ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
Advertisements

2010 PODS User Conference Houston, Texas October 28, 2010 PHMSA Update John A. Jacobi, P.E. CATS Manager, SW Region.
August 21, 2012 Western Regional Gas Conference Paul Gustilo Southwest Gas Corporation.
CAST IRON INVENTORY DARIN BURK PIPELINE SAFETY PROGRAM MANAGER, IL COMMERCE COMMISSION PAST CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PIPELINE SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES.
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
Montana Safe Digging Law 2014 Joint Engineers Conference Thu - Nov :00am-11:30am.
Pipeline Safety Trust – Getting to ZERO (incidents) Gas Pipeline Safety Issues San Bruno Lessons Learned Randy Knepper Director of Safety New Hampshire.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.
Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.
Congressional Reauthorization and PHMSA Rulemakings – Enough to avoid future tragedies? Carl Weimer, Executive Director Pipeline Safety Trust.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety Kenneth Y. Lee Engineering & Research.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Overview of Key Rule Features
Pipeline Safety Program Regulatory (DOT) Pipeline Risk Management Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 16, 2007 John A. Jacobi, P.E. PHMSA.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Program.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
South Dakota Gas Pipeline Safety Program 2011 Summary.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
SCADA Systems in the Pipeline Industry SHANE AYERS.
Distribution Integrity Management John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association.
LOGO Arizona Corporation Commission Safety Division Robert Miller.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Reauthorization September 16,
1 DIMSA A Distribution Integrity Management SME Approach August – 2009.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Overview of Integrity Verification Process (IVP) Workshop Held.
America’s Natural Gas Utilities’ Distribution Pipelines November 2, 2006 The Connection To the Customer.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
Pipeline Safety: How the Mayor’s Council On Pipeline Safety Can Help Presentation to: Mayor’s Council on Pipeline Safety Conference Name: Christopher A.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOUR MAOP? REAUTHORIZATION, SAN BRUNO, AND PHMSA’S ADVISORY BULLETIN.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Chairman David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick Commissioner Ryan Sitton September 15-17, 2015.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Verification of Records Linda Daugherty – Dep Associate.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference, November 19, 2015 TURNING TO THE STATES: WOULD MORE STATE AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT IMPROVE SAFETY? A Look at the.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: National Standards July 30, 2009.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Incident Mitigation Management (IMM): Considerations Prior to an Incident Daron Moore - August 20, 2013.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Advisory Committee Groundhog Day Jeff Wiese – OPS.
Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Looking Forward + Carl’s Question Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference New Orleans, LA November 19, 2015.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
Response to Secretary’s Call to Action. NAPSR The National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) is a non-profit organization.
Distribution Integrity Management Program
1 Information Hearing The San Bruno Explosion: Pipeline Safety In California Panel IV – Maintenance, Inspection & Financing of Gas Transmission Pipelines.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
Federal Regulatory Update
Make the pic clearer, name & university Oshin Paranjape
Pipeline Safety Issues
Federal Regulatory Update
AGA Positions on Current PHMSA Rulemakings
AGA Legal Forum - July 2017 Regulatory Concerns for LDCs
Presentation transcript:

ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager

Significant Change September 9, 2010 – San Bruno, CA 30” Transmission Pipeline Rupture Produced Crater 72’ x 26’ 47.6 million cubic feet of gas released Ignition Occurred 8 fatalities Numerous Injuries 38 Homes Destroyed and 70 Homes Damaged

Crater and Pipe – San Bruno, CA

San Bruno, CA

Findings and Fallout Substandard pipe had been installed in 1956 Welding standards had not been met The seam weld failed PG&E had inadequate emergency response procedures PG&E Public Awareness Program was inadequate California Public Utility Commission was not performing adequate inspections

Recommendations Pipeline operators need to share operation and emergency response information with Emergency Responders. Require Post-incident Anti-drug and Alcohol Tests Spike Tests on all pre-1970 transmission lines Enhance Integrity Management Programs Modify Transmission Lines for In-line Inspection (Smart Pigs)

Consequences PHMSA is under scrutiny of Congress and Public Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) is conducting audits of PHMSA and State Pipeline Safety Programs PHMSA – Are states doing their job OIG – Is PHMSA doing it’s job OIG will report to Secretary of Transportation and Congress

