WEEK SYNTHESIS Where have we been this week?. Week Synthesis: A Summary We said we would learn new language and structures in order to… 1. Work with colleagues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Advertisements

Bringing it all together!
Summative Assessment: Performance Assessments Book pgs Classroom Curriculum Assessment.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
MYP Training Session 3 Design: Planning & Preparation
UNIT CONCEPTS Enduring Understandings (McTighe & Wiggins)
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
“Developing Quality Maps: Nuts, Bolts, and Staff Development” Dr. Ann Johnson
COURSE OUTCOMES Benchmarking Curriculum for Teachers.
Understanding by Design
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Understanding by Design in action Joanne Stewart Hope College How to develop student learning goals and assessments of student learning June 2009.
UNIT STRUCTURE Meeting the needs of struggling and succeeding students Book pgs
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
From Concept Components to Lesson Objectives A Differentiated Unit Structure for all Students Book pgs Classroom Curriculum Instruction Unit Cover.
Student Growth through Long-term Transfer Boone County Schools May 2014.
Summative Assessment: Traditional Test Book pgs Classroom Curriculum Assessment.
ACE COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE An Overview.
Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
UNIT CONCEPTS Enduring Understandings (McTighe & Wiggins) Book pgs
CIA TEAM C urriculum, I nstruction, and A ssessment Presented by Gayla Arrington, Lynn Brown, Mary Beth Mitchell, Kristin Turner, Ethel Tuttle, Carrie.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Fall Visit: Year 2 Please sit by Grade Levels within Team/Departments.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Presented by the SRHS Literacy Team.  Recap Last Meeting  Focus For Today - Steps 1 And 2  Activity  Homework.
Reporting student achievement Human Society and Its Environment © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
UNIT GOALS Choosing the level of Critical Thinking Book pgs
Year 1: Fall Workshop REVIEW OF PROGRESS.  Teams of teachers formed by grade level and subject  K-2, 3-5, 6-8, Math, Science, Social Studies,
Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum Directors Conference September 20, 2006.
Integrator Session 1 Summer 2009 Unit Design. Integrator Enduring Understandings Integrating technology into higher order curriculum improves student.
The game is changing. It isn't just about math and science anymore. It's about creativity, imagination, and, above all, innovation.” –Business Week Magazine.
ACE Collaborative – Year 2 Good Morning and Welcome Please sit by GRADE levels within TEAMS Wireless Network: Aquinas Guest Password: Aquinas1957.
ACE Collaborative – Year 2 Good Morning and Welcome Please sit by GRADE levels within TEAMS.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Prepared by Joseph D. Cantara- Counsultant 1 Curriculum Mapping: A Road Map for The Common Core Standards: Session #2 The work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs: Presented.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
STEM Infusing Math and Science Across the Curriculum.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
CCRS Implementation Team SCIENCE Quarterly Meeting #
Professional Learning and Collaboration Burlington Edison School District April 7 th, 2014.
Agenda What is “learner-centered”? ~Think of Time Activity ~ Learner-Centered: In Our Own Words Effective Instructional Strategies for the Learner- Centered.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
Incorporating Strategies into Lesson Plans How to build a Burke Question Driven Unit.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Designing a Culminating Task Presented by Anne Maben UCLA Science & Literacy Coach Based on the model by Jay McTighe, Maryland Assessment Consortium.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
The Year of Core Instruction
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Understanding by Design
The Unit Structure: A Crash Course
An Overview of the ACE Collaborative for Curriculum & Instruction
From Concept Components to Lesson Objectives
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Lesson Study Facilitated by Leyton Schnellert and Cheryl Ewald
Facilitated by Leyton Schnellert NDSS April 7, 2011
Presentation transcript:

WEEK SYNTHESIS Where have we been this week?

Week Synthesis: A Summary We said we would learn new language and structures in order to… 1. Work with colleagues to articulate a K-12 diocesan curriculum (curriculum development process) 2. Generate holistic Performance Assessments and Rubrics 3. Design units that support struggling students while challenging succeeding students

The Curriculum Development Process: Prioritizing Standards Catherine Storms—Diocese of Memphis Team/Department Outcomes -Course Outcomes -Unit Goals - Lesson Plan Objectives Curriculum Standards Prioritized Standards

The Big Picture Standards that can be accomplished in a lesson plan Standards that take 2-4 weeks to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 unit to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 year to accomplish Team/Dep t. Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Goal LP

Teams of teachers formed by grade level and subject K-2, 3-5, 6-8, Science, Social Studies, Math etc. Example: 3-5 Social Studies Each team collaborates on curriculum, instruction & assessment Team/Department Outcomes articulate what students will be able to do at the broadest level—at the end of a sequence of courses or grades These Outcomes: Incorporate standards that require more than one year to accomplish Focus primarily on skills Are the responsibility of the entire team

