» “Structure of Observed Learning Outcome” (SOLO) » It is a ‘taxonomy’: It classifies, categorises learning. » It describes increasingly complex stages.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU:DELTA.
Advertisements

Teaching for Higher Order Outcomes Peter Ling June 2012.
BC Core Competencies BCSSA November 21, CurriculumAssessment Graduation Requirements Communicating Student Learning Trades/SkillsReadingStudent.
‘What is it and how could it help me and my pupils?’
Deeper Questioning: How do we use questioning effectively so that it deepens our students learning and the quality of our teaching?
Building Knowledge for Themselves Engaging Students in Building Knowledge for Themselves.
Well written objectives will… Provide clear direction for instruction Convey what is to be learned to students Provide a clear guide for assessment.
ORIC – Open Educational Resources for the Inclusive Curriculum 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Outcomes-based Teaching and Learning Pre-workshop 1 Designing Intended Learning Outcomes Designing Intended Learning Outcomes.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
1 Angela Ho, EDC Chan Chi Hung, Learning to Learn Project.
OBTL for SCM Linda Lai November Shifts Teacher-centred Education to Student-Centred Education Constructive Alignment attributes of an ideal graduate.
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
Continuous Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities for In-service Training Nizar Ibrahim 27/3/2011.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
PA SAS Training Series Han Liu Department of Teacher Education Shippensburg University Adapted from SAS
Module design Setting aims and learning outcomes Dr. John Milliken School of Education Queens University Belfast.
 PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B.
Quality Questioning Using the SOLO Taxonomy An online workshop
© Curriculum Foundation1 Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations.
The Year of the Curriculum : Life Without Levels The programme consists of a Bridging Unit and five further units: (Have you completed the Bridging Unit.
Robert Kaplinsky Melissa Canham
The Areas of Interaction are…
Deep Learning What is Deep Learning? Blank answers next to the Single ideas next to the Multiple ideas next to the.
Sample Questions Task-Based Activities Define each level shallow processing, simply recalling Demonstrate understanding Knowing when and why to apply.
What has this got to do with NCEA?
Assessment Life after Levels Autumn First response:
1 Setting Appropriate Assessment and Grading Criteria.
 Look at Egypt at night from space  How can you tell the Nile River is important in Egypt?
Solo vs Bloom.
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim.  Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956) provides 6 levels of thinking and questioning. A close.
ZU students as critical thinkers Preferred learning styles –Surface learning –Structured learning –Rote learning –Memorizing.
Alexandra Hugman, Teaching Science for Deeper Meaning, The University of Sydney, 2008 Assessment Internal- Working with Teams - Working with Peers External.
TLC Sixth Form Teaching The issues: Students disliked independent learning as it allowed room for mistakes to creep through unchecked. This led to a lack.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING. -actively involved in their own learning; -able to judge the success of their work and set and understand targets for improvement;
Going SOLO Using SOLO Taxonomy to raise the quality of learning to “out of this world.”
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.2 Explain strengths and limitations of a qualitative approach to research?
ORGANIZING LEARNING LEARNING TAXONOMIES. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ORIGINAL FORMAT Uses six levels in a hierarchy Each level depends on those preceding in the.
Structuring Learning. Agenda Structuring learning. Structuring lab sessions. Engagement. Critical Thinking. Ideas for structuring learning. Activity.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
My level of thinking and learning is… TASK: Prestructural I’m not sure about … Unistructural I have one relevant idea about … Multistructural I have several.
SOLO Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy. What level is your understanding of SOLO taxonomy.
What is the connection between outstanding learning and ‘The Wizard of Oz’? Write your ideas on a post - it.
The Middle Years Programme (MYP) is a great way to grow and learn in middle school. Students: Study a range of different subjects in interesting ways Are.
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
SOLO Pam Hook and Julie Mills. Pre-structural Uni-structural Multi-structural Relational Extended Abstract.
Dr. Carol Rubel. Agenda  Class Share  Discussion Questions  Questions and Answers 2.
Quality Assessment Design in HASS Using SOLO Framework.
Development of 4Cs among students in the framework of Content and Language Integrated Learning through debates CLIL demands a reconceptualisation of the.
Inspiring today’s children for tomorrow’s world Early Years Foundation Stage Assessment Procedure 2016.
BELLWORK: September 22nd
Do Now- Earth at night – write three observations about the map
SOLO TAXONONY Click on these symbols to reveal an item of information.
The rise of rome.
The LEQ APWH: Beemon.
Understanding Levels of Thinking using:
To introduce the ‘SOLO Taxonomy’ framework
Introduction to the Global Learning Programme for England
8/22-8/23 Study for Quiz.
The Romans: From Republic to Empire
How to make the Kessel Run in less than 12 par secs
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim
Task: Place the symbols into categories
Norman L Webb.
This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series
Presentation transcript:

» “Structure of Observed Learning Outcome” (SOLO) » It is a ‘taxonomy’: It classifies, categorises learning. » It describes increasingly complex stages of learning. » SOLO can be taught to students to identify where they are in their understanding and where they should aim to be.

