STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT Nicolas Gast Joint work with Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Dan-Cristian Tomozei March 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University
Advertisements

Improving Transmission Asset Utilization through Advanced Mathematics and Computing 1 Henry Huang, Ruisheng Diao, Shuangshuang Jin, Yuri Makarov Pacific.
Secure System Scheduling with High Wind Penetrations J. Kennedy March 2009.
Fair Real-time Traffic Scheduling over A Wireless Local Area Network Maria Adamou, Sanjeev Khanna, Insup Lee, Insik Shin, and Shiyu Zhou Dept. of Computer.
Multi-Area Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network Shmuel Oren University of California, Berkeley Joint.
Data Center Demand Response: Coordinating IT and the Smart Grid Zhenhua Liu California Institute of Technology December 18, 2013 Acknowledgements:
A SERVICE CURVE APPROACH TO DEMAND RESPONSE Jean-Yves Le Boudec Dan-Cristian Tomozei 1 1.
SATISFIABILITY OF ELASTIC DEMAND IN THE SMART GRID Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Dan-Cristian Tomozei EPFL May 26,
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Kevin Kim PENSA Summer Energy Markets: Overview Energy Consumer Demand RTO Power Generators Supply Schedule.
Risk-Limiting Dispatch for Power Networks David Tse, Berkeley Ram Rajagopal (Stanford) Baosen Zhang (Berkeley)
American Electric Power (AEP) Virtual Power Plant Simulator (VPPS) Tom Jones, Manger – Corporate Technology Development American Electric Power Grid-InterOp.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Euroheat & Power Why is there not more combined heat and power?
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Energy arbitrage with micro-storage UKACC PhD Presentation Showcase Antonio De Paola Supervisors: Dr. David Angeli / Prof. Goran Strbac Imperial College.
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant and Wind Power Operational Considerations David Lapinski Consumers Energy Company June 16, 2009.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
Costing of energy generation of multi area interconnected systems with conventional as well as renewable sources Kaisar R. Khan McNeese State University.
Energy procurement in the presence of intermittent sources Jayakrishnan Nair (CWI) Sachin Adlakha (Caltech) Adam Wierman (Caltech)
Western Wind Integration Study Debbie Lew NREL. Goal To support multi-state interests in understanding the operating and cost impacts due to the variability.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
Cork June Dynamic modelling of transmission systems: costs of seasonal-zonal transmission loss factor charging and the impact of large-scale offshore.
Smart Capacity Markets: Can they be Smart Enough? Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Smart Capacity.
Smart-Grid Calculus Dan-Cristian Tomozei (joint work with J.-Y. Le Boudec) DESL-LCA2 Workshop Orsières-Verbier March 2013.
An NSF I/UCRC Could there be a new era with much lower utility bills? Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Presented.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
NWTC Wind Integration: What Have We Learned? Michael Milligan Consultant National Renewable Energy Laboratory Planning for Wind Workshop NW Power & Conservation.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
SATISFIABILITY OF ELASTIC DEMAND IN THE SMART GRID Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Dan-Cristian Tomozei EPFL Energy Systems Day Isaac Newton Institute Cambridge,
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
Capacity Planning. Capacity Capacity (I): is the upper limit on the load that an operating unit can handle. Capacity (I): is the upper limit on the load.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
1 Open University Integrating Renewables Conference 24 January 2006 Wind power on the grid… What happens when the wind stops blowing? David Milborrow
Using Storage To Control Uncertainty in Power Systems Glyn Eggar Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics Heriot-Watt University Energy Systems.
Integrating Wind Energy Capabilities of Wind Power Plants Mark Ahlstrom Wind Energy: A Good Citizen of the Electric Grid Four Corners Wind Resource Center.
Electric Capacity Market Performance with Generation Investment and Renewables Cynthia Bothwell Benjamin Hobbs Johns Hopkins University Work Supported.
IRP Review  IRPs with Significant Detail on Flexibility Assessment  Portland General Electric  Puget Sound Energy  Other IRPs.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
Updated 1/28/2011. Renewables Integration Plans and Challenges March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
The Impact of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources on Wholesale Electricity Prices Prof. Dr. Felix Müsgens, Thomas Möbius USAEE-Conference Pittsburgh,
Slide 1/20 Defending Against Strategic Adversaries in Dynamic Pricing Markets for Smart Grids Paul Wood, Saurabh Bagchi Purdue University
A stochastic scheduling algorithm for precedence constrained tasks on Grid Future Generation Computer Systems (2011) Xiaoyong Tang, Kenli Li, Guiping Liao,
INTEGRATING WIND ENERGY WITH ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ERIC HIRST Consultant in Electric-Industry Restructuring Bellingham, WA December.
Smart Grid Vision: Vision for a Holistic Power Supply and Delivery Chain Stephen Lee Senior Technical Executive Power Delivery & Utilization November 2008.
Dynamic Power Management Using Online Learning Gaurav Dhiman, Tajana Simunic Rosing (CSE-UCSD) Existing DPM policies do not adapt optimally with changing.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
| Vasilis Zois USC 1. |  Dynamic and sophisticated demand control – Direct control over household appliances  Curtailment Reasons – Reactive Curtailment.
GRID INTEGRATION COST OF PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION G. Strbac, D. Pudjianto, P. Djapic, J. Dragovic Energy Futures Lab.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
Wind Management at MISO
Erik Ela, Eamonn Lannoye, Bob Entriken, Aidan Tuohy
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Economic Operation of Power Systems
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
penetration of wind power
EE5900: Cyber-Physical Systems
Results of Smart Charging Research
Impact of Wind Farms Aggregation on Large System Scheduling Cost Under Frequency Linked Deviation Settlement Mechanism Presented by Anoop Singh Authored.
RE Grid Integration Study with India
Arslan Ahmad Bashir Student No
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT Nicolas Gast Joint work with Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Dan-Cristian Tomozei March

STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT 2 Randomness due to: Volatility Forecast errors Design of control policies Online algorithms Dynamic optimization Performance guarantees Storage Management Energy scheduling

Production scheduling w. forecasts errors Base load production scheduling Deviations from forecast Use storage to compensate Social planner point of view Quantify the benefit of storage Obtain performance baseline what could be achieved no market aspects Compare two approaches 1.Deterministic approach try to maintain storage level at ½ of its capacity using updated forecasts 2.Stochastic approach Use statistics of past errors. 3 renewables load

Energy scheduling with delays 4 time Renewables production (control) Reserve (Fast ramping generators) Losses (e.g. wind curtailements) Production surplus Unmatched demand Storage Forecast uncertainties Non-dispatchable Easily dispatchable Used last-minute «Large» system (national level)

Example of scheduling heuristics 5 Time t Max/2 Time Needed generation Forecasted needed power Already commited generation PastFuture Time Storage level Max Time t+n Schedule ? Forecasted storage level Offset Max/2 Forecasted storage level Max Fixed offset policy Max/2 Forecasted storage level Max Fixed storage level policy

Metric and performance (large storage) 6 Max/2 Max Fixed offset FO -200 Target=50% can we do better? How to compute optimal offset? Max/2 Forecasted storage level Max Fixed storage Questions: FO +0 FO +200 Numerical evaluation: data from the UK (BMRA data archive ) National data (wind prod & demand) 3 years Corrected day ahead forecast: MAE = 19%

Fixed offset is optimal for large storage 77 = Uses distribution of error Fixed reserve is Pareto-optimal Target=50% Lower bound Optimal fixed offset Target=80% FO +50 Problem solved for large capacity What about small / medium capacity? FO

Scheduling Policies for Small Storage 8 Instant cost (losses or fast-ramping energy) Storage level at next time-slot Expectation on possible errors

DO outperforms other heuristics Large storage capacity (=20h of average production of wind energy) Power = 30% of average wind power Fixed Offset & Dynamic offset are optimal Small storage capacity (=3h of average production of wind energy) Power = 30% of average wind power DO is the best heuristic 9 Maintaining storage at fixed level: not optimal There exist better heuristics Fixed storage level Dynamic offset Fixed storage level Fixed Offset Dynamic offset Fixed offset Lower bound

Conclusion Maintain the storage at fixed level is not optimal Statistics of forecast error are important Our heuristics are close to optimal (and optimal for large capacity) Social planner point of view Provide a baseline Guidelines to design a market structure? Can be used to dimension storage Other work: Economic implications of storage Does the market leads to a socially optimal use of storage? (partially yes) Algorithmic aspects for charging EV (Distributed storage systems) 10

[1] Nicolas Gast, Dan-Christian Tomozei, Jean-Yves Le Boudec. Optimal Storage Policies with Wind Forecast Uncertainties. Greenmetrics 2012, London, UK. Related work: [2] Nicolas Gast, Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Alexandre Proutière, Dan-Christian Tomozei. Impact of Storage on the Efficiency and Prices in Real-Time Electricity Markets. ACM E-Energy 2013 [3] Bejan, Gibbens, Kelly, Statistical Aspects of Storage Systems Modelling in Energy Networks. 46th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2012, Princeton University, USA. [4] Cho, Meyn – Efficiency and marginal cost pricing in dynamic competitive markets with friction, Theoretical Economics, Questions ?

Computing the optimal storage Losses & Gaz used decreases As capacity increases As maximum power increases Develop two rules-of-thumb to compute optimal storage characteristics: Optimal power C is when P(forecast error >= C) < 1%. Optimal capacity B, when P(sum of errors over n slots >= B/2) < 1%. 12 Storage capacity (in AverageWindPower-hour) Losses + Fast ramping generation optimal capacity B

Optimal storage and time horizon Optimal storage powerOptimal storage capacity 13 We schedule the base production n hours in advance