From a Different Perspective Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, 2005. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Listening to What Were Seeing Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Advertisements

Models of Interaction Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
Copyright Joann Martyn, 2007.This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.
ISTE Standards for Teachers
Unlocking the Potential of Gaming Technology Diana Oblinger, Martin Ringle, Linda Baer.
From a Different Perspective Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Educating the Net Generation Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Why Inquiry? Inquiry is a process which naturally integrates cross-curricular competencies and the subject areas. Engages learners by making connections.
What you can do as a teacher to ensure the technology literacy of your students. Barbara Smalla 3/2010.
Teaching the 21st Century Learner Roger Von Holzen Darla Runyon Northwest Missouri State University
Smart Decision-Making for “Smart Classroom” Evolution
Listening to What We’re Seeing Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Carolyn Awalt University of Texas at El Paso Paul Resta
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Written by Troy Hicks Presentation by: Amanda Mikrut, Lindsey Victor, Kevin Harris.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Betty Collis University of Twente, The Netherlands Copyright Betty Collis This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
Copyright © 2003, Scott Higgins and Marianne Hollis Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for.
Technology Applications Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Desktop Publishing: Learning for Life.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.
Writing, Communication, and PBL Lima 2006 Using PBL to Improve Student Communication Skills Steve Bernhardt Tipsheets:
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
1 The Next Generation Learner Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. EDUCAUSE Live, July Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
21 st Century Skills/ Technology Data to Support.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
21st Century Students, Learning & Teaching Osborne Elementary Sandusky City Schools.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
The Challenge of Educating Students for the 21st Century Karin Horn ~ Instructional Technology.
ITS REAL Teaching Students Today for the Future. What’s Up with These Kids?  Dress differently  Talk differently  Act differently  Think differently.
Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Podcasts Mico e-Learning Workshop.
Implications of the Net Generation Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Designing for learning: a collaborative approach Dr Aziza Ellozy Director, Center for Learning and Teaching The American University in Cairo 4 th Conference.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
Teaching to Support the 21st Century Learner Patricia Kahn.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
NWREL Young Children and Technology. NWREL Kaiser Family Foundation Zero to Six (2003)
Transforming Learning with Technology a Portfolio by Jeanette Gorzelitz Created in EdL 325 Instructional Technology Fall 2009 As a teacher it is critical.
January 2007 Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Trecina Green, Bureau Director Office of Curriculum and Instruction Understanding How.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Educating the Net Gen Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
NETS-T.  Name  The course(s) that you coordinate for EED  Your comfort level with NETS 1.Not familiar with the NETS 2.Familiar but not comfortable.
ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.
Chapter 1 Nicole M., Christy, Gena, Steph. Introduction By: Nicole M. Influences of Technology and the Media Teachers are the facilitators rather than.
DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE Connecting Technologies - DLI Vyškov - BILC 4 th - 9 th October 2009.
Libraries are Changing Keeping Up, Being Successful.
THE EDUCATION PROFESSORS’ CHANGING ROLE: APP DEVELOPMENT FOR CONTENT DELIVERY Jane Thielemann-Downs, Janice L. Nath, and Irene Chen University of Houston.
CCHE 680 Denise Zambos. The student’s college choice… After high school, the student must decide if they will go to college and what college they will.
COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN EDUCATION USING WIKIS & BLOGS IN THE CLASSROOM.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Teaching Children About Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
Active Learning in an Interactive Classroom Kurt O’Connor IDT 600 Spring 2012.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
Integrating Tradition with Technology Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Standards-Based Assessment Linking up with Authentic Assessment
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Redesigning College Teaching at Sacramento State University
Presentation transcript:

From a Different Perspective Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. Copyright Diana G. Oblinger, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

Product of the environment Video games PC CDs Individualist GenerationXGenerationX Web Cell phone IM MP3s Online communities Net Gen BabyBoomersBabyBoomers TV generation Typewriters Telephone Memos Family focus

Media exposure 10,000 hours video games 200,000 s 20,000 hours TV 10,000 hours cell phone Under 5,000 hours reading By age 21, the average person will have spent – Prensky, s Video Games Reading Television Cell Phone

Neuroplasticity The brain reorganizes itself throughout life: neuroplasticity Stimulation changes brain structures; the brain changes and organizes itself based on the inputs it receives Different developmental experiences impact how people think For example, language learned later in life goes into a different place in the brain than when language is learned as a child ―Prensky, 2001

Carie

Today’s learners Digital Connected Experiential Immediate Social

Net gen learning preferences Teams, peer-to-peer Engagement & experience Visual & kinesthetic Things that matter

