Strategic Planning and Monitoring of projects and programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LFA Logical Framework Approach
Advertisements

PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Purpose of the Standards
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
Nine steps of a good project planning
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Results-Based Management
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Welcome everyone. Introduction of the facilitator
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
The role of assumptions
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Audit of predetermined objectives PFMA Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
Developing a Project Proposal ACTRAV-Turin. Contents Concept of “Logical Framework Approach” SPROUT – model project proposal Individual activity Presentation.
EH/GE 3131 PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 3/10/20161 Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Geography & Environment Department of Social Science School of Natural and Social.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Building an ENI CBC project
Country Level Programs
Project Cycle Management
Project Management.
THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH (LFA)
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Planning and Monitoring of projects and programs Results –Based Management (RBM) Including LFA (The Logical Framework Approach) © Project Design AB Sweden Ms. Kari Örtengren 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com

Which way is the best way?

Purpose of this seminar Increased knowledge on a strategic tool for planning, the LFA-method Tool to use in change projects Improved strategic planning of change projects Long –term objective: To contribute to strengthen the results of your change projects, sustainable effects © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2012

Planning well is crucial to reach results Thera are many different tools for planning

Many different supporting methods to be used in RBM ROPS Balanced scorecard SWOT analysis PROPS Lean The LFA method (the Logical Framework Approach) Methods with different purposes - for planning or monitoring

Participatory approach

Results-Based Management (RBM)- A Management Strategy RBM in brief, a management strategy: To manage the whole project cycle in a professional way To plan correctly, with SMART objectives Monitoring continuously - collecting data Assessing/analysing results Learning from results Disseminating results Managing and acting upon results Institutional learning to become better

Project Cycle Management

LFA The Logical Framework Approach an efficient tool for planning Result - Oriented Strategic Planning

LFA HISTORY LFA was developed in the 1960s The method is in use world wide, by all international development organizations when assessing, monitoring and evaluating projects and programs. The UN-system, EU, multilateral and bilateral development agencies all act to have their counterparts to use result oriented planning, the LFA method, when planning, implementing and evaluating projects and programs.

Why LFA? By using the LFA-method correctly the project/program reaches; RELEVANCE FEASIBILITY SUSTAINABILITY COST EFFECIENCY

The nine steps of an LFA analysis- the planning process 1. Analysis of project´s Context 2. Analysis of Stakeholders 3. Problem Analysis/Situation Analysis 4. Objectives Analysis 5. Plan of Activities 6. Plan of Resources/Inputs 7. Indicators and Source of Verification 8. Risk Analysis and Risk Management 9. Analysis of Assumptions

Step 1 Context Analysis Background Collect background information

Step 1. Context Analysis Background information Projects are part of a larger context - prior to start, collect relevant background information on the sector and on the relevant organizations to work with. Which environment will the project be situated in, the country, the region and the sector? Analysis of Context is made through studies (sector-, country- and /or regional studies etc.)

Step 2 Stakeholder Analysis People with different knowledge, different background, different sex, different region Listen and involve © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568 www.kariortengren.se

Step 2. Stakeholder Analysis Stakeholders, those who are influenced by and exert an influence on the project entity. Who will be influenced, positively or negatively, by the project. Stakeholder analysis - mapping of stakeholders and their respective roles, include gender, age, ethnic, regional and aspects of experience! Which stakeholders should be involved in planning and / or implementing the project – important to include a broad group – people with different knowledge on the sector! © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011

Step 2 Stakeholder Analysis Five main groups of stakeholders to involve: Beneficiaries/Target group Implementers Financing agents Decision makers Experts One stakeholder may belong to several groups. The stakeholders all have important information to give to the future project group/ implementers. They provide a relevant picture of the situation in order to find relevant, feasible and sustainable solutions. © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011

Problem Analysis Situation Analysis Step 3 Problem Analysis Situation Analysis Effects Focal Problems Causes How to involve stakeholders and get an understanding of the situation © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568

Step 3. Problem Analysis Situation Analysis Problem analysis is helping us finding “the roots of the evil” Three parts in a problem analysis; The main problem to be solved, one focus The causes, reasons to the focal problem The effects of the focal problem Discuss who owns the problem? A problem analysis should always be made by the local stakeholders, the owners of the problem.

