with MMO  If exchange reading unit, reading factor and imperial indicator are inconsistent, then reject with MMO  If the end reading is less than start reading, then reject with STD  If the start reading date is less than the earliest supply point start date, then reject with STD  If the supply point is end dated and if the end date is greater than the supply point end date, then reject with STD  If the exchange start reading date must be equal to end reading date, otherwise reject with STD  If the exchange end reading date is less than or equal to exchange start reading date, otherwise reject with STD  If exchange TTZ is 0 and if the exchange end reading date is less than exchange start reading date, otherwise reject with STD  Sum of read TTZ and exchange read TTZ count should not go beyond 99, otherwise reject with STD  If the shipper is not responsible for the MPRN, it would be rejected with SHI 0010

Part 2: xoserve System Validation  All the readings except the start reading date should be greater than competition effective date, otherwise reject with MRE 471  If the current and proposed market sector is Domestic, then 20% amendment tolerance rule is applied. Meter AQ changes will be accepted only if it lies beyond the tolerance range with respect to xoserve calculated initial AQ. Reject reason provided is AQA  The requested AQ value (provided in the file) and the derived AQ (using the parameters in the file) should match, otherwise reject with STD  If the MPRN is primary and if either the current or proposed market sectors is I&C, then refer the amendment, otherwise reject it with MPO  If the provided MPRN does not exist on the system, then reject with MPO  If the start read date is not later than AQ-WC backstop date, then reject with STD  If the end read date is earlier than xoserve calculated end read date, then reject with STD  Outstanding AQ/WC Appeal referral exists for this meter point, then reject with AML  Insufficient information to calculate AQ, then reject with AQA  Consumption period less than 6 month, then reject with MRE  Post code not found, then reject with POC  Start reading/date not consistent with UKLink, then reject with RRR  End reading/date not consistent with UKLink, then reject with RRR  Exchange start read/date not consistent with UKLink, then reject with RRR  Exchange end read/date not consistent with UKLink, then reject with RRR 00013

Part 2: xoserve System Validation  TTZ count incorrect, then reject with RRR  Meter exchange not identified on amendment/appeal, then reject with RRR  Manual referral with insufficient supporting information, then reject with RRR  Appeal window not currently open for request, then reject with RRR  Exchange meter serial number not provided, then reject with STD  Exchange start reading date not provided, then reject with STD  Exchange end reading date not provided, then reject with STD  Occurrence of DM since start reading date, then reject with STD  Invalid value for number of dials or digits, then reject with STD  Meter point was not part of a live supply point for entire consumption period, then reject with STD  DM meter point cannot be appealed/amended to an AQ below the domestic threshold, reject with SPO 00013