MECH 322 Instrumentation Goals Course Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Advertisements

ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 33 April 14, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 32 April 10, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 21
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lecture 42 Miles Greiner Goals Course Evaluation.
University of Alabama Electrical & Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges,
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
COURSE INFORMATION ENERGYPHYX 1020USU 1360 F COURSE INFORMATION ENERGY University Studies Breadth CoursePHYX 1020 University Studies Integrated.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 20 March 6, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner myDAQ A/D converter, temperature uncertainty, First-order, centered numerical.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 26 March 27, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Radiation temperature errors, Lab 9.1 Sensors and instructions.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
Ryann Kramer EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 23 March 13, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Transient TC response, Modeling, Expected and observed behaviors, Lab 9, Plot.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 22 March 11, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 13: Exam Review February 18, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Cross Cutting Initiatives - Education William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 4 January 26, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Had extra time, could add a few more slides next year Lab Guidelines and grading,
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Engineering Standards in Capstone Design William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America Washington, DC ASEE.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Proposed Course: ENG450: Multidisciplinary Design Bob Dennis.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING POLICIES THE WHAT, HOW AND WHY.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,
MECH 391 Instrumentation Detailed Course Description Future Plans.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
Continuous Program Improvement
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 35
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 34
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Investigating science
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

MECH 322 Instrumentation Goals Course Evaluation

My Goals Observe and Measure Important Physical Phenomena –Hydrostatic pressure head, manometer fluid shift –Beam bending, strain, elastic modulus (steel and aluminum) –Bernoulli fluid pressure variation with speed (Venturi tube and Pitot probe) –Boiling water temperature variation with pressure –Seebeck effect (voltage produced at junction of dissimilar metals) –Heat transfer coefficient dependence on fluid conductivity –Beam vibration frequency and damping –Karman vortex frequency –Feedback control (full on/off, proportional, integral) –Errors in processing time varying signal caused by noise and aliasing –Predicted, Unpredicted, and Unpredictable behaviors In lab we sometimes observe things we did not expect Requires reinterpretation and/or troubleshooting

Help students feel comfortable using instruments and data acquisition and control systems Understand theory of operation Monometers, pressure transmitters Strain gages, bridge Pitot probes, venturi, hot film anemometers MyDAQ and LabVIEW Thermocouples, signal conditions, LM35 Accelerometers Digital Relays DMM, micrometers, rulers, scales…

My Goals Perform steady and transient measurements, understand potential errors –Bias (calibration) –Random (not repeatable) –Transient (instrument requires times to respond) Communicate –Use clear tables and charts to present engineering data –Analyze and draw conclusions based on data Engineering understanding begins after the measurements (or calculations) are completed Students will not be afraid of doing experiments –Will find them “rewarding Reasonable work load –Requires focus –”

Focus Each Lab had Stages Clear handouts and lectures (I tried!) –New this year: Lecture Slides Web Site – easy materials access Lab Preparation Homework and Sample Reports –Help students know what is expected –Reduce lab time confusion –Tutorials –Do these make the make the lab too easy? LabVIEW programming by example, not theory Write reports in lab: –Analyze soon after data acquisition (allows re-acquisition) –Gives student access to instructor help Bulleted conclusion format –Outlines formal reports (prepare for senior year)

Next Year Lab 10 (beam vibration), redo with a second weight, analyze exponential damping Lab 12: Add Integral Control Offer “Lab-in-a-Box” for check out –Materials for Boiling Water Temperature, Transient TC, and Control labs –Gives students an opportunity to learn how to do labs at home Removes lab time constraint Gives students opportunity to explore Potential breakage and liability problems

Feedback Did you like –Lab preparation problems –Finishing labs in three hours Did the Lab Assistants solve too many problems for you? Was the lab too structured –Would you have liked more time to explore things? What you like to see more low-priced chip-based transducers that you can buy online and use on your own? Were the lab calculation lectures –Too detailed (waste of time) –Just right (Clear and helpful) –Too vague (can’t understand)

Feedback Now Please do the evaluation now – –Two Parts –Instructor –Learning Outcomes