» We are bombarded with different learning theories, frameworks and assessment strategies: » MYP » National Curriculum » IB DP » Concept- Based Learning » Inquiry-Based Learning » Bloom’s taxonomy » Ron Ritchart’s Visible Thinking » John Hattie’s Effect sizes » Critical thinking What do they have in common?

» We are bombarded with different learning theories, frameworks and assessment strategies: » MYP » National Curriculum » IB DP » Concept- Based Learning » Inquiry-Based Learning » Bloom’s taxonomy » Ron Ritchart’s Visible Thinking » John Hattie’s Effect sizes » Critical thinking What do they have in common?

» We are bombarded with different learning theories, frameworks and assessment strategies: » MYP » National Curriculum » IB DP » Concept- Based Learning » Inquiry-Based Learning » Bloom’s taxonomy » Ron Ritchart’s Visible Thinking » John Hattie’s Effect sizes » Critical thinking Deep Thinking

» Students need to think about, through and beyond the facts in our subjects in order to reach a deep and sophisticated understanding. » We need to make our expectations clear. How can a student demonstrate their sophisticated understanding and how can we ‘rate’ understanding? » SOLO Taxonomy is like an umbrella for thinking about understanding; for students and teachers.

Pre-structural Uni-structural Multi-structural Relational Extended Abstract

» The learning outcomes show unconnected information with no organisation. The student may complete the task with no real connection or understanding, they may have missed the point or need support to make a start. This is the ‘I have no idea!’ stage – This an important pre-learning stage that is often overlooked. It is essential that students feel comfortable in placing themselves on this stage. The prestructural stage could be at the start of a new topic or possibly at the start of a learning journey. (Quantitative stage)

» This stage is associated with the students understanding a single fact or a single piece of information. The learning is often disconnected and limited. This stage is an example of shallow learning. This is the ‘I know one thing about what we’re learning!’ stage. (Quantitative stage)

» This stage is an example of quantitative learning, where the students can simply recall a series of separate pieces of information and facts. The multistructural stage differs from the unistructural stage simply by the number of facts. The student knows several aspects of the task but fails to recognise the relationships between them. This is the ‘I know loads of things about what we’re learning about!’ stage.

» This stage exemplifies deep learning. The learning now becomes qualitative. Here the student links and relates the pieces of information, allowing them to have a deeper understanding of the task or subject. This is the ‘All the things I know I can link together and connect my learning!’ stage.

» This stage is the epitome of deep and profound thinking. Students will rethink their ideas from the relational level and look at their learning in a new way. They will then be able to use this as a basis for a prediction, generalisation, summary, reflection or creation of new understanding or learning. This stage could be christened the ‘Expert Area’, as this seems easier to explain to students.

» Pre-structural: ˃Is soccer the same as football? » Uni-structural: ˃Soccer is a ball sport. There are 11 players on the field. » Multi-structural: ˃Barcelona FC and Manchester United are famous soccer clubs ˃Only goal keeper can touch the ball ˃There is an off-side rule ˃Countries play in the world cup » Relational: ˃Players of South American teams will probably be drafted by rich European soccer clubs. » Extended Abstract ˃It is likely that a European team will win the World Cup because of their sophisticated training methods and professional structure. Although the South American teams have some highly skilled players, they do not have the financial backing needed for success in the World Cup.

» Pre-structural: ˃There was a Roman Empire » Uni-structural: ˃Romans lived a long time ago ˃They spoke Latin » Multi-structural: ˃Rome is in Italy’ ˃The Roman empire collapsed in 476 ˃Julius Caesar was an emperor » Relational: ˃It was getting difficult to manage the empire effectively. Rome seemed very far away to the people in the provinces. The provinces were putting a great financial strain on Rome. Rome needed more growth because they needed new regions to tax, to refill Rome's treasury. The Roman Army had trouble managing and guarding such a large empire, religion changed the culture of the empire; people no longer believed that the emperor was divine. The economy grew weaker because not enough taxes were brought in. Goths and Huns started attacking the Empire from all sides. All these factors contributed to the weakening of the empire until it broke in two in 476. » Extended Abstract ˃Student organises their understanding in overarching concepts like social factors (slavery, religion, conquered tribes assimilating), economic factors (taxes, size of the empire, infrastructure) and political factors (emperors relocate, powerful provinces, reasons for tribes attacking) and weighs up + justifies which concept played the most important role in the breakup of the empire.

» Now look at the handouts: ˃MYP criteria for Rome Project, ˃IB DP History Paper 3 ˃IB DP Geography Paper 1 and 2 ˃Ron Ritchhart’s thinking continua ˃Difference /similarities between Blooms and Solo. » Can you transfer the SOLO taxonomy stages to these criteria?

» We are learning how to Identify the role of the Roman Army in the Fall of the Roman Empire [Unistructural] » We are learning how to Describe the role of the Roman Army in the Fall of the Roman Empire [Multistructural] » We are learning how to Explain causes and effects of the role of the Roman Army in the Fall of the Roman Empire [Relational] » We are learning how to Justify the role of the Roman Army in the Fall of the Roman Empire [Extended Abstract] » We are learning how to Argue the role of the Roman Army in the Fall of the Roman Empire [Extended Abstract]

Two four minute videos that explain it very well: /learner_evolution_chris_h/20 12/09/solo-taxonomy.html watch?v=uDXXV-mCLPg