Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Interagency/Community-Based Planning: State & District Level Planning for Tertiary Support Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Joan Macy and Kaitlyn Stratemeier,
Adair County System of Care Overcoming Obstacles to Helping Others.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
The Role of Community Resource Mapping in the Mental Health and Schools Together-NH Initiative New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
Using Online Instruction in Positive Behavior Support Training Kansas Institute for Positive Behavior Support (KIPBS) Rachel Freeman.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
The Arizona Community of Practice (AzCoPT) June 12,
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Sustainability of PBS Implementation: State-wide Planning in Kansas March 27, 2008 Rachel Freeman University of Kansas.
Frances Blue. “Today’s young people are living in an exciting time, with an increasingly diverse society, new technologies and expanding opportunities.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Step 1: Build a Planning Team
Vermont’s Early Childhood & Family Mental Health Competencies A story of Integration & Collaboration  How can they help me?
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
SW-PBS: Leadership & Sustainability George Sugai Center on PBIS University of Connecticut University of Oregon November 2, 2005
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Presentation transcript:

Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University of Missouri Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas

Purpose of Presentation Share the evolution of Schoolwide PBS (SW-PBS) in Missouri Describe how the statewide PBIS team collaborated with professionals in mental health and developmental disabilities to – Form a statewide interagency planning process – Leverage limited funds for PBS across agencies Describe the tiered implementation training beginning in the MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD)

MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools 1999 Training Format The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) local improvement grants (LIGs) are awarded to districts to attend trainings throughout the year and during summer institutes. Staff from the University of Missouri PBS Center provides the trainers for these activities. History of MO SW-PBS

MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools MO SW-PBS Present Training Format 22 Consultants in 9 regions, 5 Tier 2/3 consultants, state data/web consultant, state coordinator and MU PBS personnel provide training/technical assistance on standardized curriculum for multiple levels and stakeholders

Implement Universals Identify Students Describe Problem Identify Function Select & Provide Intervention Evaluate Outcomes Collect & Review Data BAT – A BAT – C, D, E BAT – F, G Revised 10/12/2011

Current Statistics schools representing 202 districts are active participants – This is 29% of Missouri schools and 36% of Missouri districts Support from MO Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Dr. Tim Lewis, an MU professor and co-director of the OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, continues to be instrumental in providing ongoing technical assistance and guidance to the Missouri SW-PBS initiative.

Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Collaboration

Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery No system to inform schools that other agencies are working with the child and family Agencies and schools do not work together to develop one plan with the child and family Often agency people feel that they are asked to take sides – parents vs. the school School personnel spending minutes during meetings focusing only on the problems

Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery (Continued…) Parents not sharing what it is like at home Schools expecting parents to do it all - telling them what to do instead of collaborating around goals and dreams for child “Too many words” or with “too much Jargon” because so many different systems are working to provide services to the child and family

Interagency Collaboration Started in 2008 Agencies included: – Missouri SW-PBS – Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Office of Quality Schools Office of Special Education Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled – Department of Mental Health Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Comprehensive Psychiatric Services

Leadership Team Funding Visibility Policy/P olitical Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Active Coordination Local School Teams/Demonstrations State-wide Model for SWPBS Tier 3 Interagency System Behavioral Expertise Adapted From: Placed Policy With Political Support and Added Tier 3 Interagency Systems

Interagency Planning Team State Team District Team School Planning Team Add a Statewide Problem-solving System to Encourage Interagency Use of PBS Funds

Key Issues Related to Sustainability of Interagency Collaboration Goal was to avoid common problems associated with interagency meetings and to follow key elements of sustainability & systems change: Promote priority for a specific practice Maximize contextual fit Ensure efficacy of practices Use data for continuous generation Avoid over reliance on any one individual

Important Expectations for the Team The outcomes of the team process must address each agency’s agenda No group slowed down their own progress to wait for another group to “catch up”; instead, every agency proceeded with tasks at their own pace Goal was to remain aware of what was happening with training and technical assistance across agencies at all times

First Steps: Assessment and Brainstorming

MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools 2008 DMH CPSDDD Interagency Collaboration – First Steps

Initial Goals of the Team Work between agencies at the state level and information gleaned from working with schools and human service agencies across the state resulted in the identification of the following goals: Develop a Common Language Develop a Common Vision Develop a Common Training

