Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 2005 Sept 13, 2005 ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Timing-In Strategies On behalf of S. Ask 1), P. Borrego Amaral 1), N. Ellis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
The EMMA Turn-by-Turn BPM System A. Kalinin ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory STFC EMMA Commissioning Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, 21 May 2009.
Feedback on phase adjustment with BPTX Using scope and LHCb BPIM boards to readout BPTX signal BPIM only used for triggering, phase measurements (BPTX1-BC1,
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
28 June 2004 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR Martin Postranecky TIM OVERVIEW1 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR 28 June 2004 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
October 1st th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment at Amsterdam 1 Beam Test Result of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level-1 Trigger Chikara Fukunaga.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
The GANDALF Multi-Channel Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC)  GANDALF module  TDC concepts  TDC implementation in the FPGA  measurements.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
11 CTP Training A.Jusko, M. Krivda and R.Lietava..
Status of Data Exchange Implementation in ALICE David Evans LEADE 26 th March 2007.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
Beam phase and intensity measurement Grzegorz Kasprowicz Richard Jacobsson.
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
02/02/ S. Baron RF-Experiments Timing Meeting - Feb RF CMS ATLAS ALICE LHCb BTPX Status.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
COGGING MEETING Cogging Semi-Fine Adjust without collisions? Fine Adjust When? Cogging Meeting – Sophie BARON.
Vertex 2005, Nikko Manfred Pernicka, HEPHY Vienna 1.
Some thoughts on the New Small Wheel Trigger Issues V. Polychronakos, BNL 10 May,
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
28 June 2004ATLAS Pixel/SCT TIM FDR/PRR1 TIM tests with ROD Crate John Hill.
BEPC II TIMING SYSTEM EPICS Seminar Presented by Ma zhenhan IHEP 20.August 2002.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb (II) 1. S-TFC on xTCA – Mapping TFC on Marseille hardware 2. ECS+TFC relay in FE Interface 3. Protocol and commands for FE/BE.
CERN LECC 2006, September, Valencia, Spain Acknowledgements: Eva Calvo Giraldo, AB/BI Rhodri Jones, AB/BI Greg Kasprowicz, AB/BI Thilo Pauly, ATLAS.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Common test for L0 calorimeter electronics (2 nd campaign) 4 April 2007 Speaker : Eric Conte (LPC)
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Pedro AmaralLECC-2004, Boston, Sep1 The ATLAS Level-1 Central Trigger System On behalf of: Pedro Borrego Amaral, N. Ellis, P. Farthouat, P. Gallno,
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team.
18/05/2000Richard Jacobsson1 - Readout Supervisor - Outline Readout Supervisor role and design philosophy Trigger distribution Throttling and buffer control.
NA 62 TTC partition timing T.Blažek, V.Černý, R.Lietava, M.Kovaľ, M.Krivda Bratislava, Birmingham We are developing procedures for timing parameter adjustment.
ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR28 June 2004 TIM Requirements - John Lane1 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR 28 June 2004 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics John.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
10/3/2003Andreas Jansson - Tevatron IPM review1 Tevatron IPM Proposed design.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
62cm 64cm. DAQ status and Plans DAQ –Timing tuning –Which tools to learn (SC, Event monitor, GPIO, MIDAS, DIP, laser, storage, analysis) Plan with beam.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Status and Performance of the ALICE Trigger Electronics
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
ATLAS Local Trigger Processor
The ATLAS Level-1 Central Trigger
Trigger system Marián Krivda (University of Birmingham)
M. Krivda for the ALICE trigger project, University of Birmingham, UK
LHC Fast Timing Commissioning
Beam instrumentation and background monitoring
Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
Presentation transcript:

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 2005 Sept 13, 2005 ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Timing-In Strategies On behalf of S. Ask 1), P. Borrego Amaral 1), N. Ellis 1), P. Farthouat 1), P. Gallno 1), J. Haller 1), A. Krasznahorkay 1)2), T. Maeno 1), T. Pauly 1), H. Pessoa Lima Jr. 3)4), I. Resurreccion Arcas 1), G. Schuler 1), J. M. de Seixas 3), R. Spiwoks 1), R. Torga Teixeira 1), T. Wengler 1) 1) CERN, Switzerland 2) University of Debrecen, Hungary 3) Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 4) Brazilian Center for Research in Physics, Brazil

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20052Sept 13, 2005 Timing Concept in the Trigger System Synchronous Asynchronous Identifier-based (L1ID, BCID) Timing-based (Subject of this talk) Trigger Delay L1A Delay

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20053Sept 13, 2005 USA 15 Time of flight (bunches every 25ns = 7.5m) Detector response Cable lengths (10m = 100ns) The Problem Need well-defined procedures to do the timing-in. BC 2 BC 1

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20054Sept 13, 2005 Overview Timing Signals at ATLAS –Distribution –Local Trigger Processor –Timing Tasks ATLAS Timing-In Strategy: –Test Pulses  Decent initial timing –Beam Pick-Up Detectors  Filled-Bunch Trigger  Bunch-Crossing Trigger NEW: Read-out of the Beam Pick-Up Detectors –Beam Pick-up Signal –Global BC Identification with Filled-Bunch Trigger –Clock phase: Read-out system, test results Conclusions

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20055Sept 13, 2005 Timing Signals from the CTP Level-1 Accept (L1A) BC = Bunch Clock with MHz Orbit Signal: –1 μs long pulse every revolution (89 μs) –Is used as bunch counter reset (BCR) to synchronise the BC counters in the sub-detector front-ends, i.e. BCID –An LHC cycle consists of bunches, each uniquely identified by a BCID number. –As reference point the abort gap in the bunch train can be used.

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20056Sept 13, 2005 Distribution of Timing Signals CTP distributes L1A, BC, Orbit through CTP_OUT (see R. Spiwoks “The ATLAS Level-1 Central Trigger Processor”) Local Trigger Processor (LTP): –Interface to CTP when running in global mode –Important tool for sub-system timing-in –Replaces the CTP when running in local mode (test-pulses) Via the TTC system (Timing, Trigger and Controls) New Multiplexer Module for combining partitions CTP Up to 20 Links Partitions

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20057Sept 13, 2005 Local Trigger Processor CTP Local Calibration Request Trigger Type LTP2 Interface to CTP + CTP Replacement for Local Mode (Local Inputs, Pattern Generator) + Programmable Switch Manual: ATL-DA-ES-0033 max 30 m TTC

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20058Sept 13, 2005 Typical Timing Tasks Sub-detector-specific Timing Tasks Global Timing Adjustments BC Counter for BCID Processing TTC Distribution Data Forming (Phase between BC & Signal) Data Alignment (in steps of 25ns) BC Identification (BCR delay) Triggered BC Identification (L1A delay) BC BCR L1A Sub-detector

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg 20059Sept 13, 2005 Scenarios for Timing-In Timing-in with test-pulses: –Local mode: Stand-alone sub-detector timing-in, without the CTP, only with LTP –Global mode with CTP Will already give a decent initial timing set-up (up to a few bunch crossings) Single Beams: –Beam pick-ups to see filled bunches –CTP can be programmed to trigger on specific filled bunches: filled-bunch trigger, bunch-crossing trigger Collisions: –Scintillation-counter hodoscopes in front of the end-cap calorimeter –Coincidence between the two ends will give minimum bias trigger (also combination with bunch-crossing trigger)

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Timing-In with Test-Pulses in Local Mode LTP issues a L1A a fixed time Δt after a pre-pulse, synchronised with the ORBIT LTP should simulate CTP (same phase with Orbit as for global mode) Predict beam-beam timing (d gen ) with simulation of: –Time-of-flight –Detector response –Calibration system specific delays Also account for expected trigger latency and propagation of L1A signal Adjust L1A delay (d L1A ): scan and recover test-pulse data Test-Signal Generator d gen d L1A LTP Pre-pulse L1A ΔtΔt Sub-detector

