Spring, 2009 www.cenmi.org/miblsi Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Stakeholders in Helping Students Succeed! We have the program to get there!
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2008)1 Oregon Reading First Conference Call Data-based Action Planning Winter 2008.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
Oregon Reading First (2007)1 Oregon Reading First Coaches’ Meeting Spring 2007 IBR Preparation April 25 and 26th, 2007.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
DATA BASED DECISION MAKING IN THE RTI PROCESS: WEBINAR #2 SETTING GOALS & INSTRUCTION FOR THE GRADE Edward S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director, Center for Promoting.
Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring 2009.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Middle Schools Winter, 2009.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Cohort 4 - Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Vocabulary Screening. Overview Assesses knowledge of the meaning of grade level words read silently. Student is given 3 answer choices and chooses a synonym.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Welcome Spring
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Schoolwide Systems Review: Module 3.0 Gather Cohort 7 Middle Schools.
Spring Data Review and Action Planning: Module 1.0 Introduction Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High Schools Spring
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Spring, Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading

Acknowledgements Many slides are based upon the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski, DMG The Data Review Guide is adapted from the Thumb Area Student Achievement Model Reading Presentation Prepared by: –Gloria Johnson –Margie McGlinchey –Jim Weaver

Preparation for the Team Pair Share Review Winter Data Review Guide completed in January Locate the Team Pair Share Preparation Sheet Respond to the questions regarding your team’s assignments at Winter Data Review and be prepared to share with another team 10 minutes

Team Time Team Pair Share Team Pair Share Share with your partner team your school’s progress with the assignments on the Team Pair Share WorksheetShare with your partner team your school’s progress with the assignments on the Team Pair Share Worksheet 7 minutes per team share time7 minutes per team share time

How Are We Doing? What Do We Need To Know? 1.What percent of students achieved literacy goals (met targets)? 2.What percent of students are making adequate progress toward achieving literacy goals? Is our system of support effective enough to get students on track and to keep them there? How effective is our core (benchmark) support?

How Are We Doing? Question #1: What percent of students achieved literacy goals (met target)? What percent of students were established in winter on ORF? Mazes? What percent of students are established in spring on ORF? Mazes?

Where Do We Find Percent of Students at Benchmark, Strategic, or Intensive Levels? Use the Achievement % Report

Team Time Record % established for fall, winter, and spring on the Data Review GuideRecord % established for fall, winter, and spring on the Data Review Guide Materials NeededMaterials Needed –Achievement % Reports for each grade –Spring Data Review Guide Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

How Are We Doing? Question #2: What percent of students are making adequate progress toward achieving literacy goals? Is our system of support effective enough to get students on track and to keep them there? How effective is our core (benchmark) support?

Summary of Impact

How Effective Is Our Benchmark Instruction? What was the average weekly gain in WCPM for established level students? What percent of established level students stayed at benchmark?

Summary of Impact

Summary of Impact: Average Weekly Gain (Average Score for Spring minus Average Score for Winter) ÷ 18 weeks = Average weekly gain per semester (Sp - W) ÷ 18 ( ) ÷ 18 Use 50 th %ile for benchmark and compare to Growth Table’s typical rate of improvement (ROI) Circle + for above, - for below 50 th %ile W Sp

Summary of Impact: Percents Percents of students remaining at benchmark

How Effective Is Our Strategic Instruction? What was the average weekly gain in WCPM for emerging level students? What percent of emerging level students moved to benchmark?

Summary of Impact

Summary of Impact: Average Weekly Gain (Average Score for Spring minus Average Score for Winter) ÷ 18 weeks = Average weekly gain per semester (Sp - W) ÷ 18 ( ) ÷ 18 Using 25 th %ile for strategic, compare to Growth Table’s typical rate of improvement (ROI). Circle + for above, - for below 25 th %ile W Sp

Summary of Impact: Percents Percent of students moving from strategic to benchmark

How Effective Is Our Intensive Instruction? What was the average weekly gain in WCPM for deficit level students? What percent of deficit level students moved to strategic or benchmark?

Summary of Impact

Summary of Impact: Average Weekly Gain (Average Score for Spring minus Average Score for Winter) ÷ 18 weeks = Average weekly gain per semester (Sp - W) ÷ 18 ( ) ÷ 18 Using 10 th %ile for intensive, compare to Growth Table’s typical rate of improvement (ROI). Circle + for above, - for below 10 th %ile W Sp

Summary of Impact: Percents Percent of students moving from intensive to benchmark

Steps for Determining Adequate Progress of Deficit Level Students Find spring cut score for strategic level from the MiBLSi Preliminary Benchmark Goals for Grades 5-8 sheet Look at students listed in Intensive Support column on Summary of Impact Report and make an X next to the names of students who score at or above the spring cut score for strategic level Add number of Xs to number of  s on the report to determine the number of students making adequate progress (moving from intensive to either strategic or benchmark) Divide the sum of Xs and  s by the total number of intensive students. Multiply by 100 [(Xs +  s) ÷ Total] x 100 = %

