M EASUREMENT OF THE TRILINEAR H IGGS SELF - COUPLING AT 1.4 T E V AND 3 T E V CLIC T OMÁŠ L AŠTOVIČKA (I O P ASCR, P RAGUE ) J AN S TRUBE (CERN, G ENEVA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Current Status on ZHH Analysis ’08 5/31 GLD ZHH-group.
Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Higgs self-coupling studies at CLIC (preliminary) Tomáš Laštovička (IoP AC, Prague) Jan Strube (CERN, Geneva) LCWS2012, Arlington, TX October 22-26, 2012.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
ESFA/DESY LC Workshop 1 Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Page  1  15 min presentation + 3 min discussion  Thursday 14 th November, morning session  Updated LCWS 2012 presentation (only 3TeV case) –126 GeV.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 A.Nomerotski SUSY Benchmarking Analyses with SiD Yiming Li, Tomas Lastovicka, Andrei Nomerotski (University of Oxford) TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
Higgs self coupling Djamel BOUMEDIENE, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,,
Event Generation of Tim Barklow SLAC October 21, 2010.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade Ivanka Bozovic-Jelisavcic, Strahinja Lukic, Mila Pandurovic Branching ratio.
Search for Higgs portal Dark matter Tohoku Ayumi Yamamoto 11/5 2011/11/51.
Higgs & EWSB session LCWS marchHiggs self couplingP. Gay 1 Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear Collider Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear.
LCWS 05 1 Experimental studies of Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in gauge boson scattering and three gauge boson production P.Krstonosic Work done.
Detection of Sbottom Squark Events with Small Visible Energy Tomáš Laštovička Gordana Medin and Andrei Nomerotski – with help of Sasha Belyaev SiD Workshop.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
H. Jürgen Schreiber, ECFA/DESY Prague, Nov Future e + e - Collider Sensitivity to the HZ  Coupling M. Dubinin, H.J. Schreiber and A. Vologdin Standard.
Prospects for Beyond Standard Model Physics at CLIC Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLIC detector and physics collaboration (CLICdp) 1 Particles and.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
First Evidence for Electroweak Single Top Quark Production
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
BSM search using Higgs to invisible decay at the ILC
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

M EASUREMENT OF THE TRILINEAR H IGGS SELF - COUPLING AT 1.4 T E V AND 3 T E V CLIC T OMÁŠ L AŠTOVIČKA (I O P ASCR, P RAGUE ) J AN S TRUBE (CERN, G ENEVA ) ON BEHALF OF THE CLIC D ETECTOR AND P HYSICS S TUDY LCWS2013, T OKYO, J APAN N OVEMBER 11-15, 2013

Page  2 CLIC ENVIRONMENT

Page  3 CLIC E NVIRONMENT  Multi-staged approach –350 GeV stage motivated by better luminosity and sizeable WW fusion cross section.  CLIC will be operated at room temperature  100 MV/m gradient enabling multi-TeV CME  Effective methods for beam-induced background suppression established –10ns readout window (100ns for HCAL) –LHC-style jet reconstruction with FastJet Center of mass energy350 GeV1.4 TeV3 TeV Bunch spacing0.5 ns Bunches per train γγ → hadrons per BX

Page  4 CLIC D ETECTORS  Two detector concepts: CLIC_SiD and CLIC_ILD –Based on SiD and ILD detector concepts for ILC, adapted to CLIC environment –Full simulation and reconstruction of events, beam induced background overlaid –Particle Flow Algorithm calorimetry CLIC_SiDCLIC_ILD

Page  5 CLIC H IGGS STUDIES  Event generation, both signal and background: Whizard 1.95 –realistic beam spectrum, ISR –unpolarized beams; estimates for beam polarization scenarios  Hadronization: Pythia 6.4  Full event simulation –Geant4 via SLIC (CLIC_SiD) –60 BX γγ→hadrons overlaid in each both 3.0 and 1.4 TeV  Full event reconstruction –PFA with PandoraPFA –10 ns readout window; except HCAL: 100 ns  Target integrated luminosity: 2 ab -1 (3 TeV) and 1.5 ab -1 (1.4 TeV)  3.0 (1.4) TeV: σ HHνν = 0.63 (0.164) fb; via WW fusion

