Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEVIN B. PAGE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION VIRGINIAS RAILROADS A STAKEHOLDER IN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT.
Advertisements

Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Andre Tok, Miyuan Zhao, Joseph Y.J. Chow, Stephen G. Ritchie, and Dimitri Arkhipov, University of California at Irvine 2010 Innovations in Freight-Demand.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Copyright  2003 Global Insight, Inc. and Reebie Associates T RANSEARCH I NSIGHT Integrated Freight Data & Forecasting System Produced by Reebie Associates.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning An Executive Overview Presented by the Federal Highway Administration January 16, 2007 TX Border Partnership.
1 Briefing on Study for Enhancing Consideration of Freight in Regional Transportation Planning Freight Subcommittee Andrew J. Meese, AICP Metropolitan.
Randy Mullett Vice President - Government Relations & Public Affairs, Con-way Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Webinar February 16, 2011 Riding the U.S. and Global.
Motor Carrier Industry Overview April 2007 Tavio Headley Economist American Trucking Associations.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
October 21, 2013 Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 TRB – SHRP2 Symposium: Innovations in Freight.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Freight Data and Decision-Making Tools Talking Freight Seminar Series September 17, 2003 Felix Ammah-Tagoe,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Connectivity & Mobility
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Long-Range Transportation Improvement and Funding Needs for Urban Areas in Texas By Kevin M. Hall, Texas Transportation.
Myriad Uses of the Ohio Statewide Travel Demand Model for Access Ohio 2040 Rob Bostrom Greg Giaimo Sashi Gandavarapu Don Vary Paul Hershkowitz May
Texas Freight & Rail Studies Mark Werner, P.E. Transportation Planning & Programming Multimodal Section.
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion Workshop October 23, 2009 Patrick E. Quinn Co-Chairman & President U.S. Xpress Enterprises.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
1 Houston Economic Club May 18, 2009 Matthew K. Rose Chairman, President and CEO Transportation for Tomorrow.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board December 6th, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Primary Freight.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Texas FREIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE: FREIGHT MOBILITY & border master planS 1st Annual Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Management & Planning Conference.
Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.
Critical Commerce Corridors
Presentation transcript:

Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015

Presentation Overview Project Overview of Texas Freight Mobility Plan Methodology Forecasts by mode/deficiency analysis Conclusions 2

3 PROJECT OVERVIEW

Project Overview Client: Texas Department of Transportation – CDM Smith Team – Partnered with Atkins – Used expertise in modeling/forecasting/data Scope: First statewide freight plan for the state of Texas – Inventory of freight assets – Forecasting – Economic Analysis – Stakeholder engagement Forecasting Task included: – Modes: Highways, Rail, Water, Air, Pipelines, Border Crossings (International and Interstate), Special Generators – Years of Analysis: 2010/2014 (base year), 2040 (forecast year) Deliverables 4

5 METHODOLOGY

Methodology Task: Freight forecasts for all freight modes for the base year and future year. Perform a deficiency analysis based on those forecasts. Goal: to create a forecasting framework to cover: – All Texas freight modes – Base year of 2014 & future year of 2040 – Data & Tools Forecasts developed at two levels: – Statewide – Detailed 6

Forecast Modes and Geographic Levels 7 – Highways: corridors – Rail: corridors – Water: counties – Air: counties – Pipelines: Point of Entry, lines – Border Crossing (International and Interstate): Point of Entry for Highway/Rail – Special generators: counties

Forecast Areas 8

Projected Growth in Texas: – Population: 48.8% growth from 2014 to : 27.2 million people 2040: 40.5 million people – Employment: 62.4% growth from 2014 to : 9.7 million jobs 2040: 15.8 million jobs

2040: Population & Employment Density Within 5 mile buffer of Primary Freight Network 10

Forecast Framework Data Sources Framework was basically a series of spreadsheets with input from all available data sources Key data/tools included – The Texas statewide model (TX SAM v3) – TRANSEARCH® – Many others: FAF, USACE, traffic counts/vehicle class data Partial list shown on table on next slide 11

Data Sources 12

Statewide 2014 Texas Freight Summary : Over two billion tons of freight 2014 breakdown of surface modes: truck is dominant mode for tonnage and value

2014: Freight Tonnage by Commodity 14

2040 Texas Forecast Summary 15 Four surface modes: 2 billion tons in 2014 to 3.76 billion tons in 2040 Truck mode: 59% of tonnage in 2040