PROBLEM TREE Effekr Effects Focal Problem Causes

EXAMPLE on a PROBLEM TREE Bus company gets a bad reputation Disabled people High cost for hospital care Effekr People die and get injured Buses are delayed High number of bus accidents Careless busdrivers Buses in poor condition Roads in poor condition Stress Alcohol abuse Poor maintenance Old buses Poor maintenace Bad traffic situation Tight schedule No maintenance routines Weak knowledge on manintenace Corruption Too few drivers and buses Weak management capacity at the bus company

Formulating Objectives Step 4 Objective Analysis Formulating Objectives Three/four levels of objectives © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568

Why a Problem Tree? Problem Tree Effects Focal problem Causes Objective Tree Overall objectives Project Objective Expected results Activities

Objectives vs. Activities There is a difference between objectives and activities. Objectives should describe; Which is the changed situation to acheive What to acheive when the project is completed. What the activities are aiming at Whlle, an activity is a mean to acheive the objective Example on an objective: Enhanced competence on trade facilitation among ITP participants Example on an activity: Arrange a seminar on trade facilitation

Step 4. Objectives Analysis Three levels 1. Long-term: Overall Objectives, Development Objectives: Often Governmental level, long term perspective, vision e.g. social welfare, economic growth... Time frame: Long term. Several different projects often aiming at the same overall objectives. Sometimes also called goals. 2. Medium-term: Project Objective, Project Purpose : The main objective that the intervention/project should be able to achieve. Solution to the focal problem. The very reason for implementing a project. Time frame: Medium term (the length of the project). Purpose should be “SMART (Specific, Measurable, Approved, Realistic and Time-Bound”) 3. Short-term: Expected results, immediate objectives: The results describe the services to be produced by the project. What services do the beneficiary get access to? Short term objectives. Directly after the project activities. Time frame: After the activities have been implemented. Results should be “SMART”.

Make it logic when planning, Example Overall objectives: The project will contribute to increased trade and increased GDP in country X Project objective: Increased efficiency in the customs service in country X Expected results: Enhanced competence on custom related trade facilitation mesures among customs service staff Strengthened management capacity in the Customs service Improved customs clearence routines Expected Outputs: 500 staff members trained on trade facilitation 3. New manuals for customs clearance developed Activities: Ex. some activities 1.1 Develop a training , 1.2 Implemeted a pilot training for 20 staff , 1.3 Evaluate the training © Project Design AB K. Örtengren 2012

“SMART” project objective & results (short-term objectives) Specific Measurable Approved Realistic Time bound

Writing objective statements Example of how to write objectives To contribute to increased GDP in country X ------------------------- Improved service from the state sector to exporting companies in country X ---------------------------------------- 1.Enhanced knowledge among officials on Trade facilitation and Rules of Origin 2. Improved trade standards established and effectively enforced in the country. ------------------------------------- Activities for expected result 1: 1:1 Conduct a baseline survey of the vocational training and a need assessment (knowledge gaps) 1:2 Analyse the findings of the study 1:3 Make a curriculum for trainings based on the findings 1:3 Prepare tender documents for new training programs 1.4 Select trainers /providers of the vocational trainings 1:5 Implement pilot trainings 1.6 Follow-up /monitor of the trainings , analyze results and if needed change the trainings 1:7 Run a full scale training program for health care staff 1:8 Evaluate the program after 3 years, and analyze, if needd repeat part of the training program Objective hierachy Overall objectives (long term) --------------------------------- Project objective (mid-term): ---------------------------------- Expected Results: (Short term objectives) ------------------------------- Activities:

Terminology differs, depends on the project owners Different terminology for objectives used by different projects and donors, choose what’s best for you Objectives Think of the time – line, the logic DFID (Great Britain) EU RBM (Results- Based Management) World Bank Long-term objectives Goals Overall Impact Impacts/ Development Objectives Medium-term objective Project Purpose Project Objective Outcome Project Short-term Immediate objectives Expected Results Outputs Intermediate Outcomes © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2010 Terminology differs, depends on the project owners

When selecting objectives, bear in mind… “SMART” objectives (Specific, Measureable, Approved, Realistic and Time bound) Mandate of your Ministry/agency/NGO The resources available for implementation The problem to be solved (study the problem analysis, see step 3 in LFA) The target group Diplomacy © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2012

Step 5 Plan of Activities Plan of Operation © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568