Concerns Web as information universe not the library Source quality Text literacy Short attention span Multitasking Fast response time Reflection

Student in-class preferences ―Kvavik, Limited IT Moderate IT No IT Extensive IT Online Percentage

Learner expectations ―Noakes, 2005 ―Use of learning aids ―Stimulating student interest and thinking ―Encouraging active learning Heart: concern for students ―Helpfulness ―Empathy for students ―Enthusiasm for subject and teaching Head: knowledge of subject Hands: teaching skills ―Clear and systematic presentation ―Teaching at the right level

Student advice Be engaging; challenge us Be responsive: answer voice mails and s; office hours still matter Be seen: we’d like to see you and get to know you outside of class Set boundaries: tell us when you’re available ―Windham, 2005 Use technology appropriately: don’t be “Power Pointless” Use real world, relevant examples Be an active participant in class; show you are excited about the subject Ask students what they think Not everything needs to be on the Web

Adding not replacing Face-to-face Online Social networks Blended communication

Questions that count Concept inventories Student response units Immediate results keep students engaged Allows real-time modification of instruction A.About half as long for the heavier ball B.About half as long for the lighter ball C.About the same time for both balls D.Considerably less for the lighter ball, but not necessarily half as long E.Considerably less for the heavier ball, but not necessarily half as long Two metal balls are the same size, but one weighs twice as much as the other. The balls are dropped from the top of a two story building at the same instant of time. The time it takes the balls to reach the ground below will be:

Blogs Promotes literacy through storytelling ―Stories help us understand the world ―Express feelings and experiences ―Explore imagination and creativity Allows collaborative learning Anytime, anywhere access Bloggers comment and give feedback to others Students can write about and edit each other’s work 40% of blog authors are under age 20 ―Huffaker, 2005

Digital storytelling Offers students an opportunity for expression using multiple media Encourages reflection, integration and synthesis Individual or group projects

Social bookmarking Helps academics share, store and organize academic papers Share your library with others Find out who is reading the same material Tap into their reading list CiteULike

Individualization and practice --Kortmeier, 2004 Provide meaningful formative assessment to students Provide timely feedback to both students and instructors Reduce blind copying of answers Provide a scalable solution within the realities and budgets and available resources

Online laboratories —del Alamo, 2003

Collaborative projects Ancient Spaces: Developed by the Faculty of the Arts, University of British Columbia

Historical simulation In multiplayer mode, players can IM each other ―Muzzy Lane, 2005 Players choose leadership of a country Interaction with variables on the economy, policy, military, natural resources

Augmented reality Combines physical world and virtual world contexts Embeds learners in authentic situations Engages users in a socially facilitated context Computer simulation on handheld computer triggered by real world location ―Klopfer & Squire, 2003

Environmental detectives Players briefed about rash of local health problems linked to the environment Provided with background information and “budget” Need to determine source of pollution by drilling sampling wells and ultimately remediate with pumping wells Work in teams representing different interests (EPA, industry, etc.) ―Klopfer & Squire, 2003

Reconfiguring activities and space SCALE-UP: Student Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs Class time spent on tangibles and ponderables Problem solving, conceptual understanding and attitudes are improved Failure rates are reduced dramatically “The job is not to teach physics but to teach thinking.” --Beichner & Saul, 2003

Informal spaces Students spend more time out of class than in it “Capture time” is particularly important for non-residential students Learning occurs through conversations, web surfing, social interactions Team projects Spontaneous interactions Mingle, share, make connections

The next generation Represent a new set of characteristics Not expert users; laptop as a tool Sense of entitlement to Internet access; any interruption is a violation of their rights Prefer Internet research to library research Are exposed to problem-based learning, collaboration and computers in the classroom – Backon, et al. 2003

Children age 6 and under 2:01 hours / day playing outside 1:58 hours using screen media 40 minutes reading or being read to 48% of children have used a computer 27% 4-6 year olds use a computer daily 39% use a computer several times a week 30% have played video games Playoutside Use screen media Reading – Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003

Intuitive understanding ― Began with children in New Delhi slum Children taught themselves to surf the Net, read news, download games Replicated in many locations: children learn to browse the Internet without instruction

Ping

Time-constrained learners 35% of undergraduates are adult learners 87% commute 80% work At risk: Part-time enrollment Delaying entry into post- secondary ed Lack of high school diploma Having children Being a single parent Working full time

Limitations to learning 46% class schedules 39% number of classes 30% course options 30% access to library 80% participation in extracurricular activities – AACC, 2004 Work limits:

Life interruptions Transportation problems Financial problems Limited time Family responsibilities Health issues Work responsibilities Job shift – Bleed, 2005

Percentage 60 Age vs. learning preferences ―Dziuban, 2004 Mature 63% Boomer 55% Gen X 38% Net Gen 26% Students who were very satisfied with Web-based learning by generation

Pervasive learning Access to information, communication and computing is not limited by physical space Activities are distributed across space and time Information is virtually connected to locations Virtual environments

Competency-based programs E-Portfolios Reflection, feedback and accomplishments Real-world learning experiences through digital portfolios INHOLLAND, Western Governors University

Miriam

Comfort zones differ Multitasking Single or limited tasks Engaging Disciplined SpontaneousDeliberate ―adapted from Himes, 2004 Pictures, sound, video Text Random access Linear, logical, sequential Interactive and networkedIndependent and individual Students Faculty

Is it age or IT? How do you write most documents? long-hand or at a keyboard? Are you constantly connected? Laptop? PDA? Cell phone? How many windows are typically open on your computer? Are you a multitasker? Do you play video or computer games? Do you download music? Does your cell phone have a camera? Do you prefer immediate responses or are you content to wait?

Role selection Apprentice Builder Listener Mentor Peer teacher Publisher Team member Writer Architect Consultant Expert Guide Lecturer Resource Reviewer Role model Student RolesFaculty Roles

Choice of learning activities authentic project debate case study journaling brainstorming concept mapping peer exchange simulation coaching drill & practice

Learning objects Sharable and reusable ―Simulations ―Data sets ―Assessments

Learning activities Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) Manage and deliver online collaborative activities Create sequences of learning activities Includes individual activities and group tasks

Calibrated peer review Students write abstracts, proposals, microthemes, position papers, analyses, ethics or policy issues Students evaluate 3 calibration documents Once calibrated, student evaluates 3 peer writing assignments then their own Feedback provided on reasoning and writing ―Chapman & Fiore, 2001 Based on a peer review model: scientists write and review peer proposals

Course management

Shared resources Re-purpose and re-use Tailor to individual environments

Stephan

Responding to society’s needs HighereducationHighereducation Skilled workforce Civic understanding Social mobility

Educational capacity vs. demand Access to tertiary education ―40 to 60% in developed countries ―4% in the developing countries Percentage of the population attending college is increasing ―China: 6% today; if it grows to 19% will need 20 million seats by 2020 ―In India, if participation rates grow from 5% to 8%, 11 million more seats will be needed Educational demand exceeds capacity; projected needs: ―90 million: 2001 ―160 million: Perkinson, 2002; Larsen, 2003

Successful intelligence Analytical intelligence Creative intelligence Practical intelligence --Sternberg, 1996

Learning outcomes Information and media literacy Communication skills Critical thinking; systems thinking Problem identification, formulation and solution Creativity and intellectual curiosity Interpersonal and collaborative skills Self-direction Accountability and adaptability Social responsibility 21stcenturyskills.org

Steps to take

1. Define your principles Adaptation: It is not about whether you are a digital native but whether you can adapt to those whose style does not match your own Its not technology alone: Technology does not dazzle this generation; they are interested in function/activity Knowledge construction: Reasoning is not linear, deductive or abstract but begins from the concrete and assembles a “mosaic” Interactivity: This is a connected, interactive generation; collaboration and interaction are important learning principles Formal & informal: Learning can occur anywhere, anytime

2. Determine which learner characteristics are important Experiential Desire to do it for themselves and to “make it their own” is strong Non-text Readily absorb and convey information in non-text formats Limited time Large percentage of students working more than 30 hours per week; commuting population Opportunistic style If there is something of interest, or a question, learners will look it up on the web Desire for personal touch Being connected with peers is important; interaction with faculty remains a key satisfier

3. Outline the options Make learning interactive and experiential Consider peer-to-peer approaches Utilize real-world applications Emphasize information literacy in courses Mix online and face-to-face Encourage reflection Create opportunities for synthesis Use informal learning opportunities Use non-text media

4. Find the right balance ActionReflection Speed Deliberation Peer-to-peerPeer review Visual Text SocialIndividual ProcessContent

5. Evaluate and modify Knowledge building Organizational change Decision-making Program development Infrastructure development ―Olds, 2005 Qualitative and quantitative measures

The goal is an organization that is constantly making its future rather than defending its past. ―Hamel & Valiksngas, 2003

© 2005 All rights reserved