US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS Ron Conner Corps of Engineers.
Department of Military Affairs & Public Safety WV Office of Emergency Services Primary GIS Missions: Support Emergency Operations Partner with GIS Data.
Jon Keeling, PE, CFM Carey Johnson, CFM ASFPM 2012 Conference May 22, 2012 The Mission of Dam Safety Hazard Mitigation – Kentucky’s Experience.
May 22, 2012 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Flood Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Plan ASFPM 2012 Annual Conference Timothy J. Trautman, P.E., CFM Flood Mitigation.
Collaboration & Data Sharing for Homeland Security Wilson Fire/Rescue Services North Carolina Wilson Fire/Rescue Services North Carolina Presented by Don.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Background on Engineering Risk Assessments (ERA) for USACE Civil Works.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
International Workshop to Discuss the Science of Asset Management
Integrating Community Planning and Hazard Mitigation Planning Amanda Engstfeld FEMA Region X
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
What is HAZUS-MH? HAZUS-MH is a planning tool that estimates
1 Florida Division of Emergency Management GIS Data Discovery Richard Butgereit GIS Administrator floridadisaster.org/gis.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Business Services Emergency Preparedness. Agenda Emergencies Emergencies Business Continuation Business Continuation University Plan University Plan Building.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
1 A GIS-Based Flood Inundation Mapping and Analysis Pilot Project Indiana GIS Conference February 19-20, 2008 John Buechler, The Polis Center Moon Kim,
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Rapid Assessment A quick evaluation of a disaster/emergency impacted area.
Spring Directors’ Conference Presented By: Andrew Velasquez III
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Community As A Whole: Prepare, Respond & Recover My Favorite Flood – Starring My Community 6 Steps To Success.
The Diversity of Hazus Uses for Hazus Beyond Planning ASFPM 2011 National Conference Louisville, KY Tuesday, May 17, 2011 ASFPM 2011 National Conference.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Prioritizing Investments within the USACE Levee Safety Program Process and Methodology Overview Jason Needham,
National Hurricane Conference Training Session Panel: Decision-Making Tools for Risk Management & Assessment Claire Drury, HAZUS Program Manager.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM, URS (RAMPP Team)
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment ASFPM May 2011 James Demby – FEMA Sam Crampton - RAMPP Mary Shaw - RAMPP.
Strategies and Implications for Integrating GeoSpatial Technologies in Emergency Management Education Programs National Emergency Management Institute.
Catastrophe Readiness and Response Session 7b 1 Session 7b Critical Infrastructure Drew Bumbak.
Impact of Low Volume Roads Downstream of Dams on Hazard Classification By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive,
Richard Butgereit GIS Administrator
2013 NWHA CONFERENCE FERC’S RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING Doug Johnson – Regional Engineer - Portland From PFMA to Risk Assessment.
Michael S. Scott, PhD, GISP 1, Arthur J. Lembo, PhD 1, Brett Dobelstein 2, & Michel Sheffer, GISP, CFM 3 1 Salisbury Univ, 2 ESRGC, 3 MDSHA.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Texoma and Missouri Region JETS Training Symposium Resiliency Planning Through Hazard Vulnerability Analysis.
1 Session 7, Section 2 Critical Infrastructure Drew Bumbak.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
1 Welcome North Dakota State University Emergency Management & Planning Donald Borgen ND Division of Emergency Services ND GIS Users Conference.
FLHUG Meeting at CFGIS -- 09/21/09
Risk management and disaster preparedness
Sandia National Laboratories
Planning for Non-Routine Activities
Evacuation Safety Planners * Progress Report. Introduction: Objectives for this project were arrived upon through correspondence with the City of San.
Page 1 Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services NWS Inundation Mapping Eastern Region Flash Flood Workshop June 4, 2010 Presentation by Laurie Hogan NOAA/NWS.
Mitigation Directorate FEMA’s Mitigation Directorate and Hurricane Emergency Management The Mitigation Directorate supports Hurricane risk assessment and.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1 Adaptation to Global Climate Change Effects: FHWA Activities AASHTO Subcommittee on.
Floodplain Management D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L5 Water Resources Systems Modeling.
Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management
Sally McConkey, P.E., D.WRE., CFM Illinois State Water Survey ASFPM Chair USACE Silver Jackets Workshop – August 2012.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® December 2013 Update for the NAFSMA Annual Meeting.
MS Dam Safety Program Dusty Myers, P.E. Chief, Dam Safety Division.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 6 – Emergency Management and Operations.
Risk MAP Discovery Meeting Coos County, Oregon May 12, 2016.
1 Iowa Emergency Management Association Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department Emergency Management Program Development Course EMERGENCY.
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
THINK DIFFERENT. THINK SUCCESS.
Overview of HAZUS for Flood Loss Estimations
Paul Samuels Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences Center US Army Corps of Engineers Huntington, WV

BUILDING STRONG ® Overview  Corps Dam Safety Program overview  Consequence Estimation Using HEC-FIA (Flood Impact Analysis) ► Data inputs required ► Methodology used by the software ► Results  Indentifying Critical Infrastructure within dam failure inundation areas

