Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Plan.
Advertisements

One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Plan Stage Develop Improvement Plan.
Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
™ Goals Management Overview For ISD/RESA Support Personnel and NCA Field Consultants February 11, 2011 Carrie Finke Professional Learning Division AdvancED.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Program Evaluation and Improvement Planning The MDE Program Evaluation Student Achievement Strategy/Program/Initiative Implementation Impact.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
LEA Planning Cycle March 4, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Continual Improvement Process Oregon Department of Education April, 2012.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services LEA Planning Cycle 101 v. 2.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Collect Data & Build Profile.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
FSI Level IV Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard APRIL 2012.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Set Goals, Set Measurable Objectives and Research Best Practices.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) DO.
One Common Voice One Plan March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Office of Service Quality
When Literacy, RTI and Continuous School Improvement Work in Concert Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Maureen Staskowski Carrie Wozniak June.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Overview.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
Response to Intervention: A Multi-Tiered System of Supports Michigan Parameters and Guidance One Common Voice – One Plan.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard June 16, 2011
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
February 21-22, 2018.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
LEA Planning Cycle.
Presentation transcript:

Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

2 Continuous School Improvement Process Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop School Improvement Plan Gather Get Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Student Achievement Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

3 Guided Conversations STUDY WHY:Why do we analyze the data? HOW: How do we identify student needs? How do we use the data analysis to inform what we do? How does the vision guide the process? How do we assess how our students are doing? What:What process do we use to share this info with stakeholders? What are the student achievement needs?

4 Study Vocabulary Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) Achievement Data Demographic Data Perception Data Process Data School Data Profile /Analysis (SDP/A) School Process Rubrics/Analysis (SPR/A) Self Assessment (SA) ASSIST Self Assessment (ASSIST SA/ES) Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement

5 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

6 Continuous School Improvement Process Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile School Data Profile (SDP) School Process Rubrics (SPR) Analyze Data School Data Analysis School Process Analysis Set Goals Set Measureable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop School Improvement Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

7 Supported by: School Data Profile/Analysis

8 At what level are our students achieving? How does this compare to where we want them to be? What factors influence student achievement? What does this information tell us about our greatest area of need? What are the areas of concern over which we have control?

9 Achievement Analyze Achievement Data Achievement data paints a picture of student performance. How has student achievement changed in the last five years? When comparing the school with the district and state, which content area would the staff identify as a challenge area for the school?

10 Demographic Analyze Demographic Data Demographic data describes the students who are included in the achievement data as well as the staff who teach them. What patterns or trends in enrollment need to be addressed? What implications do the data present for the school in the following areas: staffing, fiscal resource allocations, facility planning, parent involvement, professional development, public relations, and/or recruitment?

11 Perception Analyze Perception Data Perception data gives us a look at opinions of students, parents, and staff. What are the perceptions of students regarding the quality of the instructional program? What are the perceptions of parents regarding support for student learning? What are the perceptions of teachers/staff regarding school climate?

12 Process Analyze Process Data (School Process Rubrics) Process data helps us understand how the quality of school processes might impact student achievement. What processes are used to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of research-based strategies being used in the classroom? How do staff members demonstrate high expectations for all students? Which indicators could your school further develop to improve student achievement?

13 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

14 Continuous School Improvement Process Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile School Data Profile (SDP) School Process Rubrics (SPR) Analyze Data School Data Analysis School Process Analysis Set Goals Set Measureable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop School Improvement Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

15 Goals ObjectivesStrategiesActivities Goal Source Content Area Goal Name Student Goal Statement Gap Statement Cause for Gap Measures/ Sources of Data Criteria for Success Person Responsible Goals Management Resources Objective Name Measurable Objective Statement Research Best Practices Strategy Name Strategy Statement Target Areas Activity Name Activity Description Activity Type Planned/ Actual Staff Planned/ Actual Timeline Resource Name Funding Source Planned/ Actual Amount

16 Goals Management

17 Set Goals Schools are required to write a minimum of three goals, including a goal for any area for which they do not meet AYP and/or are not performing at the state average on state assessments. Maintenance goals are appropriate for areas in which the school is performing at a satisfactory level and focused on maintaining or improving student performance in that content area. address Title I schools must address all four content areas as either improvement or maintenance goals.

18 Set Goals Goal statements: Are based on a careful analysis of data Align with challenges identified in the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Are linked to identified student academic learning needs Broadly state that all students will be successful learners in a specific area of the content.

19 Set Goals In the Goal section of Goals Management, schools are asked to identify the following: Goal Source – Continuous Improvement Content Area – Reading, writing, math, science or social studies Goal Name – Reading, Writing, Math, Science or Social Studies Student Goal Statement – “All students will be proficient in (reading, writing, math, science or social studies)”

20 Use multiple data sources Gap Statement Gap When considering the percent proficient on MEAP, there is a 10% gap between current performance by all students and the 100% goal. In addition, there is a 21% difference between students without disabilities and students with disabilities. READING Students without disabilities Students with disabilities Male Female

21 Causes for the Gap In what strands might students be underperforming? Are there subgroups in which students are underperforming their counterparts? Are there school processes that are weak as identified in the process data? Are there perceptions by students, parents, or staff that are limiting achievement?

