Overview of the Hospital Safety Score March 2013 Missy Danforth, Senior Director of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: Advance the adoption of proven strategies to improve the reliability, safety and quality of care received by patients in Tennessee hospitals.
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Is There a Relationship Between Hospital Safety Culture and Safety Outcomes in VA Hospitals? Amy K. Rosen, Ph.D. 1,2, Sara Singer, Ph.D. 3,Christine Hartmann,
Organizational Assessment Tool (OAT) Faizah Muheb VP, Analytical Services June 2013.
SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015.
Results of the 2013 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Developed for The Leapfrog Group by Castlight Heath
1 © 2004 TMIT TMIT The Leapfrog NQF Safe Practices Briefing Carol Ferguson, RN, MSN Director of Patient Safety and Performance Improvement Texas Medical.
Patient Safety: 10 Years After the Landmark IOM Report on Medical Errors: Significant Progress: Better tools, better reporting, but there is a long way.
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Research and analysis by Avalere Health Hospitals Demonstrate Commitment to Quality Improvement October 2012.
AHRQ Quality Indicators Toolkit Tool A.2 Instructions.
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
William B Munier, MD, MBA, Director Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Annual Conference.
William B Munier, MD, MBA, Director Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Annual Conference.
Safety Basic Science December 22 nd, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns.
Allied health student training Pre-placement training requirements Welcome to the video-conference. This video-conference will be recorded. Your participation.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission 2013 National Patient Safety Goals.
October 31, Susan Reinhard, PhD, RN, FAAN Senior Vice President & Director, AARP Public Policy Institute; Chief Strategist, Center to Champion Nursing.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
1955 when Codman who is also known as father of Patient safety looked at the outcome of patient care 1984 Anaesthesia patient safety foundation established.
Improving Harm Across the Board Dalton, Georgia Breakthrough in Identification of HARM: 2.
1 Welcome to the NQF Safe Practices for Better Healthcare Webinar: Optimizing a Workforce for Optimal Safe Care (Safe Practices 9-11) Hosted by NQF and.
History of patient safety : 1955 when Codman who is also known as father of Patient safety looked at the outcome of patient care 1984 Anaesthesia patient.
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement: What’s New in QAPI for 2015! June 17, 2015 Michele Kala, MS, RN, Director of Accreditation and Certification.
Performance Measurement Orientation To schedule a presentation of “Performance Measurement Orientation” for your organization staff and/or collaborators,
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Strategies for Collecting and Entering Early Mobility ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
1 Overview of the CPOE Evaluation Tool 2009 Leapfrog Group Townhall Call May 6, 2009.
Joint Commission Update Clinical Compliance and Risk Management Fall 2012.
The Leapfrog Hospital Recognition Program A program of The Leapfrog Group.
Leapfrog’s CPOE Evaluation Tool Town Hall Call May 2, 2008.
Capital Coast Palliative Care Forum Waikato Experience of Developing a District Palliative Care Strategy Jan Hewitt.
What do we know about overall trends in patient safety in the USA? Patrick S. Romano, MD MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics University of California,
Health Management Information Systems Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Lecture b This material Comp6_Unit4b was developed by Duke University funded.
Medication Use Process Part One, Lecture # 5 PHCL 498 Amar Hijazi, Majed Alameel, Mona AlMehaid.
1 1 Survey of Patient Safety Culture in U.S. Hospitals: External Validity Analyses Russ Mardon, Ph.D. Westat 2008 AHRQ Annual Conference Westat 1650 Research.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Plymouth Health Community NICE Guidance Implementation Group Workshop Two: Debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics. Pressure ulcer risk assessment.
2008 Wisconsin County Health Rankings Online Webinar Available November 14, 2008 Kyla Taylor.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 4 Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Component 6/Unit41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall.
Copyright ©2011 Georgia Hospital Association Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Emergency Department Transfer Communication Measure.
Hospital-Acquired VTE: What We Have Learned Martha J. Radford, MD Chief Quality Officer NYU Langone Medical Center September 2009.
AHRQ PSIs and IQIs in National Pay for Reporting September 14, 2009 AHRQ QI Conference Shaheen Halim, Ph.D. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs)
UNDERSTANDING AND DEFINING QUALITY Quality Academy – Cohort 6 April 8, 2013.
Thomas Kelley, MD Chief of Quality and Transformation Orlando Health Leading the Way to Better Care: Florida’s Quality Journey.
Hospital Measures Reporting in Ohio Michele Shipp, MD, DrPH AHRQ QUALITY INDICATORS USERS MEETING Wednesday September 9, 2008 AHRQ ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2008.
10 © 2010 TMIT Charles Denham, MD Chairman, TMIT Co-chairman, NQF Safe Practices Consensus Committee Chairman, Leapfrog Safe Practices Program Safe Practices.
BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois a Division of Health Care Service Corporation (HCSC), a Mutual Legal Reserve Company Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois.
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., an Independent Licensee of the BlueCross BlueShield Association. This document has been classified as public Information.
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Data We Can Count On.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Independence Plan Update February 26, © 2009 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care2 Key Points  Independence Plan introduced in 2005 –Tiered copayment product.
Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Texas Center for Quality and Patient Safety Dennis Cook, MSN, RN, CPPS Senior Director, Texas Center for Quality and & Patient Safety Texas Hospital Association.
QUALITY CARE/NPSG’S NUR 152 Week 16. OBJECTIVES Define quality improvement and the methods used in health care to ensure quality care. State understanding.
Florida Hospital Association
Hospital Engagement Network
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013
The Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program: How Will This Work?
MHA Keystone Center Update
Florida Hospital Association Hospital Engagement Network (HEN) Office Hours Wednesday, May 8, :00 PM.
2017 National Patient Safety Goals
Information provided by: Yvette Mansion-Whittaker
The 5th Annual Lorraine Tregde Patient Safety Leadership Conference “The Will to Pursue Excellence” June 14, 2012.
Data Collection Training, Part I Outcome Data
Dolores Hagan, RN BSN K-HEN Education and Data Manager August 2012
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Hospital Safety Score March 2013 Missy Danforth, Senior Director of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group