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Timing-In with Test-Pulses in Global Mode Central Trigger Processor (CTP) triggers on a fixed BCID. LTP now in transparent mode BC identification by comparing BCIDs of event fragments in the read-out events (BCR offsets) Good initial timing setup for beam-beam collisions (up to a few bunch crossings) Leaves only the global timing to be established later: –Single beams: global BCR delay –Collisions: clock phase, global L1A Test-Signal Generator LTPLTP Test-Signal Generator LTPLTP CTPCTP

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Timing-In With Beam Need to “see” the bunches BPTX = Beam position monitors for timing purposes Timing reference wrt bunches 1 per incoming beam, 175 m from IP Electro-static button electrodes Read-out currently under study

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Usage of the BPTX Signal BPTX are very powerful: 1.Filled-bunch trigger, Bunch-crossing trigger 2.Very precise time reference (clock monitoring) “TTC Machine Interface” BC-Ref BC-RF1 BC-RF2 BPTX Read-out System (Oscilloscopes + Computer) BC-Ref Orbit BC-RF1 BC-RF2 BPTX1/2 Optical Electrical Apps Database Configuration/ Steering Discr. CTP USA15 Electrical Orbit 200m (few ns) (20 ps) Filled-Bunch Trigger Monitoring

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Usage of the BPTX Signal 1)Filled-bunch trigger: Global BC Identification  Trigger input for CTP for filled-bunch trigger (Discrimination of the bunch signals by preserving the time information of each bunch at the level of a few ns)  Detection of gaps in the bunch train with CTP bunch-to-bunch scalers of trigger inputs (CTPMON) BCID BC=0

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Usage of the BPTX Signal 2)Clock Monitoring: Check the phase of each individual bunch with the phase of the clock (accuracy: ~20ps ) Monitoring of the clock from the machine. Detection of clock drift, due to  Problems in the signal chain  Temperature drifts in optical fibres Check for satellite bunches in RF buckets (2.5ns) Monitoring frequency ~ once per minute

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Expected BPTX Signal Very clean signal +20V V on 50Ω per button (from calculation, no transmission line yet) After transmission line: 20% of amplitude Simple discrimination: –Zero-crossing independent of bunch intensity –Zero-crossing depends on bunch length: –Bunch length fluctuations at 7 TeV will be %-level Nominal LHC intensity: 1.15 x p/bunch 7 TeV

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Information in the BPTX Signal –Complete signal description exists, and can be used as a fit function. Fit parameters: t 0 Time of closest approach of bunch to BPTX, NNumber of protons in bunch σBunch length (Gaussian σ) –Background is expected to be small and under control (noise, reflections, etc.)

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Clock Phase wrt LHC Bunches Resolution to be 20 ps NEW: Read-out with oscilloscopes –Relatively cheap (several 10 kCHF), no hardware and low-level software development –Guaranteed support –Signal is fully visible, no signal discrimination before read-out: necessary for debugging –Usually maximum of 4 Channels: 2 scopes required for 6 signals. For instance: Scope 1: Orbit, BC-Ref, BC-RF1, BPTX1 Scope 2: Orbit, BC-Ref, BC-RF2, BPTX2

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Test system with Tektronix TDS 3054B –5 GS/s real-time sampling rate, i.e. measurements every 200ps –Memory depth: 10k, i.e. 2μs (Read out 45 chunks of 2μs) –Max voltage on 50Ω: 5V RMS with peaks < ±30V –8-bit vertical resolution, ~0.3% –4 channels –Trigger on long-gap with hold-off time to μs-x (with x < 2.75μs) –BPTX Test signal: Shaped output from a pattern generator (Local Trigger Processor) –Built-in ethernet port: configuration and read-out through HTTP1.1 –Data analysis with ROOT and MINUIT

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Test Result: Proof of Principle with TDS 3054B Clock BPTX Test Signal Clock fit Signal fit Read out via HTTP1.1