Step 5. Activities/ Plan of Operation/ Plan of Activities Activities are means to achieve the objectives, not the objectives. Activities tackle the causes to the focal problem (see problem analysis, step 3) Activities should be clearly specified and expressed as an action. They explain how to achieve the expected results of the project (the short term objectives). Activities should be connected to the expected results , the short-term objectives (Expected result 1: activities 1:1,1:2, 1:3… etc.) © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2012

Step 5. Activities/ Plan of Operation/ Plan of Activities Activities should always be connected to the expected results/short-term objectives e.g. Result 1: Improved knowledge among decision-makers at ministerial level on efficient trade facilitation measures Activity: 1:1 Make a need assessment among staff in Ministries and relevant authorities 1:2 Develop a training program, a curricula, and training material for trainings 1:3 Print training material 1:4 Train 15 teachers/trainers (ToT ) 1:5 Implement the training program for 25 persons, a pilot training 1:6 Follow-up of the training program, review evaluations, if needed make changes in the training curricula 1:7 Complete the training program 1:8 Evaluation and dissemination of the results of the trainings 1:9 Integrate the program in to existing services Specified plans of activities make it easier to implement, to monitor and much easier to make a realistic planning of resources (budget, manning schedule and time schedule etc.) . © Project Design AB /Sweden K. Örtengren 2012

Step 6 Planning of Resources Staff Budget Equipment Time © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568

Step 6. Inputs/Resource planning Experts and personnel (human resource management, project group, reference group, which knowledge & capacity is needed?) Financing (loans, grants, funds, cost sharing, who is financing what? Future long term financing?) Equipment, equipment should be adapted to local conditions (Are spare parts and maintenance available?) Premises (office, training facilities, is there a contract for the premises?) Time (make a realistic time schedule, e.g. GANTT-schedule) © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011

Example GANTT schedule Time Schedule / Gantt Chart Microsoft Project Professional

Step 7 Indicators & Sources of verifications To monitor results © Project Design AB Kari Örtengren / 2012 kari.ortengren@telia.com Mobil: 0733-795 568

Step 7. Indicators Measure achievements Are the objectives achieved? Any positive results? The process of setting up indicators shows whether the objectives are vague and unrealistic. Indicators should be set for all expected results and for the project purpose (short-term objectives and medium-term objective). Indicators should state the quantity and the quality © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2012

Examples of indicators, quantity and/or quality, Indicators for a management training e.g.: 1. Number of persons participating in the training (SoV: List of participation) (quantity) 2. Number of occasions when knowledge among the trained personnel has been used (Source of verification (SoV): Number, interviews) (quality) 3. Number of persons passing the test after the training (SoV: The test results from the training) 4. Examples of changes made in the organization after the training (SoV: Organizational study ) 5. Staff recognition/comments 6 months after the management training ( SoV: Interviewing staff on management at the authority) Indicator for service: e.g. Number of satisfied customers (SoV: statistics, interviews %) (measures quality).

Step 7. Indicators Measure achievements A baseline study, input data is needed, in order to be able to measure the final results, to be able to compare. (E.g. how many custom clearances per year when we start our project) Each indicator should be connected to a Source of Verification (SoV), answering the questions how the information on the indicator should be collected, when/how it will be collected (e.g. SoVs interviews, exams, at the statistical office, questionnaires etc.)

Step 8 Risk Analysis and Risk Management Continuous risk analysis & risk management important to reach sustainability

Step 8. Risk Analysis & Risk Management Analysis of factors which may influence the implementation of the project and hence the achievement of the objectives. Internal and External risks Make a risk management plan – mitigation of risks, new activities. Killing factors? Important threats, threatening the whole implementation e.g. the political situation, corruption etc. © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011

Risk value Risks Probability 1-5 Consequence 1-5 Risk value Risk management /mitigation 1.Brain-drain 5 4 20 Train more staff Develop manuals for training Develop an internal long term training module Avoid dependence on one person, share responsabilities 2.Delayed deliveries 2 1 None

Analysis of Assumptions Step 9 Analysis of Assumptions Important problems to be solved by others

Step 9. Analysis of Assumptions Assumptions describe situations and conditions which are necessary for project success, problems needed to be solved, but which are largely beyond the control of the project group to solve (due to the resources of the project group, their mandate and knowledge etc.) An assumption, is a problem the project group realistically can assume that other projects/ authorities/actors will handle

Why different steps in LFA in the planning procedure? Relevance Step 1 – 4 The Context, the Stakeholder-, the Problem- and the Objectives analysis. Logical links between problems and solutions? Ensure that the problems of the target group are solved by the project. Feasible Step 5 – 7 Plan of Activities, Resources/inputs and Indicators. Are the activities and resources sufficient to achieve the objectives? (Resources: Personnel, time, funding, equipment) Sustainable Step 8 – 9 Risk analysis, Risk Management and Analysis of the Assumptions. If the project is sustainable, will the effects of the project remain without external assistance?