2014 and 2040 Total Freight Tonnage by Direction 16

Trucks/Highways: Methodology 17 Get base data for current year Develop forecasting framework Aggregate from link level to segment level Aggregate to corridor sections Develop growth rates for 2040 Smooth results Produce levels of service Identify deficiencies

Trucks/Highways: Methodology 18

I-35 Prototype 19

Highway Capacity Modified TX SAM highway capacity to fit forecasting framework. Capacity adjustments: – Parameterized and defined new alpha and beta values by functional class for the VDF – Parameterized and defined K-factor of 10 to convert hourly capacity to daily capacity – VC ratios calculated in terms of daily PCE / capacity 20

21 FORECASTS BY MODE

Trucks/Highways: Data Sources and Corridors 22 TRANSEARCH® SAMv3 Travel Demand Model RHiNO (counts)

Trucks/Highway: 2010 vs The highest increases in truck volumes are on I-35, I-10, I-45 and I-40.

Trucks/Highways: Forecasts 24

Trucks/Highways: LOS and Deficiency Analysis 25 Deficient = LOS E/F 45.7% of the Primary Freight Network and 11% of the Secondary Freight Network will be deficient by : 19.4% of Primary Freight Network is deficient

Trucks/Highways: LOS and Deficiency Analysis 26

Trucks/Highways: LOS and Deficiency Analysis 27 Highway sections predicted as unacceptable LOS in 2040 include: – I-10 from I-20 to El Paso. – I-10 from Houston to San Antonio. – I-20 from Fort Worth to US 84. – I-35 from Dallas-Fort Worth to Laredo. – I-45 from Dallas-Fort Worth to Houston. – US 59 from I-20 to Houston.

Rail: Data Sources & Corridors 28 SAMv3 Travel Demand Model TRANSEARCH ® TX-NAFF

Rail: Forecasts : million tons 2040: million tons 92 percent increase in tonnage

Rail: LOS and Deficiency Analysis 30

Rail: LOS and Deficiency Analysis 31 Deficient = LOS E/F 2010: 2 out of 41 sections are at LOS E/F 5% corridor miles 2040: 10 out of 41 sections are at LOS E/F 24% corridor miles

Water: Data Sources and Methodology 32 TRANSEARCH ®, SAMv3 and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers all provide tonnage data at the port or county level County vs. port unit discrepancy between sources – TRANSEARCH® and SAMv3: County level – USACE: Port level Base TRANSEARCH ® tonnage adjusted to account for international tonnage (captured in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers data) Forecasted to 2040 based on TRANSEARCH® growth rates and county-level forecasts adjusted to reflect statewide totals Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

Water: 2040 Forecasts Expected to increase by 43% (797 million tons in 2040) 33

Air: Data Sources and Methodology 34 TRANSEARCH ®, SAMv3 and Air Carrier Statistics County vs. airport unit discrepancy between sources Base TRANSEARCH ® tonnage adjusted to account for international tonnage (captured in the Air Carrier Statistics data) Forecasted to 2040 based on TRANSEARCH® and/or SAMv3 growth rates

Air: 2040 Forecasts million tons in 2014 to 3.6 million tons in 2040: 197.4% increase.

Air: LOS Deficiency Analysis 36

Pipelines: Data Sources Energy Information Administration (EIA) TRANSEARCH ® FAF (Freight Analysis Framework) Railroad Commission Data Secondary sources including BTS Economic Indicators, reports from universities 37

Pipelines: Challenges Extreme differences in magnitude and growth rates between sources Private investment: difficult to forecast 38

Freight in Texas, with pipelines 2014, data based on Freight Analysis Framework information 39

Special Generators: Data Sources and Methodology 40 Data available from SAMv3 and Freight Finder Employment and industry information from Department of Labor and Texas Workforce Commission Focus on: Intermodal connectors Fracking

Special Generators: Forecasts and Deficiency Analysis 41

International Border Crossings: growth 42 Trucks: 178% growth in daily heavy truck volume Rail: 18.4 % growth in tonnage

43 CONCLUSIONS

Overall Deficiency and Conclusions Key drivers of freight: Population and employment growth Highway Corridors: 46% are in high deficiency category Rail Corridors: 10 lines (~1,400 track miles) deficient, Water: Key markets show high deficiencies, Other – air, special generators, border crossings, also need improvements 44

Future Opportunities/Additional Analyses Scenario analyses and corridor studies using framework Data collection for intermodal connectors and non-highway modes Improved definition of LOS for various modes 45

Questions? Rob Bostrom, PE, Monisha Khurana, AICP, Liza Amar, AICP, 46