Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition
Advertisements

Copyright © 2004 South-Western CHAPTER 16 OLIGOPOLY.
Part 8 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
1 Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly ©2002 South-Western College Publishing Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary Practice Quiz Internet Exercises.
Oligopoly.
Imperfect Competition
Unit 4: Imperfect Competition
Strategic Decisions Making in Oligopoly Markets
Oligopoly Few sellers each offering a similar or identical product to the others Some barriers to entry into the market Because of few sellers, oligopoly.
Principles of Microeconomics: Econ102. Monopolistic Competition: A market structure in which barriers to entry are low, and many firms compete by selling.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 16 Oligopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western BETWEEN MONOPOLY AND PERFECT COMPETITION Imperfect competition refers to those.
1 Monopolistic Competition Many firms with relative ease of entry producing differentiated products. Characteristics: 1. Large # of firms. 2. Each producer.
Chapter 12: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition.
Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Strategic Pricing Chapter 13.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra,
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain how price and quantity are determined.
OLIGOPOLY Chapter 16. The Spectrum of Market Structures.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Superior Cheese CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE.
1 Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly ©2005 South-Western College Publishing Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary.
SAYRE | MORRIS Seventh Edition Imperfect Competition CHAPTER © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Alanna Holowinsky, Red River College.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.1 Prepared by: Kevin Richter, Douglas College Charlene Richter, British Columbia Institute of Technology.
11 Between Competition and Monopoly... Neither fish nor fowl. JOHN HEYWOOD (CIRCA 1565) Between Competition and Monopoly... Neither fish nor fowl. JOHN.
# McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 9.
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain how price and quantity are determined.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 14 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Chapter 11.
CHAPTER 23 MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY.
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. The equilibrium in a monopolistically.
Monopolistic Competition Topic 7(a). Contents 1. Characteristics of MC 2. Short run profit maximisation 3. Long run equilibrium 4. Assessment of MC 5.
13-1 Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 8e, by Jackson & McIver By Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia.
By: Adrian Morales and Angelica Morgan. Characterized by (1) Relatively large number of sellers; competitive aspect (2) Differentiated products; monopolistic.
11-1 Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 8e, by Jackson & McIver By Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Chapter 11 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
PURE COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY, MONOPOLISTICS AND OLIGOPOLY Pertemuan 19 Matakuliah: J0114-Teori Ekonomi Tahun: 2009.
12-1 Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 8e, by Jackson & McIver By Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly. Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition A relatively large number of sellers (Small Market Share, No Collusion,
OLIGOPOLY 1 Copyright ACDC Leadership FOUR MARKET MODELS Characteristics of Oligopolies: A Few Large Producers (Less than 10) Homogeneous or Differentiated.
Copyright 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies 8-1 Monopolistic Competition Monopolistic Competition and Efficiency Oligopoly Game Theory Three Oligopoly Models.
Ch. 16 Oligopoly. Oligopoly Only a few sellers offer similar or identical products Actions of any seller can have large impact on profits of other sellers.
6-1 Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Economic Principles 2e, by Jackson, McIver & Bajada By Muni Perumal Chapter 6 Monopolistic.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Chapter 9 Market structure and imperfect competition David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics, 9th.
University of Papua New Guinea Principles of Microeconomics Lecture 13: Oligopoly.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 9: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Week 5 Market Structures. The four types of Markets Perfect Competition Monopoly Oligopoly Monopolistic Competition.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 17 Oligopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western BETWEEN MONOPOLY AND PERFECT COMPETITION Imperfect competition includes industries.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly. Unit Objectives Describe the characteristics of monopolistic competition and oligopoly Discover how monopolistic.
Firm Behavior Under Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Game Theory AP Econ – Micro II B Mr. Griffin MHS.
Chapter 13 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly
Microeconomics 1000 Lecture 13 Oligopoly.
Market Structures – Profit Maximization, Game Theory
Chapter 8 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
Oligopoly 1.
ARE BUSINESSES EFFICIENT? 11a – Oligopoly
Ch. 16 Oligopoly.
Economics September Lecture 16 Chapter 15 Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Chapter 12: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition
Unit 4: Imperfect Competition
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
ECONOMICS UNIT #2 MICROECONOMICS
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Presentation transcript:

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 1 Imperfect competition and strategic behaviour: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 2012

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 2 Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition A large number of firms: collusion not possible, independent firms (like PC). Differentiated products. Firms compete on product quality, price, marketing and branding. Firms are free to enter and exit: small economies of scale, low set up costs. Some market power

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 3 Short-Run Price and Output Determination How much to produce? – MR = MC – Demand curve sets price Profits or losses in the short run – Profits: When AC < AR (D )—entry of new firms – Losses: When AC > AR (D )—exit of existing firms

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 4 Economic Profits Short-Run Price and Output Determination: Short-Run Profits Q D P Price and Costs MR MC Q AC

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 5 Losses Q D P Price and Costs MR MC Q AC Short-Run Price and Output Determination: Short-Run Losses

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 6 Long Run How much to produce? – MR = MC Firms tend to break even, i.e. normal profit – Tangency solution: profit-maximising firm will produce an output when its demand curve is at a tangent to its AC curve – When AC = AR (D )

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 7 Long-Run Equilibrium Q D MR MC P Price and Costs Q AC

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 8 Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 8 D MR MC Monopolistic competition firm market diagram

Quantity (French Connection jackets per day) Price & cost (dollars per French Connection jacket) D MR Excess Capacity and Markup ATC MC PriceExcess capacity Efficient scale Markup Marginal cost 50

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 10 Monopolistic Competition & Economic Efficiency Productive inefficiency: – Minimum ATC is not necessarily chosen – excess capacity Allocative inefficiency: – price does not necessarily equal MC Dynamic inefficiency – product variety and innovation

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 11 Non-Price Competition Assists firms to improve their long-run equilibrium position Product differentiation and product development Marketing and adverting to increase demand Price competition is a crash or crash through strategy.

What is Oligopoly? Oligopoly is a market structure in which a small number of firms compete, from the Greek “oligos” meaning few. There are a number of different models of oligopoly and we will look at three today.

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 13 Characteristics of Oligopoly Product differentiation? – Homogeneous products e.g. commodities and simple transformed manufactures or – differentiated product e.g. elaborately transformed manufactures – Depends where in the production chain the firm operates. – Product differentiation may be real or actual or perceived, think about the Toyota Harrier and the Lexus lx350 Concentration ratios: The percentage of total industry sales accounted for by a given (small) number of the largest firms in each industry Mutual interdependence

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 14 Characteristics of Oligopoly Incentives to collude Incentive to cheat High Barriers to Entry (same as monopoly) – Economies of scale (and scope) – Ownership of patents, copyrights – Control of strategic raw materials – Technological progress – Super normal profits may exist, but these barriers prevent entry and hence the restoration of normal profits.

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 15 Toyota harrier vs Lexus LX350 Maybe the cost reflects different production costs, but do they explain the $60,000 difference in price Production differentiation; real/actual or perceived?

Toyota Soarer SC3000 vs Lexus Soarer SC300 Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 16

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia the First JVC VHS player 1975 the first Sony Betamax machine Product differentiation; Real or perceived

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 18 Commodities: Product differentiation?

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 19 One: The Kinked Demand: Non-Collusive Oligopoly Model Output occurs where MR = MC Price remains stable over a variety of cost scenarios – Avoiding price wars – Firms ignore price increases – Firms match price decreases Criticisms – How is the current price set? – Prices may not be as inflexible as the model suggests

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 20 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 The firm’s demand and marginal revenue curves

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 21 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 The rival’s demand and marginal revenue curves MR 2 D2D2

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 22 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 MR 2 D2D2 Rivals tend to follow a price cut

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 23 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 MR 2 D2D2 Rivals tend to follow a price cut or ignore a price increase

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 24 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 MR 2 D2D2 Effectively creating…

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 25 The Kinked Demand Curve P Q D1D1 MR 1 Effectively creating a kinked demand curve P X Q D2D2 MC 2 MC 1 MR 2

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 26 The original Sony walkman vs a cheap Sanyo clone, different production costs?