The nine steps of an LFA analysis - why? 1. Analysis of project´s Context 2. Analysis of Stakeholders 3. Problem Analysis/Situation Analysis RELEVANCE 4. Objectives Analysis 6. Plan of Resources/Inputs 5. Plan of Activities FEASIBILITY 7. Indicators/measurements 8. Risk Analysis and Risk Management 9. Analysis of Assumptions SUSTAINABILITY

GROUP ACTIVITY PROBLEM: Identify one focal problem, e.g. You decided, but some proposals a) Weak efficiency in the customs service b) Little knowledge in the trade sector on rules of origin (RoO) c) Weak support from the state to the export industry STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS: Identify stakeholders in the sector (Beneficiaries/target group, Implementers, local financing agents, decision makers) List them. PROBLEM ANALYSIS: Identify reasons/causes to the focal problem and effects. Make a brief problem tree, write notes. OBJECTIVES: Set at least two expected results (short-term objectives), one project objective and two overall objectives. Formulate them “SMART” . ACTIVITIES: Find solutions/activities to achieve result 1-3. Number the activities (1:1, 1:2, 1;3 etc.) and connect them to each expected result.

LFA matrix / Log Frame – a way to summarize a project plan Preconditions © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2008

INTERVIEWS and/or WORKSHOPS Participatory approach © Project Design AB Sweden , Ms K. Örtengren 2010

Two main types of project planning workshops 1.Initial planning workshop (GOPP or LFA workshop. WHY a project ? and WHAT a project aims at?). Initial workshop is step I. Enhances engagement from a broad group of stakeholders – facilitates the future planning and implementation, listen to stakeholders! Participatory approach! Report after workshop handed over to the project management team. 2. Management workshop (HOW a project should be implemented, details ), detailed planning, specification. Planning meetings for the project management team. © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011

LFA steps in an LFA workshop STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS PROBLEM ANALYSIS!! ANALYSIS of OBJECTIVES (proposal) OVERALL ACTIVITY PLANNING (proposal) RISK ANALYSIS (overall , proposal) (ANALYSIS of ASSUMPTIONS, proposal) Proposals from the stakeholders to the project group LFA/GOPP WORKSHOP answers WHY a project and WHAT a project will handle, not HOW © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2010

LFA summary Project Planning Structured the project planning procedure in 9 steps Relevant, Feasible and Sustainable projects/programs – leads to success! Involve local stakeholders – listen to the target group LFA correctly used, strengthen local participation & local ownership! Connection problems and objectives – relevant solutions LFA during all phases of the project cycle, LFA planning sets the basis for efficient monitoring

How the LFA method works depends on its users

BRIEF on MONITORING © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2010

STEPS in MONITORING/ FOLLOW-UP of a PROJECT CONTINUOUS MONITORING of OBJECTIVES (monitoring means using indicators & sources of verifications) ANNUAL PROGESS or INTERIM REPORTS ANNUAL REVIEW MEETINGS ANNUAL WORK PLANS FINANCIAL REPORTS COMPLETION or FINAL REPORT AUDIT FOLLOW –UP MEETINGS WITH STAKEHOLDERS (incl. target group) Narrative reporting and financial reporting Every step in monitoring needs efficient planning

MONITORING PLAN! Make a monitoring plan for your project by deciding : WHAT to monitor (which objectives does your project have ) HOW to monitor (Define Indicators & Sources of Verifications, SoVs such as interviews, studies, tests etc.) WHO will collect the data (disseminate responsibilities for monitoring) WHEN to monitor (when will you collect the data/the results)