Page  6 U PDATES S INCE LCWS2012  Analysis was re-done assuming 126 GeV SM Higgs  Jet reconstruction optimized  Broken SiD reconstruction fixed (asymmetric cut on γγ→hadrons overlay)  Beam induced background samples added (e - γ, e + γ, γγ)  Template fitting technique used to evaluate λ directly –i.e. we are avoiding “uncertainty relating factor” R whenever possible –R is not well understood and depends on event selection while R is evaluated for the whole sample the actual measurement takes place in a corner of the phase-space (~10% of signal events).  Focused on the 3 TeV stage for now, 1.4 TeV will follow

Page  7 D ATA SAMPLES  Signal Samples –Generator final state is HHνν; –Pythia consequently decays Higgs to b, c, s, μ, τ, g, γ, Z, W  Standard Model Backgrounds –Standard Model 4Q and 2Q backgrounds qqqqνν, qqqqlν, qqqqll, qqqq e - γ, e + γ, γγ (both EPA, BS and combinations) – important backgrounds Hνν, qqνν, qqeν, qqll, qq – 2q, smaller effect

Page  8 T RILINEAR H IGGS SELF - COUPLING

Page  9 H IGGS TRILINEAR COUPLING  represents the trilinear coupling –and quartic coupling (even much more difficult to measure) –direct determination of the Higgs potential –the force that makes Higgs condense in the vacuum  WW fusion HHνν dominates over Higgs-strahlung ZHH for √s ≈ 1.2 TeV and above –In WW (ZHH) channel the cross section increases (decreases) with decreasing λ.

Page  10 E XTRACTION OF λ FROM σ HHνν CROSS SECTION  An option was added to Whizard to change the Higgs self-coupling parameter.  Cross section σ hhνν calculated with various λ HHH / λ SM HHH –3 TeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC beam spectrum, ISR  Cross section dependence fitted by a 2 nd order polynomial.  Values of “uncertainty relating factor R” at λ HHH / λ SM HHH = 1 : 3.0 TeV 1.4 TeV 3.0 TeV 1.4 TeV 3.0 TeV: TeV: Smaller values than for previously assumed 120 GeV Higgs.

Page  11 E XTRACTION OF λ FROM TEMPLATE FITS TO NN POLL OUTPUT  Since factor R may depend on particular event selection a template fitting method to extract λ directly is investigated.  Generate O(10 5 ) toy experiments, based on randomized NN poll output. –Uncertainty may be evaluated both from Mean value of signal normalization; Per experiment uncertainty (via Χ 2 +1). –Templates are binned so that a minimal number N of signal AND minimal number N of background events is required per bin, typically N = {2, 5, 10} Sensitivity to N value – not yet fully understood We give an uncertainty range

Page  12 E VENT R ECONSTRUCTION AND S ELECTION

Page  13 J ET R ECONSTRUCTION O PTIMIZATION  Timing cuts and the jet size are optimized to minimize the green overlap area –Average mass of the two reconstructed bosons plotted qqqqνν̅ sample –Area normalized to unity. –Best 3TeV: R = 0.7 Tight timing cuts P = 0.5 (slightly better than P = 1.0)

Page  14 I SOLATED L EPTONS  IsolatedLeptonFinder in MarlinReco allows to use parabolic relationship between cone energy ECone and track energy Etrack.  Performance has been studied in a sample containing one leptonic W decay.  Parameters optimized for the best significance of correctly identified leptonic W decays vs. incorrectly finding leptons in jets.

Page  15 J ET FLAVOUR TAGGING AT 3TeV WITH γγ OVERLAY  LCFIV ERTEX package –FANN neural net package used throughout the Higgs analysis both for the flavour tag and the event selection. –Presence of γγ overlay (60BX considered) degrades both the jet-finding and the jet flavour tag quality (shown for di-jet events). Forward jets

Page  16 N EURAL N ET P OLL  A poll of 100 FANN neural nets is used instead of a single neural net –Median of the poll votes is regarded as the NN output classifier; –Delivers stable and reproducible results; –Performance is not an average performance of all nets, it is actually matching the best performing ones.  Nets checked against overtraining.  Number of NN inputs: 23 NB: BDTs have deterministic nature but they are not immune, instability (if present) reflects in a sensitivity to BDT parameters.

