Miguel Patrício CMUC Polytechnic Institute of Leiria School of Technology and Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
Advertisements

Griffith Cracks Flaws Make the World Beautiful! Were it not for the flaws, rocks and mountains would have been perfectly boring.
LECTURER5 Fracture Brittle Fracture Ductile Fracture Fatigue Fracture
Fracture and Failure Theory. Defining Failure Failure can be defined in a variety of ways: Unable to perform the to a given criteria Fracture Yielding.
3 – Fracture of Materials
Fracture, Toughness and Strength by Gordon Williams.
ME 240: Introduction to Engineering Materials Chapter 8. Failure 8.1 CHAPTER 8.
FRACTURE Fracture is the separation, or fragmentation, of a solid body into two or more parts under the action of stress. Process of fracture- with two.
Crack Nucleation and Propagation
Lecture 25 Bodies With Holes / Stress Perturbations Around Cracks Geol 542 Textbook reading: p ;
Micromechanics Macromechanics Fibers Lamina Laminate Structure Matrix.
Fracture Specimen To Visualize whether a crack of given length in a material of known fracture toughness is dangerous, because it will propagate to given.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Engineering materials lecture #14
HRR Integral Recall with is the integration constant.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Influence of Overload Induced Residual Stress Field on Fatigue Crack Growth in Aluminum Alloy Jinhee Park (M.S. Candidate) Date of joining Masters’ program.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Computational Fracture Mechanics
Unit 3: Solid mechanics An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Solid mechanics Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should have.
Computational Fracture Mechanics
Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig
CH3 MICROMECHANICS Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig. Ultimate Strengths of a Unidirectional Lamina.
Fracture of Divertor Structures Jake Blanchard ARIES Meeting April 2011.
Foam Reinforced Aircraft Fuselage Study Narasimha Harindra Vedala, Tarek Lazghab, Amit Datye, K.H. Wu Mechanical And Materials Engineering Department Florida.
Thermal Strains and Element of the Theory of Plasticity
ASPECTS OF MATERIALS FAILURE
BENDING MOMENTS AND SHEARING FORCES IN BEAMS
The Finite Element Method
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Effect of finite size of component The SIF derived earlier is for cracks in an infinite body. However the finite size, geometry of the component, loading.
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL),
Crack propagation on highly heterogeneous composite materials Miguel Patrício.
Lecture # 6 Failure Intended learning Outcomes: 1.Describe the mechanism of crack propagation for both ductile and brittle modes of fracture. 2. Explain.
Constitutive modeling of viscoelastic behavior of CNT/Polymer composites K. Yazdchi 1, M. Salehi 2 1- Multi scale Mechanics (MSM), Faculty of Engineering.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Arnab Ghosh Ph.D. Research Assistant Analytical Modeling of Surface and Subsurface.
Periodically distributed Overview 2-D elasticity problem.
High strength materials are being increasingly used in designing critical components to save weight or meet difficult service conditions. Unfortunately.
J. L. Bassani and V. Racherla Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics V. Vitek and R. Groger Materials Science and Engineering University of Pennsylvania.
Micro/macro analysis of a composite Casa Day 22/11/06.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
2D Crystal Plasticity.
Slide 1AV Dyskin, Geomechanics Group. UWA. Australia Mechanics of Earth Crust with Fractal Structure by Arcady Dyskin University of Western Australia.
Fracture Overview Fall Figure 6.1 Rectangular plate with hole subjected to axial load. (a) Plate with cross-sectional plane;
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Exam 2 Grade Distribution. Stress-strain behavior (Room T): Ideal vs Real Materials TS
WEAR. Wear –Quantitative Measurement of Wear: A general description of adhesive wear is given by V = (kPx/3H), Where V is the volume of material worn.
Namas Chandra and Sirish Namilae
Non-Metallic Fracture Non Metallic Fractures Ceramic Plastics or Polymers Ceramic Fracture Brittle and with very less toughness This.
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Fracture Mechanics and Size Effect of Concrete
Solid object break-up Ivan Dramaliev CS260, Winter’03.
ATMIYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE MECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
Fracture of Solids Theoretical tensile strength of a solid U(r) a r
Numerical Modeling for Hydraulic Fracture Prediction on Fused Silica Surrogate Cylindrical Samples Varun Gupta.
Computational Prediction of Mechanical Performance of Particulate-Reinforced Al Metal-Matrix Composites (MMCs) using a XFEM Approach Emily A. Gerstein.
Basic principles of metallic fracture
Doç.Dr.M.Evren Toygar, DEÜ
Fracture Process Zone -1
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences
Determination of Fracture Toughness
Fracture of Solids Theoretical tensile strength of a solid U(r) a r
Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.
Mechanical Properties: 2
OVERVIEW OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
DOKUZ EYLÜL UNIVERSITY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
E =
LINEAR ELASTIC FRACTURE MECHANICS
DR. AL EMRAN ISMAIL FRACTURE MECHANISMS.
Presentation transcript:

Miguel Patrício CMUC Polytechnic Institute of Leiria School of Technology and Management

 Composites consist of two or more (chemically or physically) different constituents that are bonded together along interior material interfaces and do not dissolve or blend into each other.

 Idea: by putting together the right ingredients, in the right way, a material with a better performance can be obtained Examples of applications:  Airplanes  Spacecrafts  Solar panels  Racing car bodies  Bicycle frames  Fishing rods  Storage tanks

 Even microscopic flaws may cause seemingly safe structures to fail  Replacing components of engineering structures is often too expensive and may be unnecessary  It is important to predict whether and in which manner failure might occur  Why is cracking of composites worthy of attention?

 Fracture of composites can be regarded at different lengthscales LENGTHSCALES Microscopic (atomistic) MesoscopicMacroscopic

 Fracture of composites can be regarded at different lengthscales LENGTHSCALES Microscopic (atomistic) MesoscopicMacroscopic Continuum Mechanics

 Macroscopic  Mesoscopic (matrix+inclusions)  plate with pre-existent crack  Meso-structure; linear elastic components  Goal: determine crack path

homogenisation  Mesoscopic  Macroscopic  It is possible to replace the mesoscopic structure with a corresponding homogenised structure (averaging process)

 Will a crack propagate on a homogeneous (and isotropic) medium?  Alan Griffith gave an answer for an infinite plate with a centre through elliptic flaw: “ the crack will propagate if the strain energy release rate G during crack growth is large enough to exceed the rate of increase in surface energy R associated with the formation of new crack surfaces, i.e., ” where is the strain energy released in the formation of a crack of length a is the corresponding surface energy increase

 How will a crack propagate on a homogeneous (and isotropic) medium?  Crack tip  In the vicinity of a crack tip, the tangential stress is given by: x y

 How will a crack propagate on a homogeneous (and isotropic) medium?  Crack tip  In the vicinity of a crack tip, the tangential stress is given by: x y

 How will a crack propagate on a homogeneous (and isotropic) medium?  Maximum circumferential tensile stress (local) criterion:  Crack tip “ Crack growth will occur if the circumferential stress intensity factor equals or exceeds a critical value, ie., ”  Direction of propagation: “ Crack growth occurs in the direction that maximises the circumferential stress intensity factor ” x y

 An incremental approach may be set up  solve elasticity problem;  load the plate;  The starting point is a homogeneous plate with a pre-existent crack

 An incremental approach may be set up  solve elasticity problem;  load the plate;  The starting point is a homogeneous plate with a pre-existent crack...thus determining:

 An incremental approach may be set up  solve elasticity problem;  check propagation criterion;  compute the direction of propagation;  increment crack (update geometry); If criterion is met  load the plate;  The starting point is a homogeneous plate with a pre-existent crack

 Incremental approach to predict whether and how crack propagation may occur  The mesoscale effects are not fully taken into consideration

Basso, A.; Martínez, R.; Cisilino, A. P.; Sikora, J.: Experimental and numerical assessment of fracture toughness of dual-phase austempered ductile iron, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 33, pp. 1-11, 2010  In Basso et all (2010) the fracture toughness of dual-phase austempered ductile iron was analysed at the mesoscale, using finite element modelling.  A typical model geometry consisted of a 2D plate, containing graphite nodules and LTF zones

Basso, A.; Martínez, R.; Cisilino, A. P.; Sikora, J.: Experimental and numerical assessment of fracture toughness of dual-phase austempered ductile iron, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 33, pp. 1-11, 2010  Macrostructure  Mesostructure

