Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0316r0 Submission Mar. 2010 Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 802.11ac Preamble Authors: Date: 2010-03-10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legacy Coexistence – A Better Way?
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0627r00 Submission Yuichi Morioka, Sony Corporation Date: Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Doc.: IEEE /0315r1 Submission Mar 2008 Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Coexistence Mechanisms at 5 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r1 Date: Considerations on 11ax Auto-detection Methods January 2015 Jaeyoung Song, KAISTSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1229r1 Submission Dynamic OFDM Symbol Duration September 2014 Alan Jauh et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Preamble structure for 11ax system
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Preamble structure for 11ax system January 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jiayin Zhang, et al. (Huawei Technologies)
Doc.:IEEE /0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date:
Doc.:IEEE /1079r0 Submission Sept. 13, 2010 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 Max Frame Sizes Date: Authors:
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Doc.:IEEE /1568r1 Submission Nov Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 STA Antenna Indication in VHT Capabilities Date:
Doc.:IEEE ac Submission Nov 2010 Jun Zheng, BroadcomSlide 1 Legacy CSD Table for 11AC Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0324r2 Submission March 2012 Short Ack Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0853r3 September 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 Extensible Preamble Format Design Date:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1128r1 Submission Nov 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 BSS Transition with Bearing Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0359r1 Submission xx. xx, 2010 Il-Gu Lee et al.Slide ac preamble for VHT auto-detection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0293r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Cropping VHT Basic/Supported MCS Sets from Below Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0820r0 Submission July 13, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 MCS Selection and Padding Equations Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0064r5 Submission May 19, 2010 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0359r0 Submission Mar. 16, 2010 Il-Gu Lee et al.Slide ac preamble for VHT auto-detection Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.:IEEE /1385r0 Submission Sep Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Making the Quiet Channel Element Work for 11a/11n Clients Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0318r0 March 2013 A. Asterjadhi, Qualcomm Inc. Short MAC Header Design Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Wake up packet contents
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
VHTSIG Considerations
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
VHT Packet Length Calculation
Counter Proposal to CID 7177
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Legacy Coexistence – A Better Way?
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Counter Proposal to CID 7177
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
11bd Frame Format Date: Authors: March 2019
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
NGV PPDU Format Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Presentation transcript:

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide ac Preamble Authors: Date:

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 2 Situation 10/70r1 proposes an 11ac preamble The preamble indicates an 11ac frame via –A 0deg phase shift on LSIG at 16-20us (“not 11n GF”) –A 0deg phase shift on VHTSIG at 20-24us (“not 11n MM”) then –A 90deg phase shift at us (“not 11a”) VHT-STFVHT-LTFsL-STFL-LTFL-SIGVHTSIGAVHTSIGBVHTData 2 symbols 1 symbol T VHT auto-detection Rate=6Mbps Length determined by T

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 3 Concern A concern was raised that a hypothetical 11n implementation could detect a 10/70r1 (11ac) frame as 11n if the implementation checked that a) there is more Q-energy than I-energy across all of the HTSIG (20- 28us) into the packet (not just 20-24us), and b) the LSIG Rate field decodes to 6 Mbps –Still, this hypothetical implementation introduces an extra 4 us of latency so seems to be an unusual choice for a real-time receiver This hypothetical implementation would detect a 10/70r1 preamble as 11n MM with 50% likelihood, get a bad HTSIG CRC then revert to insensitive ED for CCA

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 4 Background From , the L_LENGTH field in an 11n MM packet is always a multiple of 3: it is calculated as where SignalExtension = 0 us at 5GHz Conversely, CCA busy time = 20us + 4us*ceil(L_LENGTH+3)/3) + SignalExtension Note: At 6 Mbps, there are 3 bytes per OFDM symbol, so each CCA busy time can actually be represented by 3 values of L_LENGTH –E.g. L_LENGTH = 4, 5, 6 all indicate a CCA busy time of 32 us + Signal Extension This is NOT LSIG TXOP protection –it is merely spoofing the duration of the current frame –Although it could be used for LSIG TXOP spoofing too

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 5 Improvement This hypothetical implementation is decoding the PLCP header and checking Q-energy > I-energy over the full HTSIG field Given such conservatism, this hypothetical implementation is also likely to be verifying a valid L_LENGTH Therefore greater discrimination between 11n MM and 11ac (with the 10/70r1 preamble) is possible by extending the L_LENGTH spoofing rule: –11n MM: –11ac: - 1 –Reserved: - 2 The Reserved value could be used a TBD future amendment

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 6 Summary Complementary to 10/70r1 Provides explicit discrimination between 11n MM and 11ac Little extra spec or implementation effort Makes the hypothetical implementation that much more hypothetical –A problematic implementation has to wait an extra 4 us to verify Q > I over the full HTSIG field, and has to verify that the LSIG Rate maps to 6 Mbps, and cannot check that L_LENGTH is a multiple of 3 The spoofing scheme has room for future growth, just in case

doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 7 Proposal Add to Specification Framework: 3.2 Preamble R The preamble shall define a mechanism to set the LSIG L_LENGTH field that improves the discrimination of 11ac frame formats that contain a LSIG L_LENGTH field from the 11n MM frame format