Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Round Table Discussion- Evaluating Arts Teachers William Kohut, Principal- Denver School of the Arts Dr. Mark Hudson- Director of Arts- Denver Public Schools.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Differentiated Supervision
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
+ Common Core Exploration Elementary Curriculum April 26, 2012.
HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Please sit with level groups at tables EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS ACADEMIES.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
2007 Strengthening Student Success Conference, San Jose Dr. Jack Friedlander Executive Vice President, Educational Programs Santa Barbara City College.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Becoming a World Class Leader: Fostering Effective Teaching and Learning for Each and Every Child Leadership I and II April 2012.
Session Materials  Wiki
Becoming a World Class Leader: Leading Through Transition June 2012.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
COLLABORATIONS TeachersPrincipals Central Office Staff UnionsCommunity.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview Training
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Applying the Skills for Proficient Problem Solving Instructional Intervention Teams Level 3 Training April 7, 2011.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Model Curriculum Units in Literacy and Humanities Strengthening curriculum, instruction, and assessment 2012 Curriculum Summit November 13 and 14, 2012.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Recognize how SLOs align the teacher and principal evaluation Develop a shared understanding of the purpose for using SLOs Become familiar with the SLO.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Becoming a World Class Leader: A Focus on Teacher Evaluation and EEA June Leadership.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
The Year of Core Instruction
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013

Seeking Answers to Your Questions Exit tweet: add to your exit ticket today *Texting and data charges may apply.

SLO FAQ Your questions will contribute to a Frequently Asked Questions list on Student Learning Objectives and the Teacher Evaluation Process which is currently under development.

Session Outcomes Participants will make connections between SLOs and the HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process deepen understanding of what SLOs are analyze and evaluate an example of an SLO create a practice SLO understand the timeline for creating and implementing SLOs for the school year become aware of resources available to support the writing, implementation, and evaluation of SLOs.

Session Outcomes on Bloom’s Taxonomy create a practice SLO analyze and evaluate an example of an SLO make connections between SLOs and the HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process deepen understanding of what SLOs are understand the timeline for creating and implementing SLOs for the school year

Teachers have more influence on students’ achievement than any other school variable. (Sanders and Rivers, 1996)

Insert Screencast Here

Turn to a partner and share (choose 2) Something that is new to you A question that was answered Something that validated what you know Something you found interesting Something you are wondering about

HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Model Charlotte Danielson’s Framework For Teaching and Learning Professional Practice (50%) Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 12.5% Domain 3 Instruction 12.5% Domain 2 Classroom Environment 12.5% Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities 12.5% Literacy Reading Writing Speaking and Listening Differentiation 25%/30% Mathematical Practices Overarching Habits Reasoning and Explaining Modeling and Using Tools Seeing Structure and Generalizing Differentiation 25%/30% Creative Problem Solving in Support of MD STEM Standards of Practice Understanding Challenges Generation of Ideas Preparation for Action Application of Technology Differentiation 25%/30% Content Assessments Performance-Based Tasks Differentiation 25%/30% Qualitative Measures Quantitative Measures Growth on State Assessments (As Mandated by MSDE) 20% Domain 5 Student Growth (50%)

Formative Assessment: True of False? Indicate your answer for each of the following statements about SLOs and the new HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process.

True or False?  MSA/HSA scores will be part of all teachers’ evaluation. FALSE Only teachers grades 4-8 who are teachers of record for mathematics and/or English Language Arts will have MSA calculated into their overall evaluation score (20%). Teachers of HSA assessed areas must align one of their SLOs to the HSA.

True or False? 2. There are exemplars of SLOs created by the curriculum offices. TRUE Example SLOs can be found on the HCPSS Transition to Common Core wiki: transitiontocommoncore.wikispaces.hcpss.org

True or False? 3. All teachers must write two SLOs. FALSE Most teachers will write two SLOs. Teachers grades 4-8 who are teachers of record for mathematics and/or English Language Arts will write one SLO.

True or False? 4. The purpose of SLOs is to set long term goals for student learning. TRUE SLOs are long term goals based on student data, are aligned with current curriculum standards, and are focused on student growth.