Basso, A.; Martínez, R.; Cisilino, A. P.; Sikora, J.: Experimental and numerical assessment of fracture toughness of dual-phase austempered ductile iron, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 33, pp. 1-11, 2010  Macrostructure  Results

Basso, A.; Martínez, R.; Cisilino, A. P.; Sikora, J.: Experimental and numerical assessment of fracture toughness of dual-phase austempered ductile iron, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 33, pp. 1-11, 2010  Macrostructure  Computational issues number of graphite nodules in model: 113 number of LTF zones in model: 31 Models were solved using Abaqus/Explicit (numerical package) running on a Beowulf Cluster with 8 Pentium 4 PCs

Zhu W.C.; Tang C.A.: Numerical simulation on shear fracture process of concrete using mesoscopic mechanical model, Construction and Building Materials, 16(8), pp (11), 2002  In Zhu et all (2002) a numerical simulation on the shear fracture process of concrete was performed: “The mesoscopic elements in the specimen must be relatively small enough to reflect the mesoscopic mechanical properties of materials under the conditions that the current computer is able to perform this analysis because the number of mesoscopic elements is substantially limited by the computer capacity”

Zhu W.C.; Tang C.A.: Numerical simulation on shear fracture process of concrete using mesoscopic mechanical model, Construction and Building Materials, 16(8), pp (11), 2002  In Zhu et all (2002) a numerical simulation on the shear fracture process of concrete was performed: “The mesoscopic elements in the specimen must be relatively small enough to reflect the mesoscopic mechanical properties of materials under the conditions that the current computer is able to perform this analysis because the number of mesoscopic elements is substantially limited by the computer capacity”

 Elasticity problem  Propagation problem  How will a crack propagate on a material with a mesoscopic structure?

 Elasticity problem  Propagation problem - Cauchy’s equation of motion - Kinematic equations - Constitutive equations + boundary conditions - On a homogeneous material, the crack will propagate if - If it does propagate, it will do so in the direction that maximises the circumferential stress intensity factor many inclusions implies high computational costs the crack Interacts with the inclusions

Homogenisable Schwarz (overlapping domain decomposition scheme) Critical region where fracture occurs Patrício, M.; Mattheij, R. M. M.; de With, G.: Solutions for periodically distributed materials with localized imperfections; CMES Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 38(2), pp , 2008  Hybrid approach

Homogenisable Critical region where fracture occurs Patrício, M.; Mattheij, R. M. M.; de With, G.: Solutions for periodically distributed materials with localized imperfections; CMES Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 38(2), pp , 2008  Hybrid approach

Homogenisable Critical region where fracture occurs Patrício, M.; Mattheij, R. M. M.; de With, G.: Solutions for periodically distributed materials with localized imperfections; CMES Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 38(2), pp , 2008  Hybrid approach

Patrício, M.; Mattheij, R. M. M.; de With, G.: Solutions for periodically distributed materials with localized imperfections; CMES Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 38(2), pp , 2008  Hybrid approach algorithm

Reference cell The material behaviour is characterised by a tensor defined over the reference cell  How does homogenisation work? Assumptions:

Then the solution of the heterogeneous problem

converges to the solution of a homogeneous problem weakly in

 Four different composites plates (matrix+circular inclusions)  Linear elastic, homogeneous, isotropic constituents  Computational domain is [0, 1] x [0,1]  Material parameters: matrix: inclusions:  The plate is pulled along its upper and lower boundaries with constant unit stress

a) 25 inclusions, periodic b) 100 inclusions, periodic c) 25 inclusions, random d) 100 inclusions, random

Periodical distribution of inclusions Random distribution of inclusions Highly heterogeneous composite with randomly distributed circular inclusions, submetido  Homogenisation may be employed to approximate the solution of the elasticity problems Error decreases with number of inclusions Error increases

M. Patrício: Highly heterogeneous composite with randomly distributed circular inclusions, submitted Smaller error

 plate (dimension 1x1)  pre-existing crack (length 0.01)  layered (micro)structure E 1 =1, ν 1 =0.1 E 2 =10, ν 2 =0.3

 plate (dimension 1x1)  pre-existing crack (length 0.01)  layered (micro)structure Crack paths in composite materials; M. Patrício, R. M. M. Mattheij, Engineering Fracture Mechanics (2010)

An iterative method for the prediction of crack propagation on highly heterogeneous media; M. Patrício, M. Hochstenbach, submitted

Reference Approximation