29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Carpe Diem WP7: FMI progress report Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRIC RADAR IMPROVEMENTS
Advertisements

Multiple Sensor Precipitation Estimation over Complex Terrain AGENDA I. Paperwork A. Committee member signatures B. Advisory conference requirements II.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Deutscher Wetterdienst Welcome to Session 5, part 2 "Diagnosis of precipitation types from radar (practise)"
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
Very-Short-Range Forecast of Precipitation in Japan World Weather Research Program Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting Toulouse France,
THE USE OF DUAL-POLARIMETRIC RADAR DATA TO IMPROVE RAINFALL ESTIMATION ACROSS THE TENNESSEE RIVER VALLEY W.A. Petersen NASA – Marshall Space Flight Center,
Review of the current and likely future global NWP requirements for Weather Radar data Enrico Fucile (ECMWF) Eric WATTRELOT & Jean-François MAHFOUF (Météo-France/CNRM/GMAP)
Development of high spatial resolution Forest Fire Index for boreal conditions Applications to Helsinki Testbed area - Preliminary results- Andrea Vajda,
PROVIDING DISTRIBUTED FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION USING A STATISTICAL NOWCAST SCHEME Neil I. Fox and Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri- Columbia.
Improving radar Doppler wind information extraction Yong Kheng Goh, Anthony Holt University of Essex, U. K. Günther Haase, Tomas Landelius SMHI, Sweden.
16/06/20151 Validating the AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature and Height product using weather radar data COST 722 Expert Meeting Sauli Joro.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
CARPE DIEM 7 th (Final) meeting – Bologna Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
FMI contribution to WGii first report Requirements from the forecasters and from the cuntomers Janne Kotro Jukka Julkunen Juha Kilpinen.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
Activity of SMHI (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute) Presentation for CARPE DIEM kick-off meeting, DLR-GERMANY, January Contact.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
49 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 3 I.Radar Representation of.
11/09/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE CARPE DIEM WP 7: FMI Progress Report Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Overview of the present HIRLAM surface assimilation Mainly taken from: HIRLAM Technical Report No. 58.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
Drop size distribution from WXT weather transmitter? Heikki Pohjola, Application specialist Thanks to Elena.
Nowcasting thunderstorms in complex cases using radar data Alessandro Hering* Stéphane Sénési # Paolo Ambrosetti* Isabelle Bernard-Bouissières # *MeteoSwiss.
10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.
Gridding Daily Climate Variables for use in ENSEMBLES Malcolm Haylock, Climatic Research Unit Nynke Hofstra, Mark New, Phil Jones.
ROFFG Romania Flash Flood Guidance System. The Romania Flash Flood Guidance System is an adaptation of the HRC Flash Flood Guidance System used in various.
CARPE-DIEM 13/6/02, slide 1German Aerospace Center Microwaves and Radar Institute CARPE-DIEM Besprechung Helsinki, June 2004 Ewan.
1- Near-Optimized Filtered Forecasts (NOFF) using wavelet analysis (O-MAPLE) 2- Probabilistic MAPLE (Probability of rain occurrence at different thresholds)
National Lab for Remote Sensing and Nowcasting Dual Polarization Radar and Rainfall Nowcasting by Mark Alliksaar.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Correction of daily values for inhomogeneities P. Štěpánek Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Regional Office Brno, Czech Republic
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
CARPE DIEM 6 th meeting – Helsinki Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer C. Adam 1 Elizabeth A. Clark 1 Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 Eric F. Wood 2 1.Dept.
Ed Maurer Partitioning precipitation into rain and snow for event-based hydrologic modeling in the Pacific Northwest U.S. Edwin Maurer Civil Engineering.
EVALUATION OF THE RADAR PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT ACCURACY USING RAIN GAUGE DATA Aurel Apostu Mariana Bogdan Coralia Dreve Silvia Radulescu.
WP 3: DATA ASSIMILATION SMHI/FMI Status report 3rd CARPE DIEM meeting, University of Essex, Colchester, 9-10 January 2003 Structure SMHI/FMI plans for.
Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.
What does radar measure? Hydrometeors: rain drops, ice particles Other objects: e.g. birds, insects.
A Global Rainfall Validation Strategy Wesley Berg, Christian Kummerow, and Tristan L’Ecuyer Colorado State University.
METR February Radar Products More Radar Background Precipitation Mode: -Volume Coverage Patterns (VCP) 21: 9 elevation angles with a complete.
Infilling Radar CAPPIs
S. Hachani 1,2,B. Boudevillain 1, Z. Bargaoui 2, and G. Delrieu 1 1 University of Grenoble(UJF/ LTHE ) 2 University Tunis el Manar (ENIT/LMHE) EGU, General.
07/22/031 Doppler radar wind data assimilation in HIRLAM 3D-Var SRNWP/COST-717 WG-3 Session on assimilation of 'non-conventional data' Kirsti.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
NEXRAD Data Quality 25 August 2000 Briefing Boulder, CO Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joe VanAndel Don Ferraro Jeff Keeler.
JMA Japan Meteorological Agency QPE/QPF of JMA Application of Radar Data Masashi KUNITSUGU Head, National Typhoon Center Japan Meteorological Agency TYPHOON.
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
Atmospheric profile and precipitation properties derived from radar and radiosondes during RICO Louise Nuijens With thanks to: Bjorn Stevens (UCLA) Margreet.
05/03/2016FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute CARPE DIEM FMI (Partner 5) progress report.
Cheng-Zhong Zhang and Hiroshi Uyeda Hydroshperic Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University 1 November 2006 in Boulder, Colorado Possible Mechanism.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
CARPE DIEM 4 th meeting Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches for Environmental.
Objective Analysis and Data Assimilation
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Radar/Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates using High-Resolution Surface Rainfall Observations in West Africa Paul A. Kucera and Andrew J. Newman.
De-aliasing of Doppler radar winds
Spatial interpolation
Uta Gjertsen, met.no, Norway Günther Haase, SMHI, Sweden
Science of Rainstorms with applications to Flood Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Carpe Diem WP7: FMI progress report Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE ·Area 1/WP3: Development of a variational assimilation scheme for doppler winds (FMI + SMHI, responsible persons at FMI Heikki Järvinen, Kirsti Salonen) ·Area 2/WP7: Advanced surface precipitation estimate from radars and a NWP model (HIRLAM) (Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola) ·Objective: Improve the accuracy and quality of operational real time precipitation measurements