Revised Pipeline Safety Act Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011 has resulted in:  Advisory Notice regarding mandate leak and valve study  Study to determine if remote leak detection and remote shut-off valves should be required on pipelines  Proposal to revise the Transmission Annual and Incident Report data reporting requirements regarding MAOP verification  Would eliminate the “Grandfather” clause regarding the MAOP of transmission pipelines and require hydro testing on that any transmission line that has not been previously hydro tested

Revised Pipeline Safety Act What’s Coming?  Maximum penalties moving from $100,000 per day to $200,00 per violation  Reduction in funding of states with inadequate Damage Prevention Programs  Study to determine if IMP inspection criteria for transmission pipelines should be expanded beyond HCAs  Requirement to promotes awareness of the NPMS  Monitoring of cast iron replacement programs  Setting of specific time limits to report an incident – 1 hour from time of discovery

Revised Pipeline Safety Act What Coming?  Review of regulations regarding gathering lines  Study to determine feasibility of expanded use of excess flow valves  Limitations regarding incorporation of industry standards by the CFR  Study regarding the use of minority and woman owned businesses associated with the operation and maintenance of pipeline facilities

“Weak State” Term being used in D.C. How will PHMSA determine a “Weak State”  Minimum Staffing Levels  Inspection Day Quota  Enforcement Actions PHMSA will:  Issue a warning to the State  Reduce funding to State Program  Decertify State Program

Is Illinois A “Weak State” Illinois:  Meets minimum staffing level  Conducts the required inspections  Takes Enforcement Actions  Issues Civil Penalties Illinois will:  Enhance Inspection Activities  Issues Civil Penalties  Post Inspection Results

ICC Initiatives Conduct comprehensive reviews of all required plans and procedures Issue NOAs or NOPVs regarding inadequate plans and procedures Initiate civil penalties for failure to modify the plans and procedures Initiate civil penalties for code violations that result in an reportable incident Initiate civil penalties for failure to respond to our notices

Impact On Operators Enhanced Inspection Activity  PA Plans  DIMP Plans  OQ Plans  Anti-D&A Plans Enhance Enforcement Procedures  Zero tolerance regarding Code Compliance More Stringent Enforcement  Enhanced Use of Civil Penalties

How Should Operators Prepare? Review all Plans and Procedures to:  Ensure they address all code requirements  Are applicable to your system Ensure that all operator personnel are familiar with the required activities, processes and procedures included in the Plans Follow the Code and Plan Requirements Keep Accurate and Complete Records

Known Weaknesses Knowledge of Plan Requirements  Operators need to know what is in their plans! Failure to implement Code and Plan Requirements  Operators frequently fail to implement their own procedures Failure to maintain Accurate and Complete Records  Some Operators fail to use their own forms

Known Weaknesses Training and Qualification  Operator personnel need to be effectively trained and qualified Lack of Resources  Skilled personnel need assistance with scheduling and paperwork  “The Job Isn’t Finished Until the Paperwork Is Done”

Enforcement Data 2009 Probable violations found in 2009 = 135 Probable violations corrected in 2009 = 53 Probable violations at the end of 2009 = 120 Compliance Actions taken in 2009 = 43 Civil Penalties assessed in 2009 = 0 Dollars assessed in 2009 = 0 Civil Penalties collected in 2009 = 0 Dollars collected in 2009 = 0

Enforcement Data 2010 Probable violations found in 2010 = 138 Probable violations corrected in 2010 = 177 Probable violations at the end of 2010 = 81 Compliance Actions taken in 2010 = 37 Civil Penalties assessed in 2010 = 0 Dollars assessed in 2010 = $0.00 Civil Penalties collected in 2010 = 0 Dollars collected in 2010 = $0.00

Enforcement Data 2011 Probable violations found in 2011 = 59 Probable violations corrected in 2011 = 64 Probable violations at the end of 2011 = 76 Compliance Actions taken in 2011 = 22 Civil Penalties assessed in 2011 = 2 Dollars assessed in 2011 = 800,000 Civil Penalties collected in 2011 = 2 Dollars collected in 2011 = 800,000

Information Resources  Enforcement Data  Links to the CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, 199 and Part 40  Code Updates  Advisory Notices  Proposed Rules  Link to Operator Registry – Validation Deadline 09/30/2012  Links to PHMSA Sites  Link to Emergency Responder Training

r/Operatorlist.html?nocache= r/Operatorlist.html?nocache=7941  Operator Information  Emergency Responder Training  Damage Prevention information  Pipeline Regulations  Link to National Pipeline Mapping System  Community Assistance & Technical Services  Link to Common Ground Alliance  Emergency Planning Information

Questions?