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Dam Safety Risk Assessment Activities  Screening ► Minimal effort, classify portfolio  Periodic Assessments and Issue Evaluation Studies ► Validate screening, identify path forward  Dam Safety Modification Studies (DSMS) ► Risk reduction alternative analysis  Critical Infrastructure Protection and Resiliency (CIPR) ► Aligned with DHS homeland security High Probability High Consequence Low Probability Low Consequence High Probability Low Consequence Low Probability High Consequence Increasing Risk Consequence Probability RISK = (Probability, Consequence)

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Dam Safety Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences Team  Virtual team of technical experts from across the Corps  GIS specialists, hydraulic engineers, and economists  Provides a standard operating procedure, technical training, and quality reviews  Produces a dam break hydraulic model, consequence estimate, and inundation map for each project  Results in a quality standardized product to support the risk assessment process

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Dam Safety Consequence Assessment Workflow New Risk Assessment 3 new “teams” MMC (H&H/Econ) 1.Generic dam break modeling 2.Consequence modeling (HEC-FIA) Risk Team (H&H/Econ) 1.PFMA specific dam break modeling 2.Consequence model refinement (HEC-FIA) Dam Break & HEC-FIA models District Team 1.Dam break modeling input and “QC” 2.Consequence modeling input and “QC”

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Corps HEC-FIA Software  GIS-based software program, currently beta version  Uses data from a HEC-RAS dam failure model (depth grids, hydrograph, cross sections, etc.)  Structure inventory can be developed using data from FEMA’s HAZUS program ► Tax parcel data or point shapefiles can also be used  Program gives a statistical estimate of direct damages and loss of life to individual structures

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation HEC-FIA Variables  Warning System Curves ► Default lowest curve is the emergency broadcast system  Mobilization curves ► Default is a maximum of 98% of population mobilized ► Can be changed depending on expected evacuation capability  Evacuation velocity ► Modeled as a straight line from the structure to the nearest safe zone, average evacuation speed is set at an average of 10 mph  Warning time relative to the breach initiation

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Mobilization Curve Example

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Example of a HEC-FIA Model

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation How HEC-FIA Works  For physical damages: ► Determine the inundation depth at the structure from the depth grid ► Apply the appropriate depth-damage curves based on structure type  For life loss estimate: ► Determine if population was warned and had time to mobilize from arrival time data ► Assign a fatality rate for remaining population based on inundation depth and structure type

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Fatality Rate Zones (1-story) Fatality rates are based on historical averages Chance Zone – 91% >FH + 15' Compromized Zone - 12% FH + 13' to 15' Safe Zone – 0.02% <FH + 13'

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Double Warnings  Downstream inundation is split into two warning zones ► No Fail Zone – Area flooded prior to or regardless of the dam failure (i.e. spillway flow) Population gets warned when flooding is predicted from heavy rainfall and will have more time to evacuate ► Fail Zone – Not flooded until after the dam fails Population is not at risk from normal flooding and will not have any reason to evacuate until a dam failure occurs or is predicted to occur

BUILDING STRONG ® Double-Warning Procedure  Must be implemented any time there is significant non-fail Population at Risk 13 TIME Overtopping Failure Expected Failure FLOW Failure Evac. Warning Major Flooding Forecast Major Flood Evac. Warning Damaging Release HEC-FIA WARNING ISSUANCE TIMES

BUILDING STRONG ®

Consequence Estimation Example HEC-FIA Model

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Results  Direct damage estimates to structures, contents, and vehicles  Population at risk during the day and at night  Loss of life during the day and at night  Agricultural damages  Results can be identified by locations/areas

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Estimation Results

BUILDING STRONG ® Critical Infrastructure Why it matters  Important to identify Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR) that could be at risk from a dam failure  Impacts caused by damage to CIKR are not included in the direct damage estimate  Impacts can be cascading  Potential damage to CIKR can be included in planning and mitigated for if identified

BUILDING STRONG ® Critical Infrastructure Examples of CIKR  Chemical manufacturing facilities, power generation plants, medical facilities  Water, sewer, and power infrastructure  Police stations, fire stations, prisons, schools  Transportation and communication networks  Many, many others…

BUILDING STRONG ® Critical Infrastructure Corps Path Forward  Currently developing a GIS-based method to identify and prioritize CIKR assets in inundation areas using DHS datasets  Priority will be given to CIKR that could impact human life safety  Integrate CIKR information into the overall risk estimate of each dam  Communicate risk levels to CIKR owners and operators

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary  Corps Dam Safety Program overview  Consequence Estimation Using HEC-FIA (Flood Impact Analysis) ► Data inputs required ► Methodology used by the software ► Results  Indentifying Critical Infrastructure within dam failure inundation areas

BUILDING STRONG ® Questions?  My Contact Info: ► Kurt Buchanan ► ► (304)  Hydraulic Engineering Center Website: ►