Develop a Common Vision What can we start doing? Focus on quality of life ‒Start the conversation with the goal, not the problem. All schools and human service agencies must work with families to focus first on prevention – not on reaction

Develop Common Vision Improve quality of life across the lifespan Foster interagency collaboration Support delivery of evidence-based, outcome- focused, person-centered services and supports Share training resources Increase professionals’ skills in implementing positive behavior support and person-centered planning Leverage limited state funds

Develop a Common Language Identify terms we need to understand to facilitate collaborative work with children and families. ‒Glossary of terms developed that will be used by schools and human service agencies in Missouri Establish ongoing communication between families, agencies and families

Develop a Common Language Glossary of terms developed that will be used by schools and human service agencies in MO Person-Centered Planning – Schools do not commonly use the term, Person- Centered Planning. Yet, the Person-Centered Plan is the starting point for provision of services through the Division of Developmental Disabilities and Comprehensive Psychiatric Services Quality of Life

Develop a Common Language Establish ongoing communication between families, agencies and schools Schools and agencies identify one person within each system to act as the contact. Add the following to school enrollment forms: “List other agencies currently working with your child”

Develop a Common Training System & Curriculum While MO SW-PBS was designing curriculum and training to develop Tier 2 system of support, collaboration with other state agencies was initiated to prepare for design of Tier 3 system of support. Common language incorporated in MO SW- PBS and Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tier 3 curricula

Develop a Common Training System & Curriculum Shared Training Opportunities - what do we need to do to make this happen? DDD is developing training systems that are modeled after systems developed by MO SW- PBS. – DDD provides training for Behavior Resource Team members during Monthly Meetings Behavior Resource Team members attend the trainings provided to schools by MO SW- PBS consultants. Schools and human service agencies will send information to one another about upcoming trainings.

The Assessment Resulted in the Following It was common for professionals to know about the interagency teams that were occurring within their own agency However, professionals in other agencies were not always aware of these interagency meetings The PBS team was curious about the extent to which interagency teams at the local and regional level “overlap” How do these teams relate to the SWPBS efforts (RPDCs) and to the BRT supports across the state

Location of RPDCs (SW-PBS Regional Trainers)

Systems of Care Interagency Meetings

Juvenile Justice Meetings

Community Transition Teams (for Students with Developmental Disabilities)

Assessing Overlap of Teams

Defining the Types of Training Needed

Four Levels of Integrated Training 1.Awareness Training in PBS 2.Training for Professionals in PBS (inservice) 3.Training Facilitators to lead teams 4.Training Experienced leaders who will provide training in areas 1-3

Layers of Training Are Needed for Different Prevention Tiers Tier 1/Universal Interventions/Primary Prevention (Example: Training for teams in systems to create positive environments, teach communication and social skills, and collect data and intervene early) Tier 2/Secondary Prevention/Specialized (Example: Trainings for teams to use data for early identification of problem behavior and implementation of interventions that will support groups of individuals) Tier 3 or Tertiary Prevention (Example: Trainings for teams to create systems that address chronic and severe problem behavior)

Four Levels of Integrated Training 1.Awareness Training in PBS – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 2.Training for Professionals in PBS (Preservice/inservice) – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 3.Training Facilitators to lead teams – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 4.Training Experienced leaders who will provide training in areas 1-3 – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3

MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools 2011 DMH CPSDDD Interagency Collaboration Community Mental Health Community Support Specialists RO BRT SB40 Transition Coordinators

First MO Interagency Task Orders Create Tertiary Level PBS Curriculum That Can Be Used Across Education, Human Services and Other Agencies Expand and Encourage Interagency Collaboration at State, Regional, and Local Levels Establish State Level Data-based Decision Making to Evaluate Impact of PBS in Missouri Ensure that Universities and Colleges Across Missouri Know About the Interagency Team and Can Access the PBS Curriculum

Two Regional Interagency Pilots Awareness training in PBS for District team, Agencies in DD, Mental Health, Families, etc School-wide PBS tools to assist districts created and embedded within the statewide training system (this is created with the team but embedded in the SWPBS training systems) Assistance in helping regional teams create strategies that will improve PBS planning for individual students within regions – Training – Service Coordination – Communication – Etc.

