Bertrand Duopoly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bertrand Again Here we study a situation known as capacity constraints.
Advertisements

Strategic Pricing: Theory, Practice and Policy Professor John W. Mayo
The World of Oligopoly: Preliminaries to Successful Entry
1 Predatory Conduct. 2 Predatory conduct is the implementation of a strategy designed specifically to deter rival firms from competing in a market. To.
MICROECONOMICS EV Prof. Davide Vannoni. Exercise session 4 monopoly and deadweight loss 1.Exercise on monopoly and deadweight loss 2.Exercise on natural.
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
Cournot Oligopoly and Welfare by Kevin Hinde. Aims F In this session we will explore the interdependence between firms using the Cournot oligopoly models.
Chapter 12 Oligopoly. Chapter 122 Oligopoly – Characteristics Small number of firms Product differentiation may or may not exist Barriers to entry.
Michael R. Baye, Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 3e. ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter.
Basic Oligopoly Models
Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013.
1 3 rd Price Discrimination. 2 Review We saw a monopoly is the only firm that sells a product. Up to this point we worked with a single price monopoly.
Chapter 12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly.
Price-Output Determination in Oligopolistic Market Structures We have good models of price- output determination for the structural cases of pure competition.
Week 13 Managerial Economics. Order of Business Homework Assigned Lectures Other Material Lectures for Next Week.
Yale lectures 5 and 6 Nash Equilibrium – no individual can do strictly better by deviating – self enforcing in agreements Investment game – all invest.
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models.
Antoine Augustin Cournot
Monopolistic Competition
The Four Types of Market Structure
1 Competitive Industry in the Short Run. 2 operating rule case 1 $/unit Q or units MC AC AVCb c The firm is a price taker - say it takes P If firm operatesif.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Nash Equilibrium.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Duopoly.
1 1 st degree price discrimination A form of Monopoly Power.
1 Sweezy Oligopoly Here we introduce the notion of Oligopoly and look at one particular model.
1 Government production Should the government produce as a monopolist or try to act like a competitive firm?
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton A Second Cournot Example.
EC102: Class 8 Christina Ammon.
1 Profit The word profit in economics really means economic profit. Let’s see what this means.
1 Oligopoly. 2 By the end of this Section, you should be able to: Describe the characteristics of an oligopoly Describe the characteristics of an oligopoly.
1 1 st degree price discrimination A form of Monopoly Power.
Types of Market Structure
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton The Cournot Model.
Perfect Competition Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN. Types of Markets u u Pure Competition or Perfect Competition u u Monopoly u u Duopoly u u Oligopoly u.
Oligopoly Chapter 16. Imperfect Competition Imperfect competition includes industries in which firms have competitors but do not face so much competition.
Competition And Market Structure
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Power of Rivalry: Economics of Competition and Profits MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Oligopoly. Oligopoly is a market in which a small number of firms compete. In oligopoly, the quantity sold by one firm depends on the firm’s own price.
Monopoly This firm is now the ultimate market power in the galaxy.
CHAPTER 12 Imperfect Competition. The profit-maximizing output for the monopoly 2 If there are no other market entrants, the entrepreneur can earn monopoly.
Oligopoly. Structure Assume Duopoly Firms know information about market demand Perfect Information.
Lecture 12Slide 1 Topics to be Discussed Oligopoly Price Competition Competition Versus Collusion: The Prisoners’ Dilemma.
Imperfectly Competitive Markets Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly.
Types of Economic Competition. Determining the Type of Economic Competition The number of firms competing in the market The amount of similarity between.
Today n Oligopoly Theory n Economic Experiment in Class.
Oligopoly: Interdependence and Collusion Industrial Economics.
© 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning, all rights reserved C H A P T E R Oligopoly.
Chapter 11 The World of Oligopoly: Preliminaries to Successful Entry.
Pashigian, Chapter 10, Exercise 3. Since marginal cost is zero, I assume each firm can produce the entire market demand. This sounds to me like a "winner.
Chapter 26 Oligopoly, mainly Duopoly. Quantity or price competitions. Sequential games. Backward solution. Identical products: p = p (Y ), Y = y 1 + y.
Oligopoly-I.
Models of Competition Part III: Imperfect Competition
OLIGOPOLY-II.
Today n Oligopoly Theory n Economic Experiment in Class.
Oligopoly Overheads. Market Structure Market structure refers to all characteristics of a market that influence the behavior of buyers and sellers, when.
Lecture 7 Price competition. Bertrand’s Model of Oligopoly Strategic variable price rather than output. Single good produced by n firms Cost to firm i.
INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS Topic 9 Oligopoly: Strategic Firm Interaction These slides are copyright © 2010 by Tavis Barr. This work is licensed under.
Microeconomics 1000 Lecture 13 Oligopoly.
ECON 330 Lecture 13 Tuesday, November 6.
ECON 330 Lecture 10.5 Tuesday, October 23.
24 C H A P T E R Pure Monopoly.
Chapter 16: Oligopoly.
Today Oligopoly Theory Economic Experiment in Class.
CHAPTER 12 OUTLINE Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Price Competition Competition versus Collusion: The Prisoners’ Dilemma 12.5.
Marginal Revenue & Monopoly
CHAPTER 10 Oligopoly.
Market Structure Wrap-Up
Chapter 7: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
CH12 :Perfect Competition Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN
Presentation transcript:

Bertrand Duopoly

We have seen that Oligopoly is a situation where there are just a few firms. In this situation each firm understands that the outcomes of its actions are also influenced by the actions of the other firms. In a Cournot duopoly the firms competed on quantity. There we saw that the output level and price of the firms fell somewhere between the monopoly level and the competitive level. In the Bertrand model firms will compete on price. It seems to me firms in the computer business compete on price. In other situations firms may compete on features of the product. Let’s turn to the Bertrand model.

Bertrand Duopoly Some assumptions of the model: If the two firms charge the same price each will get half of the market demand at that price. If one firm charges more than the other, even just a little bit, then the one with the higher price will sell nothing and the one with the lower price will have all the demand at that price. Each firm wants to maximize its profit. Let’s say the demand in a market is Q = 100 – 5P And say the marginal cost for each firm is 2.

Let’s see what the result would be if there was only one firm in this market. With Q = 100 – 5P P = 20 - .2Q MR = 20 -.4Q and with MR = MC for profit maximization 20 - .4Q = 2, so Q = 18/.4 = 45 and then P = 11. On the next slide let’s explore the demand from firm 2’s perspective. We will want to remember the assumptions we made on a previous slide.

Firm 2’s perspective on the demand it will have Q2 = 0 if P2 > P1 and profit = 0. Q2 = .5(100 – 5P2) if P2 = P1 and profit = P2Q2 – MCQ2 =(P2 – MC)Q2 =(P2 – MC).5(100 – 5P2) Q2 = (100 – 5P2) if P2 < P1 and profit = P2Q2 – MCQ2 =(P2 – MC)(100 – 5P2) Let’s say both charge the monopoly price of 11. Firm two would then have Q2 = .5(100 – 5(11)) = 22.5 and profit = (11-2)22.5 = 202.5 If firm 2 charged just a little less than 11, say 10.99, when firm 1 charges 11, then firm 2 will make Q2 = 100 – 5(10.99) = 45.05 and profit will be (10.99 – 2)45.05 = 404.9995

Firm two finds it irresistible to not charge a lower price here, when the other firm is charging a monopoly price. Now, imagine that firm 1 charges less than its marginal cost of production. Firm 1 would lose money. If firm 2 charged an even lower price firm 2 would lose money. Firm 2 would be better off not producing at all. So, when firm 1 has price lower than marginal cost, firm 2 does not want to have a lower price. If firm 1 has price at marginal cost then firm 2 doesn’t want to have a lower price because it would lose money and it doesn’t want to have a higher price because it won’t sell anything. On the next slide I will have a summary of firm 2’s reactions given what firm 1 does – we will see the best price response for firm 2.

Firm 2’s best price response If P1 > monopoly price of 11, set P2 = 11 and sell monopoly Q, 2(=mc) < P1 <= 11, set P2 = P1 – small amount, sell all of mkt at P2, P1 = 2(=mc), set P2 = 2(=mc) and sell half of market at P2 = 2, 2(=mc) > P1 >= 0, set P2 > P1 and sell nothing. Firm 1’s best price response is similar P2 > monopoly price of 11, set P1 = 11 and sell monopoly Q, 2(=mc) < P2<= 11, set P1 = P2 – small amount, sell all of mkt at P1, P2 = 2(=mc), set P1= 2(=mc) and sell half of market at P1 = 2, 2(=mc) > P2 >= 0, set P1 > P2 and sell nothing.

Let’s check some possible solutions to see if they qualify as a Nash Equilibrium. Is P1 = 11, P2 = 10.99 a Nash Equilibrium? Firm 2 does not want to change from P2 = 10.99 if firm 1 has P1 = 11, but firm 1 would want to change (what does firm 1’s best response from the previous slide suggest?). Firm 1 would want P1 = 10.98 in this case. But then firm 2 would want 10.97. This would spiral downward. What about P1 = 1.5 and P2 = 1.6 as a Nash equilibrium? Firm 2 would not want to change, but firm 1 would want something like 1.61. But then firm two would want P2=1.62. This would spiral upward.

Is P1=2 and P2=2 a Nash equilibrium Is P1=2 and P2=2 a Nash equilibrium? Both would not want to change so it is a Nash Equilibrium. Wow, here with only two firms if they compete on price the price gets driven to MC. This is the competitive solution!