Optimizing Professional Collaboration to Improve Teaching and Learning GVSU Learning Network August 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement
Advertisements

CIC Conference Getting Instruction Up to Code Through Observation & Feedback Presenters: Jacqueline Rivers, Clare Newton, & Kristina McCalip.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Meeting the Needs of Our Students GVSU Learning Network August 2014.
Induction in Effective Schools Fostering quality teaching.
LEARNING CENTERED CONFERENCING USING THE CEL FRAMEWORK NICK HEDMAN AND PATTY HOWARD.
Leadership Academy May 30 / 31.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
SYSTEM CHANGE: MIRACLES IN PROGRESS TEACHER INDUCTION, MENTORING AND RENEWAL November 4, 2006 Dr. Carol Rolheiser Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Read Aloud with Accountable Talk. Norms Courtesy  Be on time  Cell phones on silent, vibrate, or off  Be mindful of side- bar conversations  Focus.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
P ROFESSIONAL L EARNING C OMMUNITIES : Using written curriculum to design effective instruction The professional learning community model is a grand design.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Having a Strategy for Your Strategy GVSU Learning Network January 2014.
Examining Monitoring Data
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
WELCOME BACK!! WEDNESDAY. Response to Feedback Awesome!!! Hmmm… Increased collaboration Michael’s presentation Logic model work Coordinators who understand.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
Professional Learning Communities. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
GVSU Learning Network Supporting Student Learning Needs January 21 & 22, 2015.
GVSU Learning Network Understanding and Leveraging Learning Styles October 28 & 29, 2014.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
DOCUMENTING STUDENT GROWTH: PORTFOLIOS  I can explain the student growth evidence collection process. The Proof is in the Performance.
Shelly Rider AMSTI-USA Director.  To understand the effects of the Common Core State Standards on mathematical classroom instruction  To recognize the.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Multi-year Professional Development projects that are proven to be:  Replicable builds capacity for ongoing PD and collaboration  Sustainable establishes.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Data/MTSS Team Training September, Learning Goals Data/MTSS Team members will be able to assist teachers in using data to write a SMARTer PDP goal.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Curriculum Mapping Wednesday October 29 Pierre High School.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 1 Workshop 2. Welcome Back to the Leadership Academy.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Office of Service Quality
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Literacy Coach Training Day 1 August 19, Outcomes Teachers will be able to: Understand their role as skillful collaborators in school settings.
Unit 1: Education Socratic Seminar Materials: Notebook/hard writing surface Unit 1 Text Review Questions to ask during SS Writing utensil.
509A UNIT 1-WEEK2 Dr. Hasan Fall Classroom Observation Unit 1 In your small groups, reflect on your observation of the classroom video lesson using.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
August 2013 Day 2 Grand Valley Learning Network. Activating Your Instructional Model If your school has an articulated instructional model (or definition.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
New London Debriefing Roles Chuck listens GPAEA team coaches Network members Stay in descriptive voice Stick to the evidence “Everyone speaks once before.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Norwalk Community School District Instructional Rounds October 26, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Applying an Optimal Learning Model to Your Teaching Session 2
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Optimizing Professional Collaboration to Improve Teaching and Learning GVSU Learning Network August 2013

Framing the Day & Laying the Groundwork

Essential Question How do we best leverage our various forms of professional collaboration for improving learning in classrooms?

Day 1 Objectives Assist school teams in: – Clarifying the purpose of their professional collaboration. – Clarifying the areas of needed improvement for the operation of professional collaboration. – Understanding the aspects of professional collaboration that make help explain when it will help support professional growth and improved student performance. – Creating a practical rubric for communicating expectations for professional collaboration through the school.

Learning Network -Norms Silence mobile phones and other devices Be present and engaged Listen actively Make this relevant to your work and your school Call the baby ugly (call it like you see it) Reduce side conversations Speak honestly Vegas rule Share speaking opportunities—watch talk time Avoid negativity and complaining Arrive on time, start on time, end on time

Making Your Bet Explicit What is your core professional collaboration structure? What is your guiding theory? “If we..., then...” What are your indicators of success? What will tell you if it is working?

Identifying Your Team’s Learning Agenda

Individual Reflection Given the theory undergirding your school’s professional collaboration and your takeaways from the Hattie and Fullan readings, what do you see as the key barriers for optimizing the impact of professional collaboration in your school? (jot your individual notes below)

Team Discussion Given the theory undergirding your school’s professional collaboration and your collective takeaways from the Hattie and Fullan readings, what does your team see as the key barriers for optimizing the impact of professional collaboration in your school? (capture your shared sentiments below)

Identifying the Difference Makers

Video Case Study Context

“The Bet” (articulation from principal and leadership team) Professional learning communities by grade level that include regular education teachers and teachers in the bilingual program. What is your core professional collaboration structure? If we foster collaboration among teachers of regular education and bilingual classrooms, then we will raise expectations for students, teachers will share best practices, and student learning will improve. What is your guiding theory? “If we..., then...” Teachers sharing lessons and instructional strategies in meetings; teachers able to discuss changes in instructional practices What are your indicators of success? What will tell you if it is working?

Video Observation Exercise What do you see? – Descriptive – Objective – Fine grained

What Should They See Given the school’s “bet,” what should success look like for this school’s professional collaboration? Practically speaking, what should the leadership team see when they observe the professional collaboration in this school (if the bet is to pay off)? – And put yet another way, what should they monitor?

Consider... An accident... where a child in Hartford, CT has lost a hand. Boston, MA is the location of the best extremity reattachment surgical unit on the East Coast.

“Flying Northeast” is not the same as Getting to Boston

Or, as the Cheshire Cat put it... “If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.” Source: Lewis Carroll. Through the Looking Glass

Revisit Your Bet What is your rubric for success? Instructions. As a team, revisit your “bet.” Identify the main categories of quality. Once identified, complete the cells for the “fourth column” (what it looks like at proficiency). As time allows, try to complete the other columns.

Professional Collaboration Rubric Quality Domain 1. Beginning2. Emergent3. Functional4. Proficient