PART I A: EVALUATION OF THE INSTRUCTOR 1.The instructor was effective in facilitating learning in the classroom 2.The instructor was well prepared and organized 3.The instructor encouraged student questions and participation in class 4.The instructor was available and helpful outside of class 5.The instructor demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the course content 6.The instructor provided a clear course syllabus and completed the course objectives 7.Exams and assignments were appropriate and covered the course content and objectives. 8.The pace and amount of work required for this course were appropriate PART I B: COURSE INFORMATION AND EVALUATION 1.The textbook and handouts contributed to your learning 2.The audiovisual materials used in the classroom contributed to your learning 3.The computer resources were adequate and were effectively incorporated into teaching 4.The classroom environment was conducive to learning

PART II: STUDENT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION (1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 11) This course increased my: 1. ability to apply mathematics, science, and engineering 2. ability to design and conduct experiments, and analyze and interpret data 3. ability to design a system, component, or process to meet a desired need 4. ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 5. ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 6. understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities 7. ability to communicate effectively 8. understanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society and the world 9. recognition of the need for and the ability to engage in life-long learning 10. knowledge of contemporary issues 11. ability to use modern engineering tools and skills necessary for engineering practice

5 Statistical Methods Labs 1.UNR Quad Measurement –Find grass seed cost and uncertainty, very practical 2.Quad Data Analysis –Mean, St. Dev (Data Exclusion, Correlation Coefficient) –Wide range of results highlights need for calibration 3.Monometer Calibration –Calibration removes bias –Standard Deviation of output and input quantifies impression 4.Strain Gage Installation –length error estimates 5.Elastic Modulus Measurement –Uncertainty in best fit slope –Propagation of error, compare calculated to literature value Written Midterm

3 Steady and Data Acquisition Labs 6.Air Speed and Volume Flow Rate –Use pressure transmitters, check consistency –Propagation of error 7.Steady Temperature of Boiling Water at Elevation –TC, signal conditioner, LabVIEW, compare with prediction 8.Numerical Differentiation and Spectral Analysis of Unsteady Signals –Sampling Rate Theory, Time derivatives –Demonstrate unsteady data processing errors and solutions Written Midterm

4 Unsteady Measurement Labs 9.Transient Response of a Thermocouple –Heat transfer in water and air (effect of k Fluid ) –uncertainty 10.Vibration of a Weighted Cantilever Beam –Natural frequency prediction and damping –uncertainty 11.Karmon Vortex Unsteady Speed –Dynamic measurement and spectral analysis –uncertainty 12.Temperature Feedback Control –Analog output, digital relay, logic Lab Practicum Final

Evaluation ME Curriculum has 14 outcomes 1.The course increased my ability to apply the principles of mathematics, science, and engineering Instrument models, dynamic response of TC, vibrating beam, error analysis 2.The course increased my ability to conduct and design experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data Focused on understanding and performing experiments 3.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to identify and document desired needs and to design a system component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability

4.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 5.The course increased my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems Lab experiences require interpreting measurements, dealing with unexpected results, and troubleshoot problems 6.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to explain professional and ethical responsibility and identify professional and ethical issues 7.The course increased my ability to communicate effectively Quantitative engineering communication using tables and charts Draw bulleted conclusions from data Abstract of results Formal citations

Evaluation (cont) 8.(not applicable) The course enhanced my broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and social context 9.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to explain the need for, and an ability to, engage in life-long learning 10.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to identify and analyze contemporary issues 11.The course increased my ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Modern measurement instrumentation Computer Data Acquisition and Control program

12.The course increased my ability to apply the principles of science, including chemistry and calculus-based physics, in the identification, formulation, and solution of engineering problems; with depth in at least one of chemistry or calculus- based physics knowledge domains. Newton’s law analysis: Vibrating beam First law analysis: Dynamic response of thermocouple 13.(not applicable) The course increased my ability to apply the principles of mathematics and computational methods, including multivariable calculus and differential equations, in the identification, formulation, and solution of engineering problems. 14.The course increased my familiarity with statistics and linear algebra. Sample mean, standard deviation Linear Regression, St Dev of fit, Propagation of Error

Open Ended Lab/Design Revisit One Unsteady Lab –student choice, improve or “fix problems” Damped Vibration of a Cantilever Beam –Rigid fixture, steel beam, different weights Karmon Vortex Unsteady Speed –Vary cylinder diameter and distance to probe

Student Posed Labs Student poses a question Design and perform an experiment to answer it (+) More motivated self learning (-) Slower, more student and instructor effort for the same basic skills than “directed study”