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE End Users ·1. Finnish Road Authority ·Applies observed and nowcast distributions of rain, sleet and snow (EUMETSAT Atmospheric Motion Vector software for dBZ- fields implemented for operational use at FMI) and ·Accumulated snow ·Average snow clearing and road salting costs ~ 100 million euros/winter => The end user is very motivated to require continuous improvements in the accuracy of radar products

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE ·2. Kemijoki hydroelectric power company ·Applies instantaneous precipitation images from radar to river control ·Applies accumulated rain to a flow model (~ km2, grid 1 · 1 km2 ) together with Finnish Environment Institute (involved in COST 717) ·Applies accumulated snow from radar to estimate spring flood due to melting snow ·Applies existing radar products and improved ones from CARPE DIEM ·3. FMI (we are working in the Operative Services) ·Continuous and urgent need to improve radar products.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE WP 7.1: Attenuation correction based on 3D water phase diagnosis from NWP model quantities Deliverables: " Large attenuation statistics for rain-only (assumed in most existing radar systems) and variable water phase statistics " Improvement in surface precipitation " Limitation: Applies single polarization radar data => overestimation of attenuation possible in cases of hail

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE WP 7.2 Elimination of overhanging precipitation (OP) from surface estimates Altostratus: 13 % of all VPR in Finland in 2001

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE WP 7.3 Vertical reflectivity profile correction applying radars and NWP Deliverables: Automatic classification of VPR above each radar based on radar, soundings, NWP: " Precipitation " OP " Clutter " Clear air echo Bright Band: " Amplitude " Thickness " Height

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE The original WP order has been rearranged ·New order: 7.3 begins first and continues during the whole 36 months. WPs start later and feed 7.3. ·Reasons for change: 1. End users, including FMI, continuously demand a working VPR correction. 2. HIRLAM-data difficult to get at the moment as the group is very busy due to version change and platform change in autumn Practical result: We have developed a VPR correction for a network based on radar VPRs and radio soundings. It will be semi-operational in July 2002.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE VPR correction at FMI 1(2) 3D polar volume measured VPR 7 radars every 15 minutes layer thickness 200 m range km max bin count 5000 / layer IRIS

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Classification and QC of each VPR representativity rain bright band snow clutter clear air echo overhanging precipitation unphysical gradient Statistics Reference dBZ at ground level Calculation of the correction Freezing level (FL) from radio soundings (later: from HIRLAM too) Climatological profile adjusted to freezing level

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Profile diagnostics tree 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Profile diagnostics tree

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE OP and evaporation cases 1(2)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Clear air echo and clutterRain and bright band

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Snow 1(2) Bright band at ground

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Climatological profile

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE VPR CORRECTION IN A NETWORK, PRINCIPLES 1.dBZ at 500 m PsCAPPI surface is corrected to ground level. 2.Applies measured VPRs and climatological VPRs and time-space interpolated freezing level heights from 3 radio sounding stations. 3.The magnitude of the correction is: 10*log (the ground level reference Z from the profile/ convolution (Z-profile*beam)) at each range (height). Upper threshold for the correction is 30 dB.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE VPR CORRECTION IN A NETWORK, MAIN STEPS 1.Calculation of the single radar correction factor at each range based on the measured and classified VPR from each polar volume. 2.Calculation of the single radar correction factor at each range based on the climatological, temperature- adjusted VPR for each polar volume. 3.Weighted average of factors 1 and 2 is derived based on the quality of factor 1. 4.Space smoothing is applied: Actual correction at each composite pixel is a distance-weighted average of factor 3, from all radars closer than 300 km from the pixel. 5.Time smoothing is applied: Factor 4 is linearly averaged during the past 6 hours. 6.Post-correction tresholding is applied: The corrected dBZ may not exceed preselected values.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Snow 1(2) Profile correction for 500 m PsCAPPI

