Mark T. Masterson for Superintendent John Huppenthal Pamela Smith Program Director Arizona Department of Education – IT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina Educational Technology Plan. GS115C Original legislation passed in 1994, with projected funding of $365M over 5 years Created the.
Advertisements

Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
A Prelude to the Budget Proposal Regional School District #14 Bethlehem and Woodbury February Program Improvement Initiatives.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Fixing the ADE Computer System to Improve Student Achievement.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, AELAS Program Director Mark Svorinic, AZ-SLDS Program.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Coordinating ARRA and EDFacts – An Update for PESC Ross Santy Director, EDFacts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009.
Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? ADE Information Technology Division 1 Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex Jones Project.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Superintendent’s Entry Plan Dr. Lory D. Morrow. Dr. Lory Morrow will begin serving as superintendent of Davidson County Schools on January 1, The.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
State Longitudinal Data System (AZ-SLDS) Project DRAFT v7 ADE SFSF K-12 Project Manager: David Plouff AZ-SLDS Program Manager: Mark Svorinic IT Programs.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, IT Program Director September 14, 2011 ADE1.
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
Mark T. Masterson - CIO Arizona Department of Education 2012 MIS Conference San Diego, CA Friday, February 17, 2012 The Technology Maturity Model: Building.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
SIIA Vision K-20 TECHNOLOGY ► EDUCATION ► AMERICA’S Future.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
The Future of State Technology Support for Instructional Improvement Kentucky Department of Education.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Regional School District 13 Board of Education’s Recommended Budget
Strategic Plan Building Stakeholder Process Timeline District Budget Timeline State and Local Comparative Trends Funding Trends and Issues Reduction of.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
Personalized Learning: HISD’s Path to College and Career Readiness.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
School Business Systems Modernization - Update
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
District Improvement Plan June 26, 2017
Capex to Opex: Are You Ready?
District Improvement plan
ADE Technology Maturity Model for Next Generation Learning
Staples Motley School District
i21 NowShaping a Vision To Support Next Generation Learning
Presentation transcript:

Mark T. Masterson for Superintendent John Huppenthal Pamela Smith Program Director Arizona Department of Education – IT West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ November 9, 2011 ADE Information Technology Division1

2 Imperatives Standards New Systems If education is the foundation of society, then technology is quickly becoming the mortar which binds and strengthens that foundation

STUDEN T SUCCES S

GREAT TEACHE RS

EFFECTIVE INSTITUTIO NS

Transformation al Leadership Shared Vision Standards Career Ready College Ready Professional Development GREAT TEACHER S EFFECTIVE INSTITUTION S

A State-Wide system that uses information to purposefully orchestrate the resources of the all districts, LEA’s to focus on progressing each student along a personalized success plan aligned with locally adopted standards. People Process Technology Identity Content Data Analytics People Technology Applications Facilities National State Local

ACHIEVE Success Management ResourceRegistry Academic Analytics PersonalizedLearning ENABLE 21st Century Expectation s CollaborativeCommunications Core Literacy EqualAccess Secure & Efficient Operations MOTIVATE Student Owned Learning Dynamic Classroom Beyond the Halls CommunityConnected Leverage Existing Investments Adopt Proven Success Models Drive Next Gen Learning IT Focused Leadership Focused Career Ready College Ready Learner Focused

Career Ready College Ready Adaptive Content Personalized Learning Plans Achievement Tracking User Ratings & Approval Predictive Analytics Content Pacing Plans Identity Management Data Integration Reporting Intervention Case Management Entity Relationships Longitudinal Data Warehouse Student Profile & Progress Tracking Student Engagement Educator Collaboration Academic Analyzer Community Engagement Data Analytics Student Success Management Information Access Standards & Curriculum Content mapped to Standards Competency Definitions

Data Analytics Career Ready College Ready Adaptive Content Personalized Learning Plans Achievement Tracking Content mapped to Standards User Ratings & Approval Predictive Analytics Competency Definitions Identity Management Data Integration Reporting Intervention Case Management Entity Relationships Longitudinal Data Warehouse Student Profile & Progress Tracking Educator Collaboration Academic Analyzer Community Engagement Information Access Standards & Curriculum Student Success Management Student Engagement Content Pacing Plans

Integrated ConnectedEngaged Personalized Engaged Data Analytics Information Access Standards & Curriculum Student Success Management ENABLE MOTIVATE ACHIEVE How Arizona will Get There With Student 360 Career Ready College Ready

Community wide access Everyone tracking to same the goals Next Generation Learning Identity, content, data and process Integrated 1 Connected 2 Engaged 3 Personalized 4 While many Arizona Districts have higher Maturity Levels. From a State of Arizona view we are driving to personalize opportunities for all students and districts. Without the RIGHT Technology Solutions with State owned Data the journey is improbable!