22 Why are … ? Why? Why? Why? Why? Causes for the Gap IMPACT DEGREE OF CONTROL

23 Set Goals In the Goal section of Goals Management, schools are also asked to identify the following: Multiple Measures – the data sources that were used in defining your gap statement and upon which the measureable objective will be based. Criteria for Success – “Students will make progress toward measurable objectives as measured by (your multiple measures).” Person Responsible – the person ultimately responsible for seeing that the goal is reached.

24 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

25 Continuous School Improvement Process Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile School Data Profile (SDP) School Process Rubrics (SPR) Analyze Data School Data Analysis School Process Analysis Set Goals Set Measureable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop School Improvement Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

26 Goals ObjectivesStrategiesActivities Goal Source Content Area Goal Name Student Goal Statement Gap Statement Cause for Gap Measures/ Sources of Data Criteria for Success Person Responsible Goals Management Resources Objective Name Measurable Objective Statement Research Best Practices Strategy Name Strategy Statement Target Areas Activity Name Activity Description Activity Type Planned/ Actual Staff Planned/ Actual Timeline Resource Name Funding Source Planned/ Actual Amount

27 Develop School Improvement Plan Goals Management Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities

28 Set Measurable Objectives SMART - Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Results- focused, and Time-bound “Who will be able to do what, by when, as measured by what?” Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in reading. Measurable Objective Statement: The percentage of all students proficient on the MEAP in the areas of summarizing informational text will increase from XX% (Fall, 20XX) to YY% (Fall, 20XX). The percentage of non-disabled students proficient will increase from XX%(Fall 20XX) to YY% (Fall 20XX), and the percentage of disabled students proficient will increase from XX% (Fall 20XX) to YY% (Fall 20XX).

29 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

30 What research-based strategies will we use to ensure that students make progress toward meeting the goal and the measureable objective? Research-Based Best Practices

31 Right Thing Is this the Right Thing to do? Does the practice align to our need? How similar to the research situation is our situation? If our situation is not the same, can we still implement the practice with fidelity? How does this practice align with other school, building, and district initiatives and priorities? Can we build the capacity, knowledge, skills, resources, and support structures to implement this practice? Research Based Best Practices

32 Continuous School Improvement Process Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop School Improvement Plan Gather Get Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Student Achievement Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

33 Study Vocabulary Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) Achievement Data Demographic Data Perception Data Process Data School Data Profile /Analysis (SDP/A) School Process Rubrics/Analysis (SPR/A) Self Assessment (SA) ASSIST Self Assessment (ASSIST SA/ES) Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement

34 Guided Conversations WHY:Why do we analyze the data? STUDY HOW: How do we identify student needs? How do we use the data analysis to inform what we do? How does the vision guide the process? How do we assess how our students are doing? What:What process do we use to share this info with stakeholders? What are the student achievement needs?

35 Questions/Comments? Please contact:  Renie Araoz  Diane Fleming  Diane Joslin-Gould Or visit the MDE - School Improvement websiteMDE - School Improvement

36 Renie Araoz – MDE/AdvancED Michigan Deb Asano - Marquette-Alger RESA Lisa Bannon - Wexford-Missaukee ISD Ben Boerkoel - Kent ISD Judy Bonne - Wayne RESA Leah Breen - MDE Elizabeth Brophy - Calhoun ISD Betty Burke-Coduti - Marquette-Alger ISD (Retired) Henry Cade - MDE Mark Coscarella - MDE Patti Dobias - MAISA Sharon Dodson - Kalamazoo RESA Deb Dunbar - Bay-Arenac ISD Scott Felkey - Oakland Schools Diane Fleming - MDE Linda Forward - MDE Gayle Greene - Macomb ISD (Retired) Lisa Guzzardo Asaro - Macomb ISD Donna Hamilton - MDE Carrie Haubenstricker - Tuscola ISD These training materials and resources were developed in collaboration with the following individuals and organizations. We deeply appreciate their time and support. Robert Higgins - MDE Fiona Hinds - AdvancED Michigan Diane Joslin-Gould - MDE Linda Kent - MDE Scott Koziol - Michigan Center Public Schools Teresita Long - MDE Margaret Madigan - MDE Yvonne Mayfield-MDE Kathleen Miller - Shiawassee RESD Al Monetta - AdvancED Michigan (Retired) Cheryl Oczepek - MDE Carolyn Rakotz - Wayne RESA Dodie Raycraft - St Joseph County ISD Karen Ruple – MDE Jennifer Sabsook - Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Kathy Sergeant - AdvancED Michigan Consultants Beth Steenwyck Betty Underwood Jan Urban-Lurain