Presentation Overview Why is Leapfrog issuing a Hospital Safety Score Who is getting a Hospital Safety Score? Important Dates Scoring Overview – Measure Selection Measure Weights Changes to the Scoring Methodology Since November 2012 Bound on negative z-scores Dealing with Missing data Details of the data review process Questions 2

What is the Hospital Safety Score? Why is Leapfrog issuing one? The Hospital Safety Score is an A, B, C, D, or F letter grade reflecting how safe hospitals are for patients. For the first time ever, this score empowers healthcare consumers to make informed decisions based on the safety of their hospital. Leapfrog is strategically expanding its focus to get consumers to use information on safety and quality that can save their lives. 3

What Hospitals Will Receive a Hospital Safety Score? General, acute-care hospitals for which there is adequate public data Excluded Hospitals include: Specialty Hospitals (i.e. surgical centers, cancer hospitals, women’s hospitals, etc.) Critical Access Hospitals Free –Standing Pediatric Facilities Non-IPPS participating hospitals (hospitals from the state of MD) Hospitals Missing Too Much Data: More than 9 process measures More than 3 outcome measures 4

Important Dates January 2013 – Expert panel re-convened to review feedback from November 2012 safety score release and develop recommendations for the scoring methodology. March 2013 – Leapfrog’s board approved recommendations of expert panel. March Letter sent to CEOs of hospitals receiving a Hospital Safety Score. Letter included: Information about the Hospital Safety Score A username/password to a secure website where hospitals can review the source data that Leapfrog used to calculate their numerical safety score Links to the Hospital Safety Score help desk and helpful documents March 20 th to April 8 th - Data Preview Period Mid April – data preview website refreshed with any changes received during data review period. Late April - Hospitals will be able to preview letter grades 48 hours prior to the pubic release ( For more information about important dates, visit: hospitals/updates-and-timelines-for-hospitalshttp:// hospitals/updates-and-timelines-for-hospitals 5