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Snow and clutterProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) RainProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) RainProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE STEP 1: SINGLE RADAR CORRECTION FACTOR ·The reference dBZ at ground level must be carefully selected to avoid spurious corrections: ·The reference dBZ at ground level (green dot in the previous example cases) is usually the measured dBZ at the lowest level (100 m) of the profile. ·Reference dBZ at ground is extrapolated from upper levels in two automatically classified cases: ·- bright band is diagnosed at ground level ·- clutter is diagnosed at ground level ·In the following images examples are shown.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) RainProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) RainProfile correction (no cutter)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Bright band at groundProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Profile correction (no extrapol.) Bright band at ground

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE STEPS 2-3: MIXING OF MEASURED AND CLIMATOLOGICAL VPR ·Each instantaneous, single radar VPR correction factor is a weighted mean of two factors, based on two simultaneous profiles: ·- The climatological VPR, adjusted to the actual freezing level, obtained from the time-space interpolated temperature soundings, weight=0.2. ·- The measured VPR, weight = 0-1 according to the quality of the profile (quality ~ height scaled precipitation volume).

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1(2) Climatological profileProfile correction

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE STEP 4: SPATIAL AVERAGING OF THE CORRECTION FACTOR ·Instantaneous correction factor at each composite pixel applies profiles from several surrounding radars: ·A composite pixel in a network is selected from the radar, whose measurement is closest to the ground (height h). ·Each instantaneous VPR correction factor at a composite pixel is a weighted mean of the simultaneous factors at each radar, within the range 300 km from the pixel; weight ~ distance to each radar squared/300**2. ·The factor from each radar is taken from the same height h. In this way we “borrow” the neighbouring profiles to the radar from which the actual pixel value is taken. ·Important effect: The correction does not introduce reflectivity steps along the seams of composites.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE STEP 5: TIME AVERAGING ·So far we have only derived correction factors for each composite pixel at each time moment (time series). Small scale VPR variability is eliminated applying time-averaging: ·Each instantaneous VPR correction factor at a composite pixel is a linearly weighted average of the 24 instantaneous corrections during the last 6 hours; the older the correction the less is the weight. ·The correction factors derived in step 5 are the ones we actually apply for the 500 m PseudoCAPPI composite. The factors in steps 1-4 are only used for derivation of the final correction factor.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE STEP 6: TRESHOLDING OF TOO LARGE CORRECTIONS ·In case that the resulting corrected dBZ is too large, e.g. embedded convection occurs at longer distances whereas the measured VPR represents shallow precipitation close to the radar, the final dBZ is not allowed to exceed preselected values. Treshold value at each pixel depends on the actual hydrometeor water phase analysis (rain, sleet, snow) at ground level. The phase analysis is based on linearly extrapolated 3-hourly analysis of T and RH at the height of 2 m.

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE FUTURE OF WP 7 ·WP 7.3 will continue 36 months (inclusion of HIRLAM) and apply all useful results from WPs 7.1 and 7.2 ·Deliverables from WP 7.3 at +13 months: ·- Statistics of VPRs and single radar VPR corrections in Finland, a large climatological data set (1 year, 7 radars, every 15 minutes). ·- VPR correction in a network, the method (tuning of the parameters still required) ·- validation of the method (applies radar pairs and gauges) ·- end user experience ·- 2 ERAD papers, textbook in radar meteorology, (peer reviewed paper around +18 months)

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Original deliverables: " VPR correction at a single radar applying time-averaged (~6h) VPR corrections (TA) based on reflectivity profiles derived from the measured polar volumes every 15 minutes " VPR correction at a single radar applying TA-corrections and climatological VPR based on the actual freezing level height obtained from meteorological soundings and climatological profile shape statistics measured with the radars (TAC) " VPR correction in the radar network based on space-averaged TAC-corrections (TSAC) " VPR correction in the network based on TSAC-correction and VPRs estimated from a NWP model in co-operation with SMHI (Gunther Haase).

29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Validation of the deliverables from WP " Improvement in gauge-radar comparisons of 12 h accumulations " Improvement of long range dBZ from radar A, compared to the short range dBZ from radar B in the same overlapping region " Improved long range POD and FAR of precipitation at ground from radar compared to AWS/SYNOP (ON/OFF) " Improved POD and FAR in the precipitation nowcasts " Improved skill in the End User applications