Amended Oregon Geospatial Metadata Standard DRAFT PROPOSED BY METADATA WORKGROUP 18 TH FRAMEWORK FORUM, MAY 20, 2015, SALEM Bob DenOuden, GEO

Metadata Workgroup Members: Bob DenOuden (GEO) Daniel Stoelb (OEM) Don Pettit (DEQ) Malavika Bishop (DEQ) Josh Tanner (GEO) Tanya Haddad Roger Mills (BLM) Rachel Smith, Clark Niewendorp (DOGAMI) Eric Brandt (LCOG) Myrica McCune (INR)

Summary of current Oregon metadata standard Oregon’s metadata standard presented at the very first standards forum, December, 2002 Based on FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, with a minimum mandatory elements list Never adequately finalized or documented The desire was to clarify the metadata standard and run it through current process Consider adopting ISO standard

Minimum elements in current standard:

Workgroup’s approach to amending standard The metadata workgroup reconvened in April, 2014, met six times Considered ISO 191* standard adoption, decided to stay with a subset of FGDC elements for now – revisit ISO later Reviewed entire FGDC CSDGM standard and designated elements: ◦mandatory ◦mandatory if applicable ◦optional, but recommended ◦all others remain optional Metadata standard applies to state agency GIS data intended for external distribution Metadata standard document edited to match current template design Draft amended metadata standard 45 day review period ended March 16 th

Added elements Mandatory 1.9 Point of Contact (individual or organization knowledgeable of data) 2.3 Completeness Report Horizontal Positional Accuracy Report Lineage Source Information Citation (if additional source data integrated into dataset) Section 4: Spatial reference Information, Horizontal Coordinate System definition Section 5 Entity and Attribute Information 6.1 Distributor Source Information (Contact Information compound element) Mandatory If Applicable Supplemental Information for Description Currentness reference (changed from Mandatory in original standard) Place Keyword Stratum Keyword Temporal Keyword 1.12 Security Information Quantitative Horizontal Positional Accuracy Assessment Quantitative Vertical Positional Accuracy Assessment Time Period of Content for integrated source data Source Contribution Horizontal Coordinate System Definition – Geographic Altitude System Definition Depth System Definition Attribute Definition Source Entity and Attribute Detail Citation Distributor Fees

Next steps Send draft amended standard to OGIC for endorsement Provide good examples of metadata meeting the standard (once endorsed) Provide guidance on best tools available to populate, maintain, and use metadata Provide guidance on metadata for geospatial web services