Page  17 N EURAL NET INPUTS invariant masses of jet pairs event invariant mass and visible energy missing transverse energy E t y min and y max from FastJet p t min, p t max of jets #leptons, #isolated leptons and #photons in event max(|η i |) and sum(|η i |) of jet pseudorapidities η i angle between jet pairs sums of LCFI flavour tag outputs (per jet pair): b-tag, c(b)-tag, c-tag and b(light)-tag

Page  18 A NALYSIS R 3T E V  Cut-and-count Method –14% on σ HHνν̅  Super-fine binning shown: –re-binned for template fitting purposes based on a minimal number of signal and background events per bin.  Flat signal distribution is by construction.  Template fitting gives 10-12% on σ HHνν̅ –which reflects (x 1.47) in % on λ HHH  Template fitting λ HHH directly: 15-18% depending on the minimal number of events required per bin

Page  19 S CALING R ESULTS TO P OLARIZED B 3 T E V  Assuming polarized beams the cross section increases significantly:  This would reflect in estimated 12% and 10% uncertainty on λ HHH for (-80,0) and (-80,30) polarization, respectively, assuming the same 2ab -1 integrated lumi.  Further improvements possible by adding other channels (HHe + e -, ZHH) –and results from lower energy stages (350 GeV, 1.4 TeV).

Page  20 Q UARTIC C OUPLING g HHWW  In an analogy to λ HHH, the quartic coupling g HHWW was modified in a private version of a Whizard1 and corresponding uncertainty ratio factor evaluated. –R’ = –0.26 –No template fitting done.  This would translate in 3% uncertainty on the g HHWW coupling at 3 TeV, assuming λ HHH fixed at its SM value.

Page  21 S UMMARY  Results were presented of the Higgs self-coupling measurement with 3 TeV CLIC machine and m H = 126 GeV –Full simulation and reconstruction in CLIC_SiD; realistic beam spectrum, ISR, … –Unpolarised beams – beam polarization impact discussed –Accounted for realistic γγ→hadrons event pile-up/overlay and for γγ, e + γ, e - γ backgrounds –Event selection based on a poll of neural networks, overtraining checked –Two methods: cut-and-count, template fitting  We observe % λ HHH 3 TeV –Estimated 10% and 12% for (-80,30) and (-80,0) beam polarization, resp. –Updated numbers for 1.4 TeV are not available yet EPS HEP 2013: 28% unpolarized beams  Similar approach applied to quartic coupling g HHWW leading to 3% 3 TeV.

Page  22 S PARES

Page  23 A DDRESSING HZνν BACKGROUND  HZνν̅ contributes to qqqqνν̅ background –We set m H = 12 TeV to avoid signal double-counting; –Therefore, HZνν̅ contribution is suppressed.  Impact of HZνν̅ estimated based on qqqqνν̅ samples with m H = 126 GeV –Double-counted signal subtracted statistically; –Unfortunately, this can not be done for neural net training and it still trains on signal assigned to both signal and background; –Good performance nevertheless, no significant degradation observed. –Degradation would be caused by both HZνν̅ and signal considered as background in NN training.  We conclude that the effect is negligible in our case, however, this exercise might have to be repeated with latest updates.

Page  24 E VENT SELECTION  4 jets reconstructed with FastJet –3 possible combinations to make two Higgs bosons. –Jets paired in hemispheres. –A purely geometric criterion to pair jets is less biased than a kinematic one. –Forward jet reconstruction is difficult and at some point leads to losing particles and replacing them with background.  No isolated leptons –Suppression of qqqqll and qqqqeν.  Neural network classifier –Combining 22 quantities into one. 1.4 TeV

Page  25 E VENT SELECTION  Example variables/inputs for 1.4 TeV; signal and 4q backgrounds shown.