SCORING OVERVIEW 6

Measure Selection Criteria Publicly-reported from national data sources, reflecting individual hospital results Leapfrog Hospital Survey CMS’s Hospital Compare Endorsed or in use by a national measurement entity Linked to patient safety (“freedom from harm”) Directly quantifying patient safety events Assessing processes that lead to better outcomes Identified by experts as important to patient safety Forty-five candidate measures identified; 26 recommended for inclusion in score (note PSI 11 not available for the scoring period) 7

Measures included in the Hospital Safety Score Measure NamePrimary Data SourceSecondary Data Source Process and Structural Measures (15) Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey AHA Annual Survey (2009 Technology Supplement to the AHA Annual Survey) i ICU Physician Staffing (IPS)2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey2010 AHA Annual Survey i Safe Practice 1: Leadership Structures and Systems2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 2: Culture Measurement, Feedback and Intervention2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 3: Teamwork Training and Skill Building2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 4: Identification and Mitigation of Risks and Hazards2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 9: Nursing Workforce2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 17: Medication Reconciliation2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 19: Hand Hygiene2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Safe Practice 23: Care of the Ventilated Patient2012 Leapfrog Hospital Survey SCIP INF 1: Antibiotic within 1 HourCMS Hospital Compare SCIP INF 2: Antibiotic SelectionCMS Hospital Compare SCIP INF 3: Antibiotic Discontinued After 24 HoursCMS Hospital Compare SCIP INF 9: Catheter RemovalCMS Hospital Compare SCIP VTE 2: VTE ProphylaxisCMS Hospital Compare Outcome Measures (11) Foreign Object RetainedCMS Hospital Compare Air EmbolismCMS Hospital Compare Pressure Ulcer – Stages 3 and 4CMS Hospital Compare Falls and TraumaCMS Hospital Compare CLABSILeapfrog Hospital SurveyCMS Hospital Compare PSI 4: Death Among Surgical InpatientsCMS Hospital Compare PSI 6: Iatrogenic PneumothoraxCMS Hospital Compare PSI 11: Postoperative Respiratory FailureCMS Hospital Compare PSI 12: Postoperative PE/DVTCMS Hospital Compare PSI 14: Postoperative Wound DehiscenceCMS Hospital Compare PSI 15: Accidental Puncture or LacerationCMS Hospital Compare [i] [i] AHA Annual Survey © 2011 Health Forum, LLC 8

Weighting Process Two (2) measure domains, each weighted 50%: 1.Process/structural measures 2.Outcome measures Three (3) criteria for weighting individual measures Strength of Evidence (rating of 1 or 2) Opportunity (rating of 1, 2, 3), based on coefficient of variation Impact (rating of 1, 2, or 3), based on no. of patients possibly affected by the event and severity of harm to individual patients Weight score: [Evidence + (Opportunity x Impact)] 9

Z-Score Methodology Standardizes data from individual measures with different scales Counts how many standard deviations a hospital’s score on the measure is away from the mean Mean always equals 0; worse than mean = negative z-score ; better than mean = positive z-score Translate raw score on measure to z-score: Process/Structural Measures = [(Hospital Score – Mean)/Standard Deviation] Outcome Measures = [(Mean – Hospital Score)/Standard Deviation] 10

Overall Score Summation of z-score for each measure × weight for each measure CPOE z-score × CPOE weight + IPS z-score x IPS weight + CLABSI z-score × CLABSI weight.... etc. If measure has missing data, then weight for that measure is re-apportioned to other measures within the same domain 3.0 was added to each hospital’s final score to avoid possible confusion with interpreting negative patient safety scores 11

CHANGES TO THE SCORING METHODOLOGY SINCE NOVEMBER

Bounds on Z-scores Issue: For those measures in which hospitals are clustered at the ‘best performing’ end of the scale (e.g., rare outcomes; some process measures), hospitals that do not perform well on the measure can have a substantial negative z-score (i.e. -7 to -20). Even though each individual measure carries a relatively low weight, this substantial negative z-score on one measure can have more influence on the hospital’s overall safety score than was intended. Change to scoring methodology: In an effort to reflect the actual variation in hospital performance, but to minimize the possibility of a single measure overwhelming a hospital’s overall score, we are implementing a lower bound on z-scores. Based on analysis of the November 2012 safety score data, we are setting the lower bound for z-scores at