Steps for Determining Adequate Progress of Deficit Level Students [( Xs +  s) ÷ Total] x 100 = % [( 3 + 0) ÷ 10] x 100 = 30% x x

Team Time Complete pages 2 & 3, sections A, B & C of Reading Data Review GuideComplete pages 2 & 3, sections A, B & C of Reading Data Review Guide –Materials needed Previous slides in handout for referencePrevious slides in handout for reference Summary of Impact ReportsSummary of Impact Reports AIMSweb Aggregate Growth TableAIMSweb Aggregate Growth Table CalculatorCalculator –MiBLSi Preliminary Benchmark Goals for Grades 5-8 Finish early?Finish early? –Complete the optional Summary Table Directions are on the next two slidesDirections are on the next two slides Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Team Time Optional Transfer the information from the Data Review Guide to the Summary Table, for second semesterTransfer the information from the Data Review Guide to the Summary Table, for second semester Highlight with yellow or green highlighters using key at bottom of the tableHighlight with yellow or green highlighters using key at bottom of the table If finished before time is up, follow the same steps to transfer first semester data using Spring Data Review Guide completed in JanuaryIf finished before time is up, follow the same steps to transfer first semester data using Spring Data Review Guide completed in January

Team Time Complete the Middle School Summary Table Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Using the data from Sections A, B & C, or the optional Summary Table, answer the Guiding Questions on the Data Review Guide

Schoolwide Implementation Features Goals, Objectives, Priorities Assessment Instructional Program and Materials Instructional Time Differentiated Instruction/Grouping/Scheduling Administration/Organization/Communication Professional Development

Schoolwide Examples Instructional Time Students receive one hour of reading instruction daily –Explicit instruction in vocabulary, comprehension, fluency Additional time is allocated for struggling students

Schoolwide Examples (con’t.) Differentiated Instruction Flexible homogenous groups based on student performance Group size, time allotted, and instructional materials are based on student performance data

Schoolwide Examples (con’t.) Administration, Organization, and Communication –Leadership maintains a focus on high-quality instruction, organizing and allocating resources to support reading instruction –Create an organized plan to deliver Scientifically-Based Reading practices Grade/Content level teams Monthly leadership meetings

Team Time SchoolWide Evaluation and Planning Tool (SWEPT) Team Time 5 Complete SWEPTComplete SWEPT 5 minutes per section (35 minutes)5 minutes per section (35 minutes) Turn in one copy of page 12 todayTurn in one copy of page 12 today Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Action Plan Progress Monitoring In the fall we developed an action plan with –Two measurable goals specifying where we wanted to be by spring –Activities needed to achieve those goals In winter data review we made mid-year adjustments and added one additional goal to the Action Plan (Vocabulary) The year is almost over…How did we do?…

Team Time Review your action plan and data Did you achieve your goals?Did you achieve your goals? Complete section 3 of the Data Review GuideComplete section 3 of the Data Review Guide Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Implications for Summer and Fall 2009 Considering all data sources for all grades complete Next Steps, section number 4, of the MS Reading Data Review Guide

Team Pair Share Topics for sharing: –How Are We Doing? Spring ‘09 Reading outcomesSpring ‘09 Reading outcomes –Did We Achieve Our Action Plan Goals? –What Are Our Next Steps? Implications for Summer 09 planning/activitiesImplications for Summer 09 planning/activities Implications for Fall 09 planning/activitiesImplications for Fall 09 planning/activities Team Time

Where Can We Use What We’ve Done Today? A Look to the Future… Staff meetings to share with fellow teachers Board meetings to update them on the outcomes and preliminary planning for the summer and next year Curriculum committee or board when data suggests specific issues for which the school lacks instructional materials that have SBRR Basis for Fall Action Plan Needs assessment for SBRR professional development Needs assessment for grant opportunities

Congratulations! You’ve Completed Year Three of a Three to Five Year Change!! Success can rarely be credited to only one person.Success can rarely be credited to only one person. Take a look around your team’s table.Take a look around your team’s table. Acknowledge the contributions of your teammates by writing the name of the person to your left on the back of a sticky note and jotting a note of appreciation on the front. Repeat for the person to your right.Acknowledge the contributions of your teammates by writing the name of the person to your left on the back of a sticky note and jotting a note of appreciation on the front. Repeat for the person to your right. Place sticky notes, comment side up in the center of the table in random order. When all are complete, read them aloud, guessing the name of the person being described.Place sticky notes, comment side up in the center of the table in random order. When all are complete, read them aloud, guessing the name of the person being described. Contributions can be serious or humorous. Have some fun!!Contributions can be serious or humorous. Have some fun!! Team Time

TEAMWORK is not always about winning, but working together to make things happen