Animal ID: Opportunities for Value-Added Marketing and Production Efficiencies Prepared by: Kynda R. Curtis Assistant Professor and State Specialist Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benefits and Costs Associated With An Animal Identification System for Cattle in the United States Prepared by: DeeVon Bailey, Ph.D. Professor Department.
Advertisements

BEEF CATTLE MARKET OUTLOOK AND TRENDS DR. CURT LACY EXTENSION ECONOMIST-LIVESTOCK.
USDA PROCESS VERIFIED Michael Boland and Renee Sanden Kansas State University Funded by Agricultural Marketing Resource Center.
Risk Management in Bovine Spongiform Encephalophy Traceability Process and Tracing of Animals June 22, 2005 Paul Clayton U.S. Meat Export Federation.
Marketing Natural Meats: Targeting Consumer Segments in Your Marketing Plan Dawn Thilmany National SARE March 2008 Collaborators: Wendy Umberger and Amanda.
Australian Livestock ID Systems: What Can We Learn? Prepared by: Glynn T. Tonsor Dept. of Agricultural Economics Michigan State University Ted C. Schroeder.
Definition  Commodity – Undifferentiated – Perfectly competitive markets  Products – Differentiated – Monopoly - Workable competition – Niche Market,
The Cost of Meeting Consumer Demand(s) John Lawrence Extension Livestock Economist and Director, Iowa Beef Center Iowa State University.
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
The National Animal Identification System: Basics, Blueprint, Timelines, and Processes Prepared by: C. Wilson Gray District Extension Economist, Agricultural.
Policy in Action: AMS Involvement in Differentiating Food and Agricultural Markets Kenneth C. Clayton Agricultural Marketing Service United States Department.
Animal Identification: Liability Exposure and Risk Management Prepared by: Doug O’Brien, Senior Staff Attorney Michael Roberts, Director National Agricultural.
Age Verification for Japan: What is involved and is it right for me? Prepared by: John D. Lawrence Iowa State University Western Center for Risk Management.
© 2005 Notification and Reporting on Food Incidents: Irish Approach Food & Drugs Authority Bangkok Thailand Dorothy Guina-Dornan.
White Oak Pastures Bluffton, GA Harris Family Heritage Since 1866.
Introduction to Value-Added Goat Products Karen Jackson, UT Extension Agent.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Youth Livestock.
What is the Most Effective Way to Produce Food Safety? INFORMS Seminar Series Isenberg School of Management October 29, 2004 Julie A. Caswell
Food Safety and Government Regulations Food Animal Quality Assurance Youth Curriculum Guide.
Industry Responds with Advanced Quality and Traceability World Pork Congress April 29, 2004 Paul Clayton U.S. Meat Export Federation.
Pig production opportunities in Central and Eastern Europe Barriers and possibilities April 2014, Willy Baltussen and Robert Hoste.
Organic Products. Sponsored by: Definition USDA provides this national definition for Certified Organic Products and use of its Label: Organic products.
Food and Fiber System. Roles and Meanings of Food  Food holds many meanings and serves many roles  Why is food important to you?  What role does.
By Payton Fehringer. Why Red Angus Genetics?  Superior maternal traits  Crossbreeding advantages  Promotional tools  Red Angus Association.
Certification & Labeling Considerations for Agricultural Producers.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOOD SCIENCE INDUSTRY Agriscience 102 Applied Agricultural Science and Technology #8408 TEKS: (c)(5)(A)
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Genetically Modified Foods Food Safety
Chris Zemlak Heather Sherstobitoff Heather Sherstobitoff Jason Kuchinka Jason Kuchinka Kimberly Russell Kimberly Russell Jennalee Ecklund.
1 Animal ID: Costs and Benefits. Gary Brester and Vince Smith MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics FPCC May 21, 2009 Poplar, MT.
Consumer Demand and Marketing. NEW ZEALAND 85% of our agricultural output is exported About 63% of our revenue comes from agriculture Effective marketing.
Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers New England Extension Food Safety Partnership Project funded by USDA CSREES – Project.
Possible Producer Benefits from a National Animal Identification System (NAIS) Prepared by: Dr. Ruby Ward Assistant Professor Extension Economist Economics.
2010 K State Beef Conference Value Optimization Mark Harmon Joplin Regional Stockyards, Inc.
© Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Farm Management Chapter 1 Farm Management in the Twenty-First Century.
Farm Foundation Traceability and Quality Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003 Kansas City, MO National Animal ID: Value Traceability Opportunities Glenn.
RED TRACTOR SCHEME MANAGING & PROMOTING ASSURANCE FOR THE FOOD CHAIN.
Duane Horvey Curtis Ridgway Eldon Forrest Karrie Buxton.
The Future of Antibiotics in Pork Production NPB – Swine Education In-Service Terry Fleck
To Fight EID, Think Global, Act Local Our response to Emerging Diseases is considered on a global basis, but implementation is regional – The risk and.
SAFEGUARDING THE FOOD SUPPLY HOW DO WE PROTECT THE FOOD SUPPLY FOR AN ENTIRE NATION?
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
Ag Policy, Lecture 18 Environmental Policy (Knutson Chapter 9) Food Safety & Security (Knutson Chapter 10) Food Assistance & Nutrition (Knutson Chapter.
Animal ID Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas Cooperative Extension
Mark Harmon. Joplin Regional Stockyards Located in Southwest Missouri Located in Southwest Missouri 23,000 Customer Base / serving 3.0 million cattle.
Market Vertical Coordination  Communication and distribution  Historically relied upon price signals »Markets and spot negotiation  Moving toward non-market.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Beef Industry March 13, 2003.
NAIS in the Southeast Southeastern Livestock Network By Jim Akers.
NAFTA Trade Flows General Agriculture and the Food Industry.
Farm Foundation Traceability and Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003.
Economic and regulatory aspects of mandatory GMO labeling Sean B. Cash, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts.
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION go.osu.edu/AQCA Youth Food Animal Quality Assurance Curriculum Guide Food Safety and Government Relations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03J Slaughter Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
SH, Feb Emerging Roles for Food Labels Dr. Shida Henneberry Professor of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University Nanjing.
Challenges of Animal Identification in the West Prepared by: Russell Tronstad, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Specialist Department of Agricultural and.
Organic and Conventional Beef in the United States Dustie Tibboel.
Organic Certification Requirements and Choices. What Organic Certification Means Agricultural crops were grown without the use of synthetic pesticides,
Animal Raising Claims in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products October 14, 2008 United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection.
2 Objectives 1.To identify and distinguish among government agencies and their role in food safety 2.To analyze and apply the laws set by government agencies.
Organic Foods Kevin Thomas, RD POMH Food and Nutrition Services.
WI MAQA - January Care And Management MAQA (Meat Animal Quality Assurance)
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Billy Moss Area Livestock Teacher North Region Agricultural Education February 2004.
NEED FOR ACTION Large sections of the populations in many developing countries still suffer from the ravages of unsafe, unhygienic or adulterated food,
Food Safety and Government Relations
Assured Food Standards
Agricultural Marketing
Production and Marketing Contracts in Agriculture
Agricultural Marketing
Presentation transcript:

Animal ID: Opportunities for Value-Added Marketing and Production Efficiencies Prepared by: Kynda R. Curtis Assistant Professor and State Specialist Department of Resource Economics University of Nevada Reno Western Center for Risk Management Education Western Extension Marketing Committee

Presentation Outline Overview Why might a national animal ID system be important? How might an animal ID system impact my bottom line? Case examples Summary Web resources

Overview Animal traceability system motivation –Minimize liability and bad publicity of food borne illness –Traceability systems isolate source and scope of food safety Reduce recall costs Additional benefits to all members of food distribution system –Access to new markets –Price premiums –Production efficiencies

Why Might a National Animal ID System be Important? Traceability systems such as animal ID –Facilitate trace back during food-borne disease outbreaks –Minimize liability and potential bad publicity Governmental food safety standards in the U.S. reduce food safety hazards Increased food safety risks –Food imports (foods produced overseas) –New food production technology Biotechnology

Case Examples StarLink –Genetically modified corn product not approved for commercialization in U.S. Possible human allergen –Environmental activist group proved StarLink introduced into human food supply –Resulted in costly recall program Mad Cow Disease (BSE): December 2003 –Holstein cow in south-central Washington State –Resulted in two month investigation, 28 of 80 cohort cows traced back –Many overseas markets now closed to U.S. beef e.g. Japan and Korea

The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) Track animals from slaughter to herd or premise of origin Identification numbers for animal, herd of origin, and premise (ranch) of origin Record system of animal movement Assure consumers of U.S. beef safety levels

How Might an Animal ID System Impact My Bottom Line? Provide access to new markets –Overseas markets –Product quality attributes Provide access to price premiums –Value-added markets Aid in production efficiencies –Herd management –Improved profits

Consumers and the NAIS Food quality characteristics are important to consumers –Rising consumer incomes in developed countries –Studies show as income and education rises diet quality improves –Consume more fruits, vegetables, chicken, etc. Consumers now spend more money on quality foods and food away from home Seek assurances from food industry regarding food safety and other quality attributes

Value-Added Markets Consumers willing to pay more for high-value products –Contain requested quality attributes Quality attributes/characteristics –Process oriented Growth enhancers, pesticides, feed, animal treatment…. –Content oriented Fat content (lean), marbling, bacteria and/or disease free

Credence Characteristics Many quality attributes are credence in nature Credence characteristics can NOT be discerned by physical inspection Consumer uncertainty regarding the existence of the attribute Seek quality assurances from industry and government agencies

Price Premiums Studies show consumers willing to pay premiums for: –Food safety –Specific nations/areas of origin –Natural/organic production –Humane animal treatment Traceability systems allow for process and content attribute verification

Case Examples of Companies Requiring Traceability McDonald’s, Jack in the Box, & Red Lobster –Purchase meat from processors which ensure high food safety standards –Rewards include guaranteed sales contracts and premium pricing Seek evidence of safety procedures through record-keeping –McDonald’s plan to have 10% of beef purchases source traceable by end of 2004

Case Examples of Companies Using Traceability Maverick Ranch –Natural and organic products –3rd party testing for antibiotics, growth hormones, and pesticide residue –USDA certified “organic” label Coleman Natural Meets –Free range grazing, natural grass feed –No hormones or antibiotics –Humane animal treatment –USDA approved “natural beef” label

Case Examples of Companies Using Traceability Farmland Industries –Farmer-owned cooperative –USDA “processed verified” logo –Process verification system Genetics Animal nutrition Animal health and welfare Safety measures Environmental protection –100% traceability of all products in program

Production Efficiencies Traceability systems enhance producer ability to: –Track animal performance from weaning to slaughter –Identify most profitable genetics Herd management –Sell low performing cattle –Reproduce identified high performance genetics

Example Case of Production Related Efficiencies Ranchers Renaissance –Cooperative of ranchers, stockers, feeders, processors, and retailers –Market Cattleman’s Collection, Harris Rancher, and Rancher’s Reserve brands –Use electronic ID system since 1997 Efficient and economic way to collect data on each animal and share with all partners Data includes animal source, process, and genetic verification –Increased revenues by $2-$3 per hundred-weight on each calf

Summary Consumers seek high-quality foods Uncertainty surrounding quality and safety levels due to credence nature Traceability systems may reduce consumer uncertainty –Consumers willing to pay for greater traceability Access to new markets Increased pricing (premiums) Production efficiencies gained through increased information

Web Resources for Relevant Information Maverick Ranch – Coleman Natural Meats – High Plains Journal – U.S. Animal Identification Plan – Choices Magazine –