1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM Target Station Conceptual Design 15-April-2013 Kris Anderson Fermilab/Accelerator Division/Mechanical Support Department.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
Horn design for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam Nikolas Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
EUROnu Target and Horn Studies Nikolaos Vassilopoulos/IPHC-CNRS on behalf of WP2 1ECFA Review PanelDarensbury, 02/05/2011.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Estimation of temperature increase in the dump through Monte – Carlo simulations and rough calculations N. Charitonidis (EN/MEF)
Safety issues for WP2 E. Baussan on behalf of WP2.
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Estimates of Radiation Levels in the Main Linac Tunnel and Beam Dump Caverns for the CLIC Design Study Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto SATIF 10, S.
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
Radiation Protection studies for the Linac4 / Linac2 interface Joachim Vollaire, DGS-RP 28/09/2015 Linac4 Coordination Meeting.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Characterization of the nTOF Radioactive Waste M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Beamline optimization schedule Vaia Papadimitriou LBNF Beamline Manager Accelerator and Beam Interface Group Meeting.
MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
General overview, layout of the pbar separator Target handling concept FLUKA calculations - for the target station - for the shielding flask Status of.
Heating and radiological
Induced-activity experiment:
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
Studies on Energy Deposition and Radiation for the 4horn system
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Preliminary Study – Radiation induced activity in a SB Target
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
CFS consideration on the Main Dump and around
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
Target Station Facility Safety ASPECTs
Presentation transcript:

1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN

2 Introduction In a Neutrino Factory, neutrinos result from the decay of high-energy muons These muons are themselves decay product of a pion beam generated by the interaction of a high-intensity proton beam with a suitable target

3 Introduction There are two different ideas for producing a neutrino beam: Muon storage ring Neutrino super beam These results give some guide-lines, which are intended for both facilities

4 Introduction An important aspect of a future Neutrino Factory is the material activation in the target system and its surroundings. A first estimation of the production of residual nuclei has been performed by the Monte Carlo cascade code FLUKA

5 FLUKA simulations A compromise between CPU time and precision: A simplified geometry DEFAULTS SHIELDIN, conceived for calculations for proton accelerators The new evaporation module is activated (EVAPORAT) The pure EM cascade has been disabled

6 An overview of the facility The facility consists of a target, two horns, a decay tunnel and a dump. It is shielded by 50 cm thick walls of concrete and is embedded in the rock. Top view

7 Target and horns A 4 MW, 2.2 GeV proton beam is sent onto the target with a flux of 1.1E16 protons/s. A liquid mercury target is presently being considered, inserted in two concentric magnetic horns for pion collection and focusing. Proton beam

8 Decay tunnel The decay tunnel consists of a steel pipe filled with He (1 atm), embedded in a 50 cm thick layer of concrete 60 m long Inner diameter of 2 m Thickness of 16 mm Cooling system (6 water pipes) Front view

9 Rooms for maintenance Two small rooms of 6 m 2, filled with air, have been placed upstream of the magnetic horns for dose scoring Two concentric magnetic horns (300 kA, 600 kA) surround the target Top view

10 Two small rooms of 6 m 2, filled with air, have been placed upstream of the magnetic horns for dose scoring Two concentric magnetic horns (300 kA, 600 kA) surround the target Side view Rooms for maintenance

11 Beam dump Downstream of the decay tunnel, a dump consisting of: An inner cylinder of graphitic carbon An outer cylinder of polycristalline graphite An iron shielding Side view

12 Surroundings The whole structure (target, horn and decay tunnel) is embedded in the rock, which has been divided into 100 regions for scoring the inelastic interaction distribution

13 Surroundings The whole structure (target, horn and decay tunnel) is embedded in the rock, which has been divided into 100 regions for scoring the inelastic interaction distribution

14 Horn Material: ANTICORODAL 110 alloy (Al 96.1%) Irradiation time: six weeks Specific activity (Bq/g) at different cooling times

15 Horn, after 6 weeks of irradiation

16 Steel pipe Material: steel P355NH (Fe 96.78%) Average values for the whole pipe (60 m long) 10 years of operation Operational year of 6 months (1.57*10 7 s/y) Specific activity (Bq/g) Steel pipe

17 Steel pipe, after 10 years of operation

18 Steel pipe: 24 regions for scoring In order to obtain the spatial distribution of stars and induced radioactivity, the steel pipe has been divided into 24 regions 5 m long 1.6 cm thick

19 Steel pipe, star density per proton

20 Steel pipe, after 10 years of operation 1 year of cooling

21 Steel pipe, power density crossing the inner surface

22 Steel pipe, central part Induced activity (Bq/g) in the central part of the pipe and multiples of EL (Exemption Limits) calculated with the addition rule

23 Steel pipe, after 10 years of operation

24 Steel pipe, after 10 years of operation

25 Concrete The target system is shielded by 50 cm thick walls of concrete Specific activity (Bq/g) after 10 years of operation, operational year of 6 months Concrete around the tunnel Concrete around the horn HeAir

26 Concrete, after 10 years of operation

27 Earth around the decay tunnel Dividing the earth into six concentric layers (1 m thick) The distribution of the induced radioactivity in the earth has been obtained:

28 Earth around the decay tunnel The distribution of the induced radioactivity in the earth has been obtained: Dividing each layer into twelve regions

29 Earth, after 10 years of operation

30 Earth, after 10 years of operation

31 Earth, after 10 years of operation

32 Earth, after 10 years of operation Exponential fit at 10 m, 35 m, 55 m from the target. Lambda=0.86 (+/-2.2%) 1 year of cooling

33 Earth, after 10 years of operation

34 Earth, after 10 years of operation

35 Conclusions Every year of operation, 4 horns become highly radioactive and require a long term deposit, e.g. underground close to the facility After 10 years of operation, the steel pipe in the decay tunnel, the concrete and a 2 m thick layer of earth have to be treated as radioactive waste Outside this “hot region”, after 10 years of operation and 20 years of cooling the induced radioactivity in the earth goes below the Swiss exemption limit

36 Future work Based on these simulations, estimation of the dose-equivalent rate due to The horn The steel pipe The concrete for maintenance, dismantling and radiation- protection issues