Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Restructuring Sustaining the Change Sam Redding Center on Innovation & Improvement
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
AYP Changes for Percent Meeting Standard Elementary uniform bar (3-5)
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
New Teacher Induction Model
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Colorado Department of Education
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education Cooperative Kentucky Science and Technology Corporation Kentucky State University University of Kentucky

CKPIMS Project Goals  Improve the overall student performance in mathematics and science in lowest achieving schools in the participating school districts  Close the achievement gap among student subgroups as identified in each school’s Improvement Profile  Develop, implement and evaluate professional development strategies which can be used across participating school districts  Develop, implement, and evaluate a system for monitoring school performance and attainment of improvement goals  Create processes and strategies which will enable school districts and schools to sustain and enlarge upon the impacts of this project

CKPIMS Project Activities Develop an “improvement profile” for each school and overall group of schools using a modified version of the Science/Mathematics Program Improvement Review Conduct a comprehensive review of each districts curriculum to insure alignment with the Kentucky Program of Studies and insure adequate depth of instruction Develop and Implement a training program based on the identified science/mathematics content and pedagogical needs Develop and implement a “peer mentoring program” to support program implementation Develop and implement a leadership training program for school principals and/or lead teachers facilitating high quality mathematics and science instruction Implement a web-based classroom observation system to determine patterns of instruction and track program implementation

Rationale/Assumptions Program Improvement Profile (PIP) Schools cannot develop and/or implement a successful improvement plan without first recognizing and understanding the current level of practice Student achievement will improve as a result of changing both context and practice based on an understanding of the current program A qualified external review team can more readily identify program issues as It is difficult, if not impossible, for teachers and the administration to critically analyze their own existing program Ratings should be based on a rubric which reflects best practice and clearly delineates levels of practice and performance Professional development must be linked to identified program issues and deficiencies to enable both individual and overall program improvement

Program Improvement Profile Procedures  One-Day Site Visit  Observe all teachers teaching mathematics or science  Review school’s program documentation  Interview the principal, teachers, students  Collect teacher perception data  Examine assessment data and student achievement information  Provide school comprehensive report with recommendations

Reporting Program Improvement Profile Findings General meeting of participating school teacher leaders and administrators to: (1) discuss procedures and general findings; (2) discuss strategies for planning and implementing corrective strategies based on Program Improvement Profile Teacher leader/principal team, with support from PIP reviewers, will present findings to school faculty Teacher leaders will provide leadership for development of math/science program improvement plan

Utilizing the Program Improvement Profile: Individual School Level  Review the report with the teaching staff  Prioritize recommendations  Identify major issues from recommendations and develop goals, objectives, strategies for improving student performance  Develop a short-range and long-range plan to meet goals and objectives  Implement the plan including the necessary professional development, contextual changes, curriculum development, etc. as identified in improvement plan  Evaluate activities and progress toward goals on a pre-determined schedule  Adjust plan based on evaluation data and continue implementation

Aggregated PIP Data to Inform the CKPIMS MSP Project  Data from all PIPs will be integrated into a “program-wide profile” to inform the development of coop-wide professional development  Aggregated data will be distributed to participating districts to assist with needs assessment for district-wide professional development  Aggregated data will provide the basis for year 2 activities and development of future regional projects

CKPIMS Project Contacts Donna Shaw, CKPIMS Project Director Stephen Henderson, CKPIMS Asst. Project Director and Program Manager (859) , ext. 231