Operational Hazard. Definition. An operational hazard is any condition, action, or set of circumstances that compromises the safety of Army aircraft,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Advertisements

Integra Consult A/S November 2005Dhaka, Bangladesh Reporting - Inspired by ESARR 2 Workshop Dhaka, November 2005.
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
THE ROLE OF THE NTSB IN ATC INVESTIGATIONS Richard J. Wentworth National Resource Specialist (ATC) Operational Factors Division (AS-30)
1 Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.
Overview of the Privacy Act
The Army Safety Program
ASO-8-1 Safety Excellence Is Global Mission Success.
Presented January 20, 2011 by: John Allen Director, Flight Standards Service (AFS-1) Federal Aviation Administration Public Aircraft Operations Forum.
FLW EO Office 1 COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. FLW EO Office 2 Overview  Describe the Army’s EO Complaint Process  Define the types of Complaints  Describe.
Page 1 County of Los Angeles Corrective Action Plan Program Enhancements John Sterritt CEO Risk Management.
Restraint and Seclusion Ty Manieri Scott Hall 1. Overview Current Oregon law concerning the use of restraint and seclusion in public schools; The recent.
1 Cash Handling – It’s my job Whether you take in lots of money or … you collect “pennies”
Incident Command System Basic Course
School Safety Training
 Definition  Purpose  Who it Applies to  When Determinations are Required  Types of Determinations  Responsibilities  LOD Packages Overview.
Article 42. – Emergency Safety Interventions ESI Regulations K.A.R and As Passed by the Kansas State Board of Education 2.
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar Air Traffic Management Occurrence Reporting Mexico City, Mexico, 14 – 16 March 2006 Jeremy Jackson – Civil Aviation.
University of Pittsburgh Study Abroad Programs Guidelines and Checklist.
Army Family Advocacy Program 1 of R APR 06 Restricted Reporting Policy for Incidents of Domestic Abuse.
SMS Implications for Education Jim Dow Chief, Flight Training & Examinations Transport Canada Presentation to National Training Aircraft Symposium
Focus on Incident reporting
/0203 Copyright ©2002 Business and Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Safety Training Presentations Safety and Health Program.
Safety and Health Program Section B of the Forest Activities Code.
Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.
Welcome.
ASSESSMENT TASK 5 PRESENTATION ON : THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Mr. Bob Hahn Associate Director, School of Aviation Safety Naval Aviation Schools Command NAS Pensacola MISHAP PREVENTION EDUCATION IN NAVAL AVIATION.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. From the moment a child enters the school system, sensitive information is collected about the child (and even.
OSHA Office of Training and Education1 Safety and Health Programs.
Medical Law and Ethics, Third Edition Bonnie F. Fremgen Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Part 13 Informal Complaint Process Filing and Investigating Informal Complaints 35 th Annual Airports.
AIRTANKER BASE MANAGER (ATBM).
USAACE Reg Dated 23 NOV 09 Change 1
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Research Project #1 Reengineering DOT Data Programs.
Human Factors & Safety Management Systems Mike O’Leary Eddie Rogan.
Mr. Bob Hahn Associate Director, School of Aviation Safety Naval Aviation Schools Command NAS Pensacola MISHAP PREVENTION EDUCATION IN NAVAL AVIATION.
Privacy Act United States Army (Managerial Training)
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Department of Defense (DoD) Funded Human Subjects Research J. Bruce Smith, MD.
Somerset ISD Online Acceptable Use Policy. Somerset Independent School District Electronic Resources Acceptable Use Policy The purpose of this training.
Independent Duty Funds (IDF) and Family Readiness Funds
THE ROLE OF THE NTSB IN ATC INVESTIGATIONS
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar
AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION AERO 4100 / 5100
Aviation Safety CW2 Nicholas gleim.
Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program
The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary Romero
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
ICAO Harmonized Safety Management Requirements – The Safety Concern
OSU Controlled Substances Training Module for Researchers
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Operational Hazard. Definition. An operational hazard is any condition, action, or set of circumstances that compromises the safety of Army aircraft, associated personnel, airfields, or equipment

Correcting operational hazard Operational hazards should be corrected at the lowest level possible On the spot corrections vs. OHR (lowest level)

Operational Hazards may involve: Air Traffic Control (ATC) Airways and NAVAIDs Controller procedures and techniques Near mid air collisions Aircraft operations

Aircraft maintenance or inspections Weather services Airfield/Heliport facilities and services Flight or maintenance training and education DOD, FAA, and ICAO regulations, directives, and publications

What is an OHR? Identifies and documents an aviation hazard before it leads to an accident DA Form 2696-R complies with provisions of AR 385-10

What is an OHR? DA Form 2696-R fulfills the NATO STANAG 3750FS "Airmiss Reporting and Investigation" DA Form 2696-R compliments the FAA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS)

OHRs will be used within DA for accident prevention purposes only Restrictions on OHRs OHRs will be used within DA for accident prevention purposes only

OHRs will not be used: To report flight violations for punitive actions To determine misconduct for line of duty investigations By evaluation boards (FEB, etc.) to determine pecuniary liability As evidence for disciplinary action

Using of OHR to track repeat offenders

Risk Management process and OHRs Hazard Identification - originator and ASO Hazard Assessment - ASO Risk Decisions and Control Options - ASOs recommendation to commander, block 11 Implementation - commanders corrective actions in block 12 Supervision - is the originator satisfied?