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 BPTX resolutions: Toy-Simulation, 1000 samples, TDS3054B resolutions (vertical resolution: 0.2V) t 0 = 0 ± 2.6ps σ = 252ps ± 3.0ps N = (1.150 ± 0.015) x t 0 uncorrelated to σ, N Correlation between σ and N: 0.68 Test Result: Resolutions Clock Phase resolution: –Difference of two consecutive clock signals –Resolution of phase measurement: 20ps –Resolution of single time measurement: 20ps/√2 = 14ps Measured Simulated

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 BPTX Read-Out: Conclusions The read-out requirements for the ATLAS BPTX can be fulfilled with 2 modern off-the-shelf sampling oscilloscopes with: –4 channels each –Sampling rate ≥ 5 GS/sec –Memory deep enough to accommodate 89μs –Communication via ethernet

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Conclusion I have presented strategies for timing in the sub-detectors –With test-pulses in local and global mode a good initial timing setup can be achieved: up to a few bunch crossings ATLAS beam pick-up detectors are very powerful for timing-in with beam: –Filled-bunch trigger: Global BC identification –Measuring and monitoring of the clock phase wrt LHC bunches

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Backup slides

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Minimum-bias trigger: One hodoscope plane on each side replacing part of the JM moderator between Inner Detector and LAr Scintillator Counter Hodoscope η coverage: z = ± 3.5 m ~25 cm < R < ~115 cm  ~1.8 < η < ~3.3 φ segmentation: probably 8 Very high efficiency for minimum bias events

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 The CTP is timed-in using the beam pick-ups as timing reference: CTP can generate triggers with a fixed latency for specific bunch crossings using the beam pickups Using the scintillatior hodoscopes, the CTP can restrict triggers to crossings with interactions Timing-In CTP Using the Beam Structure Adjust offset BCID LHC BCID CTP

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, )Sub-detector chooses a quantity with high rate due to interaction products and small background from other sources 2)Map out the LHC bunch structure by plotting activity vs. BCID using random triggers or scanning all BCID values with L1As 3)Compare to (known) LHC bunch structure, e.g. position of long gap Timing Check Using the Beam Structure Adjust for offsets But: this procedure can take several days for certain sub- detectors with low rate and acceptance.

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Global BC Identification with Filled-Bunch Trigger Discriminate BPTX signal (at the ns level) Propagation of BPTX signal into CTP is known ToF from BPTX position to z=0 is known CTP has scalers for each PIT bit and each single bunch: find abort gap for the BPTX trigger signal BC=0 BCID

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 BPTX Signal Expectation Longitudinally Gaussian-shaped bunch produces a current of mirror charge on the button surface, which gives a voltage signal on the transfer impedance: Basic model: “Differentiated Gaussian convolved with an exponential due to the RC” Transfer Impedance Z T = 1.04Ω Read-out 50Ω BPTX Bunch N protons length σ 16pF u R (t) (no transmission line yet)

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Expected BPTX Signal Very clean signal +20V V on 50Ω per button (from calculation, no transmission line yet) Zero-crossing independent of bunch intensity Zero-crossing depends on bunch length: –100ps effect between injection and 7 TeV –Bunch length fluctuations at 7 TeV will be %-level Nominal LHC intensity: 1.15 x p/bunch At Injection At 7 TeV 7 TeV5 x 10 9 p/bunch

Thilo Pauly, CERN/PH, LECC Heidelberg Sept 13, 2005 Acquisition Mode/Scope Trigger Acquisition modes: –Real-time sampling (single shot, averaging mode) –Equivalent-time sampling (only for repetitive signals) Different trigger possibilities: –For a real-time single shot mode, any trigger can be used: whole bunch train is read out. –For averaging or equivalent-time sampling, a trigger signal with small jitter is needed. Possibilities: Orbit signal Combination: First Orbit, then clock edge BPTX signal itself, with trigger hold-off time set to find particular gaps in the bunch train