True or False? 5. Multiple levels of support and training will be available to staff for writing, implementing, and evaluating SLOs. TRUE Differentiated school-based and systemwide professional learning opportunities will be made available to staff to support work with SLOs.

True or False? 6. Teachers may choose team SLOs or create individual ones. TRUE HCPSS values the power of collaborative teams and encourages teams to use data proactively to meet the needs of students.

True or False? 7. All teachers will be evaluated on the Framework for Teaching Domains (professional practice) and Student Growth every year. FALSE Tenured teachers will be evaluated on Domains 1-4 (professional practice) every three years. Nontenured teachers will be evaluated on Domains 1-4 and Domain 5 Student Growth until tenured. All teachers will be evaluated on Domain 5: Student Growth every year.

True or False? 8. SLOs are approved in consultation with your principal. TRUE All teachers will have a goal setting conference with their primary evaluator to discuss and approve SLOs.

True or False? 9. HCPSS has created templates and tools to inform and expedite the SLO writing process. TRUE The HCPSS Student Learning Objective template and Guide are two examples of tools to support the SLO writing process.

True or False? 10. Teachers will be asked for feedback on enhancements and changes to the SLO writing, implementation, and evaluation process. TRUE Teacher professional growth, student learning, and continuous improvement are at the heart of our work in HCPSS. Teacher feedback and data will be invaluable to this process.

Evaluation Cycle Professional PracticeStudent Growth Nontenured teachersEvery year Tenured teachersEvery 3 rd yearEvery year Number of SLOs Nontenured and tenured teachers grades 4-8 who are teachers of record for mathematics and/or English Language Arts 1 All other nontenured and tenured teachers 2 (aligned with 2 different Domain 5 components)

Timeline By September 30, 2013Set goals in collaboration with evaluator. May be individual or team goals. Fall Semester 2013Demonstrate critical attributes through observation. Collect artifacts and evidence. Follow a continuous improvement process. By January 31, 2014Mid-Year Progress Review Confirm and revise goals, processes, document progress Spring Semester 2014End of Year Conference and Evaluation Present documentation and reflection to evaluator. Evaluator completes evaluation and provides copy to teacher

Tools, Resources, and Supports transitiontocommoncore.wikispaces.hcpss.org

Seeking Answers to Your Questions Exit tweet: add to your exit ticket today *Texting and data charges may apply.

Work of the Breakout Groups Analyzing SLOs Practicing SLO writing Giving and receiving feedback Final reflection

Choose a quote Battelle for Kids, 2009 “If properly implemented, student learning objectives help teachers bring more science to their art, strengthen instructional support to the classrooms, and improve the quality of the outcome.” Without reliable data and information, educators will make inaccurate assumptions about their instructional practices and students’ performance. William J. Slotnik A B

Analyzing Sample SLOs Using the SLO Guide Questions and highlighters, analyze the sample SLO. Reflection What do you notice? What questions do you have? What knowledge, skills. and resources would this teacher need to effectively implement his/her SLO?

Writing a practice SLO In your groups, collectively write an SLO. In addition to contributing to the product, each group member should assume a role: Facilitator Recorder Process observer Resource specialist

Combine your group with another Share your practice SLO with another group. Give warm and cool feedback to each other about your practice SLOs. Share your perspectives on the SLO writing process through the lens of the role you played in your group.

Give and get feedback on your practice SLO Warm feedback: Given in the form of statements, it includes positive comments about attributes of the work. Cool feedback: Given in the form of questions to encourage presenter to see areas for growth and improvement.

Exit Tweet In 140 characters or less, summarize your learning today on an index card or post it. Don’t forget to include your questions.

Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013

Additional SLO Activities

Analyzing an SLO At table groups, individually write your observations, reactions, and questions about the sample SLO into your section of the placemat. When ready, share your insights with the group and write commonalities you had into the center of the placemat Be prepared to share your group’s insights with the larger group.

Spell it Out!: S-L-O On your letter card, write a word or phrase that comes to mind when you think about SLOs that begins with that letter. Form groups of 3 so that your letters spell out “SLO.” Share your ideas with your group. S L O S L O

SLO Brainstorm In your small groups, create a visual/graphic organizer that represents what you know about SLOs. Be prepared to share your thinking with others.