Small Denominators Issue: Minimum reporting requirements vary among data sources and measures. For measures that have a publicly reported numerator and denominator, Leapfrog will establish reporting requirements that meet Leapfrog’s standard for scientific acceptability. Change to scoring methodology: When a measure’s denominator is publicly available, Leapfrog applies the following minimum reporting requirement for using the measure in the safety score: the number of cases in the denominator must be >= 30. This minimum reporting requirement was identified from the literature, which suggests that thirty cases is generally the point when a non- normal distribution begins to approximate a normal distribution, which is important given the Safety Score’s use of z-scores for standardizing data across disparate data sets. The minimum sample size of 30 has also been used by other organizations that are engaged in evidence-based public reporting of health care performance data. 14

DETAILS OF THE DATA REVIEW PROCESS 15

Secure Website login login Details on what public reports were used to obtain source data. Links to source data with instructions. Hospitals must confirm their Medicare Provider Number before moving on to the next page. 16

Source Data Instructions for hospital to review their source data and a link to the help desk For each measure, hospitals are provided with the measure name, type of measure, data source (primary or secondary), reporting period, measure score (i.e. points, rate, SIR, etc) Hospitals are asked to confirm that each Measure Score matches their score (i.e. rate, SIR, etc) from the Data Source (i.e. Leapfrog Hospital Survey Results, CMS Hospital Compare, etc) 17

Where to Locate Source Data – Hospitals That Submitted a Leapfrog Hospital Survey by February 28, 2013 CPOE: Visit find the column labeled “prevent medication errors.” Leapfrog score used to determine points towards safety score (i.e. 4 bars equals 100 points, 3 bars equals 50 points, etc). ICU Physician Staffing: Visit find the column labeled “Appropriate ICU Staffing.” Leapfrog score used to determine points towards safety score. CLABSI Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR): Visit find the column labeled “prevent ICU infections.” The SIR was used to calculate in the safety score calculation, and is located in the first sentence in the first paragraph above the table. 18

Where to find your hospital's CLABSI SIR on Leapfrog’s results website 19

Where to Locate Source Data – Hospitals That Did Not Submit a Leapfrog Hospital Survey by February 28, 2013 CPOE: Leapfrog used information you provided to the American Hospital Association through the 2009 AHA Technology Supplement. ICU Physician Staffing: Leapfrog used information you provided to the American Hospital Association through the 2011 AHA Annual Survey. CLABSI Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR): Leapfrog used information published by CMS. Visit Select the “Healthcare Associated Infections” report and search for hospital by name or MPN (do not type in the hyphen sometimes included with the MPN). 20

Where to find your hospital’s CLABSI SIR on CMS’ results website 21

22

Where to Locate Source Data – CMS Data for All Hospitals SCIP Measures: Hospital rates are published by CMS at Measures-Surgical-Care-Im/iz5u-4mk2 Measures-Surgical-Care-Im/iz5u-4mk2 HACs: Hospital rates are published by CMS at Condition-Measures/qd2y-qcgs Condition-Measures/qd2y-qcgs PSIs: Hospital rates are published by CMS at Research-And-Quality-Measure/vs3q-rxc5 Research-And-Quality-Measure/vs3q-rxc5 You can download your hospital’s results into a CSV or XLS formatted file. 23

What if the Measure Score doesn’t match the public report? Hospitals are asked to contact the help desk immediately once they have confirmed the measure and reporting period. Hospitals must provide a copy of the public report that shows a different score If we find a recording error, we will update the score and re-issue a numerical safety score 24

Preview Numerical Safety Score 25

More Information Hospital Safety Score Help Desk - Hospital Safety Score Website – Data Review Website - validation/validation-loginhttp:// validation/validation-login 26