Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program Optimize Separator Operating Pressures to Reduce Flash Losses SPE Paper B. Boyer -
Advertisements

Green Completions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum Institute.
Oil and Gas Industry Presentation Activities, GHG Emission Sources, and Potential Reductions January 14, 2009.
Methane Losses from Compressors Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Northern Natural Gas Company, INGAA, CECO, Heath Consultants,
Vapor Recovery in Offshore Applications Gulf Coast Regulatory and Environmental Affairs Group Meeting July 11, 2013.
EcoVapor Recovery Systems
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
Optimizing Nitrogen Rejection Units
Hydrocarbon Emissions Detection & Remediation Project Josh McDowell Small Business Assistance Coordinator Department of Community Outreach.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Seals Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission Interstate.
Highlights of Colorado’s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon Emission Reduction Rules - Adopted February 2014 Presentation to WESTAR May 2014 Will Allison Colorado.
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-line Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
Acid Gas Removal Options for Minimizing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors.
Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Production Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
ExxonMobil US Production Co. September 21, 2004 Natural Gas STAR Program Involvement and Experience United States Production Company.
Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Sponsors – American Petroleum Institute and ExxonMobil Production Company September 21,
Defining the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector: Exploration, Production, and Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Western Climate Initiative – Oil & Gas Collaborative.
Reduced Emission Completions (Green Completions) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural.
WESTAR Oil & Gas Conference October 2008 Lori Bocchino Wyoming Oil & Gas Permitting and New Rule/Policy Revisions.
Pipeline Pumpdown Practices and Hot Taps
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Natural Gas Dehydration Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program Casper,
New Membrane Applications in Gas Processing
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
Processor Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors Association,
New Air Quality Regulation “NSPS OOOO” Oil and Natural Gas Industry Workshop October 24, 2012 Robert Keatley, PE Senior Engineer/Supervisor DEP – Division.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer Workshop Bill Barrett.
Directed Inspection & Maintenance At Compressor and Gate Stations
EPA NATURAL GAS STAR PROGRAM. Focus Primary focus for a successful program Encouragement and support from upper management Select the right implementation.
Company Reported Opportunities Technologies From Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and Pioneer.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Partner Reported Opportunities for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
World Bank Global Gas Flaring Reduction Gas STAR International and GGFR Mutual Goals Roger FERNANDEZ U.S. EPA Natural Gas STAR Team Leader.
Smart Automation Well Venting Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum.
EPA NATURAL GAS STAR PROGRAM. EPA Welcomes a new Natural Gas STAR Partner Devon Energy becomes an official partner in the EPA Natural Gas STAR Program.
Chapter 15 Refrigeration Refrigeration systems: To cool a refrigerated space or to maintain the temperature of a space below that of the surroundings.
EPA Natural Gas Star Annual Meeting © Chevron 2006 Chevron Experience: Methane Emission Mitigation Natural Gas STAR Producers & Processors Technology Transfer.
Natural Gas STAR and NiSource A Winning Partnership Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits
Page 1 Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits Part 2: Is Recovery Profitable? p Savings associated with pressure reduction p Costs.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Producer Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Natural Gas STAR Program Gas Processing Technology Transfer Workshop Oklahoma City, OK April 22, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) at Gas Processing Plants Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Processors Technology Transfer Workshop.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners Murphy Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group,
Replacing Glycol Dehydrators with Desiccant Dehydrators Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
Installing Plunger Lift in Gas Wells Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR from Natural Gas STAR Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Transmission Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation and.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Pioneer Natural.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
FMI: Vapor Recovery Units Market Revenue, Opportunity, Forecast and Value Chain
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API,
NiSource Natural Gas STAR Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 3, 2003 Merrillville, Indiana.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Methane Emission Reductions from Reciprocating Compressors
Processing Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 17, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Amarillo,
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Production Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 19, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop New.
Natural Gas STAR Program epa.gov/gasstar. The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and.
FLASH EMISSIONS JIM COOPER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION.
Solar Power Applications
PNEUMATICS Chapter 3 ROTARY COMPRESSORS
PTRT 1391 Natural Gas Processing II Chapter 3
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
Presentation transcript:

Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program Casper, Wyoming August 30, 2005

Vapor Recovery Units: Agenda Methane Losses Methane Savings Is Recovery Profitable? Industry Experience Discussion Questions

