Toxicity Evaluation of Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Data Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Division - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HYGIENE STANDARDS AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS
Advertisements

Background – Scope and Development of the GHS as an International System Hazard Classification – Physical Hazards – Health Hazards – Environmental Hazards.
 Chemical manufacturers & importers must classify each chemical produced or imported. They must: Determine the appropriate hazard classes & associated.
Classification of substances and mixtures on the basis of health hazard Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M. Tatjana Humar – Jurič, M.Sc.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
Health Hazards The overall objective for this module is that given a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), the participant will interpret health hazard information.
Assessing Dose and Potency of Chemicals Robert Blaisdell, Ph.D, Chief Exposure Modeling Section Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
An introduction for chemical engineers
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
1 Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Sheryl K. Reilly, Ph.D. Chief, Biochemical Pesticides Branch
Use of pesticides and residues in wine Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009 Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009.
An adverse effect on a living creature that results from a single dose or exposure to a substance. What is an Acute Effect.
1 Module 3 Toxicity. 2 Toxicity Measures The term Ct is used to describe an estimate of dose. C represents the concentration of the substance (as vapor.
Emissions Transport and Fate Concentrations Exposure Dose Dose-response Relationship Health Risk Schematic overview of a Health Risk Assessment.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
Site Planning and Layout  In the design phase of a facility, fire protection requirements are considered in the site layout  Water supply, traffic and.
MOSQUITO CONTROL PESTICIDE EXPOSURE AND HOW TO RESPOND TO PUBLIC CONCERNS Presented By Brian J. Hughes, PhD at the Arbovirus Surveillance Workshop Friday,
It Takes a Village to Raise a Child Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Section - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
GHS Training Module 1 Introduction to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
1 Harmonised classification of substances (Annex VI of the CLP Regulation)- Example of substance classification Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
Gradient CORPORATION Corrales Environmental Air Quality Health Evaluation Prepared for New Mexico Environment Department By Chris Long, ScD; Mara Seeley,
ABM Employee Hazard Communication Training. Hazard Communication Standard In 1983, the Federal Government established the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard.
HAZARD COMMUNICATION (HAZCOM) Environmental Health, Safety, and Risk Management Stephen F. Austin State University.
ERT 312 Lecture 3 Toxicology. What is toxicology? Qualitative and quantitative study of adverse effects of toxicants on biological organisms Toxicant.
TOXICOLOGY Trina Redford, Industrial Hygienist National Naval Medical Center Naval Business Bldg 615, 2 nd Fl. Philadelphia, PA.
Health Hazards Instructional Goal
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
A Review of Exposure and Toxicity. The Need for Gloves and Respirators A Brief Review of Exposure.
The Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Richard Pont, adapted for 2003 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification.
What does WHMIS mean? W Workplace H Hazardous M Materials I Information S System WHMIS is a Canada wide hazard communication system developed to provide.
Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools Economic Criteria.
Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Acceptable Exposure Limits …extrapolation of toxicological data to recommendations for limits for occupational exposures.
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Health risk assessment – systemic effects (1) REMINDER OF INHALED DOSE PG intake of 3.2 mg/day or mg/kg bw/day for a 60-kg bw consumer Systemic.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
Unit 3 – Environmental Chemistry.  A pollutant is any material or energy that can cause harm to a living thing.  Pollution is a change to the environment.
EHS 507 Potential dose: the amount of chemical that is ingested or inhaled, or the amount of chemical contained in material applied to skin. Applied dose:
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
Data Useful for Health Identification (MSDS) Threshold Limit Values (TLV) Odor threshold for vapor Physical state Vapor pressure of liquid Sensitivity.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Health risk assessment – systemic effects (1) REMINDER OF INHALED DOSE PO intake is 7.2 mg/day 0.12 mg/kg bw/day for a 60-kg adult 2.
Operating Engineers National Hazmat Program 1 Dose and response The reaction is dependent on the amount of the chemical received, but... – Some doses are.
Dose-Response ENVR430 Nov 09, 2009 Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp (6 th Edn) Chapter 2, pp (7 th Edn) Timbrell Chapter 2, pp (3 rd.
Know your hazards An overview of chemical hazards and the associated pictograms.
Purpose, Scope and Application of the GHS 1. The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) is a rational and comprehensive.
Transforming Our World: Delivering affordable medicines to anyone, anywhere, any day 1 Health hazards of substances Annex 1 – Part 3 of CLP Date: Name:
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Overview of the CPSC Directorate for Health Sciences * Mary Ann Danello, Ph.D. Associate Executive Director * The views expressed in this presentation.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
HYGIENE STANDARDS AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
OTHER REGULATIONS IN INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
Objective – Be Safe in the Lab
WHO Classification (by active ingredient)
TOXICOLOGY.
VICH GL 54, Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: General approach to establish an Acute Reference Dose (ARfD)
Presentation transcript:

Toxicity Evaluation of Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Data Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Division - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Outline Toxicity assessments  Chemicals with adequate toxicity data  Chemicals with limited toxicity data

Toxicity Assessment The basic objective of a toxicity assessment is to identify what adverse health effects a chemical causes and how the appearance of these adverse effects depends on exposure level (dose)

TCEQ Exposure Durations and Averaging Times Acute – 1 hour intermittent exposure (short-term) Chronic – lifetime exposure (long-term)

Tiered Approach for Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Information

Cumulative Normal Distribution

Threshold of Concern Approach

Obtain LC 50 data and acute inhalation NOAELs from animal studies for 97 chemicals Exposure duration: 1-hour intermittent exposure, but frequently included > 1 hr studies, and in some cases multiple day studies Categorize chemicals into different acute inhalation toxicity potency classes using LC 50 data and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (United Nations 2005)

Threshold of Concern (TOC) Table 3-3. Threshold of Concern Approach for Determining Tier II Generic Short-Term ESLs Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category 5 Skin IrritationCorrosiveIrritantMild Irritant Eye IrritationCauses serious eye damage Causes serious eye irritation Causes mild to moderate eye irritation d Oral LD 50 mg/kg 0 to < 5 a > 5 to < 50 a > 50 to < 300 a > 300 to < 2000 a > 2,000 a LC 50 gas ppm v 0 to < 100> 100 to < 500> 500 to < 2500> 2500 to < 5000> 5,000 LC 50 dust & mists b mg/m 3 0 to < 50> 50 to < 500> 500 to < 1000> 1000 to < 5000> 5,000 LC 50 vapors c mg/m 3 0 to < 500> 500 to < 2000 > 2000 to < 10,000> 10,000 to < 20,000> 20,000 Generic Short-Term ESL 4 µg/m 3 20 µg/m µg/m µg/m 3

Cat 3&4 =12.6 mg/m 3 Cat 5 = 104 mg/m 3 Cat 2 = 2 mg/m 3 Cat 1 = 0.4 mg/m 3 Calculate the 10th percentile of the cumulative percentage distribution of NOAELs in each category

Threshold of Concern (TOC) Divide the 10 th percentile NOAEL values by 100 to account for human variability and uncertainty of animal to human extrapolation Cat 1: 0.4 mg/m 3 / 100 = 4 ug/m 3 Cat 2: 2 mg/m 3 / 100 = 20 ug/m 3 Cat 3&4: 12.6 mg/m 3 / 100 = 125 ug/m 3 Cat 5: 104 mg/m 3 / 100 = 1000 ug/m 3 Use the LC 50 data of a chemical to categorize it into a GHS category. Use the TOC for that category as a generic ESL

Tier II Generic ESLs NOAEL to LC 50 Ratio Approach

NOAEL-to-LC 50 Ratio 10 th percentile ratio = Calculate the ratio between acute inhalation NOAELs and LC50 Calculate the 10th percentile ratio

NOAEL-to-LC 50 Ratio Divide the ratio of by 100 to account for human variability and uncertainty of animal to human extrapolation Health-Protective Ratio = LC 50 data x = generic ESL

TOC or NOAEL-to- LC 50 Ratio Approach? Both approaches use LC 50 data, although the TOC approach is generally more conservative than the NOAEL-to- LC 50 Ratio approach Use information on the chemical (i.e., toxicity of chemical class or chemical structure) and a weight-of-evidence approach to decide which approach is most defensible Choose the most conservative number if there is uncertainty in the quality of the LC 50 data

Summary For chemicals with limited toxicity data, statistical or relative toxicity/potency approaches can be used to derive health- protective default or generic ESLs  Tier 1 – Threshold of Regulation  Tier II – Threshold of Concern toxicity potency classes or NOAEL-to-LC 50 Ratio  Tier III – Relative Toxicity/Potency Approach

Questions Roberta L. Grant (512) Toxicology Division Website: ? ? ? ? ?