5-9 Outcomes for the team or department Based on standards that Take more than a year to accomplish and require team coordination Are critical for student success in subsequent grades or courses The stem “SWBAT” (students will be able to) For each Outcome, one verb from Bloom’s Taxonomy Verb must be: Active Observable Constitute a “floor” not a “ceiling” of student achievement

The Big Picture Standards that can be accomplished in a lesson plan Standards that take 2-4 weeks to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 unit to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 year to accomplish Team/Dept. Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Goal LP

Course Outcomes articulate what students will know and be able to do by the end of one specific subject or course These Outcomes: Incorporate standards that require more than one unit to accomplish Focus on content knowledge and skills Span one subject and one year Build on and do not repeat Team/Dept. & Course Outcomes from previous grades May contribute directly to relevant Team/Dept. Outcomes

5-9 Outcomes for each course/subject Based on standards that Take more than 4-weeks to accomplish Are critical for student success in subsequent grades or courses The stem “SWBAT” (students will be able to) For each Outcome, one verb from Bloom’s Taxonomy Verb must be: Active Observable Constitute a “floor” not a “ceiling” of student achievement

The Big Picture Standards that can be accomplished in a lesson plan Standards that take 2-4 weeks to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 unit to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 year to accomplish Team/Dept. Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Goal LP

Based on standards that typically require 2-4 weeks to accomplish Each is the basis for a Unit Goal that articulates the level of critical thinking students will engage with the Unit Concept “Chunk” information in useful ways Identify the core concepts for a subject/course that will lead to “enduring understandings” Sequenced in order to form a “story” or course narrative Opening Unit ought to be engaging

8-10 Unit Concepts for each course/subject Elementary subjects with less academic time (e.g., science, social studies) or electives may only have 4-6 for the year Not in SWBAT form Our Basic Needs (1 st Grade Science) Systems of Linear Equations (HS Algebra) May be phrased in terms of an essential question The American Revolution: What were the reasons for and against the colonists revolt from England? (7 th Grade Soc. Stud.) Sequenced in order to form a course narrative

The Big Picture Standards that can be accomplished in a lesson plan Standards that take 2-4 weeks to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 unit to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 year to accomplish Team/Dept. Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Goal LP

Unit Goals articulate what all students will know and be able to do at the end of a 2-4 week unit They do so by stating the level of critical thinking, or the level at which students will engage with the Unit Concept Unit Goals: Incorporate standards that require 2-4 weeks to accomplish Focus on content and skills Will be assessed independently and individually on new material

8-10 (or 4-6) Unit Goals—one for each Unit Concept The stem “SWBAT” (students will be able to) Each uses one verb from Bloom’s Taxonomy Verb must be: Active Observable Challenging & Developmentally Appropriate Constitute a “floor” not a “ceiling” of student achievement

Performance Assessments: A Summary Provide a culminating Unit assessment in which students demonstrate Unit Goal critical-thinking and Unit Concept attainment through performance of a task Projects and presentations are performance assessments only if: They allow students to demonstrate achievement of the Unit Goal The performance at the level of the Unit Goal is attempted independently and individually (I&I) and on previously unseen material (students in 3 rd grade and beyond) Younger students and ELLs may benefit from scaffolds and graphic organizers Good performance assessments often allow students to make decisions about the content.

A logical progression of lesson plan objectives facilitates organized, meaningful learning 2-4 day lesson plans “chunk” concepts together, which helps students remember new knowledge and connect it to prior knowledge Multiple, diverse and uniquely placed assessments support struggling students while challenging succeeding students Based on the ideas of Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins (Understanding by Design) coupled with those of Robert J. Marzano (A Different Kind of Classroom).

The Big Picture Standards that can be accomplished in a lesson plan Standards that take 2-4 weeks to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 unit to accomplish Standards that take more than 1 year to accomplish Team/Dept. Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Goal LP

Unit Structure: 5 Phases 3-5 Acquiring & Integrating LPs that focus without distraction on building toward the Unit Goal. A Traditional Test that identifies at what level each student has engaged independently & individually (I&I) the Unit Goal. 1-3 Extending & Refining LPs that challenge students to integrate the Unit Concept into the Course Narrative in sophisticated ways, while providing struggling students more I&I opportunities to demonstrate unsophisticated achievement of the Unit Goal 1 Using Knowledge Meaningfully LP that uses the Unit Concept in an academic or real-world situation A Performance Assessment, which may or may not derive from the Using Knowledge Meaningfully LP, that assesses the Unit Goal achievement level by each student (I&I) in an academic or real-world situation.