Methane Losses from Storage Tanks Storage tanks are responsible for 6% of methane emissions in natural gas and oil production sector 96% of tank losses occur from tanks without vapor recovery Other Sources 21 Bcf Storage Tank Venting 9 Bcf Pneumatic Devices 61 Bcf Meters and Pipeline Leaks 10 Bcf The numbers here are from the 2003 inventory. .425 Bcf from tanks with control devices / (2.26 + 7.877 Bcf) = 4% of tank emissions are from tanks with control devices (this is from 2003 petroleum and gas inventories) Gas Engine Exhaust 12 Bcf Dehydrators and Pumps 17 Bcf Well Venting and Flaring 18 Bcf Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2003

Sources of Methane Losses 9 Bcf methane lost from storage tanks each year from producers* Flash losses - occur when crude is transferred from a gas-oil separator at higher pressure to an atmospheric pressure storage tank Working losses - occur when crude levels change and when crude in tank is agitated Standing losses - occur with daily and seasonal temperature and pressure changes 7.877 Bcf from tanks, 2003 petroleum inventory (this takes into account an assumption that 29% have control devices) 2.26 Bcf from tanks w/o control devices, 2003 gas inventory 0.45 Bcf from tanks w/ control devices, 2003 gas inventory * Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2003

Methane Savings: Vapor Recovery Units Capture up to 95% of hydrocarbon vapors vented from tanks Recovered vapors have higher Btu content than pipeline quality natural gas Recovered vapors are more valuable than natural gas and have multiple uses Re-inject into sales pipeline Use as on-site fuel Send to processing plants for recovering NGLs Vapor Recovery Units are of great value because they are able to capture up to 95 percent of the hydrocarbon vapors that accumulate in storage tanks. These vapors usually have a higher Btu content than pipeline quality natural gas. The higher Btu content is the result of a natural refining process in which a lower pressure on the liquid crude allows some more complex hydrocarbon molecules to escape from the liquid and exist as components of the natural gas. The higher Btu content of these vapors can be extracted in the form of liquids and sold as separate products (such as propane, butane, ethane, etc.). The value of these liquids, in addition to the value of the gas, depends on the demand for the specific product, but is generally more valuable than methane alone.

Types of Vapor Recovery Units Conventional vapor recovery units (VRUs) Use rotary compressor to suck vapors out of atmospheric pressure storage tanks Require electrical power or engine Venturi ejector vapor recovery units (EVRUTM) or Vapor Jet Use Venturi jet ejectors in place of rotary compressors Do not contain any moving parts EVRUTM requires source of high pressure gas and intermediate pressure system Vapor Jet requires high pressure water motive

Standard Vapor Recovery Unit Control Pilot Suction Line Vent Line Back Pressure Valve Crude Oil Stock Tank(s) Electric Control Panel Suction Scrubber Bypass Valve Gas This graph illustrates a VRU installed on a single crude oil storage tank (multiple tank installations are also common). Hydrocarbon vapors are drawn out of the storage (stock) tank under low pressure, typically between four ounces and two psi, and are first piped to a separator (suction scrubber) to collect any liquids that condense out. The liquids are usually recycled back to the storage tank. From the separator, the vapors flow through a compressor that provides the low pressure suction for the VRU system. (To prevent the creation of a vacuum in the top of a tank when oil is withdrawn and the oil level drops, VRUs are equipped with a control pilot to shut down the compressor and permit the back flow of vapors into the tank.) The vapors are then metered and removed from the VRU system for pipeline sale or on-site fuel supply. Gas Sales Meter Run Check Valve Liquid Transfer Pump Condensate Return Electric Driven Rotary Compressor Sales Source: Evans & Nelson (1968)

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Vapor Recovery Installations

Venturi Jet Ejector* Temp Indicator Pressure Indicator High-Pressure TI PI TI High-Pressure Motive Gas (~850 psig) Discharge Gas (~40 psia) TI Flow Safety Valve PI EVRUTM Suction Pressure (-0.05 to 0 psig) The pressure readings shown are for a specific example. Low-Pressure Vent Gas from Tanks (0.10 to 0.30 psig) *Patented by COMM Engineering

Vapor Recovery with Ejector Gas to Sales @ 1000 psig Compressor 6,200 Mcf/d Gas 281 Mcf/d Net Recovery (19 Mcf/d Incr.fuel) 900 Mcf/d 5,000 Mcf/d Gas 5,000 Bbl/d Oil Ejector 40 psig LP Separator Ratio Motive / Vent = 3 = 900/300 300 Mcf/d Gas Oil & Gas Well Oil Crude Oil Stock Tank Oil to Sales

Vapor Jet System* The pressure readings shown are for a specific example. *Patented by Hy-Bon Engineering

