Deirdre Giesen & Ger Snijkers EESW 9-11 September 2013 Communication with businesses and response burden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Response Process Model as a Tool for Evaluating Business Surveys Deirdre Giesen Statistics Netherlands Montreal, June 20th 2007 ICES III.
Advertisements

ENBES Steering Committee report Past Initiated in 2008 i. create network of European researchers and practitioners in establishment statistics.
NORTHERN TERRITORY TREASURY Performance Development Framework (PDF) Review 2003 Original Treasury PDF Implemented 2009 November reviewed.
The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.
Thursday, 10 July, 2008Q2008, 8-11 July 2008, Rome1 Getting Data for Business Statistics: A Response Model for Business Surveys Ger Snijkers Statistics.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Ger Snijkers Vanessa Torres van Grinsven Business Survey Communication Practices UNECE Workshop on Statistical Data Collection Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1 School Improvement Plan - School Improvement Management System - Feb. 27, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED)
Introduction to Marketing © Objectives  To consider foundations for a good marketing strategy  To understand the steps needed to create a marketing.
1 1 Web and Paper Questionnaires seen from the Business Respondent’s Perspective Gustav Haraldsen, Statistics Norway Jacqui Jones, UK Office of National.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
Toolkit to Promote the Use of the CIFOR Guidelines Jeanette Stehr-Green, MD CSTE Consultant June 13, 2011.
Donatella Fazio BLUE-ETS project coordinator Maria Grazia Calza BLUE-ETS senior researcher ISTAT BLUE-ETS BLUE – Enterprise and Trade Statistics 2012 ESSnet.
The Future of Statistical Data Collection? Challenges and Opportunities Johan Erikson (Statistics Sweden) Gustav Haraldsen (Statistics Norway) Ger Snijkers.
Community Services Programme Strand 1 & 3 Business Planning Re-contracting April 2014.
Deirdre Giesen & Barbara Berkenbosch Managing perceived response burden: why and how.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Management of stakeholder relationships and communication at Statistics Finland UNECE Works Session on Statistical Dissemination and Communication Geneva,
Support for design of statistical surveys at Statistics Sweden
Modernisation and Quality of Business Statistics – NSI Perspective Ger Snijkers (Statistics Netherlands) Gustav Haraldsen (Statistics Norway) EESW, 9-11.
Increasing motivation for better reporting in establishment surveys Mojca Bavdaž, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Johan Erikson & Boris Lorenc, Statistics.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
A Strategy for Prioritising Non-response Follow-up to Reduce Costs Without Reducing Output Quality Gareth James Methodology Directorate UK Office for National.
1 OECD Workshop on Business and Consumer Tendency Surveys, Rome, 19 September 2006 SESSION 1 RECENTLY DEVELOPED INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR OPINION SURVEYS.
The MEMOBUST project Ágnes Andics EESW Nürnberg 1.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Hallgrímur Snorrason Management seminar on global assessment Session 8: Planning, programming and priority setting under budgetary restraints; human resource.
Towards a more efficient system of administrative data management and quality evaluation to support statistics production in Istat Grazia Di Bella, Simone.
Thursday, June 21, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey Ger Snijkers Martin Luppes Barbara.
CEPS, 1 Place du Congrès 1000, Bruxelles , ESSnet Workshop October, Cologne BLUE-ETS BLUE-Enterprise and Trade Statistics.
Improving the Respondent Experience in the United Kingdom Julie Curzon/Debra Prestwood UK Office for National Statistics (ONS)
Overview of measures used by NSIs to reduce response burden Conference on Administrative Simplification in Official Statistics, SIMPLY 2010 Virginie Raymond-Blaess.
Discussion Session 5: Data collection Maiki Ilves Statistics Estonia
Modernisation of Statistics Production Stockholm November 2009 Summary and Conclusions New York 24 February 2010 Mats Wadman Deputy Director General Statistics.
Large Enterprise Management Anna-Greta Erikson Business Surveys Unit.
1 Monitoring and Evaluating Employee Wellness Programs.
Q Rome Italy, July Towards Producing and Using Response Burden Data for Establishment Surveys at Statistics Sweden Johan Erikson, Dan Hedlin,
Implementation of the European Statistics Code of Practice Yalta September 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
3-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Hill, Hill, Perlitz, Professional Training & Assessment, 1e C HAPTER 3 TAEDES505A Evaluate.
1 Monitoring and Evaluating Employee Wellness Programs.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Metadata and quality Hans Viggo Sæbø, Statistics Norway
GSIM, DDI & Standards- based Modernisation of Official Statistics Workshop – DDI Lifecycle: Looking Forward October 2012.
Managing Agriculture KnowledgeThrough Localized CommunityExpert System Managing Agriculture Knowledge Through Localized Community Expert System A Research.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Ombudsman Western Australia Serving Parliament – Serving Western Australians Evaluation in the Western Australian Ombudsman’s Office Kim Lazenby & Jane.
1 1 Reflections about the Impact Business Questionnaires have on Perceived Response Burden and Survey Quality Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway
CHANGE READINESS ASSESSMENT Measuring stakeholder engagement and attitude to change.
Progress Report on Quality Issues SIPUS – Strengthening of Internationalisation Policies at Universities in Serbia February 18, 2015 Belgrade, Serbia.
State Development Information and tips to develop the Annual Work Plan 1.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
Valuing Complaints - Developing a Performance and Learning Culture College Development Network Complaints Handling Advisory Group 6 May 2015 Paul McFadden.
Sources of Motivation in Business Surveys Vanessa Torres van Grinsven, Irena Bolko, Mojca Bavdaž,
Administrative Data and Official Statistics Administrative Data and Official Statistics Principles and good practices Quality in Statistics: Administrative.
4–6 September 2013, Vilnius, Lithuania High-Level Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries QUALITY FRAMEWORK AT.
>> EU-ISRAEL TWINNING PROJECT Activity D.4 Cognitive Aspects of Questionnaire Design Jerusalem, 30 March – 1 April 2014.
Karin Hansson, Statistics Sweden Maja Islam, Eurostat
PowerPoint to accompany:
In Search of Motivation for the Business Survey Response Task
Deirdre Giesen & Barbara Berkenbosch
Modernisation of Statistics Production Stockholm November 2009
Presentation transcript:

Deirdre Giesen & Ger Snijkers EESW 9-11 September 2013 Communication with businesses and response burden

Outline Overview “communication findings” BLUE-ETS Recommendations for NSI communication with businesses Directions for further research

Acknowledgements BLUE-ETS deliverables ; workshop on communication (Brussels ) CBS Deirdre Giesen, Vanessa Torres van Grinsven, Ger Snijkers et al. University of Ljubljana: Mojca Bavdaž, Irena Bolko et al. SSB Gustav Haraldsen, Oyvin Kleven, Tora Löfgren, Dag Gravem et al. SCB: Boris Lorenc, Andreas Persson et al. SORS: Rudi Seljak et al. University of Bergamo: Sylvia Biffignandi et al. CEPS: Mikkel Barslund et al. Ger Snijkers & Jacqui Jones (2013) Business Survey Communication Chapter 9 in “Designing and Conduction Business Surveys”

BLUE-ETS research on burden and motivation Measurement and reduction of response burden in official business surveys NSIs practice Businesses’ perspectives on official statistics e.g. Case studies Analyses of data on burden and response behaviour in Sweden, Norway and Netherlands Studies on effects of actions to reduce burden and/or increase motivation: Experiments on improving motivation in Sweden and Slovenia, studies on effects of questionnaire design in Norway and The Netherlands

Slovenian experiment (Bavdaž & Bolko 2013)

Framework for NSI communication and response behaviour Survey communication Output-related communication Communication initiated by NSI Communication in the media about surveys and statistics Corporate image of NSI Costs and benefits of responding Response behaviour Costs and quality of data collection

Results case studies 1 Response burden related to response behaviour, eg. more burden: lower and later response, more edits needed Perceived burden related to actual burden but also by perception of NSI and usefulness statistics

Results case studies 2 Experiments aiming at increasing motivation by better communication did not show many of the expected effects. The two questionnaire studies showed that questionnaire redesign can reduce actual and perceived burden

Recommendations

Promote consistent and positive image Show in all types of communication that NSI is thrustworthy friendly professional produces valuable output and cares about both response burden and quality.

Build relationships Build and manage relationships with key stake holders in business world (e.g. advisory councils with representatives of business as users and providers of data; contacts with business organisations; outreach activities). Develop and promote dedicated output relevant to target groups in business world (e.g. statistical packages for starting your business, statistical package for market research, quick scan for benchmarking). Communicate about these things ….

pre-field survey communication Know respondents (e.g. record keeping studies, profiling of large businesses) Keep registers and contact information up to date Use survey calendars to help business plan their resources …

field survey communication Provide clear address information on envelope Indicate Unit / Reporting period / Deadline on letter ánd questionnaire Be clear about mandatory status, but do not stress immediately Provide appealing reasons for need of the survey request Use incentives (?) Provide efficient assistance for questions and complaints (e.g. website, helpdesk, complaint procedures) Provide single point of contact for large enterprises Document special arrangements for respondents Indicate changes in questionnaire User-friendly questionnaires …

Post-field survey communication Provide feed-back about status of submitted questionnaire Plan follow-up calls as quickly as possible after submission of questionnaire Use information of past response behaviour for design of follow-up strategies / sanctions …

Directions future research Focus on communication for SMEs What are effective strategies to affect response behaviour? What motivates respondents besides surveys being mandatory? How to explain the relevance of a survey to a business? If and how to work with incentives Should we include information in letters about how long it takes to complete?

How to make progress Involve businesses organisations and businesses in design of surveys and other communications aimed at businesses Bring in theories form various disciplines Study actual behaviour of business respondents Collect management info to monitor data collection process Evaluate results of actions Try to do experiments or pilot studies Document and share work done