Community wide access Everyone tracking to same the goals Next Generation Learning Identity, content, data and process Integrated 1 Connected 2 Engaged 3 Arizona through the ADE with sponsorship from the Governor, House, Senate and Superintendent has undertaken a Major Modernization Effort….. We are designing the frame work to ensure success tomorrow!

ADE Information Technology Division14  Successes: SAIS Phase 1, II,III, IV Governor Funded Infrastructure complete Oct 2011… $1M project  System Available for FY12: Jul …First time in 10 yrs  40 Day Aggregation for FY 12 completed on schedule (We completed FY11 in May of 2011) First time in 10 yrs  Over 600 Customer Requests/Bug Fixes implemented in 10 months…More than the last 10 years!  Kicked off Great Plans ADE Financial System Replacement (6 Month  Kicked off ALEAS Program

ADE Information Technology Division15  Data Governance Board Established in Aug 2011 Public Meetings Conducted in Sept and Oct  Initial ALEAS Strategy approved to go forward  Great Plains ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) System Approved.  Approved SAIS Reverse Engineering Effort to determine the cost and alternatives to replace this important system. Nov Data Governance Board on 17 Nov 2011  Submitted ADE proposed To-Be Enterprise Architecture for approval…Allows framework for future development!  Submitted FIM as ADE Identity Management Solution for Approval…Provides Security for Students and Teachers!

ADE Information Technology Division16 Kick Off Program State School BRD. Data Governance Committee 8/11 Start Business Case Development. Define Standard ADE Architecture. Gather ALEAS Requirements. 11/119/12 Deliver Business Case to State School Board.Delivery Completed Requirements to Build RFP’s Deliver ADE Standard Architecture Blue Print Interview Small, Medium and Large School Districts Continue Require Build Prototype Architecture AELAS Vision ”Vendor Agnostic” Ed services deployed to Districts that wish to subscribe (ex. SIS, Assessment, and Back Office applications) “Pay For Service” model Allows for PARRC assessment Analytics deployed to Teachers / Administrators

4/28/11ADE Information Technology Division17 SAIS Special Education Food Service Library Finance Transportation Assessment Human Resources SIS (Student Information System) The tool creates reports that everyone at the appropriate level can access These reports help inform instruction and reallocate resources effectively An interoperable system connects all information and technologies This program results in student improvement and enables the continuous collection of information for future success 17 Proposed Education Management Information System

ADE Information Technology Division18

Strengths Executive leadership (Governor, Legislative) supports the effort to replace SAIS Executive IT leadership has experience in delivering multi-phased multi-million dollar projects Aligns with Superintendent’s view on how education should be transformed Alliances with MCESA, NAU, and ASU Current Data System (SAIS) is being stabilized to bridge the gap for a short-term (3 years) Current SLDS provides 50 measures and thousands of demensions….The front-end will be modernized to ensure ease of use Opportunities Will help State, districts, schools, teachers make data- driven decisions to improve student learning/facilitate achievement/close achievement gaps to better prepare for competitive global marketplace Rebuild, strengthen education community and all stakeholder relationships (Business, Higher Ed) Successful implementation can translate into strategic public relations event Innovation/technology development will make ADE/State of Arizona leader in educational tech community-at-large Reduce overall IT spending in the future through consolidation efforts Threats Multiple project approval stages thus causing potential bottlenecks or roadblocks Cost of system more than currently allocated/budgetd Loss af alliances and partners if project not delivered in 3 years Certain stakeholder groups may become hostile: District/School IT staff and/or SMS/SIS vendors Competitors new products and innovation Loss of future funding / grants if system not updated Weaknesses Stakeholders/consitutuents alliances/partnerships due to poor past performance is a potential hurdle to get needed support/trust/cooperation Available grant / budget dollars undefined and not yet approved Lack of standard Data Governance - difficult to transform disparate data sets Data collections requirements/definitions are dynamic Necessary resources to deliver effort will be sourced from vendors/resource to create infrastructure /platform design required to support future data system SWOT ANALYSIS on delivering a successful State-Wide integrated total student management tool. Giving Teachers, Parents, Districts a complete 360 view of a student

Questions ADE Information Technology Division20