Vapor Jet System* The pressure readings shown are for a specific example. Utilizes produced water in closed loop system to effect gas gathering from tanks Small centrifugal pump forces water into Venturi jet, creating vacuum effect Limited to gas volumes of 77 Mcfd and discharge pressure of 40 psig *Patented by Hy-Bon Engineering

Criteria for Vapor Recovery Unit Locations Steady source and sufficient quantity of losses Crude oil stock tank Flash tank, heater/treater, water skimmer vents Gas pneumatic controllers and pumps Outlet for recovered gas Access to low pressure gas pipeline, compressor suction or on-site fuel system Tank batteries not subject to air regulations The installation of a VRU can have a two-fold benefit: It can be a profitable investment for the producer; and By reducing hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) below specified action levels, the investor can avoid the need to comply with certain state and federal regulations.

Quantify Volume of Losses Estimate losses from chart based on oil characteristics, pressure and temperature at each location (± 50%) Estimate emissions using the E&P Tank Model (± 20%) Measure losses using recording manometer and well tester or ultrasonic meter over several cycles (± 5%) This is the best approach for facility design Of the first two methods, using the chart (see next slide) is quicker and as accurate as direct measurement since it was designed using actual field data. The E&P Tank model was developed by the American Petroleum Institute and the Gas Research Institute to give a greater magnitude of accuracy by computerizing the mathematical calculations from the field data and avoiding interpretation problems associated with the chart.

Estimated Volume of Tank Vapors 110 100 90 80 40° API and Over 70 Vapor Vented from Tanks- cf/Bbl - GOR 60 30° API to 39° API 50 40 Under 30° API 30 20 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Pressure of Vessel Dumping to Tank (Psig)

What is the Recovered Gas Worth? Value depends on Btu content of gas Value depends on how gas is used On-site fuel - valued in terms of fuel that is replaced Natural gas pipeline - measured by the higher price for rich (higher Btu) gas Gas processing plant - measured by value of NGLs and methane, which can be separated The use of recovered gas as an on-site fuel can offset the retail cost of fuel and the cost of transportation to the site. Natural gas is now sold by the energy content (Btu), not volume (Mcf). Rich gas demands a higher price from both pipelines and processing plants.

Value of Recovered Gas Gross revenue per year = (Q x P x 365) + NGL Q = Rate of vapor recovery (Mcfd) P = Price of natural gas NGL = Value of natural gas liquids As previously stated, VRUs can recover approximately 95 percent of accumulated hydrocarbon vapors. Thus, when calculating the value of recovered gas it is critical to keep in mind that the rate of vapor recovery (Q) is equal to 95 percent of estimated total gas losses.

Value of NGLs

Cost of a Conventional VRU

Is Recovery Profitable?

Top Gas STAR Partners for VRUs Top five companies for emissions reductions using VRUs in 2003 Company 2003 Annual Reductions (Mcf) Partner 1 1,333,484 Partner 2 962,078 Partner 3 661,381 Partner 4 521,549 Partner 5 403,454

Industry Experience: Chevron Chevron installed eight VRUs at crude oil stock tanks in 1996

Industry Experience: Devon Energy For 5 years Devon employed the Vapor Jet system and recovered more than 55 MMcf of gas from crude oil stock tanks Prior to installing the system, tank vapor emissions were ~ 20 Mcfd Installed a system with maximum capacity of 77 Mcfd anticipating production increases Revenue was about $91,000 with capital cost of $25,000 and operating expenses less than $0.40/Mcf of gas recovered This paid back investment in under 2 years

Lessons Learned Vapor recovery can yield generous returns when there are market outlets for recovered gas Recovered high Btu gas has extra value VRU technology can be highly cost-effective in most general applications Venturi jet models work well in certain niche applications, with reduced O&M costs. Potential for reduced compliance costs can be considered when evaluating economics of VRU, EVRUTM or Vapor Jet

Lessons Learned (cont’d) VRU should be sized for maximum volume expected from storage tanks (rule-of-thumb is to double daily average volume) Rotary vane or screw type compressors recommended for VRUs where Venturi ejector jet designs are not applicable EVRUTM recommended where there is gas compressor with excess capacity Vapor Jet recommended where less than 75 Mcfd and discharge pressures below 40 psig

Discussion Questions To what extent are you implementing this BMP? How can this BMP be improved upon or altered for use in your operation(s)? What is stopping you from implementing this technology (technological, economic, lack of information, focus, manpower, etc.)?