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 27 Collusion and Cartels Incentives and opportunities to collude Incentive to cheat, Visy and Amcor for example vs OPEC Are illegal in Australia and you will go to jail and may be pay ha huge fine. Enough said

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 28 Two: Oligopoly Behaviour: A Game Theory Approach Compare the behaviour of oligopolists to a simple duopoly game of strategy, actions and pay-offs as shown in the profit pay-off matrix Mutual interdependence – the fate of one firm lies partially or wholly with the performance or decisions of other firms in that same industry Incentives to collude, reduce Q and increase P Incentive to cheat, firms now have excess capacity and may be able to sell more than their quota and not get caught

Game theory and the economics of cooperation Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. Strategic decisions are those in which each person, in deciding what actions to take, must consider how others might respond to that action.

Game theory and the economics of cooperation Because the number of firms in an oligopolistic market is small, each firm must act strategically. Each firm knows that its profit depends not only on how much it produces, but also on how much the other firms produce.

The prisoners’ dilemma The prisoners’ dilemma provides insight into the difficulty in maintaining cooperation. Often people (of firms) fail to cooperate with one another even when cooperation would make them all better off.

The prisoners’ dilemma The prisoners’ dilemma is a particular 'game' between two captured prisoners that illustrates why cooperation is difficult to maintain even when it is mutually beneficial.

The prisoners’ dilemma Kelly’ s decision Confess Kelly gets 8 years Ned gets 8 years Kelly gets 20 years Ned goes free Kelly goes free Ned gets 20 years gets 1 yearKelly Ned gets 1 year Remain silent Remain Silent Ned’s decision

The prisoners’ dilemma The dominant strategy is the best strategy for a player to follow regardless of the strategies chosen by the other players. Cooperation is difficult to maintain, because cooperation is not in the best interest of the individual player.

An oligopoly game Number 1 High price High Price Toyota $100 billion Nissan $100 billion Toyota $150 billion Nissan $40 billion Toyota $40 billion Nissan $150 billion Toyota $50 billion Nissan $50 billion Low price Low price Toyota Nissan Where is the Nash Equilibrium?

An oligopoly game Number 2 High price High Price Toyota $100 billion Nissan $100 billion Toyota $150 billion Nissan $60 billion Toyota $60 billion Nissan $150 billion Toyota $50 billion Nissan $50 billion Low price Low price Toyota Nissan Where is the Nash Equilibrium?

An oligopoly game Number 3 High price High Price Toyota $100 billion Nissan $100 billion Toyota $ 90 billion Nissan $40 billion Toyota $40 billion Nissan $90 billion Toyota $50 billion Nissan $50 billion Low price Low price Toyota Nissan Where is the Nash Equilibrium?

Game theory and the economics of cooperation Because the number of firms in an oligopolistic market is small, each firm must act strategically. Each firm knows that its profit depends not only on how much it produces, but also on how much the other firms produce.

Game theory and the economics of cooperation Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. Strategic decisions are those in which each person, in deciding what actions to take, must consider how others might respond to that action.

The equilibrium for an oligopoly A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which economic actors interacting with one another each choose their best strategy given the strategies that all the others have chosen.

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 41 Oligopoly and Economic Efficiency Productive inefficiency – Minimum ATC is not necessarily chosen  under-allocation of resources Allocative inefficiency: – Price does not necessary equal MC  output is restricted

Three: Price leadership; tacit collusion This is when one firm has a dominant position in the market and the firms with lower market shares follow the pricing changes prompted by the dominant firm. We see examples of this with the major mortgage lenders and petrol retailers where most suppliers follow the pricing strategies of leading firms. Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 42

If most of the leading firms in a market are moving prices in the same direction, it can take some time for relative price differences to emerge which might cause consumers to switch their demand. Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 43 Price leadership

Firms who market to consumers that they are “never knowingly undersold” or who claim to be monitoring and matching the cheapest price in a given geographical area are essentially engaged in tacit collusion. Does the consumer really benefit from this? Probably not  Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 44

Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia. 45 Oligopoly and Economic Efficiency Dynamic efficiency: Long-term improvements in product quality and production methods may occur Technical progress