Logical In-Vial Dilution with Ultrafiltration for Anion Analysis IC Application Work AW US6-0149-012011 Presented by Carlos Bazán 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUALITY CONTROL IN HEMATOLOGY
Advertisements

1 Method Selection and Development l Initial Considerations n What does the method need to do? 3 What analyte/s need to be assayed? 3 What range or concentration.
Ic_sampl_prep_ _e.ppt 1 IC Metrohm inline sample preparation Techniques for analytical success Metrohm Ion Chromatography Bart Cleeren, Metrohm.
Assessing Laboratory Quality – Systematic Bias Robert O. Miller Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © High-Throughput Non-Contact Acoustic Liquid Dispensing Systems New Challenges in Automation and Implementation.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Figure 1. Artel MVS Ben Schenker 1, Keith Albert 2, Tanya Knaide 2 1 TTP LabTech Inc, 1 Kendall Sq, Cambridge, MA 02141, US 2 Artel, 25 Bradley Drive,
World Health Organization
Development of an Automated, Pyridine Free Method for Aerosol Cyanide Compounds and Hydrogen Cyanide. An Alternative to NIOSH LeRoy Dobson, Chemist.
Dr Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 1 CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr El-deen Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr.
Basic Questions Regarding All Analytical & Instrumental Methods (p 17-18) What accuracy and precision are required? How much sample do I have available,
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
Detection of Copper in Wastewater Seth Holm Chem4101 December 2009.
Palletizing the Easy Way
Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice
MLAB 1335 Immunology/Serology Terry Kotrla
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
QC | Slide 1 of 16 June 2006 Good Practices for Quality Control Laboratories P art 4: Inspecting the laboratory Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
Method Comparison A method comparison is done when: A lab is considering performing an assay they have not performed previously or Performing an assay.
P RINCIPLES OF C LINICAL C HEMISTRY A UTOMATION. A UTOMATION I N C LINICAL C HEMISTRY The modern clinical chemistry laboratory uses a high degree of automation.
airQrate line of calibrators
Real-time PCR automated solution for food pathogen testing
Quality Assurance.
Validation of Analytical Method
Quality assurance of sampling and analytical instruments
Procedure Writing Basics Mr. Richard Crisler Spring-2006.
Fully automated blood grouping system IH-1000
Introducing the new HIAC and PharmSpec 3.0
Field Methods of Monitoring Aquatic Systems Unit 9 – Ion-Chromatography Copyright © 2006 by DBS.
A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek – Applications Chemist.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
EVol ® Introducing the Worlds First Digitally-Controlled Analytical Syringe Everyone an Expert.
900-LC P. van Poppel – Field Support Specialist October 2009.
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
Pete the penguin says… “Before “Before the show begins, don’t forget to visit the snack bar”
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
MICROLAB 600 Diluter & Dispenser
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Why do we need to do it? What are the basic tools?
Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 2015 Introduction to Quality Control.
Equipment Rating & Economic Evaluation. Course outline  Equipment rating  Economic evaluation of a flowsheet Engineering economic review Cost factors.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
03 - CONCENTRATION - DILUTIONS CHEMISTRY 30 – UNIT 2 – SOLUBILITY – CH. 16 IN TEXT.
LC/MS Chromatography Systems 212-LC. 2 The Complete Solution Varian LC components, pumps, autosamplers and the New MS Workstation SW (V6.6) can be used.
IH&S 725 Dr. Myers, C.I.H. Quality assurance of sampling and analytical instruments Lecture Notes.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
 Routine viral diagnostics: indirect and direct detection of viruses. ◦ Indirect detection: serological tests; ◦ Direct detection:  Viral antigens;
Enzymatic analyses on wine By Wernich Kühn Central Analytical Facility Stellenbosch University.
Overview of Instrument Calibration Presents by NCQC, India.
Method Validation of VINDTA 3C (TA/DIC) Marine Scotland Science (MSS) Experience and Concerns Pamela Walsham.
Mercury Extraction with LIX26 and LIX84 Ionic Exchangers in n-Heptane Project Objective: The goal of the project is to study the capacity of two commercially.
One-Stage Quantitative
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
James Byrd, Marta Kozak 28 Apr 2011
Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS)
LIAISON®: Instrument Overview
NEQAS Survey 212 Factor IX 15/24
دکتر جعفر علاوی طوسی، متخصص پاتولوژی
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
EPA Method Equivalency
Workshop: Materials Use
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
AUTOMATED LIQUID DELIVERY SYSTEM
The Analysis of Soils and Waters in Accordance with U. S
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Extraction Procedure (2)
Statistics Review ChE 477 Winter 2018 Dr. Harding.
Choice of Methods and Instruments
Diagnostics Analytical 920 LC Semi-Prep 940 LC
Presentation transcript:

Logical In-Vial Dilution with Ultrafiltration for Anion Analysis IC Application Work AW US Presented by Carlos Bazán 1

Overview Dosino technology provides a highly efficient and accurate method for performing dilutions in-line; saving customers time, money, and reducing human error Previous configurations required external mixing with added components and added $$ The In-Vial Dilution configuration can perform dilutions in an empty sample vial and utilizes the Dosino to mix the diluted sample Intelligent re-dilution of samples above the calibration range is possible Next-Vial Dilution allows the next sample in the series to be diluted while the current sample is still running, maintaining high sample through-put 2

Components needed 881, 882, or 850 IC 858 Sample Processor with peristaltic pump ( ) 800 Dosino with 10 mL Dosing Unit IC Equipment for Ultrafiltration ( ) T-Connector 3 X UNF ( ; diverts flow for dilution or filtration) In-line check valve ( ; prevents Dosino from pulling from ultrafiltration cell waste) 10 mL Transfer Capillary ( ) Wash station for IC ( ) 3

Basic function Sample is aspirated into the transfer capillary by the Dosino. The in-line check valve prevents UF cell waste from being aspirated. 4

Basic function The aspirated sample and a quantity of UHP H 2 O to complete the dilution are dispensed into an empty sample vial. 5

Basic function The diluted sample is aspirated and dosed several times to mix it completely. 6

Basic function The peristaltic pump moves the diluted sample through the ultrafiltration cell and to the IC. 7

MagIC Net Sample Table Injections= 1 for normal analysis, 2 when an intelligent re-dilution check should be performed Dilution= the Manual Dilution Factor for hand-dilutions made Value 1= the Dosino Dilution Factor; the dilution the instrument will perform Value 2= the Dilution Vial; vial position the dilution is performed in Value 3= the Intelligent Dilution Vial; vial position for intelligent re-dilution when needed 8

Features: Calibration Calibration from one stock standard; levels made by variable dilution Makes standard prep easier, saves time, reduces human error Dilution Factor (Value 1)

Features: Next-Vial Dilution Prepares the dilution of the next sample in the series while the previous sample is still running Reduces the overall dilution time needed for a sample series; very valuable for labs needing high through-put Can be used with intelligent re-dilution; during the re-dilution run the next sample is prepared Uses the SD.NEXT values in the program to access the POSITION, VALUE1 and VALUE2 of the next line in the sample table 10

Features: Multi-component Intelligent Re-dilution Software can evaluate which out of the entire list of component ions is most above the calibration range Re-dilutes samples accordingly 11 If this is not an intelligent dilution run (Injection=1),or the Area of Fluoride =0,then Autodilution Factor for Fluoride=0. If it is an intelligent dilution run (Injection=2) then Autodilution Factor for Fluoride = (Concentration of Fluoride in current run / (Concentration of Fluoride in the highest standard X the Manual Dilution Factor )) X the Dosino Dilution Factor

Features: Multi-component Intelligent Re-dilution 12

Performance: Calibration Linearity Low calibration RSD Linear across a broad calibration range 13

Performance: Dilution Accuracy 99%+ Accuracy compared to a 1:10 hand-dilution 96%+ Accuracy compared to a 1:100 hand-dilution (1:100 is maximum advisable Dosino-prepared dilution with 10 mL Dosing Unit) 14

Performance: Reproducibility Approximately 1.5% RSD on 6 replicate injections of 1:100 dilution (with lower RSD at lesser dilution factors). 15

Performance: Intelligent Re-dilution System can re-dilute samples based on which ion is most above the calibration range; can compare all analytes in component table Highest standard Samples FluorideClN0 2 as NBrNO 2 as NP0 4 as PSO 4 Std ppm ppm1.507 ppm1.977 ppm ppm9.699 ppm ppm 16

Market Potential A large percentage of environmental and QC laboratories must routinely perform sample dilutions User proficiency is going down, so reliable in-line, automated methods for dilution and standard preparation are highly valuable Automatic re-dilution of samples above the calibration range saves time, especially on samples with 48 hr. hold-time L OW COST OF THE SYSTEM MEANS WE SHOULD SELL A LOT OF THESE TO A LOT OF USERS ! 17

Acknowledgements Jay Kim for invaluable contributions to programming of the intelligent dilution and next-vial dilution components of the method Dr. Shibu Paul for the initial development request and continuing drive to perfect the method Dr. Hari Narayanan for advice and guidance Larry Tucker for suggestions on sample flow path plumbing and wisdom on Dosino capabilities Dr. Stuart Procter for method testing during technical training sessions 18

Questions? 19