COMMUNICATION PLAN Make a communication plan for your organisation to disseminate results to efficiently recieve sustainable results, Communication plan by defining the following: WHO will/should receive the data on the results from the project, who needs it WHY communicate to different stakeholders, the purpose with the communication WHICH data is needed for different stakeholders HOW to disseminate/communicate results WHEN to disseminate data

LFA & RBM TERMINOLOGY TERMIOLOGY FOR PLANNING & MONITORING LFA terminology use when planning OVERALL OBJECTIVES (long-term) PROJECT OBJECTIVE (medium-term) EXPECTED RESULTS (short-term) EXPECTED OUTPUTS (direct result from activities) RESOURCES RBM terminology , use when measuring performance, during implementation and evaluation IMPACT MEDIUM-TERM OUTCOME SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OUTPUTS INPUTS

LEVELS of MONITORING TERMIOLOGY IN MONITORING 1. IMPACT (Overall objectives) 2. MEDIUM-TERM OUTCOME (project objective) 3. SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES (expected results) 4. OUTPUTS 5. INPUTS 1. Long term effects on life changes and living standards (e.g. Increased trade and/or improved GDP) 2. Medium term effects- access usage and satisfaction of users (E.g. Improved Efficiency in Customs Service in region X ) 3. Short term effects, services produced (e.g. a. Improved technical administrative solutions in custom service in region X, b. Strengthened knowledge among administrative staff in Customs Service in Region X ) 4. Very short-term results, direct effect of the activities, such as 150 staff trained, 20.000 manuals printed etc. 5. Financial, staff, time input needed to implement project (e.g. 200 USD, 45 man months and 3 years)

Capacity development To achieve sustainable results, analyse capacity development needs at different levels in the society. © Project Design AB Sweden K. Örtengren 2011 Kari.ortengren2telia.com +46-733-795 568

Profession (competence) Capacity Building Contextual analysis Institutional framework System of organizations Organization Unit within organiz. Individual/ Profession (competence)

To ensure sustainability- Make an Exit Strategy /Continous Risk Management To reach sustainable results, important factors to plan for at an early stage (to make a risk management plan regarding): 1. Local Capacity for ownership of the process, depends on: a. Knowledge among staff b. Willingness to change c. Participation and responsibility d. Future financing, long term financing e. Available time 2. Methods for implementation of the project, have to be adapted to local conditions, to cultural-, instititutional- and to gender aspects, age and capacity. 3. The distribution/dissemination of the knowledge needs to be efficient within the organisation and to other organisations and regions. 4. Political will and political awareness on the issue. 5. Legislation and regulations

Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring: the systematic and continuous assessment of progress over time by collecting and analysing information, and using that information to improve the project’s work. The periodic measurement of progress of a program/project . Monitoring focus on: Project/program implementation process, tracking progress towards a predetermined set of objectives, by using indicators and sources of verifications. Evaluation: the assessment at one point in time of the impact of a project and the extent to which objectives have been achieved. Both are tools for identifying strengths and weaknesses and for making good and timely decisions to reach progress.

Evaluation Criteria Relevance: The appropriateness of the project objectives to the problems it addresses and to the physical and policy environment. Efficiency: Results acheived at reasonable cost i.e how well inputs/means have been converted into results in terms of quality, quantity and time? Effectiveness: An assessment of the contribution made by the results to achievement of the project purpose and how assumptions have affected project achievements. Impact: The effect of the project on its wider environment. Its contribution to the objectives for the sector (overall objectives) Sustainability: Likelihood of the benefits produced by the project to continue to flow after end of project with particular reference to ownership, environment, policy support, institutional capacity and financial support.

The nine steps of an LFA analysis - why? 1. Analysis of project´s Context 2. Analysis of Stakeholders 3. Problem Analysis/Situation Analysis RELEVANCE 4. Objectives Analysis 5. Plan of Activities 6. Plan of Resources/Inputs FEASIBILITY 7. Indicators/measurements 8. Risk Analysis & Risk Management 9. Analysis of Assumptions SUSTAINABILITY

Summary Good planning with an efficient tool such as the LFA Planning is a process , a participatory approach Define SMART objectives including monitoring tools such as indicators & source of verifications Specify activities Make a risk analysis & risk management plan Set aside time, resources and skills for planning & monitoring Responsible monitoring persons Analysing data & learning from results Dissemination of results to relevant stakeholders Good project management skills helps

How strategic planning and monitoring works depends on its users, on us!