Submitting OHRs Anyone may submit an OHR, military or civilian Anonymity of originator is acceptable but precludes a response

OHR is not required when an accident or deficiency report is completed When airborne report to ATC and follow up with a written report Non aviation hazard reporting, DA Form 4755 (para 2-3b)

Administering the OHR program Preparing an OHR (App B) Filled out in triplicate Original to USASC (if appropriate) First copy to originator Second copy to unit files Typed or legibly written in ink

Routing of an OHR When forwarding correspondence, request the results of the investigation, including corrective actions taken, be returned to the sender Correspondence will state that OHR information will be used for accident prevention and safety purposes only

Routing of an OHR OHR will be submitted to the appropriate ASO or Army flight operations Flight operations will forward the OHR to the ASO Forward OHRs pertaining to other units to the ASO of that unit

Forward OHRs to USASC (Attn: CSSC-SA) for: DA Staff, Major Army Commands (MACOMs), or units not in the chain of command Other Department of Defense (DOD) services or a host nation Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) OHRs considered relevant by unit ASO or commander

Routing of an OHR. Provide OHRs submitted on civil aviation operations to FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) (see fig 2 -1) Aviation hazards noted at Air Force or Navy installations should be reported to the base operations office

Routing of an OHR OHRs on Army Air Traffic Control (ATC) forwarded through the MACOM to the Director, US Army ATC Activity Near collisions, air or ground, will be reported to the FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Responsibilities: Originator Complete blocks 1-10 of DA Form 2696- R Provide name and address if a response is desired

Responsibilities: ASO. Complete blocks 11 and 13 of DA Form 2696-R Commander. Complete and sign block 12 of DA Form 2696-R

Managing the OHR program Commanders will: Report and investigate hazards promptly Correct hazards promptly

Managing the OHR program Commanders will: Emphasize the importance of the OHR as a safety tool Emphasize that OHR and the flight violation reports are two separate systems that may be used simultaneously to enhance safety

Managing the OHR program Commanders will: Sign and return the OHR to the ASO within 10 working days from the date the ASO received the OHR Forward an OHR to the higher headquarters when applicable

ASOs will: Manage the unit OHR program Promptly investigate Seek to identify system defects Recommend appropriate countermeasures

ASOs will: Forward the OHR to the commander with appropriate recommendations Ensure the report is received back from the commander within 10 working days of original receipt Return the report to the originator within 20 working days of original receipt

ASOs will: If unable to return the report within 20 working days a written status report will be provided every 10 working days until completion File OHRs IAW AR 25-400-2 (MARKS) File number 385-10b Maintain the OHR for two years

What helps make the OHR program effective Make OHR forms (DA Form 2696 R) readily available Educate unit personnel on the OHR program at safety meetings Emphasize that the OHR and a flight violation report are two separate systems that may be used simultaneously Discuss OHRs at safety meetings

Publicize through posters Take OHRs seriously Get command involvement Give prompt replies to originators Take timely action to correct the problem Publicize through posters

Target corrections on systems defects rather than simply fixing operating errors (picking leaves)

Common problems of an OHR program Used, or perceived to be used, for disciplinary actions Lip service to complaints OHR war Lack of emphasis during safety meetings

FAA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System The Aviation Safety Reporting System was established in 1975 under a Memorandum of Agreement between the FAA and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) FAA provides most of the program funding; NASA administers the program and sets its policies in consultation with the FAA and the aviation community

Purpose. The ASRS collects, analyzes, and responds to voluntary submitted aviation safety incident reports in order to lessen the likelihood of aviation accidents

ASRS data are used to: Identify deficiencies and discrepancies in the National Aviation System (NAS) so that these can be remedied by appropriate authorities Support policy formulation and planning for, and improvements to, the NAS Strengthen the foundation of aviation human factors safety research

All submissions are voluntary Reports sent to the ASRS are held in strict confidence More than 250,000 reports have been submitted (Sep 93) and no reporters identity has ever been breached by the ASRS ASRS de-identifies reports before entering them into the database

The FAA does not use ASRS information against reporters in enforcement actions The FAA waives fines and penalties for unintentional violations This exception does NOT extend to reports of accidents or criminal activities

Uses of ASRS information: Alerting messages. The FAA issues an alerting message for circumstances which might compromise safe flight Callback. A monthly safety bulletin which contains: Exerpts information from ASRS incident reports and provides supporting commentary Summaries of ASRS research studies and related aviation safety information

Callback. A monthly safety bulletin which contains: Exerpts information from ASRS incident reports and provides supporting commentary Summaries of ASRS research studies and related aviation safety information

ASRS Directline. Periodical publication for operators of complex aircraft Database Search Requests. Information is the ASRS database is available to interested parties