2013-2014 APPR CHANGES AND UPDATES Cattaraugus-Little Valley CSD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Professional Growth and
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
IVg IVc IVa Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Rhode Island School Counselor Evaluation Jean Greco, Patricia Nailor and Karl Squier RISCA Spring Conference Rhode Island Convention Center April 11,
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Data Driven Instruction for Common Core Learning
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
APPR How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Differentiated Supervision
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
+ Welcome! Agenda: 5:00-5:30 Influences discussion 5:30-6:30 Review of last week’s discussion NBPTS standards 6:30-6:45 Break 6:45-7:00 NAEA Standards.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Daretta L. Wilson EDU645: Learning & Assessment for the 21st Century Professor: Alan Belcher February 16, 2016.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Update on UDL Implementation Measurement and GD Comparison Districts
Professional Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

APPR CHANGES AND UPDATES Cattaraugus-Little Valley CSD

Thanks to the committee… Jessica Mentley Jessica Brassard-Moore Jolene Ayres Cathy Pearl Audrey Mauda Lisa LaQuay Fred Christopher Tammy Brooks Kristi Neal Val Plunkett Tony Giannicchi Aaron Wolfe Jon Peterson Carrie Yohe

Relax There are no huge changes to the plan. The decision was made to retain the NYSUT Rubric— 2011 Version. Our HEDI point scales will remain the same. The portfolio process will now include an optional conference between teacher and evaluator—at the request of either the teacher or supervisor. For the school year, portfolios are due Thursday, April 10 th !

Focus Indicators Specific indicators that all teachers in the district will be responsible for demonstrating. Apply only to standards 1, 2, 6, & Focus Indicators for each standard. The remainder of the 50% are still individual choice. Forms have been developed that will help teachers cover the Focus Indicators in their pre-observation and portfolio. Professional Development will be targeted to help build capacity with these indicators.

Standard A: Meets diverse learning needs of each student IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher does not vary or modify instruction to meet diverse learning needs of students. Teacher varies or modifies instruction to meet the diverse learning needs of some students. Teacher varies or modifies instruction to meet the diverse learning needs of most students. Teacher varies or modifies instruction to meet the diverse learning needs of each student. Students suggest ways in which the lesson might be modified to advance their own learning and teacher acknowledges the suggestion.

Standard C: Incorporates disciplinary and cross-disciplinary learning experiences IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher does not create learning experiences for students to apply disciplinary and cross-disciplinary knowledge to personal experiences and real world problems. Teacher creates occasional learning experiences for students to apply disciplinary and cross- disciplinary knowledge to personal experiences and real world problems. Teacher creates regular learning experiences for students to apply disciplinary and cross-disciplinary knowledge to personal experiences and real world problems. Teacher creates regular opportunities for students to apply disciplinary and cross- disciplinary knowledge to personal experiences and real world problems. Teacher seeks student input prior to planning such learning experiences.

Standard B: Articulates learning objectives/goals with learning standards IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher is unable to articulate how learning objectives are aligned with learning standards and/or how students will achieve the learning goals. Teacher is able to articulate how some learning objectives are aligned with learning standards and has designed some opportunities for students to achieve the learning goals. Teacher is able to articulate how the learning objectives align with learning standards and includes several different opportunities for students to achieve the learning goals including application of 21st Century Skills. Teacher is able to articulate how the learning objectives are aligned with learning standards and includes several different opportunities for students to achieve the learning goals including application of 21st Century Skills. Students suggest additional ways in which to demonstrate their learning.

Standard B Designs learning experiences using prior knowledge IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher does not design learning experiences that connect students’ prior content knowledge to new learning. Teacher designs some learning experiences that connect prior content knowledge to new learning. Teacher designs learning experiences that connect prior content knowledge to new learning within and across disciplines. Teacher designs learning experiences that connect prior content knowledge to new learning. Teacher plans opportunities for students themselves to make connections to prior learning within and across disciplines.

Pre-observation Form Lesson PreOb Form.docx Preobservation Guide.docx

Standard B: Participates on an instructional team IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher makes no effort to collaborate with teammates or to share information and/or best practices with colleagues to support high expectations for student learning. Teacher inconsistenly collaborates with teammates to fulfill duties. Teacher shares limited information and/or best practices with colleagues to support high expectations for student learning. Teacher collaborates with teammates to support high expectations for student leaning. Teacher regularly shares information and/or best practices with colleagues to improve practice and to support high expectations for student learning. Teacher proactively collaborates with teammates to support high expectations for student learning. Teacher consistently shares information and/or best practices with colleagues.

Standard B: Communicates student performance IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher rarely or does not communicate expectations, student performance, or progress, and/or discussions are addressed in a manner that is insensitive, negative, or blaming. Teacher occasionally communicates expectations, student performance, or progress. Discussions are occasionally respectful of and sensitive to cultural norms. Teacher regularly communicates expectations, student performance or progress. Discussions are frequent, respectful, and sensitive to cultural norms. Teacher establishes processes that enable and encourage regular, two-way communication. Students facilitate communication between the family and school. Discussions are frequent, respectful, and sensitive to cultural norms.

Standard A: Reflects on evidence of student learning IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher does not examine and/or analyze formal and informal evidence of student learning to inform professional growth. Teacher occasionally examines and/or analyzes formal and informal evidence of student learning ; professional growth is only loosely aligned with the needs of students. Teacher regularly examines and analyzes formal and informal evidence of student learning; professional growth is aligned with the needs of students. Teacher engages in an ongoing examination and analysis of formal and infomal evidence of student learning; professional growth is aligned with the needs of students. The teacher reviews the impact of professional learning on student achievement.

Standard A: Sets Goals IneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective Teacher does not set goals to enhance personal strengths or address personal weaknesses in teaching practice. Teacher sets goals to enhance areas of personal strengths or address areas of personal weaknesses in practice, however goals are poorly formulated and do not improve teaching and learning. Teacher sets goals to enhance areas of personal strengths or address areas of personal weaknesses in practice. Goals are well formulated and improve teaching and learning Teacher sets goals to enhance areas of personal strengths or address areas of personal weaknesses in practice. Personal goals are well formulated and improve teaching and learning. Goals are well formatted with specific student learning needs.

Curriculum Website