Implementing the CCSSM Planning for Instruction. CCSSM are.... Student Habits of Mind-Standards for Mathematics Practice Learning Outcomes-Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
PK & PCK Discussion Session Facilitated by Dr Zahari Hamidon.
Through Instructional Rounds
Facilitating Conversations in Collaborative Learning Structures Strategies That Promote Meaningful Discourse Janice Bradley Charles A. Dana Center.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
PRESENTED BY DR. LINDA K. GRIFFITH JANUARY 14, 2013 Mathematics CIV 8 Implementing CCSS in HS.
 Mathematics Progressions – Common Core Elizabeth Gamino, Fresno Unified Public Schools Denise Walston, Council of the Great City Schools.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of November 29, 2010,
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Instructional Demands of the 2011 Mathematics Frameworks Challenges and Opportunities Pioneer Valley Regional School District October 28, 2011 Farshid.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Common Core Circles Part II Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Unit and Lesson Planning
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT LESSONS Region 5 Mathematics Network Conference September 16, 2013.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Standards to Curriculum Curriculum to Standards. A Series of Four CIVS Instructional Facilitators, Math Content Leads, Specialists and Administrators.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Setting High Academic Expectations that Ensure Academic Achievement TEAM PLANNING STANDARDS & OBJECTIVES TEACHER CONTENT KNOWLEDGE.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
PRESENTED BY DR. LINDA K. GRIFFITH APRIL 29, 2013 Planning for CCSSM Instruction-First Grade.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
Integrating Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics and Science.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
October, 2011 Ingham ISD Michigan Mathematics Coordinators and Consultants MSP Update.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Region V Mathematics Network Conference On-Line Resources.
PRESENTED BY DR. LINDA K. GRIFFITH MAY 3, 2013 Planning for CCSSM Instruction-Second Grade.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
PRESENTED BY DR. LINDA K. GRIFFITH OCTOBER 15 Purposeful Pedagogy and Discourse Instructional Model.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Discovery Education Common Core Academy: Making Common Sense Out of the Math Common Core January 23-24, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Integrating Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics and Science.
For Elementary Schools.  The structure of the new assessment  How does it inform instruction?  What the data tells us  Where are we now?  How do.
Field Fridays: Immersing Preservice Teachers in Learning Inquiry Mathematics Instruction Eula E. Monroe & Damon L. Bahr Brigham Young University Joseph.
Curriculum Leadership Council Elementary Mathematics Break-Out Session November 21, 2013.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21 st Century.
PARCC Model Content Frameworks A Review. 2 Structure of the Frameworks Examples of key advances from the previous grade; Fluency expectations or examples.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
The Teachers’ Guides are the core of the programme: Learning progressions by outcomes Support for using Student Activity Books Planning support Links to.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
5 Practices for Orchestrating productive math discussions
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Contemporary Issues November 8, 2010.
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
Increasing Rigor to Develop Critical Thinking Skills
Collaborative Curriculum Groups
Planning and Preparation
Assessment for Learning
Collaborative Curriculum Groups
Deep Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

Implementing the CCSSM Planning for Instruction

CCSSM are.... Student Habits of Mind-Standards for Mathematics Practice Learning Outcomes-Mathematics Content Standards

CCSSM are not A List of Things to "Cover" A Pacing Guide A Curriculum

Curriculum What When Why Who How

Curriculum The learning constellations for each grade/course are determined and organized based upon the CCSSM and learning trajectories. Formative assessments are used to determine where students are in the learning trajectory and determine next instructional moves.

Constellations of Learning Term I heard first used by Deborah Schifter. New term that does not bring the baggage of prior usage (not unit, not cluster, not domain but related to these in some ways). Teachers will almost never be attending to a single standard, but instead working on a constellation of learning that is focused and coherent. Teachers will be working on multiple constellations simultaneously.

Tools for Developing Curriculum Standards (Content) Progressions Learning Trajectories (Construct Maps) Essential Understandings

Standards Progressions are... Standards written in narrative form.

Standards Progressions can be used to… Develop teacher knowledge about the standard(s) and/or domain(s). See how content knowledge grows over time - Vertical articulation. Take the second step toward curriculum development for CCSSM.

You may be asking, what was the first step? Teachers developing a deep understanding of the Standards for Mathematical Practice.

Standards Progressions McCallum ons Wu ometry.pdf

Learning Trajectories… Identify bridging standards. Identify underlying cognitive principals. Identify student misconceptions, strategies and inscriptions. Identify models, related representation and contexts. Describe students' movement from naive to sophisticated ideas.

Construct Maps….. Do all the things Learning Trajectories do. Describe student behaviors at each step in the trajectory.

Learning Trajectories can be used to... Inform the planning of the instructional sequence. Design formative assessments to locate students in the trajectory. Inform instruction planning to move classes and individual students along the trajectory. Take the third step in curriculum development.

Learning Trajectories are empirically developed..... Developers use their content knowledge, experiences, etc. to propose a learning trajectory. Instruction is designed based on the proposed trajectory. Instructional sequence is implemented. Trajectory is modified during and following this implementation. Several rounds of modification and implementation may be required.

Learning Trajectories Hess (Progressions) Confrey (Trajectories) Lehrer (Construct Maps) Battista (Building on Student Reasoning)

Essential Understandings are... Resources that can help us take the fourth step in curriculum development. A series of books from NCTM that will help us think deeply about what are the essential understanding that are necessary to achieve the learning outcomes mandated by CCSSM.

Planning for Instruction (Curriculum Development) Faculty study the Standards for Mathematical Practice Faculty study the Mathematics Content Standards using the standards progressions Faculty identify and sequence constellations of learning using learning trajectories and essential understandings. Faculty work collaboratively to design or identify formative assessment tasks for each constellations. Teachers use formative assessment results to plan next instructional moves including differentiation.

Show Video Mrs. White Kindergarten

Purposeful Pedagogy and Discourse Instructional Model: Student Thinking Matters Most Jacobs, Lamb, and Philipp on professional noticing and professional responding; Smith, Stein, Hughes, and Engle on orchestrating productive mathematical discussions; Ball, Hill, and Thames on types of teacher mathematical knowledge; Levi and Behrend (Teacher Development Group) on Purposeful Pedagogy Model for Cognitively Guided Instruction.

Some musings.... Change is a process and not an event. Curriculum development is a process and not an event. Sequencing may not be linear. Basing instruction on formative assessment results requires flexibility from day to day. Role of interim assessment may change.

Links to Book Resources NCTM Essential Understandings ?id=129 ?id=129 Heinemann – Battista books Cognition-Based Assessment and Teaching Author.aspx?id= Author.aspx?id=4639

Link to Jere Confrey’s work Optimized for use with the Safari and Chrome browsers. Less smooth with Firefox and Internet Explorer.

Link to Text Analysis Tool Item 2b Math Analysis Tool