Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Geodetic monitoring of crustal deformation in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica Hannu Koivula, Jaakko Mäkinen, Joel Ahola and Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic.

Advertisements

Beyond GEOID12: Implementing a New Vertical Datum for North America

Investigation of the Topographic Effect by Using High Degree Spherical Harmonic Expansion Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA IAG Scientific Meeting.

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.

Comparison of Gravimetric Geoid Models Over the Great Lakes Region Daniel R. Roman and Xiaopeng Li.

National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.

ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.

Modeling Airborne Gravimetry with High-Degree Harmonic Expansions Holmes SA, YM Wang, XP Li and DR Roman National Geodetic Survey/NOAA Vienna, Austria,

New Scientific Applications with Existing CGPS Capabilities Earthquakes, Soil Moisture, and Environmental Imaging Andria Bilich Geosciences Research Division.

G13A Towards a New Vertical Datum Daniel R. Roman 1, Xiaopeng Li 2, Simon A. Holmes 3, Vicki A. Childers 4, and Yan M. Wang 1 1. Geosciences Research.

Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.

Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,

Progress Toward a Unified Geoid-Based Vertical Datum for North America

Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,

1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)

Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.

GOCE ITALY scientific tasks and first results Fernando Sansò and the GOCE Italy group.

Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.

Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.

1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.

Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.

Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.

Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid

Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.

EGU General Assembly 2011, 3 rd – 8 th April 2011, Vienna, Austria EGU EIGEN-6 A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from.

Spectral characteristics of the Hellenic vertical network - Validation over Central and Northern Greece using GOCE/GRACE global geopotential models Vassilios.

Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,

Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.

OSTST March, Hobart, Tasmania Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography from altimetry and GRACE: Toward a realistic estimation of the error field Marie-Helene.

Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.

Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions

Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,

International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.

Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.

A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.

Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.

GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.

Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.

ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,

Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.

Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division.

Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.

GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.

The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.

1 Least Square Modification of Stokes’ Formula vs. Remove- Compute-Restore Technique Lars E. Sjöberg Royal Institute of Technology Division of Geodesy.

Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,

The use of absolute gravity data for validation of GOCE-based GGMs – A case study of Central Europe 1), 2) Walyeldeen Godah 2) Jan Krynski 2) Malgorzata.

Scientific Roadmap towards Height System Unification with GOCE 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Th. Gruber (1), R. Rummel (1), M.

An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.

Determination of the Mean Dynamic Topography at the Coast using the Geodetic and Ocean Approaches and Consequences for Worldwide Height System Unification.

GOCE/GRACE GGM evaluation over Greece with GPS/Leveling and gravity data G.S. Vergos, V.D. Grigoriadis, I.N. Tziavos, D.A. Natsiopoulos, E.A. Tzanou.

GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.

Integration of Gravity Data Into a Seamless Transnational Height Model for North America Daniel Roman, Marc Véronneau, David Avalos, Xiaopeng Li, Simon.

Evaluation of the Release-3, 4 and 5 GOCE-based Global Geopotential Models in North America M. G. Sideris (1), B. Amjadiparvar (1), E. Rangelova (1), J.

How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.

GOCE geoids and derived Mean Dynamic Topography in the Arctic Ocean Ole B. Andersen & Per Knudsen. DTU Space – Copenhagen, Denmark.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.

Uncertainties of MDT and geostrophic currents estimated from GOCE and satellite altimetry: A case study in China's Marginal Seas Shuanggen Jin 1,2, Guiping.

B. Amjadiparvar(1), E. Rangelova(1), M. G. Sideris(1) , C. Gerlach(2)

Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr

Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region

Presentation transcript:

Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey Division, CCRS, NRCan, Canada 3 National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, USA European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2012 Vienna | Austria | 22 – 27 April

Outline Objectives Data sets used GRACE/GOCE gravity models comparison with GPS/leveling data in Alaska/Yukon area Improvement in local geoid computation by combing surface gravity data Conclusions 2

Objectives 3 To assess the improvement of GRACE/GOCE satellite gravity models over EGM08 in the Alaska/Yukon area To examine the improvement of GRACE/GOCE satellite gravity models in local geoid computation based on the method of remove- restore and kernel modification

Data used 4 Surface gravity data: 544,957 –457,477(NGS)+74,933(GSD)+12,547(NGA) 3,265,928 (DNSC08) altimetric gravity anomaly 95 and 90 GPS/leveling data in Alaska and Yukon, respectively Sea surface topography model from Foreman et al 2008 Global gravity models used: 1.TIM (Time-wise solution GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R3) 2.DIR (Direct solution GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R3) 3.GOCO02s 4.EIGEN_6c 5.EGM08 6.CGG10 (Canada)

5

GRACE/GOCE gravity models comparison with GPS/leveling data 6 To avoid leakage of high frequency, only combined models (cut/paste) used where

Weight function used (10&60 degree) 7

Mean geoid difference by degree (h – H) – N 8

STD of Geoid difference by degree (h – H) – N 9

EIGEN_6c (10 degree c/p window) 10

EIGEN_6c (zoom in) 11

Eigen_6c and EGM08

N = MSSH(DNSC08) – SST(Foreman) 13

(MSSH – SST) – N(Combined models) 14

Local Geoid (Stokes-Helmert Method) Helmert co-geoid height: Geoid height: Low-degree components: Modification of the Degree-Banded Stokes kernel:

Weight function and its spectral Modification coefficients (Huang and Véronneau 2012) : Spectral transfer functions: Truncation error coefficients: L=150 LE=L-u/2

GPS/Levelling Test 1 93 GPS and leveling stations90 GPS and leveling stations

Conclusions (1) There is no noticeable improvement in GPS/leveling comparisons in Alaska (crustal motion, subsidence, PGR. etc.). GPS/leveling (Yukon) comparison shows the improvement of satellite models over EGM08 happens between degree 80 to cm (21 to 18 cm) improvement of EIGEN_6c over EGM08 is seen at degree 195. There is no improvement after degree EGM08 does not improve after degree 1000, too. 18

Conclusions (2) GOCO02s seems more accurate than other solutions between degree 130 to 195. Coefficients of all satellite models after degree 195 seem to degrade significantly and are not useable Altimetric geoid comparisons show the improvement between degree 105 to 160. Local geoid comparisons show a similar pattern 19