Additional First MO Interagency Task Orders Create 2 Glossy Brochures About the Interagency Efforts for Dissemination Gather information from Local, Regional, and Statewide Professionals to Guide Implementation Modify a District tier 2 & 3 self assessment checklist that includes interagency planning in addition to other district-level considerations

First MO Interagency Task Orders (Continued) Expand Tiered Training Systems in Developmental Disabilities – Medicaid Reimbursement for Organizations to Implement Tiers 1 & 2 – Tier 3 Can Only Be Facilitated by BCBA Certified Professionals) – Create a Training System Similar to Statewide PBIS

Products and Outcomes Logic model, draft task orders, and mission statement Modification of a district self assessment and implementation planning checklist for tiers 2 & 3 that includes interagency collaboration Team member audit of a tier 3 interagency training system in Kansas using online modules, onsite classes, mentoring observations, and intervention fidelity

Products and Outcomes (Continued) Policy document --how PBS can be implemented from a tiered perspective within the DD system Development of a tool similar to the Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET) – Agency Systems Supports Evaluation Tool (ASSET) Software program designed – “Big Seven” for Agencies – To provide data-based decision making in general using Incident Reports

Products and Outcomes (Continued) Human subjects design outlining a plan for disseminating a qualitative study of interagency collaboration in MO First glossy brochure describing the purpose of the Missouri Interagency Statewide Team Training materials created for regional team (ie. Kirksville awareness PBS materials), meeting minutes, and perceptions of individuals participating in process thus far

Products and Outcomes (Continued) State interagency professionals visited two state schools implementing SW-PBS; during this visit information was gathered about how to begin structuring interviews, focus groups, and tool development

Working Smarter Not Harder Using Already Existing Developmental Disability Resources to Establish Data, Systems, and Practices for Preventing Problem Behavior and Increasing Quality of LIfe

Development of Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Supports Systems 1:1 crisis behavior management ineffective and expensive-”focus on putting out fires” System wide approach necessary for effectiveness and best use of resources – Modeling after Mo-SW state level systems- “not re- inventing the wheel” – Person Centered Process – focus on QOL – To implement must have training, coaching, mentoring and system support

Mo SW Model Regional Consultants - Unit of Implementation = School Building - System of Recognition (Bronze, Silver Gold) - Training designed for implementation phases - SET -ODR -Big ‘5’ School Team to design implementation of school wide Tier 1 and 2 strategies Mo DDD Tiered Supports Model Regional Behavior Resource Team Members - Unit of implementation = Agency or Family - System of Recognition of implementation -Trainings to be designed for Implementation phases -ASSET -EMT (incident reports) -Big ‘7’ Agency/Family team – design and implement systemic Universal Strategies Systems Data Practices

Missouri Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Support Work Structure Regional Behavior Analyst Behavior Resource Lead or Supervisor Team Member Family 1-Decision Maker and Caretakers Agency 1 Implementation Team and Coach Agency 2 Implementation Team and Coach Team Member Agency 3 Implementation Team and Coach Agency 4 Implementation Team and Coach Family 2-Decision Maker and Caretakers

MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Supports Practices include: 3) Intensive individualized behavior supports- to be developed and implemented by licensed professionals. 2) Specialized strategies for common problem situations; and 1) Universal strategies-proactive, preventative, positive teaching based strategies for staff and families to use

Other System Modifications That Support Implementation Licensure required for practice of Applied Behavior Analysis (with exemption for IDEA) Medicaid Waiver services to fund additional assistance with implementation of model – Behavior Analysis services – for development of Intensive Individualized supports – Person Centered Strategies Consultation - to develop, around an individual, implementation of universal strategies that improve quality of life

MO DDD Expected Outcomes Development and implementation of universal strategies will: – Advance quality of life outcomes – Improve processes and practices – Support communication and consistency for all individuals (those served and those supporting) – Reduce occurrences and severity of crisis situations

Missouri Division of Developmental Disabilities Tiered Supports Model What? Applied Behavior Analysis What? Focused teaching strategies What? Proactive, preventive, positive & teaching based strategies for staff and families to use consistently and continuously

Additional Example of Interagency PBS Awareness Brochure