U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.
Advertisements

Geographic tools and resources
Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
M&E of Programs and the Data Infrastructure: GIS as the Rosetta Stone John Spencer MEASURE Evaluation.
Geographic tools and M&E: Linking data to support M&E.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Monitoring and Evaluation of National Tuberculosis Programs Regional Workshop Kyiv, Ukraine May 23-26, 2006.
Begin with the End in Mind
Geography and Health Using geography to strengthen data and improve health in the developing world John Spencer Senior GIS Specialist MEASURE Evaluation,
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
Context of Decision Making
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Review of key themes. Module 1: Data demand & use key concepts  Data are needed to improve the delivery of services  Providers play a critical role.
Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.
Strengthening Information Systems for Community Based HIV Programs Heidi Reynolds and Florence Nyangara Global Health Mini University 9 October 2009.
Role of GIS in food and nutrition surveillance SESSION 15 University of Nairobi June, 2004.
Building Capacity on Program Evaluation in Latin America: The Experience of the Partnership between Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP)
Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,
Introduction to World Geography
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
F UNDAMENTALS OF G EOGRAPHIC D ATA James STEWART MEASURE Evaluation 15 février 2010 Suivi et Evaluation des programmes VIH/SIDA- Séminaire régional CESAG.
PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.
Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Measuring Success Toolkit
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Data and Interoperability:
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS

Overview  Value of geographic perspective is a valuable tool for M&E.  Role of geographic data & tools in evidence-based decision making for M&E.  Geographic identifiers can be used to link data sets and  Reduce “stovepiping “of data  Improve recognition of spatial patterns  Deepen the understanding of M&E program data  Using geography to link datasets can  Increase collaboration with other organizations  Expand the inventory of available data  Lower costs.  Leveraging geography enhances evidence-based decision making & strengthens overall data infrastructure.

Photo by Eileen Maher

Where

Why

Value of Mapping  Facilitates recognition of spatial patterns  Provides insight into data  Highlights data quality issues  Provides a powerful tool for  Decision support  Analysis  Data display  Picture worth 1,000 words

Value of Geography  More than just mapping  Strengthens data infrastructure by  Providing a way to link different data sets  Increases collaboration  Expands inventory of available data  Can lowers costs of data creation and maintenance  Enforcing data schema standards

GEOGRAPHY CAN STRENGTHEN THE DATA INFRASTRUCTURE

A STRONG DATA INFRASTRUCTURE MAKES BETTER DECISIONS AND BETTER OUTCOMES MORE LIKELY

Data Infrastructure  Available data  Systems to support, update, and disseminate data

Data Streams

The world is complex; take advantage of as much data as possible

Geography is key link Population DistrictPopulation North3253 South5621 East8732 West7715 OVC DistrictOVC North812 South1011 East2709 West1411

Geography is key link Population and OVC DistrictPopulationOVCPercent OVC North South East West

Geography is key link  Seems obvious  Data need to have a geographic identifier  Data must have complementary structure  One record per observation  Consistent geographic identifiers  Compatible level of geographic representation  Don’t necessarily need a GIS—data can be linked and shared in Excel or Access

Geographic Identifiers S E S E

Geographic Identifiers  Administrative units  Provinces  Districts  Communes  Etc.  Village or community name

OVC CASE STUDY Nigeria

The world is complex; take advantage of as much data as possible

Mapping: One Tool in the Toolbox

Key Steps to Mapping  Include Geographic Identifier in Data  Where are things?  Select Software  ArcGIS  DevInfo  Diva-GIS  Excel to Google Earth  Google Earth

Power of Geography and Mapping  Data quality  Target efforts for improving data quality  Strengthen data quality by enforcing data schema standards  Demonstrate value of high quality data  Decision making  Facilitate Data Visualization  Demonstrate impact of programs  Integrate various data sources

Power of Geography and Mapping  Adding the “where” can help understand the “why”  Geography can act as a “Rosetta Stone” to link different elements of the data infrastructure

Discussion Questions  Can anyone provide an example of how the use of geography and mapping has helped improve the decision making process within his or her country or organization?  Can anyone provide an example of stovepiping of data? And do you see this as a problem for your country or organization?

Discussion Questions (cont’d)  If you’re affected by stovepiping of data, how do you think you could overcome it? Or if you’ve had to overcome stovepiping in the past, how did you accomplish it?  Has anyone had a positive experience with linking to external data sets? Such as linking to data from the national mapping agency (NMA), other ministries, universities?

Discussion Questions (cont’d)  Has anyone here collaborated with the NMA to obtain data? Can you share any lessons learned?

General Objective The general objective of the module « Fundamentals of Geographic Data » is to present the fundamentals of geographic data, including the relationship between geographic and attribute data, and to help participants understand some important data quality considerations.

Session Plan  Geographic data  Geographic identifiers  Data schema best practices

Geographic Identifiers

Geographic Identifiers  GPS coordinate  Administrative name  In reference to other features

Geography basics

Latitude/Longitude

Taj Mahal: Latitude Longitude

GPS Coordinate Global Positioning System

GPS Coordinates Advantages  Very accurate:  10 meters or less  Easy to get a quick location of a few objects  Receivers and devices becoming more affordable Disadvantages  If many objects need to be located, there needs to be a well designed data collection protocol  Capturing something other than a point can add time and cost

GPS Coordinate  Best practice:  Display as latitude/longitude coordinate  Example:

Geographic Identifiers  Administrative division names or codes  Regions, provinces, districts, communes  Human settlement names or codes  Cities, villages, neighborhoods, informal settlements  Exact locations  Street addresses, GPS coordinates

Geographic Identifiers: Administrative Divisions Source: Odhiambo, Emma. “Census Cartography: The Kenyan Experience,” presented at the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Contemporary Practices in Census Mapping and Use of Geographical Information Systems, 29th May – 1st June 2007, New York. Kenyan Geographic Hierarchy for 1999 Census

Acknowledgments: USAID, FEWS, EDC- International Program, and the U.S. Geological Survey.

Source: Administrative boundaries downloaded October 2008 from

Geographic Identifiers: Human Settlements  Cities  Towns  Villages  Neighborhoods  Communities  Informal settlements

Geographic Identifiers  Anything that helps uniquely identify where something is

MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.