Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Likelihood ratios Why these are the most thrilling statistics in Emergency Medicine.
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Divisional Meeting 15 th January 2009 Streptococcal Pharyngitis: A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Signs and Symptoms and the External Validation.
Is it True? Evaluating Research about Diagnostic Tests
Diagnostic Tests for Lower Extremity Osteomyelitis Laura Zakowski, MD* *no financial disclosures.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
1 The Odds Ratio (Relative Odds) In a case-control study, we do not know the incidence in the exposed population or the incidence in the nonexposed population.
Statistics for Health Care
EBM-Diagnostic Testing K. Mae Hla, MD, MHS Primary Care Faculty Development Fellowship November 13, 2010.
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Screening.
Diagnosis Articles Much Thanks to: Rob Hayward & Tanya Voth, CCHE.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Statistics & graphics for the laboratory
Lecture 4: Assessing Diagnostic and Screening Tests
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Dichotomous Tests Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH September 27, 2012 Thanks to Josh Galanter and Michael Shlipak 1.
1 Interpreting Diagnostic Tests Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2012 Note to readers: you may find the additional.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Evidence Based Practice in Psychology – Lecture 3 May 31, 2007.
Screening and Diagnostic Testing Sue Lindsay, Ph.D., MSW, MPH Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute for Public Health San Diego State University.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of signs & symptoms predicting uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women Giesen LGM Erasmus.
1 Risk Assessment Tests Marina Kondratovich, Ph.D. OIVD/CDRH/FDA March 9, 2011 Molecular and Clinical Genetics Panel for Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
Statistics for the board September 14 th 2007 Jean-Sebastien Rachoin MD.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
HSS4303B – Intro to Epidemiology Feb 8, Agreement.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
1 Medical Epidemiology Interpreting Medical Tests and Other Evidence.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Shoulder Objective Examination How to Interpret Special Tests.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Sensitivity:DISEASE Specificity:PRESENTABSENT TEST RESULTS POSITIVEAbA+b NEGATIVECdC+d a+cb+da+b+c+d Lets recall the 2x2 contingency table Probability.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography.
Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M
Evidence-Based Medicine
An Idiots Guide to Statistics Curriculum 3.6
Principles of Epidemiology E
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Computation of Post Test Probability
The two-step Fagan's nomogram.
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary

Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome are determined simultaneously.

Sensitivity Proportion of people with the target disorder who have a positive test. It is used to assist in assessing and selecting a diagnostic test/sign/symptom.

Specificity Proportion of people without the target disorder who have a negative test. It is used to assist in assessing and selecting a diagnostic test/sign/symptom.

Likelihood ratio (LR) The likelihood that a given test result would be expected in a patient with the target disorder compared with the likelihood that that same result would be expected in a patient without the target disorder LR+ = sensitivity/(1-specificity) LR- = (1-sensitivity)/specificity

Pre-test probability/prevalence The proportion of people with the target disorder (defined or confirm with gold standard) in the population at risk at a specific time (point prevalence) or time interval (period prevalence)

Pre-test odds The odds that the patient has the target disorder before the test is carried out pre-test probability/ (1 – pre-test probability).

Post-test odds The odds that the patient has the target disorder after the test is carried out pre-test odds × likelihood ratio. – pre-test odds × LR+ – pre-test odds × LR-

Post-test probability The proportion of patients with that particular test result who have the target disorder post-test odds/(1 + post-test odds).

Positive predictive value Proportion of people with a positive test who have the target disorder

Example Suppose you have a patient with anemia and a serum ferritin of 60 mmol/L. You come across a systematic review* of serum ferritin as a diagnostic test for iron deficiency anemia, with the results summarised as follows in the table

Summary Table Disorder Present Disorder Absent Total Test Positive 731 a 270 b 1001 a+b Test Negative 78 c 270 d 1578 c+d Total809 a+c 1500 b+d 2578 a+b+c+d

Calculation( 一 ) Sensitivity = a/(a+c)= 731/809 = 90% Specificity = d/(b+d)= 1500/1770 = 85% LR+ = sensitivity/(1-specificity)= [a/(a+c)] / [b/(b+d)]= 90%/15% = 6 LR- = (1-sensitivity)/specificity = [c/(a+c)] / [d/(b+d)]= 10%/85% = 0.12

Calculation( 二 ) LR+ = 6, LR- = 0.12 Pre test probability=0.8 –Pre test odds=0.8/0.2=4 –Post odds(+)=4×6=24 –Post Probability(+)=24/(1+24)=0.96 –Post odds(-)=4×0.12=0.48 –Post probability (-)=0.96/(1+0.96)=0.49

SnNout When a sign/test/symptom has a high Sensitivity, a Negative result rules out the diagnosis. For example, the sensitivity of a history of ankle swelling for diagnosing ascites is 93%; therefore if a person does not have a history of ankle swelling, it is highly unlikely that the person has ascites.

SpPin When a sign/test/symptom has a high Specificity, a Positive result rules in the diagnosis. For example, the specificity of a fluid wave for diagnosing ascites is 92%; therefore if a person does have a fluid wave, it rules in the diagnosis of ascites.